search
Back to results

Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tanezumab 10 mg
tanezumab 5 mg
naproxen
placebo
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring monoclonal antibody RN624 PF-04383119 nerve growth factor anti-nerve growth factor OA pain arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or intent to become pregnant
  • BMI greater than 39
  • other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease

Sites / Locations

  • Greystone Medical Research, LLC
  • Saadat Ansari, MD
  • Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / Central Arizona Medical Associates, PC
  • Novara Clinical Research
  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
  • Central Phoenix Medical - Clinical Research Advantage
  • Paradigm Clinical, Inc
  • eStudySite
  • Orthopedic Physicians of Colorado, PC
  • University Parks Hematology/Oncology
  • Edinger Medical Group and Research Center
  • Valley Research
  • Lakewood Orthopedic Medical & Surgical Group
  • High Desert Medical Group Research for Life
  • Premiere Clinical Research, LLC
  • Miracle Mile Medical Center
  • Samaritan Center for Medical Research
  • Del Carmen Medical Center
  • Probe Clinical Research, Corp.
  • Lawrence P.McAdam, MD, A Medical Corporation
  • Westlake Medical Center
  • Peak Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Denver Internal Medicine Group
  • Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Colorado Hematology
  • Colorado Orthopedic Consultants, PC
  • American Clinical Research, LLC
  • Norwalk Medical Group
  • Rheumatology Consultants of Delaware
  • HeartCare
  • In Vivo Clinical Research, Inc
  • S & W Clinical Research
  • Centre for Rheumatology, Immunology and Arthritis
  • Kendall South Medical Center, Inc
  • Sunshine Research Center
  • Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA
  • HeartCare Research
  • Tampa Medical Group PA
  • Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.
  • River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
  • Millennium Pain Center
  • Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
  • MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
  • Pasadena Pharmacy
  • The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
  • L-Marc Research Center
  • Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
  • Gulf Coast Research, LLC
  • Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers
  • Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
  • Miray Medical Center
  • Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated
  • Planters Clinic
  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
  • St. John's Medical Research Institute, Inc.
  • Diagnositc Center of Medicine
  • Independent Clinical Researchers
  • Wolfson Medical Center
  • Clinical Research Consortium
  • SPRI Bronx LLC
  • Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
  • Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Providence Health Partners - Center for Clinical Research
  • Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Consultants
  • Signal Point Clinical Research Center, LLC
  • Physicians' Research, Inc
  • PrimeCare of Southeastern Ohio, Inc
  • Cor Clinical Research, LLC
  • The Family Healthcare Center, PA
  • Southern Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
  • Coastal Carolina Research Center
  • Low Country Rheumatology, PA
  • The Carolina Center for Rheumatology and Arthritis Care, PA
  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
  • South Austin Orthopedics
  • Tekton Research Inc. - Research Office
  • Texas Orthopedic Specialists
  • Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic Research
  • Southwest Orthopedic Group
  • The Neurology Center
  • Gill Orthopedic Center
  • Robert R. King, M.D., PA
  • AZ Clinical Research
  • Spring Clinical Research
  • Sugar Land Med-Ped, P.A.
  • Grayline Clinical Drug Trials
  • J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic
  • J. Lewis Research, Incorporated/Foothill Family Clinic South
  • Commonwealth Orthopedics & Rehabilitation , P.C.
  • IntegraTrials, LLC
  • Virginia Hospital Center
  • HypotheTest, LLC
  • Empirical Clinical Trials, LLC
  • Arthritis Northwest, PLLC

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

3

4

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 percent [%]; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Participants assessed their average daily pain score in the index hip/knee using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. A weekly mean was calculated using the daily index hip/knee pain scores within each specified study week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [worst stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse response.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher score indicated a better health related quality of life.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). These 8 domains are also summarized as 2 summary scores: mental component aggregate (MCA) and physical component aggregate (PCA). Total score range for each of the 2 summary scores =0 (minimum level of functioning) to 100 (maximum level of functioning). Higher (8 domains and 2 summary) scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during the specified study week were summarized.
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days participants used any of the rescue medication, during the specified week were summarized.
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified week were summarized.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Laboratory values: hematology (hemoglobin; hematocrit; red blood cell count [less than {<}0.8* lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5* LLN,>1.75* upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell count<0.6* LLN, >1.5* ULN, liver function (total bilirubin>1.5* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0* ULN, total protein; albumin<0.8* LLN; >1.2* ULN), renal function (blood urea nitrogen; creatinine>1.3* ULN, uric acid>1.2* ULN), lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN), electrolytes (sodium<0.95* LLN, >1.05* ULN; potassium; chloride; calcium; magnesium; phosphate; bicarbonate<0.9* LLN, >1.1* ULN), chemistry (glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN), urinalysis (specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8, glucose; protein; blood; ketones; urobilinogen; bilirubin; nitrite, esterase>=1).
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as treatment related adverse events were presented. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator.
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality and 13 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 2 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 122 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Participants who developed anti-tanezumab antibodies after treatment were evaluated for the presence of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Number of participants with positive ADA were summarized for reporting groups: Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo and Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo. Results with titer value >= 4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies were counted as positive.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, heart, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, breasts, abdomen, musculoskeletal, neck, extremities, thyroid and others. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements
Vital signs included the assessment of the following: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs (based on the investigator's judgment) considered as adverse events were reported.

Full Information

First Posted
March 13, 2009
Last Updated
April 20, 2021
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00863304
Brief Title
Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)
Official Title
A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND PLACEBO AND NAPROXEN CONTROLLED MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 9, 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 27, 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 16, 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Test the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of tanezumab compared with naproxen and placebo in patients with osteoarthritis

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
monoclonal antibody RN624 PF-04383119 nerve growth factor anti-nerve growth factor OA pain arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
849 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
4
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
tanezumab 10 mg
Intervention Description
tanezumab 10 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
tanezumab 5 mg
Intervention Description
tanezumab 5 mg one dose at weeks 0 and 8
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
naproxen
Intervention Description
naproxen 1000 mg daily for 16 weeks
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
placebo to match tanezumab and naproxen dosing
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 16
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score was 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse physical function.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
Patient global assessment of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder: if the improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=50 percent and >=2 units in WOMAC pain subscale or WOMAC physical function subscale score; if improvement from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Percentage of participants who were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responder were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least 30 Percent and 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with at least 30 percent and 50 percent reduction in WOMAC pain subscale at specified weeks were reported in this outcome measure.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With at Least 2 Points Improvement in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1=very good (no symptom and limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Improvement signifies a decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 percent [%]; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline up to Week 16 in Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score: Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline up to Week 16 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score in the Index Hip or Knee at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
Participants assessed their average daily pain score in the index hip/knee using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. A weekly mean was calculated using the daily index hip/knee pain scores within each specified study week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score was 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (worst stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst possible pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [maximum difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [worst stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated worse response.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum), where higher score indicated a better health related quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Title
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Aggregate Scores at Weeks 12 and 16: Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)
Description
The SF-36 health survey is a self-administered questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health domains: domain 1= general health, domain 2= physical function, domain 3= role physical, domain 4= bodily pain, domain 5= vitality, domain 6= social function, domain 7= role emotional, domain 8= mental health. Total score for each of the 8 domains were scaled from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). These 8 domains are also summarized as 2 summary scores: mental component aggregate (MCA) and physical component aggregate (PCA). Total score range for each of the 2 summary scores =0 (minimum level of functioning) to 100 (maximum level of functioning). Higher (8 domains and 2 summary) scores indicate a better health related quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 12, and 16
Title
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Description
Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 16
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Used Rescue Medication
Description
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Percentage of participants with any use of rescue medication during the specified study week were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Duration of Rescue Medication Use
Description
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days participants used any of the rescue medication, during the specified week were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken
Description
In case of inadequate pain relief for osteoarthritis, acetaminophen up to 4000 mg per day up to 3 days per week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in mg used during the specified week were summarized.
Time Frame
Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 16
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 24 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities
Description
Laboratory values: hematology (hemoglobin; hematocrit; red blood cell count [less than {<}0.8* lower limit of normal [LLN], platelets <0.5* LLN,>1.75* upper limit of normal (ULN), white blood cell count<0.6* LLN, >1.5* ULN, liver function (total bilirubin>1.5* ULN, aspartate aminotransferase; alanine aminotransferase; gamma-glutamyltransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase>3.0* ULN, total protein; albumin<0.8* LLN; >1.2* ULN), renal function (blood urea nitrogen; creatinine>1.3* ULN, uric acid>1.2* ULN), lipids (cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN), electrolytes (sodium<0.95* LLN, >1.05* ULN; potassium; chloride; calcium; magnesium; phosphate; bicarbonate<0.9* LLN, >1.1* ULN), chemistry (glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN), urinalysis (specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8, glucose; protein; blood; ketones; urobilinogen; bilirubin; nitrite, esterase>=1).
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Description
All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QT interval corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula [QTcF], QT interval corrected for heart rate using Bazett's formula [QTcB], RR intervals and heart rate) were analyzed. Participants with abnormal ECG findings reported as treatment related adverse events were presented. Relatedness to treatment was assessed by investigator.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Description
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 4 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality and 13 items scored from 0 (normal function) to 2 (extreme abnormal function), higher score indicates higher abnormality. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 122 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Level
Description
Participants who developed anti-tanezumab antibodies after treatment were evaluated for the presence of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies in their serum. Number of participants with positive ADA were summarized for reporting groups: Tanezumab 5 mg + Placebo and Tanezumab 10 mg + Placebo. Results with titer value >= 4.32 nanogram per milliliter of anti-tanezumab neutralizing antibodies were counted as positive.
Time Frame
Baseline, Weeks 8, 16, and 24
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examinations Findings
Description
Physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, heart, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, breasts, abdomen, musculoskeletal, neck, extremities, thyroid and others. Criteria for abnormal physical findings were based on investigator's discretion.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1)
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Associated With Vital Sign Measurements
Description
Vital signs included the assessment of the following: body temperature, blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate. Number of participants with clinically significant vital signs (based on the investigator's judgment) considered as adverse events were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Osteoarthritis of the hip or knee according to Kellgren-Lawrence x-ray grade of 2 Exclusion Criteria: pregnancy or intent to become pregnant BMI greater than 39 other severe pain, significant cardiac, neurological or psychiatric disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Greystone Medical Research, LLC
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saadat Ansari, MD
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Coastal Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc. / Central Arizona Medical Associates, PC
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Novara Clinical Research
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Central Phoenix Medical - Clinical Research Advantage
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paradigm Clinical, Inc
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85705
Country
United States
Facility Name
eStudySite
City
Chula Vista
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91911
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Physicians of Colorado, PC
City
Englewood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Parks Hematology/Oncology
City
Englewood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Edinger Medical Group and Research Center
City
Fountain Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92708
Country
United States
Facility Name
Valley Research
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lakewood Orthopedic Medical & Surgical Group
City
Lakewood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90712
Country
United States
Facility Name
High Desert Medical Group Research for Life
City
Lancaster
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93534
Country
United States
Facility Name
Premiere Clinical Research, LLC
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90807
Country
United States
Facility Name
Miracle Mile Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90036
Country
United States
Facility Name
Samaritan Center for Medical Research
City
Los Gatos
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Del Carmen Medical Center
City
Reseda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91335
Country
United States
Facility Name
Probe Clinical Research, Corp.
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lawrence P.McAdam, MD, A Medical Corporation
City
Thousand Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westlake Medical Center
City
Westlake Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91361
Country
United States
Facility Name
Peak Anesthesia and Pain Management
City
Centennial
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Internal Medicine Group
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mountain View Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Colorado Hematology
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Colorado Orthopedic Consultants, PC
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80110
Country
United States
Facility Name
American Clinical Research, LLC
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Name
Norwalk Medical Group
City
Norwalk
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06851
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Consultants of Delaware
City
Lewes
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19958
Country
United States
Facility Name
HeartCare
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34202
Country
United States
Facility Name
In Vivo Clinical Research, Inc
City
Doral
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33166
Country
United States
Facility Name
S & W Clinical Research
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centre for Rheumatology, Immunology and Arthritis
City
Fort Lauderdale
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kendall South Medical Center, Inc
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33175
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sunshine Research Center
City
Opa-locka
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33054
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
HeartCare Research
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tampa Medical Group PA
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Masters of Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Augusta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30909
Country
United States
Facility Name
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
City
Blue Ridge
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30513
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pasadena Pharmacy
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Pain Treatment Center of the Bluegrass
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40503
Country
United States
Facility Name
L-Marc Research Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bone and Joint Clinic of Baton Rouge
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70808
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Coast Research, LLC
City
Baton Rouge
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70808
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mid-Atlantic Medical Research Centers
City
Hollywood
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20636
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC
City
Brockton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Miray Medical Center
City
Brockton
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02301
Country
United States
Facility Name
Great Lakes Research Group, Incorporated
City
Bay City
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48706
Country
United States
Facility Name
Planters Clinic
City
Port Gibson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39150
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. John's Medical Research Institute, Inc.
City
Springfield
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
65807
Country
United States
Facility Name
Diagnositc Center of Medicine
City
Henderson
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89052
Country
United States
Facility Name
Independent Clinical Researchers
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wolfson Medical Center
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Consortium
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89119
Country
United States
Facility Name
SPRI Bronx LLC
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10454
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medex Healthcare Research, Inc.
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbus Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Health Partners - Center for Clinical Research
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45439
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic & Sports Medicine Consultants
City
Middletown
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Signal Point Clinical Research Center, LLC
City
Middletown
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physicians' Research, Inc
City
Zanesville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43701
Country
United States
Facility Name
PrimeCare of Southeastern Ohio, Inc
City
Zanesville
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cor Clinical Research, LLC
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73103
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Family Healthcare Center, PA
City
Clinton
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29325
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern Orthopaedic Sports Medicine
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29204
Country
United States
Facility Name
Coastal Carolina Research Center
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29464
Country
United States
Facility Name
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Carolina Center for Rheumatology and Arthritis Care, PA
City
Rock Hill
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29732
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
City
Simpsonville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29681
Country
United States
Facility Name
South Austin Orthopedics
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78745
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tekton Research Inc. - Research Office
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78746
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Orthopedic Specialists
City
Grapevine
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76051
Country
United States
Facility Name
Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic Research
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southwest Orthopedic Group
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Neurology Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gill Orthopedic Center
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert R. King, M.D., PA
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
AZ Clinical Research
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spring Clinical Research
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sugar Land Med-Ped, P.A.
City
Sugar Land
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77479
Country
United States
Facility Name
Grayline Clinical Drug Trials
City
Wichita Falls
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76309
Country
United States
Facility Name
J. Lewis Research, Inc. / Foothill Family Clinic
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84109
Country
United States
Facility Name
J. Lewis Research, Incorporated/Foothill Family Clinic South
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84121
Country
United States
Facility Name
Commonwealth Orthopedics & Rehabilitation , P.C.
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22205
Country
United States
Facility Name
IntegraTrials, LLC
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Hospital Center
City
Arlington
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22205
Country
United States
Facility Name
HypotheTest, LLC
City
Roanoke
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24018
Country
United States
Facility Name
Empirical Clinical Trials, LLC
City
Selah
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98942
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis Northwest, PLLC
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99204-2336
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
IPD Sharing URL
https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30936738
Citation
Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019. Erratum In: J Pain Res. 2020 Sep 14;13:2267-2268.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25274899
Citation
Ekman EF, Gimbel JS, Bello AE, Smith MD, Keller DS, Annis KM, Brown MT, West CR, Verburg KM. Efficacy and safety of intravenous tanezumab for the symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis: 2 randomized controlled trials versus naproxen. J Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;41(11):2249-59. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.131294. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A4091018&StudyName=Tanezumab%20in%20osteoarthritis%20of%20the%20hip%20or%20knee%20%282%29
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Tanezumab in Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee (2)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs