search
Back to results

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component.

Primary Purpose

Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release
Sponsored by
Grünenthal GmbH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Back Pain focused on measuring Severe chronic low back pain, Neuropathic pain, Constipation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent signed.
  • Male or female 18 years of age or older.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at the Enrollment Visit.
  • Women of childbearing potential must practice medically acceptable methods of birth control during the trial.
  • Participant must be appropriately communicative and able to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain, and to complete the questionnaires used in this trial.
  • Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as World Health Organization Step III) as judged by the investigator.
  • Participants who require a washout of co-analgesics at enrolment must have an average pain score (NRS-3) of 5 points or higher. Participants who do not require a washout of co-analgesics at enrollment must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher.
  • The painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire must be either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive). If the participant is being treated with a stable regimen of centrally acting co-analgesics, a "negative" painDETECT score (score 9 points or higher).

Inclusion criteria prior to allocation to treatment:

  • Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher.
  • Participants must score either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive) on the painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a clinically significant disease or clinical laboratory values that in the investigator's opinion may affect effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments.
  • Presence of active systemic or local infections that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments.
  • Employees of the investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the investigator.
  • Participation in another trial concurrently, or within 4 weeks prior to the Enrollment Visit.
  • Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and/or appropriate use of the Investigational Medicinal Products.
  • Any painful procedures (e.g., major surgery) scheduled during the trial duration (Enrollment Visit until Final Evaluation Visit) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety assessments.
  • Pending litigation or application for insurance/governmental benefits due to chronic pain or disability and/or if the granted benefits might be influenced by a successful participation in the trial.
  • Low back pain caused by cancer and/or metastatic diseases.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion thereof in the investigator's judgment.
  • Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
  • Participants with acute intoxication with alcohol, hypnotics, centrally acting analgesics, or psychotropic active substances.
  • Participants with severe renal impairment, i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min (according to the National Kidney Foundation 2002).
  • Known history of clinical laboratory values or current clinical laboratory values reflecting moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
  • History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
  • Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm (including brain metastases if present at the Enrollment Visit). Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 hours) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women.
  • Severe respiratory depression with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, acute or severe bronchial asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  • Presence or suspicion of paralytic ileus.
  • Participants with severe cardiac impairment, e.g., New York Heart Association class >3, myocardial infarction less than 6 months prior to the Enrollment Visit, and/or unstable angina pectoris and/or cor pulmonale.
  • Participant with known history of rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption.
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to tapentadol, oxycodone, naloxone, and their formulations.
  • Participants with acute biliary obstruction or acute pancreatitis.
  • Participants with hypothyroidism (including myxedema) or Addison's disease.
  • Participants taking any prohibited concomitant medication.

Sites / Locations

  • AT001
  • AT002
  • DE005
  • DE007
  • DE021
  • DE009
  • DE030
  • DE020
  • DE023
  • DE028
  • DE012
  • DE032
  • DE017
  • DE003
  • DE011
  • DE031
  • DE013
  • DE001
  • DE027
  • DE014
  • DE029
  • DE008
  • DE004
  • DE034
  • DE018
  • DE015
  • DE006
  • DE002
  • DE010
  • DE025
  • DE019
  • DE016
  • DE024
  • DE026
  • DE022
  • IT003
  • IT001
  • IT002
  • IT004
  • IT005
  • ES006
  • ES007
  • ES001
  • ES003
  • ES008
  • ES002
  • ES010
  • ES009
  • ES004
  • ES005

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR)

Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
For this pain assessment, the participant indicated the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value reported represents the change from the randomization visit (i.e., the last 3 days in the washout period prior to Investigational Medicinal Product initiation and titration) to the end of the continuation period (i.e., up to 9 weeks on the stable dose). The theoretical values range from -10 to 10. A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (Baseline Visit).
Change in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) Total Score
The Constipation Assessment (PAC-SYM) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that assessed the severity of symptoms of constipation. Participants were asked "How severe have each of these symptoms been in the last two weeks?" e.g. "Pain in your stomach". There are 3 subscales: 4 questions on abdominal symptoms, 3 on rectal symptoms and 5 on stool symptoms. Responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absence of symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms). If the changes in the overall or subscale scores are positive then there is a worsening in symptoms associated with constipation. The change in the assessment of constipation symptoms (PAC-SYM) total score from the Randomization Visit to the Final Evaluation Visit. The PAC-SYM overall score is the sum of scores of all non-missing items divided by the number of non-missing items (if at least 6 items were non-missing).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recalled Average Pain Intensity
The recalled average pain intensity score on the NRS-3 was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), on this scale 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. This scale recalls the average pain intensity during the last 3 days. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 3 days (the last 72 hours prior to the visit)".
Change in Recalled Average Pain Intensity at the End of Treatment
The recalled average pain intensity score on the NRS-3 was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), on this scale 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. This scale recorded the average pain intensity recalled by the participant during the previous 3 days. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 3 days (the last 72 hours prior to the visit)". A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (baseline visit).
Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg
Typical dermatomal pain was defined as being pain that radiates beyond the knee towards the foot (sciatica) or pain evoked by stretching of the sciatic nerve. The participant was asked to rate their pain intensity over the past 3 days with regards to this particular pain characteristic. The recalled average pain intensity over the past 3 days for the pain radiating towards or into the leg was assessed by the participant using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Change of Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg at the End of Treatment
Typical dermatomal pain was defined as being pain that radiates beyond the knee towards the foot (sciatica) or pain evoked by stretching of the sciatic nerve. Therefore, the participant was asked to rate their pain intensity over the past 3 days with regards to this particular pain characteristic. The recalled average pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. A negative sign indicates that there was a decrease in the average pain radiating towards or into the leg.
Worst Pain Intensity Over the Past 24 Hours
The recalled worst pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your worst pain during the last 24 hours prior to the visit"
Change in Worst Pain Intensity Over the Past 24 Hours at the End of Treatment
The recalled worst pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your worst pain during the last 24 hours prior to the visit". A negative change indicates that the pain intensity decreased from the start of the trial.
painDETECT Final Assessment
The painDETECT was a participant completed questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions in four domains. Based on these questions a final assessment score was calculated. The minimum score ranged from zero to a maximum of 38. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 were scored as being "negative" (had no neuropathic pain component). A value between 19 and 38 was rated as being "positive" (neuropathic component present). Values from 13 to 18 were scored as being "unclear". The theoretical range of change in this trial ranged from -38 to 15. A negative change indicated a decrease in their neuropathic component of pain.
Change in painDETECT Final Assessment at the End of Treatment
The painDETECT was a participant completed questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions in four domains. Based on these questions a final assessment score was calculated. The minimum score ranged from zero to a maximum of 38. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 were scored as being "negative" (had no neuropathic pain component). A value between 19 and 38 was rated as being "positive" (neuropathic component present). Values from 13 to 18 were scored as being "unclear". The theoretical range of change in this trial ranged from -38 to 15. A negative change indicated a decrease in their neuropathic component of pain.
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Sub-scores and Overall Score Assessment
In the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) the participant rated their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions were answered on an 11-point scale; from 0 (symptom not present) to 10 (symptom at its worst imaginable intensity, e.g. worst burning imaginable). The overall NPSI score was calculated by the summation of all ten responses and ranges between 0 and 1. For pain descriptions burning, pressing, paroxysmal (pain like electric shocks or stabbing), evoked (due to touch) and paresthesia (sensation that is not unpleasant) or dysesthesia (unpleasant) sub-scores are reported. The overall values reported for all participants that completed the questionnaire are shown. A symptom was absent if the value is 0, the symptom was present in all participants and all participants rated it at its worst possible intensity if a value is 1.
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Sub-scores and Overall Score Assessment at the End of Treatment
In the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) the participant rated their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions were answered on an 11-point scale, from 0 (symptom not present) to 10 (symptom at its worst imaginable intensity, e.g. worst burning imaginable). The overall NPSI score was calculated by the summation of all ten responses and ranges between 0 and 1. For pain descriptions burning, pressing, paroxysmal (pain like electric shocks or stabbing), evoked (due to touch) and paresthesia (sensation that is not unpleasant) or dysesthesia (unpleasant) sub-scores are reported. The overall values reported for all participants that completed the questionnaire are shown. A symptom was absent if the value is 0, the symptom was present in all participants and all participants rated it at its worst possible intensity if a value is 1. A negative change indicates that the intensity of the symptom has decreased since the start of treatment.
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) has several brief broad questions on 8 aspects of health (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. The physical and mental summary scores were calculated from the individual responses. A higher score indicates a better participant perceived state of health. All domains were scored on a scale from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health), with 100 representing the best possible health state.
Changes in the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at the End of Treatment
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) has several brief broad questions on 8 aspects of health (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. The physical and mental summary scores were calculated from the individual responses. A higher score indicates a better participant perceived state of health. All domains were scored on a scale from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. The change in the SF-12 score shows an improvement in health from baseline if the values are positive. The higher the value the greater the improvement since starting the trial.
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome
The participant scored the EuroQol-5 questionnaire. The EuroQol-5 questionnaire uses a health state classification with 5 dimensions. Each dimension was assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1 (with 1 indicating "full health" and 0 representing "dead"). The higher the values (the closer the value is to 1) the better the health status in a treatment group.
Change in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome at the End of Treatment
The participant scored the EuroQol-5 questionnaire. The EuroQol-5 questionnaire uses a health state classification with 5 dimensions. Each dimension was assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1 (with 1 indicating "full health" and 0 representing "dead"). The higher the values (the closer the value is to 1) the better the health status in a treatment group.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Anxiety
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate anxiety. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of anxiety. A decrease in values over the trial period indicate that there has been an improvement.
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the End of Treatment: Anxiety
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate anxiety. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of anxiety. A negative sign indicates that there has been a decrease in anxiety since the start of treatment.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Depression
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate depression. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of depression. A decrease in values over time indicates that there has been an improvement.
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the End of Treatment: Depression
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate depression. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of depression. A decrease in values over time indicates that there has been an improvement. A negative change value indicates a decrease in the depression score since the start of treatment.
Patient Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicated the perceived change over the treatment period. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Clinician Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
In the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicated the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician was requested to choose one of seven categories for each participant. The Clinician rated the participants change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Overall Quality of Sleep
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The questionnaire measures 4 main concepts: 1 of the 4 main concepts being the overall quality of sleep. The participant rated this categorically as being one of the following: excellent, good, fair or poor. The improvement, no change or worsening is reported based on the replies scored by the participants given at their End of Continuation Visit.
Sleep Evaluation: Number of Awakenings
The participants were requested to answer the following question: How many times did you wake up during the night? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported for the night prior to their Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the End of the Continuation Visit (12 weeks after randomization).
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Number of Awakenings
The participants were requested to answer the question: How many times did you wake up during the night? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported. The change from baseline in the number of times of waking up during the night in a treatment group is reported. A negative symbol indicates that there was a reduction in the number of awakenings.
Sleep Evaluation: Number of Hours Slept
The participants were requested to answer the following question: How long did you sleep last night [hours]? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported for the night prior to their Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the End of the Continuation Visit (12 weeks after randomization).
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Number of Hours Slept
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The answer was in response to the question: Sleep evaluation: How long did you sleep last night [hours]? The value reported is the change in the number of hours of sleep from baseline. The positive value indicates that there was an increase in the number of hours of sleep in a treatment group.
Sleep Evaluation: Latency (Time Taken to Fall Asleep)
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The participant was asked: How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night [hours]? The values are for the night prior to the Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the Final Evaluation Visit (12 weeks after randomization). The higher the value the longer it took to fall asleep.
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in Latency (Change in the Time Taken to Fall Asleep)
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The participant was asked: How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night [hours]? The values are for the night prior to the visits. The negative change from baseline indicates that the time to falling asleep decreased from baseline in a treatment group.
Comparison of the Number of Participants Affected by Gastrointestinal Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Typical for Opioids
In this outcome measure the number of participants affected by early gastrointestinal-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). As the trial population was opioid-naïve this was considered of interest. The composition score from participant who reported: Mild, moderate to severe nausea and/or Mild, moderate to severe vomiting and/or Mild, moderate to severe constipation was evaluated.
Composite Event Based Comparison of Gastrointestinal Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Typical for Opioids
In this outcome measure the early gastrointestinal-related treatment emergent events (TEAEs) were evaluated. As the trial population was opioid-naïve this was considered of interest. The composition score of reported events of Mild, moderate to severe nausea and/or Mild, moderate to severe vomiting and/or Mild, moderate to severe constipation was evaluated.

Full Information

First Posted
April 19, 2013
Last Updated
January 25, 2016
Sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01838616
Brief Title
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component.
Official Title
Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol PR Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone PR in Non-opioid Pre-treated Subjects With Uncontrolled Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Pain Component.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Grünenthal GmbH

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This was a clinical effectiveness trial designed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of treatment with tapentadol prolonged release with that of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged release in non-opioid pre-treated subjects with severe chronic low back pain with a neuropathic pain component. Both tapentadol and the opioid oxycodone are effective in chronic severe pain and tapentadol and oxycodone/naloxone have shown advantages in gastrointestinal tolerability versus oxycodone. Therefore, it was of high scientific interest to compare the latter 2 analgesics with respect to gastrointestinal tolerability. Tapentadol may have advantages regarding the neuropathic pain-related symptoms of low back pain due to its 2 mechanisms of action.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Back Pain, Low Back Pain, Neuropathic Pain
Keywords
Severe chronic low back pain, Neuropathic pain, Constipation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
367 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
Other Intervention Name(s)
Nucynta, Palexia
Intervention Description
All participants started with 50 mg tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (twice daily). The dose of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release will be adjusted in increments of 50 mg to a level that provided adequate analgesia. Titration will be after a minimum of 3 days on a dose. Participants are permitted a maximum dose of 250 mg twice a day (500 mg total daily dose). After titration participants will remain on the stable dose for 9 weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release
Other Intervention Name(s)
Targin
Intervention Description
All participants start with 10 mg/5 mg oxycodone/naloxone (twice daily). The dose of oxycodone/naloxone may be adjusted in increments of 10mg/ 5 mg oxycodone/naloxone to a level that provide adequate analgesia. Titration will be after a minimum of 3 days on a dose. Participants will be permitted a maximum dose of 50 mg/ 20 mg oxycodone/naloxone twice daily a day (100 mg/40 mg total daily dose). After titration participants will remain on the stable dose for 9 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
Description
For this pain assessment, the participant indicated the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value reported represents the change from the randomization visit (i.e., the last 3 days in the washout period prior to Investigational Medicinal Product initiation and titration) to the end of the continuation period (i.e., up to 9 weeks on the stable dose). The theoretical values range from -10 to 10. A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (Baseline Visit).
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) Total Score
Description
The Constipation Assessment (PAC-SYM) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that assessed the severity of symptoms of constipation. Participants were asked "How severe have each of these symptoms been in the last two weeks?" e.g. "Pain in your stomach". There are 3 subscales: 4 questions on abdominal symptoms, 3 on rectal symptoms and 5 on stool symptoms. Responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absence of symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms). If the changes in the overall or subscale scores are positive then there is a worsening in symptoms associated with constipation. The change in the assessment of constipation symptoms (PAC-SYM) total score from the Randomization Visit to the Final Evaluation Visit. The PAC-SYM overall score is the sum of scores of all non-missing items divided by the number of non-missing items (if at least 6 items were non-missing).
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recalled Average Pain Intensity
Description
The recalled average pain intensity score on the NRS-3 was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), on this scale 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. This scale recalls the average pain intensity during the last 3 days. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 3 days (the last 72 hours prior to the visit)".
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in Recalled Average Pain Intensity at the End of Treatment
Description
The recalled average pain intensity score on the NRS-3 was assessed using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), on this scale 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates pain as bad as you can imagine. This scale recorded the average pain intensity recalled by the participant during the previous 3 days. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your pain on average during the last 3 days (the last 72 hours prior to the visit)". A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (baseline visit).
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg
Description
Typical dermatomal pain was defined as being pain that radiates beyond the knee towards the foot (sciatica) or pain evoked by stretching of the sciatic nerve. The participant was asked to rate their pain intensity over the past 3 days with regards to this particular pain characteristic. The recalled average pain intensity over the past 3 days for the pain radiating towards or into the leg was assessed by the participant using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change of Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg at the End of Treatment
Description
Typical dermatomal pain was defined as being pain that radiates beyond the knee towards the foot (sciatica) or pain evoked by stretching of the sciatic nerve. Therefore, the participant was asked to rate their pain intensity over the past 3 days with regards to this particular pain characteristic. The recalled average pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. A negative sign indicates that there was a decrease in the average pain radiating towards or into the leg.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Worst Pain Intensity Over the Past 24 Hours
Description
The recalled worst pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your worst pain during the last 24 hours prior to the visit"
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in Worst Pain Intensity Over the Past 24 Hours at the End of Treatment
Description
The recalled worst pain intensity during the last 24 hours was assessed using an 11-point Numeric rating scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. The participant was asked: "Please rate your pain intensity by assessing the one number that best describes your worst pain during the last 24 hours prior to the visit". A negative change indicates that the pain intensity decreased from the start of the trial.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
painDETECT Final Assessment
Description
The painDETECT was a participant completed questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions in four domains. Based on these questions a final assessment score was calculated. The minimum score ranged from zero to a maximum of 38. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 were scored as being "negative" (had no neuropathic pain component). A value between 19 and 38 was rated as being "positive" (neuropathic component present). Values from 13 to 18 were scored as being "unclear". The theoretical range of change in this trial ranged from -38 to 15. A negative change indicated a decrease in their neuropathic component of pain.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in painDETECT Final Assessment at the End of Treatment
Description
The painDETECT was a participant completed questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 14 questions in four domains. Based on these questions a final assessment score was calculated. The minimum score ranged from zero to a maximum of 38. Participants with a score between 0 and 12 were scored as being "negative" (had no neuropathic pain component). A value between 19 and 38 was rated as being "positive" (neuropathic component present). Values from 13 to 18 were scored as being "unclear". The theoretical range of change in this trial ranged from -38 to 15. A negative change indicated a decrease in their neuropathic component of pain.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Sub-scores and Overall Score Assessment
Description
In the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) the participant rated their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions were answered on an 11-point scale; from 0 (symptom not present) to 10 (symptom at its worst imaginable intensity, e.g. worst burning imaginable). The overall NPSI score was calculated by the summation of all ten responses and ranges between 0 and 1. For pain descriptions burning, pressing, paroxysmal (pain like electric shocks or stabbing), evoked (due to touch) and paresthesia (sensation that is not unpleasant) or dysesthesia (unpleasant) sub-scores are reported. The overall values reported for all participants that completed the questionnaire are shown. A symptom was absent if the value is 0, the symptom was present in all participants and all participants rated it at its worst possible intensity if a value is 1.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Sub-scores and Overall Score Assessment at the End of Treatment
Description
In the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) the participant rated their symptoms of neuropathic pain. Ten pain questions were answered on an 11-point scale, from 0 (symptom not present) to 10 (symptom at its worst imaginable intensity, e.g. worst burning imaginable). The overall NPSI score was calculated by the summation of all ten responses and ranges between 0 and 1. For pain descriptions burning, pressing, paroxysmal (pain like electric shocks or stabbing), evoked (due to touch) and paresthesia (sensation that is not unpleasant) or dysesthesia (unpleasant) sub-scores are reported. The overall values reported for all participants that completed the questionnaire are shown. A symptom was absent if the value is 0, the symptom was present in all participants and all participants rated it at its worst possible intensity if a value is 1. A negative change indicates that the intensity of the symptom has decreased since the start of treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)
Description
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) has several brief broad questions on 8 aspects of health (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. The physical and mental summary scores were calculated from the individual responses. A higher score indicates a better participant perceived state of health. All domains were scored on a scale from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health), with 100 representing the best possible health state.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Changes in the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) at the End of Treatment
Description
The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) has several brief broad questions on 8 aspects of health (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health) that a participant was asked to score over the last week. The physical and mental summary scores were calculated from the individual responses. A higher score indicates a better participant perceived state of health. All domains were scored on a scale from 0 (lowest level of health) to 100 (highest level of health), with 100 representing the best possible health state. The change in the SF-12 score shows an improvement in health from baseline if the values are positive. The higher the value the greater the improvement since starting the trial.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome
Description
The participant scored the EuroQol-5 questionnaire. The EuroQol-5 questionnaire uses a health state classification with 5 dimensions. Each dimension was assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1 (with 1 indicating "full health" and 0 representing "dead"). The higher the values (the closer the value is to 1) the better the health status in a treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index Outcome at the End of Treatment
Description
The participant scored the EuroQol-5 questionnaire. The EuroQol-5 questionnaire uses a health state classification with 5 dimensions. Each dimension was assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1 (with 1 indicating "full health" and 0 representing "dead"). The higher the values (the closer the value is to 1) the better the health status in a treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Anxiety
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate anxiety. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of anxiety. A decrease in values over the trial period indicate that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the End of Treatment: Anxiety
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe anxiety. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate anxiety. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of anxiety. A negative sign indicates that there has been a decrease in anxiety since the start of treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: Depression
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate depression. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of depression. A decrease in values over time indicates that there has been an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at the End of Treatment: Depression
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment scale for the symptom severity of anxiety disorders and depression. It comprises 14 items. Seven statements describe depression. Each answer is scored on a four-point scale (0-3). All seven answers are summed to a total score with a maximum score of 21 points. A score below 7 is not considered to indicate depression. A score of 11 or above is considered to be a case of depression. A decrease in values over time indicates that there has been an improvement. A negative change value indicates a decrease in the depression score since the start of treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Patient Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
Description
In the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) the participant indicated the perceived change over the treatment period. PGIC is a 7 point scale depicting a patient's rating of overall improvement. Patients rate their change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Clinician Global Impression of Change at the End of Treatment
Description
In the Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC) the clinician indicated the perceived change over the treatment period. The clinician was requested to choose one of seven categories for each participant. The Clinician rated the participants change as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "no change," "minimally worse," "much worse," or "very much worse."
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Overall Quality of Sleep
Description
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The questionnaire measures 4 main concepts: 1 of the 4 main concepts being the overall quality of sleep. The participant rated this categorically as being one of the following: excellent, good, fair or poor. The improvement, no change or worsening is reported based on the replies scored by the participants given at their End of Continuation Visit.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation: Number of Awakenings
Description
The participants were requested to answer the following question: How many times did you wake up during the night? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported for the night prior to their Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the End of the Continuation Visit (12 weeks after randomization).
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Number of Awakenings
Description
The participants were requested to answer the question: How many times did you wake up during the night? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported. The change from baseline in the number of times of waking up during the night in a treatment group is reported. A negative symbol indicates that there was a reduction in the number of awakenings.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation: Number of Hours Slept
Description
The participants were requested to answer the following question: How long did you sleep last night [hours]? The values were calculated from the data that participants self-reported for the night prior to their Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the End of the Continuation Visit (12 weeks after randomization).
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in the Number of Hours Slept
Description
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The answer was in response to the question: Sleep evaluation: How long did you sleep last night [hours]? The value reported is the change in the number of hours of sleep from baseline. The positive value indicates that there was an increase in the number of hours of sleep in a treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation: Latency (Time Taken to Fall Asleep)
Description
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The participant was asked: How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night [hours]? The values are for the night prior to the Randomization Visit (Baseline) and for the night prior to the Final Evaluation Visit (12 weeks after randomization). The higher the value the longer it took to fall asleep.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Title
Sleep Evaluation at the End of Treatment: Change in Latency (Change in the Time Taken to Fall Asleep)
Description
The sleep evaluation questionnaire was completed by the participant. The participant was asked: How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night [hours]? The values are for the night prior to the visits. The negative change from baseline indicates that the time to falling asleep decreased from baseline in a treatment group.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Visit (Week 12)
Title
Comparison of the Number of Participants Affected by Gastrointestinal Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Typical for Opioids
Description
In this outcome measure the number of participants affected by early gastrointestinal-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). As the trial population was opioid-naïve this was considered of interest. The composition score from participant who reported: Mild, moderate to severe nausea and/or Mild, moderate to severe vomiting and/or Mild, moderate to severe constipation was evaluated.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit) to End of Titration Period (End of Week 3)
Title
Composite Event Based Comparison of Gastrointestinal Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Typical for Opioids
Description
In this outcome measure the early gastrointestinal-related treatment emergent events (TEAEs) were evaluated. As the trial population was opioid-naïve this was considered of interest. The composition score of reported events of Mild, moderate to severe nausea and/or Mild, moderate to severe vomiting and/or Mild, moderate to severe constipation was evaluated.
Time Frame
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Week 3 (End of Titration Period)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Informed consent signed. Male or female 18 years of age or older. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at the Enrollment Visit. Women of childbearing potential must practice medically acceptable methods of birth control during the trial. Participant must be appropriately communicative and able to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain, and to complete the questionnaires used in this trial. Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months prior to enrollment. Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as World Health Organization Step III) as judged by the investigator. Participants who require a washout of co-analgesics at enrolment must have an average pain score (NRS-3) of 5 points or higher. Participants who do not require a washout of co-analgesics at enrollment must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher. The painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire must be either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive). If the participant is being treated with a stable regimen of centrally acting co-analgesics, a "negative" painDETECT score (score 9 points or higher). Inclusion criteria prior to allocation to treatment: Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher. Participants must score either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive) on the painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of a clinically significant disease or clinical laboratory values that in the investigator's opinion may affect effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments. Presence of active systemic or local infections that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments. Employees of the investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the investigator. Participation in another trial concurrently, or within 4 weeks prior to the Enrollment Visit. Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and/or appropriate use of the Investigational Medicinal Products. Any painful procedures (e.g., major surgery) scheduled during the trial duration (Enrollment Visit until Final Evaluation Visit) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety assessments. Pending litigation or application for insurance/governmental benefits due to chronic pain or disability and/or if the granted benefits might be influenced by a successful participation in the trial. Low back pain caused by cancer and/or metastatic diseases. History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion thereof in the investigator's judgment. Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions. Participants with acute intoxication with alcohol, hypnotics, centrally acting analgesics, or psychotropic active substances. Participants with severe renal impairment, i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min (according to the National Kidney Foundation 2002). Known history of clinical laboratory values or current clinical laboratory values reflecting moderately or severely impaired hepatic function. History of seizure disorder or epilepsy. Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm (including brain metastases if present at the Enrollment Visit). Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 hours) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. Severe respiratory depression with hypoxia and/or hypercapnia, acute or severe bronchial asthma or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Presence or suspicion of paralytic ileus. Participants with severe cardiac impairment, e.g., New York Heart Association class >3, myocardial infarction less than 6 months prior to the Enrollment Visit, and/or unstable angina pectoris and/or cor pulmonale. Participant with known history of rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption. History of allergy or hypersensitivity to tapentadol, oxycodone, naloxone, and their formulations. Participants with acute biliary obstruction or acute pancreatitis. Participants with hypothyroidism (including myxedema) or Addison's disease. Participants taking any prohibited concomitant medication.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Director Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Grünenthal GmbH
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AT001
City
Senftenberg
ZIP/Postal Code
3541
Country
Austria
Facility Name
AT002
City
Vienna
ZIP/Postal Code
1100
Country
Austria
Facility Name
DE005
City
Bad Saarow
ZIP/Postal Code
15526
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE007
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10435
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE021
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10787
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE009
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12627
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE030
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13125
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE020
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44787
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE023
City
Böhlen
ZIP/Postal Code
04564
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE028
City
Cottbus
ZIP/Postal Code
03050
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE012
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01067
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE032
City
Essen
ZIP/Postal Code
45355
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE017
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60313
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE003
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60596
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE011
City
Görlitz
ZIP/Postal Code
02826
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE031
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20253
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE013
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30159
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE001
City
Kiel
ZIP/Postal Code
24105
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE027
City
Kiel
ZIP/Postal Code
24106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE014
City
Kiel
ZIP/Postal Code
24119
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE029
City
Köln
ZIP/Postal Code
50924
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE008
City
Köln
ZIP/Postal Code
51069
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE004
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE034
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04107
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE018
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04109
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE015
City
Magdeburg
ZIP/Postal Code
39104
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE006
City
Mainz
ZIP/Postal Code
55116
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE002
City
Mittweida
ZIP/Postal Code
09648
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE010
City
Rudolstadt
ZIP/Postal Code
07407
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE025
City
Schwerin
ZIP/Postal Code
19055
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE019
City
Stadtroda
ZIP/Postal Code
07646
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE016
City
Weinheim
ZIP/Postal Code
69469
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE024
City
Westerstede
ZIP/Postal Code
26655
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE026
City
Wiesbaden
ZIP/Postal Code
65185
Country
Germany
Facility Name
DE022
City
Wiesbaden
ZIP/Postal Code
65187
Country
Germany
Facility Name
IT003
City
Catania
ZIP/Postal Code
95125
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IT001
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IT002
City
Parma
ZIP/Postal Code
43126
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IT004
City
Pavia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
IT005
City
Varese
ZIP/Postal Code
21046
Country
Italy
Facility Name
ES006
City
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES007
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES001
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08916
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES003
City
Centelles
ZIP/Postal Code
08540
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES008
City
Guadix
ZIP/Postal Code
18500
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES002
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES010
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28050
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES009
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28850
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES004
City
Oviedo
ZIP/Postal Code
33009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ES005
City
Santiago de Compostela
ZIP/Postal Code
15705
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26095455
Citation
Baron R, Likar R, Martin-Mola E, Blanco FJ, Kennes L, Muller M, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness of Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Compared with Oxycodone/Naloxone PR for the Management of Severe Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 3b/4 Study. Pain Pract. 2016 Jun;16(5):580-99. doi: 10.1111/papr.12308. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs