search
Back to results

Synergetic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE - 2nd Study. (SynBioSe-2)

Primary Purpose

Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Belimumab Injection
Sponsored by
Leiden University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic focused on measuring systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, systemic autoimmune disease, glomerulonephritis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, renal insufficiency, renal failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the SLICC criteria 2012
  2. Severe, active SLE disease defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:

    1. SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) with 12 or more points
    2. New or worse SLE-related activity of major organs, i.e.: CNS-SLE (includes NPSLE), vasculitis, nephritis, pericarditis and/or myocarditis, myositis, thrombocytopenia < 60, hemolytic anemia < 4.4mmol/L (=7.0g/dL)
    3. high disease activity that requires or warrants induction treatment by switching to or increasing dosage of oral mycophenolate
  3. New, persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine)
  4. Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met:

    1. ANA seropositivity, as defined by a positive ANA-titer ≥ 1:80, before and at screening :

      • Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period; OR
      • One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of ANA (eg, ANA by HEp-2 titer, ANA by ELISA) must include the date of the test.
    2. Anti-DNA seropositivity, as defined by a positive anti-dsDNA serum antibody ≥ 30 IU/mL, before and at screening:

      • Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period.
      • One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by Farr assay or ELISA) must include the date of the test.
  5. Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is:

    • Not pregnant or nursing
    • Of non-child-bearing potential (i.e. after hysterectomy, postmenopausal, bilateral ovariectomy or documented bilateral tubal ligation or other permanent female sterilization procedure)
    • in agreement to not become pregnant (if female subjects of childbearing potential) and therefore must be sexually inactive by abstinence or use contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1%.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Active pregnancy, as proven by a positive urine beta-HCG test or a positive serum beta-HCG
  2. Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency (IgA < 0.1 g/L)
  3. Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening
  4. Active infection at time of screening, as follows:

    • Hospitalization for treatment of infection within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
    • Use of parenteral (intravenous of intramuscular) antibiotics (including anti-bacterials, anti-virals, anti-fungals or anti-parasitic agents) within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study
    • Serological evidence of viral hepatitis defined as: patients positive for HbsAg test or HBcAb or a positive hepatitis C antibody not treated with antiviral medication
  5. Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV
  6. Have a history of a primary immunodeficiency
  7. Have a neutrophil count of < 1.5x10E9/L
  8. Have a significant infection history that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
  9. Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins or monoclonal antibodies
  10. Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value in the opinion of the investigator
  11. Have current drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence within 365 days prior to Day 0 of the study
  12. Have an active malignant neoplasm or one in the history of the last 5 years, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally and with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years
  13. Have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, poses a significant suicide risk
  14. Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, any intercurrent significant medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study

Sites / Locations

  • University Medical Center GroningenRecruiting
  • Leiden University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Radboud University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • HagaZiekenhuisRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

BLM+RTX treatment arm

Standard of Care treatment arm

Arm Description

Intervention 1 Belimumab injection: subcutaneous weekly injections with 200mg belimumab (BML) for the duration of the entire study period of two years. Intervention 2 Rituximab infusion: Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab (RTX) at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab. Intervention 3: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L.

Intervention 1: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. Optional intervention: (if patients flare or are non-responders on mycofenolate mofetil + prednisolone) : Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Treatment failure rate
The treatment failure rate will be measured at 104 weeks in both treatment arms with the hypothesis that lower treatment failure rates will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change of disease relevant auto-antibodies present at baseline, in particular anti-dsDNA
All disease relevant auto-antibodies will be measured at 28 weeks and compared to baseline with the hypothesis that a better reduction will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
Sustained change of autoantibody production
The sustained reduction of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Seroconversion of disease relevant auto-antibodies
Seroconversion of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Change of memory B-cell numbers
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Sustained change of memory B-cell numbers
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Sustained change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Evaluation of the renal response
The number of partial and complete renal responders in case of lupus nephritis
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLEDAI
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints by the The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 105, with a higher score indicating a higher disease activity
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLICC
SLICC damage score (System Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) will be assesed at baseline, one year and two years, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 47, with a higher score indicating more damage
Evaluation of the clinical response by QoL questionnaires
QoL questionnaires will be assessed at multiple time points by the SF-36 (ShortForm-36) questionnaire, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100, with a higher score indicating a higher quality of life
Evaluation of the clinical response by the amount of moderate and severe flares.
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Evaluation of the clinical response by the ability to reduce concomitant immunosuppression without flares
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints

Full Information

First Posted
October 12, 2018
Last Updated
October 5, 2023
Sponsor
Leiden University Medical Center
Collaborators
Dutch Kidney Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03747159
Brief Title
Synergetic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE - 2nd Study.
Acronym
SynBioSe-2
Official Title
A Randomized Trial to Investigate the Reset of Humoral Autoimmunity by Combining Belimumab With Rituximab in Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
October 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Leiden University Medical Center
Collaborators
Dutch Kidney Foundation, GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In follow-up of the previous SynBioSe Study the present study is a randomized controlled trial designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab (anti-BAFF) followed by rituximab(anti-CD20) in lupus nephritis patients.
Detailed Description
Rationale: The SynBioSe-1 study is the first study to comprehensively describe the clinical and immunological effects of combining rituximab (RTX) and belimumab (BLM) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). From the pioneering SynBioSe-1 study, we have learned that combining RTX+BLM was safe and well-tolerated with important clinical responses. Immunologically, we unexpectedly observed that long-term B-cell depletion was not achieved due to migration of mature B-cells triggered by depletion of BAFF serum levels. The latter observation was in contrast to the study's null-hypothesis that combination therapy would lead to long-term B-cell depletion. The contrary was demonstrated, namely the relative early recirculation of mature B-cells. As such, the immunological and clinical lessons from the SynBioSe-1 study in conjunction with accumulating data from several large studies on combination B-cell targeted treatment have led to the postulation that starting treatment with RTX+BLM would result in an improved B-cell targeting strategy, notably on tissue-resident autoreactive B-cells, associated with improved long-term clinical disease amelioration. Therefore, the present SynBioSe-2 study is designed to further investigate the long-term clinical and imunological efficacy of combination B-cell targeting by starting treatment with belimumab followed by rituximab. Objectives: The primary objective is to assess whether combination treatment BLM+RTX will lead to reduced treatment failure and the improvement of pivotal, SLE-specific autoimmune phenomena compared to SLE patients treated with standard of care. Study design: a multi-center, randomized, controlled, open-label study Study population: SLE patients with a severe flare with major organ involvement or persistent high disease activity despite conventional treatment Intervention: In addition to standard therapy, SLE patients will receive self-administered, subcutaneous injections of belimumab every week for the entire study period and 2 infusions of rituximab 1000 mg on day 28 (week 4) and day 42 (week 6). Main study parameters: The primary clinical efficacy parameter is the treatment failure rate during the 2 years study period. Secondary endpoints are clinical and non-biased immunological effects of the treatment summarized as follows: reduction of disease relevant autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibody production at 28 weeks, total renal response rate at 28 weeks, regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation at 28 weeks; sustained, long-term B-cell depletion during 104 weeks; sustained reduction of relevant anti-nuclear autoantibodies, including seroconversion during 104 weeks; and sustained regression of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation during 104 weeks. Additionally, the study will perform safety and toxicity monitoring according to Common toxicity Criteria (CTC) developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) with the use of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and evaluate the reduction of concomitant immunosuppression and the number of moderate and severe flares during study follow-up. Study duration: 104 weeks. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation and potential benefits: The study will include SLE patients with a severe flare necessitating remission induction treatment with intensive immunosuppression. The use of belimumab followed by rituximab can ameliorate disease activity even more than conventional treatment in the short-term and contribute to the successful tapering of concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. The latter will possibly lead to the reduction of infectious complication as compared to conventional treatment. The risks are predominantly related to the side effect profile of rituximab and belimumab and infectious complications of long-term B-cell depletion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Keywords
systemic lupus erythematosus, lupus nephritis, systemic autoimmune disease, glomerulonephritis, autoimmune glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, renal insufficiency, renal failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Multi-center
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
70 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BLM+RTX treatment arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention 1 Belimumab injection: subcutaneous weekly injections with 200mg belimumab (BML) for the duration of the entire study period of two years. Intervention 2 Rituximab infusion: Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab (RTX) at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab. Intervention 3: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L.
Arm Title
Standard of Care treatment arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Intervention 1: Standard of care: induction therapy with three intravenously infusions methylprednisolone of 1000mg (or 500mg if weight is below 60kg), oral prednisolone 60mg with a quick tapering scheme to reach 5mg in 10 weeks and mycofenolate mofetil start dosis 500mg twice daily with maximum dosis of 2000mg twice daily depending on tolerance and area under curve (AUC) aimed at 60mg*hour/L. Optional intervention: (if patients flare or are non-responders on mycofenolate mofetil + prednisolone) : Two intravenously infusions of 1000mg rituximab at week 4 and week 6 after the start of belimumab.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Belimumab Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Benlysta subcutaneous injection of 200mg
Intervention Description
Weekly injection of belimumab prior to two infusions of rituximab with continuation of the belimumab as maintenance therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Treatment failure rate
Description
The treatment failure rate will be measured at 104 weeks in both treatment arms with the hypothesis that lower treatment failure rates will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change of disease relevant auto-antibodies present at baseline, in particular anti-dsDNA
Description
All disease relevant auto-antibodies will be measured at 28 weeks and compared to baseline with the hypothesis that a better reduction will be obtained in the RTX+BLM arm.
Time Frame
28 weeks
Title
Sustained change of autoantibody production
Description
The sustained reduction of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Seroconversion of disease relevant auto-antibodies
Description
Seroconversion of pathogenic autoantibodies, in particular anti-dsDNA autoantibodies
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Change of memory B-cell numbers
Description
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Time Frame
28 weeks
Title
Sustained change of memory B-cell numbers
Description
The detection of (autoreactive) memory B-cells by standardized flowcytometry and in B-cell culture assays
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
Description
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Time Frame
28 weeks
Title
Sustained change of immune complex-mediated excessive neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation
Description
The quantification of ex vivo NET induction with a 3-dimensional, confocal microscopy technique
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the renal response
Description
The number of partial and complete renal responders in case of lupus nephritis
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLEDAI
Description
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints by the The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K), with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 105, with a higher score indicating a higher disease activity
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the clinical response by SLICC
Description
SLICC damage score (System Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus) will be assesed at baseline, one year and two years, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 47, with a higher score indicating more damage
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the clinical response by QoL questionnaires
Description
QoL questionnaires will be assessed at multiple time points by the SF-36 (ShortForm-36) questionnaire, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 100, with a higher score indicating a higher quality of life
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the clinical response by the amount of moderate and severe flares.
Description
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Evaluation of the clinical response by the ability to reduce concomitant immunosuppression without flares
Description
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Description
Patients will be monitored at frequent timepoints
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Have a clinical diagnosis of SLE according to the SLICC criteria 2012 Severe, active SLE disease defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met: SLEDAI-2K (SLE Disease Activity Index) with 12 or more points New or worse SLE-related activity of major organs, i.e.: CNS-SLE (includes NPSLE), vasculitis, nephritis, pericarditis and/or myocarditis, myositis, thrombocytopenia < 60, hemolytic anemia < 4.4mmol/L (=7.0g/dL) high disease activity that requires or warrants induction treatment by switching to or increasing dosage of oral mycophenolate New, persisting or progressive disease activity despite the use of conventional maintenance immunosuppressive treatment (e.g. mycophenolate or azathioprine) Positive for relevant SLE-specific autoantibodies defined as a situation in which 1 or more of the following criteria are met: ANA seropositivity, as defined by a positive ANA-titer ≥ 1:80, before and at screening : Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period; OR One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of ANA (eg, ANA by HEp-2 titer, ANA by ELISA) must include the date of the test. Anti-DNA seropositivity, as defined by a positive anti-dsDNA serum antibody ≥ 30 IU/mL, before and at screening: Positive test results from 2 independent time points within the study screening period. One positive historical test result and 1 positive result during the screening period. Historical documentation of a positive test of anti-dsDNA (eg, anti-dsDNA by Farr assay or ELISA) must include the date of the test. Female subjects are eligible to enter the study if she is: Not pregnant or nursing Of non-child-bearing potential (i.e. after hysterectomy, postmenopausal, bilateral ovariectomy or documented bilateral tubal ligation or other permanent female sterilization procedure) in agreement to not become pregnant (if female subjects of childbearing potential) and therefore must be sexually inactive by abstinence or use contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1%. Exclusion Criteria: Active pregnancy, as proven by a positive urine beta-HCG test or a positive serum beta-HCG Significant hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG < 4.0 g/L) or an IgA deficiency (IgA < 0.1 g/L) Immunization with a live vaccine 1 month before screening Active infection at time of screening, as follows: Hospitalization for treatment of infection within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study Use of parenteral (intravenous of intramuscular) antibiotics (including anti-bacterials, anti-virals, anti-fungals or anti-parasitic agents) within previous 60 days of day 0 of the study Serological evidence of viral hepatitis defined as: patients positive for HbsAg test or HBcAb or a positive hepatitis C antibody not treated with antiviral medication Have a historically positive HIV test or test positive at screening for HIV Have a history of a primary immunodeficiency Have a neutrophil count of < 1.5x10E9/L Have a significant infection history that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study Have a history of an anaphylactic reaction to parenteral administration of contrast agents, human or murine proteins or monoclonal antibodies Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value in the opinion of the investigator Have current drugs or alcohol abuse or dependence within 365 days prior to Day 0 of the study Have an active malignant neoplasm or one in the history of the last 5 years, except basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin treated with local resection only or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated locally and with no evidence of metastatic disease for 3 years Have evidence of serious suicide risk including any history of suicidal behavior in the last 6 months and/or any suicidal ideation in the last 2 months or who, in the investigator's opinion, poses a significant suicide risk Have any other clinically significant abnormal laboratory value, any intercurrent significant medical or psychiatric illness that in the opinion of the investigator would make the candidate unsuitable for the study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD
Phone
T +31-(0)71-5262148
Email
y.k.o.teng@lumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Leiden University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9713 GZ
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. K. de Leeuw, MD, PhD
Phone
T +31-(0)50-3612908
Email
k.de.leeuw@umcg.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. K. de Leeuw, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Leiden University Medical Center
City
Leiden
ZIP/Postal Code
2333 ZC
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD
Phone
T +31-(0)71-5262148
Email
y.k.o.teng@lumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. Y.K.O. Teng, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Radboud University Medical Center
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Drs. E.M. van Ommen
Phone
T +31-(0)24-3614761
Email
Ellen.vanOmmen@radboudumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Drs. E.M. van Ommen
Facility Name
HagaZiekenhuis
City
The Hague
ZIP/Postal Code
2545 AA
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. D. Soonawala, MD, PhD
Phone
T +31-(0)70-2100000
Email
D.Soonawala@hagaziekenhuis.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dr. D. Soonawala, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36371234
Citation
van Schaik M, Arends EJ, Soonawala D, van Ommen E, de Leeuw K, Limper M, van Paassen P, Huizinga TWJ, Toes REM, van Kooten C, Rotmans JI, Rabelink TJ, Teng YKO. Efficacy of belimumab combined with rituximab in severe systemic lupus erythematosus: study protocol for the phase 3, multicenter, randomized, open-label Synbiose 2 trial. Trials. 2022 Nov 12;23(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06874-w.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Synergetic B-cell Immunomodulation in SLE - 2nd Study.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs