TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Primary Purpose
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Ablation Techniques, RFA
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TACE
RFA
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
- No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1
- Child-Pugh Stage A or B
- Treatment naive
Exclusion Criteria:
- A platelet counts of <40×109/L,prothrombin time activity <40%;
- Albumin >2.8 g/dL, total bilirubin <51.3 umol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase(AST)<5 times of upper limit
- No evaluale target lesions
- Uncontrolled or refractory ascites, ongoing variceal bleeding or encephalopathy
- Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases
- Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC
- Pregnant women or lactating women
- Be allergic to adriamycin, lobaplatin, mitomycin and iodized oil
Sites / Locations
- Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,Recruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
TACE-RFA
TACE alone
Arm Description
1-2 times of TACE treatment, then followed by RFA treatment.
TACE treatment several times till tumor progress to advance stage
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Overall survival rate
Secondary Outcome Measures
Tumor progression rate
Tumor progress to advanced-stage rate
Hepatic dysfunction rate
Adverse event rate
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02435953
Brief Title
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Official Title
Transarterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ming Zhao
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The current standard treatment for intermediate-stage HCC (BCLC stage B) is transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone.The combination of TACE with RFA has also reported to be an effective treatment for HCC. Some prospective studies have shown TACE combined RFA to have better efficacy than any of them alone for early stage HCC (single tuomor ≤5 cm). However, to the investigators' knowledge, there have not been any prospective studies to assess whether TACE combined sequentially with RFA is more effective than TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. The investigators hypothesized that the combination of TACE and RFA might result in better patient survival than TACE alone. Thus, the purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of sequential TACE-RFA with TACE alone for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC. Intermediate-stage HCC in this study was defined as 2-3 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size 3-7 cm or 4-10 intrahepatic lessions, largest tumor size ≤7 cm; ECOG-PS 0;Child-pugh A or B;no tumor thrombus or extrahepatic metastases.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Chemoembolization, Therapeutic, Ablation Techniques, RFA
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma,TACE,Chemoembolization, RFA,Intermediate-stage
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
TACE-RFA
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1-2 times of TACE treatment, then followed by RFA treatment.
Arm Title
TACE alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
TACE treatment several times till tumor progress to advance stage
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TACE
Intervention Description
TACE will be done according to the current method in our center. We use intra-injection of lipiodol mixed with pirarubicin,mitomycin and lobaplatin when the catheter was placed in the superselective location very close to the tumor. Gelfoam sponge was then injected to temporarily occlude the arterial blood flow.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
RFA
Intervention Description
For RFA, we used two commercially available system (Cool-Tip, Valleylab,USA) and (Octopus RF Systema,Starmed,Korea)with needle electrode with a 17-gauge internally cooled electrode.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival rate
Time Frame
3 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tumor progression rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Tumor progress to advanced-stage rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Hepatic dysfunction rate
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Adverse event rate
Time Frame
3 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Multiple HCC (2-3 lesions), largest lesion 3-7 cm in diameter, or multiple HCC (4-10 lesions), each ≤ 7 cm in diameter
No vascular invasion or etrahepatic metastases
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1
Child-Pugh Stage A or B
Treatment naive
Exclusion Criteria:
A platelet counts of <40×109/L,prothrombin time activity <40%;
Albumin >2.8 g/dL, total bilirubin <51.3 umol/L; alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase(AST)<5 times of upper limit
No evaluale target lesions
Uncontrolled or refractory ascites, ongoing variceal bleeding or encephalopathy
Severe heart, brain or kidney diseases
Previous or concurrent cancer that is distinct in primary site or histology from HCC
Pregnant women or lactating women
Be allergic to adriamycin, lobaplatin, mitomycin and iodized oil
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343272
Email
zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tao Pan, doctor
Phone
862087343271
Email
pantao0909@hotmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Organizational Affiliation
Principal Investigator, Clinical Professor
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Minimally Invasive Interventional Division, Medical Imaging Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center,
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
500060
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ming Zhao, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343272
Email
zhaoming@sysucc.org.cn
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tao Pan, doctor
Phone
+86 020 87343271
Email
pantao0909@hotmail.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
TACE+RFA Versus TACE Alone for Intermediate-stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs