search
Back to results

TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Ablation Techniques, RFA

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TACE
RFA
Sponsored by
Ming Zhao
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
  • No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1
  • Child-Pugh Stage A or B
  • Treatment naive

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A platelet counts of <40×109/L,prothrombin time activity <40%;
  • Albumin >2.8 g/dL, total bilirubin <51.3 umol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase(AST)<5 times of upper limit
  • No evaluale target lesions
  • Uncontrolled or refractory ascites, ongoing variceal bleeding or encephalopathy
  • Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases
  • Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC
  • Pregnant women or lactating women
  • Be allergic to adriamycin, lobaplatin, mitomycin and iodized oil

Sites / Locations

  • Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Recruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

TACE-RFA

TACE alone

Arm Description

1-2 times of TACE treatment, then followed by RFA treatment.

TACE treatment several times till tumor progress to advance stage

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall survival rate

Secondary Outcome Measures

Tumor progression rate
Tumor progress to advanced-stage rate
Hepatic dysfunction rate
Adverse event rate

Full Information

First Posted
May 3, 2015
Last Updated
October 12, 2016
Sponsor
Ming Zhao
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02435953
Brief Title
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ming Zhao

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone.The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Some prospective studies have shown TACE combined RFA to have better efficacy than any of them alone for early stage HCC (single tuomor ≤5 cm). However, to the investigators' knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than TACE alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. Intermediate-stage HCC in this study was defined as 2-3 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size 3-7 cm or 4-10 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size ≤7 cm; ECOG-PS 0;Child-pugh A or B;no tumor thrombus or extrahepatic metastases.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Ablation Techniques, RFA
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TACE-RFA
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1-2 times of TACE treatment, then followed by RFA treatment.
Arm Title
TACE alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
TACE treatment several times till tumor progress to advance stage
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TACE
Intervention Description
TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mixed with pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RFA
Intervention Description
For RFA, we used two commercially available system (Cool-Tip, Valleylab,USA) and (Octopus RF Systema,Starmed,Korea)with needle electrode with a 17-gauge internally cooled electrode.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival rate
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tumor progression rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Tumor progress to advanced-stage rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Hepatic dysfunction rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Adverse event rate
Time Frame
3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1 Child-Pugh Stage A or B Treatment naive Exclusion Criteria: A platelet counts of <40×109/L,prothrombin time activity <40%; Albumin >2.8 g/dL, total bilirubin <51.3 umol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase(AST)<5 times of upper limit No evaluale target lesions Uncontrolled or refractory ascites, ongoing variceal bleeding or encephalopathy Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC Pregnant women or lactating women Be allergic to adriamycin, lobaplatin, mitomycin and iodized oil
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343272
Email
zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tao Pan, doctor
Phone
862087343271
Email
pantao0909@hotmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
500060
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343272
Email
zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tao Pan, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343271
Email
pantao0909@hotmail.com

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs