Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON)
Primary Purpose
Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Aortic Valve Replacement with EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency focused on measuring Aortic Valve Replacement
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years or older
- Aortic stenosis or stenosis-insufficiency of aortic valve requiring a planned replacement as indicated in the preoperative evaluation;
- Scheduled to undergo planned aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass surgery, MAZE procedure, septal myectomy, pacemaker/ICD implant and or atrial appendage occlusion/removal.
- Signed and dated the informed consent form prior to investigation procedures;
- Geographically stable and agrees to attend Follow up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for a maximum of 5 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pure aortic insufficiency
- Requires emergency surgery
- Aneurysm of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta requiring surgical intervention
- Left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 25%
- Active endocarditis within 3 months prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- Concomitant valve (mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic) disease requiring repair with an annuloplasty ring or replacement with prosthesis
- Prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring.
- Myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- Previously implanted with EDWARDS INTUITY Aortic valve; alcohol or drug abuser
- Disease limiting life expectancy to less than 12 months
- Pregnant or lactating
- Currently participating in another drug or device clinical investigation;
- Documented blood diatheses
- Requires non-cardiac procedures such as carotid procedures or mediastinal tumor removal
- Had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6-months prior to scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
- Study site pre-operative echocardiographic assessment shows evidence of an intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
- Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical circulatory support, or mechanical ventilation within 30 days of procedure
- Documented renal insufficiency as determined by Serum creatinine ≥ 200 µmol/L (2.27 mg/dL) at screening or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
- Documented hyperparathyroidism
Sites / Locations
- AKH Vienna-Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien; University Vienna
- Kerchoff Klinik-Bad Nauheim
- MHH-Medizinische Hoschschule Hannover
- Herzzentrum Uniklink Koln-Klinik und Poliklinik fur Herz und Thoraxzchirurgie
- University Leipzig: Herzzentrum Leipzig Gmbh
- Klinikum der Universitat Muchen-Grosshadern; Clinic at the University of Munich
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
Study Valve
Arm Description
Subjects act as own control
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the total number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01445171
Brief Title
Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve
Acronym
TRITON
Official Title
Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Edwards Lifesciences
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to confirm that the safety and performance of the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System.
Detailed Description
This is a two-phase, non-randomized, prospective, single arm, multi-center clinical investigation. Each subject in Phase 1 and Phase 2 is consented for a period of 5 years. All subjects will be assessed for clinical follow-up at the following intervals: Discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 1 year and annually thereafter until 5 years of follow-up is achieved per subject.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Valve Stenosis With Insufficiency, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Keywords
Aortic Valve Replacement
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
295 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Study Valve
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Subjects act as own control
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Aortic Valve Replacement with EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System
Intervention Description
Aortic Valve bioprosthesis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent of Early Adverse Events
Description
Number of early adverse events occurring within 30 days of procedure divided by the total number of enrolled subjects times 100.
Time Frame
Events occuring within 30 days of procedure
Title
Percent of Late Adverse Events
Description
Number of late adverse events divided by the total number of late patient years times 100. Late patient years are calculated from 31 days post-implant to the date of the last contact (follow up or adverse event).
Time Frame
Events occurring >= 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Subject's With Device Technical Success
Description
Device technical success is defined as the successful delivery and deployment of one bioprosthesis with one delivery system with a maximum of two attempts.
Time Frame
At time of surgery, an average of 3 hours
Title
Number of Subject's With Procedural Success
Description
Procedure success is defined as device technical success followed by the absence of adverse events requiring device reoperation, requiring implantation of permanent pacemaker, or subject death.
Time Frame
Discharge(an average of 13 days) or 10 days post-implant, whichever comes first
Title
Subject's New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class Compared to Baseline
Description
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life.
Class I. No limitation of physical activity. Ordinary physical activity does not cause undue fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).
Class II. Slight limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea (shortness of breath).
Class III. Marked limitation of physical activity. Comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary activity causes fatigue, palpitation, or dyspnea.
Class IV. Unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of heart failure at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort increases.
Time Frame
1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Score on the EQ-5D- Quality of Life Questionnaire Over Time
Description
The EQ-5D is a standardized questionnaire that asks subjects to rate themselves (no problems, some problems, extreme problems) on mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale is indexed and ranges from a minimum of 0.275 and a maximum of 1.000. A lower number indicates the participants experiences more problems and a higher number indicates the participants experiences fewer problems.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, and 1 Year post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Mean Systolic Gradient Measurements Over Time.
Description
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. Mean gradient values depend on the size and type of valve.
Time Frame
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Effective Orifice Area Measurements Over Time.
Description
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time.
Time Frame
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Amount of Aortic Valvular Regurgitation Over Time
Description
Aortic valvular regurgitation occurs when the aortic valve in the heart does not close tightly allowing some of the blood that was pumped out of the heart to leak back into it. Aortic valvular regurgitation is evaluated by echocardiography over time. It is assessed on a scale from 0 to 4, where 0 represents no regurgitation and 4 represents severe regurgitation.
Time Frame
Discharge (an average of 13 days), 1 Month, 3 Months, 1 Year, 2 Years, 3 Years, 4 Years, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average White Blood Cell Count Measurement Over Time.
Description
Laboratory analysis of White Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subject; WBC fight infection.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Red Blood Cells Count Over Time.
Description
Laboratory Analysis of Red Blood Cell Count on blood drawn from subjects; RBC carry oxygen.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Hemoglobin Count Over Time.
Description
Laboratory Analysis of Hemoglobin Count on blood drawn from subjects. Hemoglobin is an oxygen-carrying protein in red blood cells.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Hematocrit Percentage Over Time.
Description
Laboratory Analysis of Hematocrit Percentage on blood drawn from subjects. Hematocrit is the proportion of red blood cells to the fluid component (plasma) in the blood.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Platelet Count Over Time.
Description
Laboratory Analysis of Platelet Count on blood drawn from subjects; platelets help with blood clotting.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Reticulocytes Percentage Over Time.
Description
Reticulocytes are immature red blood cells; a reticulocyte blood test measures the amount of these cells in the blood.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Haptoglobin Measurement Over Time.
Description
Laboratory Analysis of Haptoglobin on blood drawn from subjects; Haptoglobin is a protein produced by the liver.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
Title
Subject's Average Serum LDH Measurement Over Time.
Description
The lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) test looks for signs of damage to the body's tissues.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months, 1 Year, and 5 Years post-implant
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years or older
Aortic stenosis or stenosis-insufficiency of aortic valve requiring a planned replacement as indicated in the preoperative evaluation;
Scheduled to undergo planned aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary bypass surgery, MAZE procedure, septal myectomy, pacemaker/ICD implant and or atrial appendage occlusion/removal.
Signed and dated the informed consent form prior to investigation procedures;
Geographically stable and agrees to attend Follow up assessments at the hospital of surgical services for a maximum of 5 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
Pure aortic insufficiency
Requires emergency surgery
Aneurysm of the aortic root and/or ascending aorta requiring surgical intervention
Left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤ 25%
Active endocarditis within 3 months prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
Concomitant valve (mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic) disease requiring repair with an annuloplasty ring or replacement with prosthesis
Prior mitral, tricuspid or pulmonic valve surgery, which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve, mechanical valve, or annuloplasty ring.
Myocardial infarction (MI) within 1 month prior to the scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
Previously implanted with EDWARDS INTUITY Aortic valve; alcohol or drug abuser
Disease limiting life expectancy to less than 12 months
Pregnant or lactating
Currently participating in another drug or device clinical investigation;
Documented blood diatheses
Requires non-cardiac procedures such as carotid procedures or mediastinal tumor removal
Had a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6-months prior to scheduled aortic valve replacement surgery
Study site pre-operative echocardiographic assessment shows evidence of an intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical circulatory support, or mechanical ventilation within 30 days of procedure
Documented renal insufficiency as determined by Serum creatinine ≥ 200 µmol/L (2.27 mg/dL) at screening or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis
Documented hyperparathyroidism
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Prof Axel Haverich
Organizational Affiliation
MHH Hannover
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AKH Vienna-Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Wien; University Vienna
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Kerchoff Klinik-Bad Nauheim
City
Bad Nauheim
ZIP/Postal Code
61231
Country
Germany
Facility Name
MHH-Medizinische Hoschschule Hannover
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Herzzentrum Uniklink Koln-Klinik und Poliklinik fur Herz und Thoraxzchirurgie
City
Koeln
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Leipzig: Herzzentrum Leipzig Gmbh
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04289
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Universitat Muchen-Grosshadern; Clinic at the University of Munich
City
Munich
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28453629
Citation
Laufer G, Haverich A, Andreas M, Mohr FW, Walther T, Shrestha M, Rahmanian P, Holzhey D, Roth M, Schmitz C, Schramm R, Giot C, Wahlers TCW. Long-term outcomes of a rapid deployment aortic valve: data up to 5 years. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;52(2):281-287. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx103.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25218544
Citation
Haverich A, Wahlers TC, Borger MA, Shrestha M, Kocher AA, Walther T, Roth M, Misfeld M, Mohr FW, Kempfert J, Dohmen PM, Schmitz C, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Duhay FG, Laufer G. Three-year hemodynamic performance, left ventricular mass regression, and prosthetic-patient mismatch after rapid deployment aortic valve replacement in 287 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.07.049. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23058665
Citation
Kocher AA, Laufer G, Haverich A, Shrestha M, Walther T, Misfeld M, Kempfert J, Gillam L, Schmitz C, Wahlers TC, Wippermann J, Mohr FW, Roth M, Skwara A, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Borger MA. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: a prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):110-5; discussion 115-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.07.108. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29912142
Citation
Wahlers TCW, Andreas M, Rahmanian P, Candolfi P, Zemanova B, Giot C, Ferrari E, Laufer G. Outcomes of a Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Versus Its Conventional Counterpart: A Propensity-Matched Analysis. Innovations (Phila). 2018 May/Jun;13(3):177-183. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000509.
Results Reference
result
Links:
URL
https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/what-is-heart-failure/classes-of-heart-failure
Description
New York Heart Association Classification
URL
https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/
Description
Measure of Health Status Survey (EQ-5D)
Learn more about this trial
Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs