Surgical Versus Anaesthetic Placement of Rectus Sheath Catheters (SPARC)
Primary Purpose
Pain, Postoperative, Wound; Abdomen, Incision
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rectus Sheath Catheter
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain, Postoperative
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged over 18 years
- Able to provide informed consent
- Undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery or emergency laparotomy via a midline incision extending above the umbilicus
- Weight of 50kg or over to standardise the analgesia given.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Weight of less than 50kg
- Patients unable to consent
- Age under 18 years
- Inability to insert RSC - local infection or severe coagulopathy
- Allergy to local anaesthetic
- Chronic pre-operative use of strong opioids or gabapentins and or chronic pain syndromes
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Surgeon-inserted
Anaesthetist-inserted
Arm Description
Rectus sheath catheter will be inserted under direct vision / palpation of the space at the end of the operation.
Rectus sheath catheter will be inserted under ultrasound guidance by the anaethetist.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time taken to insert rectus sheath catheters
This will be recorded in theatre on a stopwatch and recorded.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain scores
Patients will be asked to score their pain in recovery and on days 0,1,2,3 post operatively. This will be graded using a Numeric Pain Rating Scale.
Peri-operative analgesic use
Analgesic use intra-operatively and post-operatively for 3 days. This will include strong opioids, paracetamol, NSAIDs, codeine, ketamine, IV lignocaine, tramadol, clonidine and PCA usage post-operatively.
Catheter issues
This includes haemorrhage, dislodgement, blockage
Duration of catheter use
TIme to diet and mobilisation
Time to discharge
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03137732
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Last Updated
April 28, 2017
Sponsor
Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03137732
Brief Title
Surgical Versus Anaesthetic Placement of Rectus Sheath Catheters
Acronym
SPARC
Official Title
Surgical Placement Versus Anaesthetic Placement of Rectus Sheath Catheter for Pain Relief Following Major Abdominal Surgery (SPARC). A Single Centre Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 2018 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Countess of Chester NHS Foundation Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a single centred randomized controlled trial comparing surgeon versus anaesthetist inserted rectus sheath catheters for management of analgesia post major abdominal surgery.
Detailed Description
Background and study aims Pain management post laparotomy (abdominal surgery) can be difficult and in our trust we are increasingly using rectus sheath catheters (RSCs).This is achieved by placing catheters, done by either by the surgeon or anaesthetist into the potential space between the rectus muscle and the posterior rectus sheath. Two catheters are placed, one on either side of the mid-line wound. Local anaesthetic is then infused through the catheters for up to 3 days post-operatively. This provides analgesia to the central abdominal wall in the region of the T7-T11 dermatomes. It only provides analgesia for somatic pain, not visceral pain and hence needs to be used in addition to a multi-modal analgesic regime usually including a patient controlled analgesia device (PCA) containing either morphine or oxycodone. Advantages of a RSC infusion over an epidural include that it can be used in patients with coagulopathy or systemic infection and can be safely performed asleep. It is also less labour intensive to manage on the ward and does not carry the same risks of hypotension and excessive fluid administration that are associated with an epidural.
There is randomised controlled trial evidence that RSC infusions in addition to PCA provide superior analgesia when compared to PCA alone in surgery performed through a midline incision. There is also a randomised controlled trial in progress that is comparing analgesic quality of epidural infusions to RSC with PCA. In most published literature to date, RSC are inserted by the anaesthetist using ultrasound to aid placement. In our hospital, some RSC are inserted by anaesthetists although the majority are performed by surgeons at the end of an operation. This is because we believe that this technique is less time consuming and both insertion techniques result in equivalent analgesia.
The primary aim endpoint of this study is to determine any difference in insertion time for rectus sheath catheters between those inserted by surgeons and those inserted by anaesthetists. Observationally in our hospital, there is no difference in quality of analgesia provided by the two insertion techniques. However, surgical insertion of RSC causes less disruption of an operation as the patient already has their abdomen draped with sterilised skin as part of their surgical procedure. Also, surgical insertion of RSC with an open abdomen is potentially easier than ultrasound guided insertion by an anaesthetist before an operation.
Who can participate? Any adults undergoing emergency or elective laparotomy (major abdominal surgery.) What does the study involve? All participants will receive rectus sheath catheters but will be randomly allocated to each group. Following the surgery, participants will have to answer questions about their pain on 3 consecutive days.
What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? There are no specific benefits to patients and the risks are the same if they were in the trial or not as it is routine in our hospital to use rectus sheath catheters as a means of analgesia post laparotomy. These risks include bleeding, dislodgement of catheter and failure of catheter and are low risk.
Where is the study run from? This a single centre study at the Countess of Chester Hospital in the United Kingdom.
When is study starting and how long is it expected to run for? We anticipate recruiting patient from June 2017 for 6 months. How long will the trial be recruiting participants for? No funding is required as all data collection will be carried out by doctors working in the departments but the study is being supported and supervised by the Hospital's Research and Development department.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Postoperative, Wound; Abdomen, Incision
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Patients will be blinded to the intervention that they are randomized to intraoperatively.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Surgeon-inserted
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rectus sheath catheter will be inserted under direct vision / palpation of the space at the end of the operation.
Arm Title
Anaesthetist-inserted
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rectus sheath catheter will be inserted under ultrasound guidance by the anaethetist.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Rectus Sheath Catheter
Intervention Description
Insertion of rectus sheath catheter via either method
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time taken to insert rectus sheath catheters
Description
This will be recorded in theatre on a stopwatch and recorded.
Time Frame
under 15 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain scores
Description
Patients will be asked to score their pain in recovery and on days 0,1,2,3 post operatively. This will be graded using a Numeric Pain Rating Scale.
Time Frame
4 days
Title
Peri-operative analgesic use
Description
Analgesic use intra-operatively and post-operatively for 3 days. This will include strong opioids, paracetamol, NSAIDs, codeine, ketamine, IV lignocaine, tramadol, clonidine and PCA usage post-operatively.
Time Frame
4 days
Title
Catheter issues
Description
This includes haemorrhage, dislodgement, blockage
Time Frame
4 days
Title
Duration of catheter use
Time Frame
4 days
Title
TIme to diet and mobilisation
Time Frame
likely 1-3 days
Title
Time to discharge
Time Frame
approximately 7 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients aged over 18 years
Able to provide informed consent
Undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery or emergency laparotomy via a midline incision extending above the umbilicus
Weight of 50kg or over to standardise the analgesia given.
Exclusion Criteria:
Weight of less than 50kg
Patients unable to consent
Age under 18 years
Inability to insert RSC - local infection or severe coagulopathy
Allergy to local anaesthetic
Chronic pre-operative use of strong opioids or gabapentins and or chronic pain syndromes
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Dale Vimalachandran, MBChB MD FRCS
Phone
01244 365000
Email
dale.vimalachandran@nhs.net
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Elizabeth G Kane, MBChB BSc MRCS
Email
ekane1@nhs.net
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Surgical Versus Anaesthetic Placement of Rectus Sheath Catheters
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs