search
Back to results

TARGET-LOAD Pilot Study Comparing Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading vs. Standard of Care

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CardioMEMS
Sponsored by
STAVROS G DRAKOS
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe clinical HF resistant to intensive medical therapy and requiring LVAD implantation
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <=25% and cardiomegaly at time of LVAD implantation
  • Non-ischemic etiology of HF
  • Undergone LVAD implantation within prior 4 weeks or planned for LVAD implant
  • History of HF < 5 years
  • Body Mass Index <=35 kg/m^2
  • Pulmonary artery branch diameter between 7 - 15 mm
  • Female subjects of childbearing age with negative urine or serum pregnancy test and agreeing to use reliable mechanical or hormonal form of contraception during study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Evidence of active acute myocarditis confirmed by histology
  • History of previous cerebrovascular accident resulting in significant fixed motor deficit, limiting ability to perform exercise testing
  • Implanted mechanical aortic and/or mitral valve(s) and/or right heart valve(s)
  • Aortic valve closure
  • Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or sarcoidosis
  • Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter below normal (restrictive cardiomyopathy)
  • Irreversible multi-organ failure
  • Diagnosis of psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or poor psycho-social issues likely to impair compliance with study protocol
  • Any condition that could limit survival to less than 2 years
  • History of cardiac or other organ transplant
  • Contraindicated to anti-coagulation, antiplatelet therapy, or diagnosis of coagulation disorders
  • Require acute or chronic renal replacement therapy within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Participation in any other clinical investigations involving another Mechanical Circulating Support device or HF-related drug
  • Active infection
  • History of recurrent (>1) pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis
  • Unable to tolerate right heart catheterization
  • Implantation of cardiac re-synchronization therapy < 3 months before enrollment
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin and/or clopidogrel

Sites / Locations

  • University of Kentucky
  • Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

Control

Intervention

Arm Description

After LVAD implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using echocardiographic imaging and other standard-of-care practices. During the Unloading phase, patients are serially evaluated with echocardiograms to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation performed when predefined criteria are met. After explantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up.

After LVAD and wireless monitoring system (CardioMEMS) implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using CardioMEMS. During the Unloading phase, invasive hemodynamic guidance (via CardioMEMS) will be utilized to optimize pressure and volume unloading along with serial echocardiographic evaluations to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation will be considered. After explantation, patients will undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up with adjustments of HF medications based on the CardioMEMS-guided hemodynamic assessment.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Proportion of subjects that meet explantation criteria by month 12 post-LVAD implantation, have LVAD explanted and retain left ventricular ejection fraction >=45% at 12 months post-LVAD weaning
Removal of LVAD happens when subject meets all five of the following explantation criteria: (1) left ventricular end-diastolic diameter < 60mm; (2) left ventricular end-systolic diameter < 50mm; (3) left ventricular ejection fraction > 45%; (4) left ventricular end-diastolic pressure <= 15 mmHg; (5) resting cardiac index > 2.4 L/min/m^2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Hospital Admissions
Proportion of subjects admitted to the hospital for HF exacerbations at any time point during the study
Six-minute Walk Test
Subject performance during six-minute walk test at 12 months after LVAD implantation

Full Information

First Posted
July 15, 2021
Last Updated
August 28, 2023
Sponsor
STAVROS G DRAKOS
Collaborators
Abbott
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04977310
Brief Title
TARGET-LOAD Pilot Study Comparing Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading vs. Standard of Care
Official Title
Prospective, Randomized-controlled, Non-blinded, Multi-center, Pilot Trial to Compare Standard-of-care LVAD Unloading Plus Heart Failure Medications Reverse-modeling Management Versus Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading With the Use of the Wireless Monitoring System CardioMEMS Plus Heart Failure Medications Reverse-remodeling Management
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
January 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 1, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
STAVROS G DRAKOS
Collaborators
Abbott

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study is a prospective, randomized-controlled, non-blinded, multi-center, pilot trial to compare standard-of-care left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading plus heart failure (HF) medications reverse-remodeling management versus hemodynamics-guided LVAD unloading with use of the wireless monitoring system CardioMEMS plus HF medications reverse-remodeling management.
Detailed Description
LVADs are being increasingly used in end-stage heart failure patients as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as a destination therapy (DT). Although LVAD recipients are considered to be optimally unloaded with speed optimizations following LVAD implantation, re-hospitalizations due to HF recurrence are far from negligible. Recent studies have reported that at least 35% of hospital readmissions post-LVAD implantation are due to HF exacerbations, volume status changes or other cardiac causes (arrhythmias etc.). This suggests that patients are being sub-optimally unloaded and/or taking inadequate medical therapy and probably this decreases the chances for potential reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that cardiac dimensions obtained from echocardiography do not adequately reflect the degree of mechanical unloading of the heart. It has also shown strong evidence that pulmonary artery (PA) pressures monitoring can be reliably used to assess the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP). Symptomatic heart failure exacerbation requiring hospital admission may lie at the end of a spectrum of worsening hemodynamics that are unable to be detected before the manifestation of symptoms and limits the potential for myocardial recovery. Therefore, it is proposed that repeatedly adjusting LVAD pump flow speed and tailoring standard HF medications depending on the patient's PA pressure acquired from the CardioMEMS device can optimize pressure and volume unloading and promote reverse cardiac remodeling and recovery. Clinical experience with LVAD support has shown that a subset of LVAD patients can experience reverse cardiac remodeling and significant improvement of myocardial function suggesting that LVAD-induced mechanical unloading of the failing heart may be a plausible therapeutic strategy aiming at myocardial recovery and device removal. These explanted patients have shown "myocardial plasticity" in clinical studies and that they can be responsive and sensitive to load changes. These patients will be carefully monitored to prevent increased load and wall stress to drive again the detrimental spiral of cardiac remodeling and HF recurrence, which appears to be the case in at least one third of LVAD patients after device weaning. Along the same lines, the results from another clinical study showed a significant and large reduction in hospitalization for HF patients who were managed with CardioMEMS. Therefore, further improvement of patients' HF management will depend mainly on better identification and pro-active management of their fluid and hemodynamic status. It is proposed that chronically adjusting HF medications using CardioMEMS-guided hemodynamic assessment in patients who have weaned from LVAD support could improve long-term durability of cardiac improvement after LVAD weaning.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
10 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
After LVAD implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using echocardiographic imaging and other standard-of-care practices. During the Unloading phase, patients are serially evaluated with echocardiograms to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation performed when predefined criteria are met. After explantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up.
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
After LVAD and wireless monitoring system (CardioMEMS) implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using CardioMEMS. During the Unloading phase, invasive hemodynamic guidance (via CardioMEMS) will be utilized to optimize pressure and volume unloading along with serial echocardiographic evaluations to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation will be considered. After explantation, patients will undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up with adjustments of HF medications based on the CardioMEMS-guided hemodynamic assessment.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CardioMEMS
Intervention Description
Cardio-MEMS-guided Post-LVAD cardiac unloading and recovery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of subjects that meet explantation criteria by month 12 post-LVAD implantation, have LVAD explanted and retain left ventricular ejection fraction >=45% at 12 months post-LVAD weaning
Description
Removal of LVAD happens when subject meets all five of the following explantation criteria: (1) left ventricular end-diastolic diameter < 60mm; (2) left ventricular end-systolic diameter < 50mm; (3) left ventricular ejection fraction > 45%; (4) left ventricular end-diastolic pressure <= 15 mmHg; (5) resting cardiac index > 2.4 L/min/m^2
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hospital Admissions
Description
Proportion of subjects admitted to the hospital for HF exacerbations at any time point during the study
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Six-minute Walk Test
Description
Subject performance during six-minute walk test at 12 months after LVAD implantation
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Severe clinical HF resistant to intensive medical therapy and requiring LVAD implantation Left ventricular ejection fraction <=25% and cardiomegaly at time of LVAD implantation Non-ischemic etiology of HF Undergone LVAD implantation within prior 4 weeks or planned for LVAD implant History of HF < 5 years Body Mass Index <=35 kg/m^2 Pulmonary artery branch diameter between 7 - 15 mm Female subjects of childbearing age with negative urine or serum pregnancy test and agreeing to use reliable mechanical or hormonal form of contraception during study Exclusion Criteria: Evidence of active acute myocarditis confirmed by histology History of previous cerebrovascular accident resulting in significant fixed motor deficit, limiting ability to perform exercise testing Implanted mechanical aortic and/or mitral valve(s) and/or right heart valve(s) Aortic valve closure Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or sarcoidosis Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter below normal (restrictive cardiomyopathy) Irreversible multi-organ failure Diagnosis of psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or poor psycho-social issues likely to impair compliance with study protocol Any condition that could limit survival to less than 2 years History of cardiac or other organ transplant Contraindicated to anti-coagulation, antiplatelet therapy, or diagnosis of coagulation disorders Require acute or chronic renal replacement therapy within 3 months prior to enrollment Participation in any other clinical investigations involving another Mechanical Circulating Support device or HF-related drug Active infection History of recurrent (>1) pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis Unable to tolerate right heart catheterization Implantation of cardiac re-synchronization therapy < 3 months before enrollment Congenital heart disease Hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
John Kirk
Phone
801-585-2944
Email
john.kirk@hsc.utah.edu
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stavros Drakos, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
University of Utah
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Kentucky
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40536
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Isaacs, MS
Phone
859-323-4738
Email
jennifer.isaacs@uky.edu
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emma Birks, M.D.
Facility Name
Inova Heart and Vascular Institute
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bhruga Shah, RN
Phone
703-776-3697
Email
Bhruga.Shah@inova.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Palak Shah, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

TARGET-LOAD Pilot Study Comparing Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading vs. Standard of Care

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs