search
Back to results

Targeting Cognition in Bipolar Disorder With Pramipexole (PRAM-BD)

Primary Purpose

Bipolar Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pramipexole
Placebo
Sponsored by
Brigham and Women's Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Bipolar Disorder focused on measuring Bipolar Disorder, Cognition

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age 18-65
  • DSM-IV BD I or II diagnosis
  • Affective stability, defined by a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) rating of < 8 and a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD) rating of < 16 at screening and baseline. We will further require that any subsyndromal depression has not significantly worsened in the 4 weeks prior to randomization so as to avoid enrolling subjects who are on the verge of a full depressive episode.
  • Evidence of clinically-significant neurocognitive impairment at screening
  • Clinically-acceptable, stably-dosed, mood stabilizing medication regimen for > 1 month prior to enrollment, with no medication changes planned over the 12-week study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of CNS trauma, neurological disorder, ADHD, or learning disability
  • Positive urine toxicology or DSM-IV diagnosis of substance abuse/dependence within 3 months
  • Active, unstable medical problem that may interfere with cognition
  • Recent history of rapid-cycling
  • Abnormal lab or ECG result at screen
  • History of heart failure
  • Significant suicidal risk (HRSD item 3 > 2 or by clinical judgment)
  • Estimated IQ in MR range as per Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) standard score of less than 70
  • Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (including oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy)
  • Women who are breastfeeding
  • Participation in any other investigational cognitive enhancement study within 30 days

Sites / Locations

  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • The Zucker Hillside Hospital
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Pramipexole

Placebo

Arm Description

Pramipexole, by mouth. Dosing will be initiated at 0.25 mg on night one, followed by 0.25 mg twice-a-day day two onward, and increased every week to a target of 4.5 mg/day for the 12-week duration of the study.

Placebo, by mouth. Dosing will be initiated at 0.25 mg on night one, followed by 0.25 mg twice-a-day day two onward, and increased every week to a target of 4.5 mg/day for the 12-week duration of the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Mean change of symptoms of mania throughout the study. YMRS contains 7 items rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptom) and 4 items scored 0 (symptom absent) to 8 (severe symptom), with total range from 0 to 60, where higher score indicates manic symptoms.
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)
Mean change of symptoms of depression throughout the study. HRSD consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where higher score indicates more depressive symptoms.
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Mean change for positive symptoms throughout the study. BPRS consists of 18 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (not observed) to 7 (very severe), with a total score range from 18-126, where higher scores indicate psychiatric symptoms.
Number of Participants With Suicidal Acknowledgements
Number of individual participants who acknowledged at least one item on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) over the 12-week study period. Examples of items on the scale are suicidal ideation (having thoughts, planning) and suicidal behavior (preparing, attempting).
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.

Full Information

First Posted
March 19, 2015
Last Updated
February 14, 2020
Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02397837
Brief Title
Targeting Cognition in Bipolar Disorder With Pramipexole
Acronym
PRAM-BD
Official Title
Pramipexole in Bipolar Disorder: Targeting Cognition (PRAM-BD)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 26, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 26, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Collaborators
The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Converging evidence suggests that patients with bipolar disorder suffer from deficits in neurocognitive functioning that persist, despite remission of acute affective symptoms. These impairments contribute directly to functional disability, highlighting the need for interventions above and beyond standard treatments in order to achieve a full inter-episode recovery. The current study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of a dopamine agonist (pramipexole), on these persistent cognitive abnormalities in euthymic bipolar patients using a placebo-controlled, adjunctive, 12-week trial design.
Detailed Description
All eligible participants will undergo study visits at screening, baseline (week 0), week 1, week 2, week 3, week 4, week 6, week 8, and week 12, (end of study). Randomization will be conducted via a computer generated program and all study staff will be blinded unless un-blinding is required for safety reasons. Subjects will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio with stratification for concomitant antipsychotic status and depression at baseline (HRSD <8 vs > 8). Study drug will be blinded and matched to placebo. Adapting from our previous work in BD and according to package labeling, the dosage titration schedule will be slow and flexible. Dosing will be initiated at 0.25 mg QHS on night one, followed by 0.25 mg BID day two onward, and increased every week to a target of 4.5 mg/day. As compared with our previous maximum 1.5 mg/day (Burdick et al. 2012), we opted to allow up to 4.5 mg/day (the maximum approved dosage in Parkinson's disease) to ensure adequate target engagement. We are familiar with this dose range, as 4.5 mg/day was allowed in our study in BD depression (Goldberg et al. 2004). Dosing will be flexible based on side effects; however, if 1.5 mg/day cannot be tolerated, the subject will be discontinued. Titration will occur up to week 6 and then efforts will be made to maintain the same dose until the completion of the trial (week 12).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Bipolar Disorder
Keywords
Bipolar Disorder, Cognition

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
103 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pramipexole
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Pramipexole, by mouth. Dosing will be initiated at 0.25 mg on night one, followed by 0.25 mg twice-a-day day two onward, and increased every week to a target of 4.5 mg/day for the 12-week duration of the study.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo, by mouth. Dosing will be initiated at 0.25 mg on night one, followed by 0.25 mg twice-a-day day two onward, and increased every week to a target of 4.5 mg/day for the 12-week duration of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pramipexole
Other Intervention Name(s)
Mirapex
Intervention Description
Up to 4.5mg, PO, (by mouth) per day of the 12-week study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
placebo match study drug
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.
Time Frame
Week 6
Title
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery
Description
MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) as measure of Neurocognitive/Functional Measures is a standardized battery designed to measure cognitive functioning in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is represented as a composite T score. This T-score scale has a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10, where higher scores reflect better performance.
Time Frame
Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)
Description
Mean change of symptoms of mania throughout the study. YMRS contains 7 items rated from 0 (symptom absent) to 4 (severe symptom) and 4 items scored 0 (symptom absent) to 8 (severe symptom), with total range from 0 to 60, where higher score indicates manic symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 12
Title
Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD)
Description
Mean change of symptoms of depression throughout the study. HRSD consists of 14 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe), with a total score range of 0-56, where higher score indicates more depressive symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 12
Title
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)
Description
Mean change for positive symptoms throughout the study. BPRS consists of 18 items, each defined by a series of symptoms. Each item is rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 1 (not observed) to 7 (very severe), with a total score range from 18-126, where higher scores indicate psychiatric symptoms.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Suicidal Acknowledgements
Description
Number of individual participants who acknowledged at least one item on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) over the 12-week study period. Examples of items on the scale are suicidal ideation (having thoughts, planning) and suicidal behavior (preparing, attempting).
Time Frame
up to Week 12
Title
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
Description
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
Description
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.
Time Frame
Week 6
Title
The Probabilistic Stimulus Selection Task
Description
The probabilistic selection task assesses the tendency to learn from positive versus negative outcomes. In the probabilistic stimulus selection task, participants are trained to choose one of two paired stimuli; three sets of paired stimuli are shown in total (AB, CD, and EF) and are presented randomly during the training period. To minimize verbal encoding, stimuli are Japanese Hiragana characters. Probabilistic feedback regarding the "correct" choice is provided. We report the mean percentage of accuracy on choosing the correct paired stimuli among the two treatment groups.
Time Frame
Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Age 18-65 DSM-IV BD I or II diagnosis Affective stability, defined by a Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) rating of < 8 and a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRSD) rating of < 16 at screening and baseline. We will further require that any subsyndromal depression has not significantly worsened in the 4 weeks prior to randomization so as to avoid enrolling subjects who are on the verge of a full depressive episode. Evidence of clinically-significant neurocognitive impairment at screening Clinically-acceptable, stably-dosed, mood stabilizing medication regimen for > 1 month prior to enrollment, with no medication changes planned over the 12-week study period. Exclusion Criteria: History of CNS trauma, neurological disorder, ADHD, or learning disability Positive urine toxicology or DSM-IV diagnosis of substance abuse/dependence within 3 months Active, unstable medical problem that may interfere with cognition Recent history of rapid-cycling Abnormal lab or ECG result at screen History of heart failure Significant suicidal risk (HRSD item 3 > 2 or by clinical judgment) Estimated IQ in MR range as per Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) standard score of less than 70 Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are not using a medically accepted means of contraception (including oral contraceptive or implant, condom, diaphragm, spermicide, intrauterine device, tubal ligation, or partner with vasectomy) Women who are breastfeeding Participation in any other investigational cognitive enhancement study within 30 days
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Katherine Burdick, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anil Malhotra, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Zucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore LIJ- Health System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Zucker Hillside Hospital
City
Glen Oaks
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11004
Country
United States
Facility Name
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22152405
Citation
Burdick KE, Braga RJ, Nnadi CU, Shaya Y, Stearns WH, Malhotra AK. Placebo-controlled adjunctive trial of pramipexole in patients with bipolar disorder: targeting cognitive dysfunction. J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jan;73(1):103-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07299. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14992985
Citation
Goldberg JF, Burdick KE, Endick CJ. Preliminary randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pramipexole added to mood stabilizers for treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Mar;161(3):564-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.564.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Targeting Cognition in Bipolar Disorder With Pramipexole

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs