search
Back to results

Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Permanent Treatment in End-stage Heart Failure (SweVAD)

Primary Purpose

End-stage Heart Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HM III
OMM, optimal medical management
Sponsored by
Vastra Gotaland Region
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for End-stage Heart Failure focused on measuring HM III, survival, LVAD

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed informed consent
  2. Adult (≥ 18 years)
  3. Chronic heart failure ≥ 45 days or stable not supported by mechanical circulatory support since >7days on single inotrope.
  4. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%.
  5. NYHA IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6
  6. At least 2 of 4 adverse prognostic criteria:

    • SHFM estimated 1-year survival ≤75%
    • NTproBNP ≥ 2000 ng/l
    • VO2 max < 14 ml/kg/min or <50% of predicted VO2max with attainment of anaerobic threshold (AT), or unable to perform.
    • Need for continuous or intermittent inotropic support or >2 hospitalizations during last 6 months.
  7. Receiving medical management with optimal doses of betablockers, ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, and MRAs for at least 30 days if tolerated.
  8. Receiving CRT if indicated for at least 45 days.
  9. Receiving ICD if indicated and appropriate.
  10. Ineligible for cardiac transplantation (e.g. high age and/or co-morbidities)
  11. Considered suitable for the study by a multidisciplinary board

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Eligible for heart transplantation or is likely to become eligible after VAD treatment (bridge-to-candidacy)
  2. Indication for revascularisation, valvular surgery or other cardiac intervention expected to improve cardiac function and prognosis (CABG, PCI TAVI, mitraclip etc.)
  3. INTERMACS profile 1 "crash and burn"
  4. On-going mechanical circulatory support.
  5. Heart failure due to restrictive cardiomyopathy pericardial disease, active myocarditis or uncorrected thyroid disease.
  6. Mechanical aortic valve that will not be converted to a bioprosthesis or patch
  7. Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction
  8. Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk
  9. Active, uncontrolled infection

11. Stroke within 90 days or carotid artery stenosis > 80 % 12. Significant vascular disease. 13. Severe COPD or severe restrictive lung disease. 14. Intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values (AST or ALT or total bilirubin) > 5 times the upper limit of normal, or INR > 2.0, which is not due to anti-coagulant therapy.

15. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other operative therapy the patient will require based upon the patient's health status.

16. Platelet count < 50,000. 17. Measured GFR <20 ml/min/1.73m2 unresponsive to inotrope treatment or chronic dialysis.

18. High risk for right ventricular failure according to echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamic measurements as judged by the investigator (>2 parameter constitute an exclusion criteria) using a combination of the:

a. Severe TI b. TAPSE < 0.72 cm c. RVEDD/LVEDD > 0.72 d. CVP > 16 mm Hg e. MPAP - RAP < 10 mmHg SPAP-DPAP/CVPm >1 ok, <0.5 very bad, in between borderline f. CVP/PCWP > 0.63 g. RVSWI < 300 mm Hg x ml/m2 h. Bilirubin > 34 micromol/L 19. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 42 kg/m2. 20. Psychiatric disease, cognitive dysfunction, alcohol or drug abuse, or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair study compliance 21. Female of childbearing age with a positive pregnancy test or not willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study.

22. Condition, other than heart failure, that could limit survival to less than 2 years.

Sites / Locations

  • Sahlgrenska Univesitetssjukhustet, TransplantationscentrumRecruiting
  • Linköping Univ HospitalRecruiting
  • Skåne University HospitalRecruiting
  • Karolinska Univ HospitalRecruiting
  • Univ Hospital of UmeåRecruiting
  • Uppsala Univ HospitalRecruiting
  • Örebro Univ HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

HM III

OMM, Optimal Medical Management

Arm Description

Patients randomized to mechanical circulatory support will be treated with the HeartMate III (HM III) left ventricular assist device system.

Patients randomized to OMM will be treated according to international guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-84

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Survival at two years of follow-up
survival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of participants free from disabling stroke during the 2-year follow-up period
Survival free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) >3)
A composite endpoint of "survival free from disabling stroke", survival and non-planned hospitalizations
Survival free from a composite endpoint of disabling stroke, survival and non-planned hospitalizations
Survival at year of follow-up
Survival at year
Functional capacity (NYHA) during the 2-year follow-up period
functional capacity determined by NYHA classification
Functional capacity (6 min walk-test) during the 2-year follow-up period
functional capacity determined by 6 min walk-test
Functional capacity (peak VO2)
functional capacity determined by peak VO2
Health-related quality of Life during the 2-year follow-up period
Health-related quality of Life asses with EQ-5D-5L, SF-36 and KCCQ
Number of participants with heart-failure related events
Cost-effectiveness during the 2-year follow-up period
Cost effectiveness calculated with QUALY (Quality-adjusted Life-year) and LY (Life year)
Renal function during the 2-year follow-up period
Glomerular filtration rate evaluated by 51 chrome-EDTA or Iohexol clearance
Hospital admissions during the 2-year follow-up period
Number of hospital admissions
Number of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs)
Functional capacity (peak VO2)
functional capacity determined by peak VO2
Three-years survival
survival
Four-years survival
survival
Five-years survival
survival

Full Information

First Posted
October 23, 2015
Last Updated
April 25, 2023
Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Collaborators
Karolinska University Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping, Skane University Hospital, Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Umeå, Region Örebro County
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02592499
Brief Title
Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Permanent Treatment in End-stage Heart Failure
Acronym
SweVAD
Official Title
Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
June 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Vastra Gotaland Region
Collaborators
Karolinska University Hospital, University Hospital, Linkoeping, Skane University Hospital, Uppsala University Hospital, University Hospital, Umeå, Region Örebro County

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study is a prospective, randomized, non-blinded, national, multi-center study. The study will consist of the assignment of eligible patients to treatment with either a HeartMate III (HM III) left ventricular assist device system or to pharmacological treatment (optimal medical management, OMM) according to current guidelines. Eighty (80) patients will be enrolled in this study and randomized in a 1:1 fashion between the HM III and OMM, based on a modified power calculation.
Detailed Description
The primary objective is to compare survival between left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) destination therapy and optimal medical management in a Swedish end stage heart failure population ineligible for cardiac transplantation. The secondary objective is to compare treatment groups with respect to organ function, functional capacity, quality of life and adverse events. All patients enrolled in the study will be followed through 2 years. Patients who continue to be on going with the HM III or on OMM past 2 years will continue be followed for their outcomes and adverse events for up to 5 years. Patient recruitment was expected to occur over 24 months, but due to difficulties in recruiting patients will be longer (approximately 48 months) The study will be conducted in Sweden at all 7 University Hospitals and implantations will be performed in 5 sites.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End-stage Heart Failure
Keywords
HM III, survival, LVAD

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HM III
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to mechanical circulatory support will be treated with the HeartMate III (HM III) left ventricular assist device system.
Arm Title
OMM, Optimal Medical Management
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to OMM will be treated according to international guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-84
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
HM III
Other Intervention Name(s)
left ventrical assist device, LVAD
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
OMM, optimal medical management
Intervention Description
Patients randomized to OMM will be treated according to international guidelines. All patients should receive a beta blocker, an ACE-inhibitor or an Angiotension II receptor blocker, and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist if tolerated and at optimally titrated doses according to guidelines. Loop diuretics should also be used as needed to control fluid retention. Other drugs that may relieve symptoms and improve prognosis can be used (incl ivabradin, digoxin, hydralazine,isosorbiddinitrate, anticoagulant agents). Patients that have an indication for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) should receive such therapy. Surgical interventions that may be indicated for specific underlying or contributing causes of heart failure.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival at two years of follow-up
Description
survival
Time Frame
2 years,
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants free from disabling stroke during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
Survival free from disabling stroke (Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) >3)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
A composite endpoint of "survival free from disabling stroke", survival and non-planned hospitalizations
Description
Survival free from a composite endpoint of disabling stroke, survival and non-planned hospitalizations
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Survival at year of follow-up
Description
Survival at year
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Functional capacity (NYHA) during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
functional capacity determined by NYHA classification
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Functional capacity (6 min walk-test) during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
functional capacity determined by 6 min walk-test
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Functional capacity (peak VO2)
Description
functional capacity determined by peak VO2
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Health-related quality of Life during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
Health-related quality of Life asses with EQ-5D-5L, SF-36 and KCCQ
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Number of participants with heart-failure related events
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cost-effectiveness during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
Cost effectiveness calculated with QUALY (Quality-adjusted Life-year) and LY (Life year)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Renal function during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
Glomerular filtration rate evaluated by 51 chrome-EDTA or Iohexol clearance
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Hospital admissions during the 2-year follow-up period
Description
Number of hospital admissions
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Number of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Functional capacity (peak VO2)
Description
functional capacity determined by peak VO2
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Three-years survival
Description
survival
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Four-years survival
Description
survival
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Five-years survival
Description
survival
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Signed informed consent Adult (≥ 18 years) Chronic heart failure ≥ 45 days or stable not supported by mechanical circulatory support since >7days on single inotrope. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 30%. NYHA IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6 At least 2 of 4 adverse prognostic criteria: SHFM estimated 1-year survival ≤75% NTproBNP ≥ 2000 ng/l VO2 max < 14 ml/kg/min or <50% of predicted VO2max with attainment of anaerobic threshold (AT), or unable to perform. Need for continuous or intermittent inotropic support or >2 hospitalizations during last 6 months. Receiving medical management with optimal doses of betablockers, ACE-inhibitors or ARBs, and MRAs for at least 30 days if tolerated. Receiving CRT if indicated for at least 45 days. Receiving ICD if indicated and appropriate. Ineligible for cardiac transplantation (e.g. high age and/or co-morbidities) Considered suitable for the study by a multidisciplinary board Exclusion Criteria: Eligible for heart transplantation or is likely to become eligible after VAD treatment (bridge-to-candidacy) Indication for revascularisation, valvular surgery or other cardiac intervention expected to improve cardiac function and prognosis (CABG, PCI TAVI, mitraclip etc.) INTERMACS profile 1 "crash and burn" On-going mechanical circulatory support. Heart failure due to restrictive cardiomyopathy pericardial disease, active myocarditis or uncorrected thyroid disease. Mechanical aortic valve that will not be converted to a bioprosthesis or patch Moderate to severe aortic insufficiency without plans for correction Technical obstacles, which pose an inordinately high surgical risk Active, uncontrolled infection 11. Stroke within 90 days or carotid artery stenosis > 80 % 12. Significant vascular disease. 13. Severe COPD or severe restrictive lung disease. 14. Intrinsic hepatic disease as defined by liver enzyme values (AST or ALT or total bilirubin) > 5 times the upper limit of normal, or INR > 2.0, which is not due to anti-coagulant therapy. 15. Intolerance to anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapies or any other operative therapy the patient will require based upon the patient's health status. 16. Platelet count < 50,000. 17. Measured GFR <20 ml/min/1.73m2 unresponsive to inotrope treatment or chronic dialysis. 18. High risk for right ventricular failure according to echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamic measurements as judged by the investigator (>2 parameter constitute an exclusion criteria) using a combination of the: a. Severe TI b. TAPSE < 0.72 cm c. RVEDD/LVEDD > 0.72 d. CVP > 16 mm Hg e. MPAP - RAP < 10 mmHg SPAP-DPAP/CVPm >1 ok, <0.5 very bad, in between borderline f. CVP/PCWP > 0.63 g. RVSWI < 300 mm Hg x ml/m2 h. Bilirubin > 34 micromol/L 19. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 42 kg/m2. 20. Psychiatric disease, cognitive dysfunction, alcohol or drug abuse, or psychosocial issues that are likely to impair study compliance 21. Female of childbearing age with a positive pregnancy test or not willing to use adequate contraceptive precautions during the study. 22. Condition, other than heart failure, that could limit survival to less than 2 years.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Göran Dellgren, MD
Phone
+4631-342 88 63
Email
goran.dellgren@vgregion.se
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristjan Karason, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Vastra Gotaland Region
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sahlgrenska Univesitetssjukhustet, Transplantationscentrum
City
Gothenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
41234
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Göran Dellgren
Phone
+46 31-342 88 63
Email
goran.dellgren@vgregion.se
Facility Name
Linköping Univ Hospital
City
Linköping
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Wodlin, MD
Facility Name
Skåne University Hospital
City
Lund
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oscar Braun, MD
Facility Name
Karolinska Univ Hospital
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lars Lund, MD
Facility Name
Univ Hospital of Umeå
City
Umeå
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Krister Lindmark, MD
Facility Name
Uppsala Univ Hospital
City
Uppsala
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ola Vedin, MD
Facility Name
Örebro Univ Hospital
City
Örebro
Country
Sweden
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Barna Szado, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
We have not yet made an exact plan but see no reason for not sharing the data regarding IPD underlying the results of the study, as well as the protocol, SAP and ICF after publication, but will also depend on requirement by the journal upon publication.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After publication
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Not decided yet

Learn more about this trial

Swedish Evaluation of Left Ventricular Assist Device as Permanent Treatment in End-stage Heart Failure

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs