search
Back to results

tDCS in Cervical Dystonia

Primary Purpose

Cervical Dystonia

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
transcranial direct current stimulation
Sponsored by
University of Minnesota
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Dystonia

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 21-65 years of age
  2. Segmental dystonia, defined as dystonia in the neck plus another region is allowed, but CD must be primary source of disability.
  3. Medications for dystonia are allowed, but they must be on a stable dose for the duration of the experiment. Individuals may be receiving BTX injections, but must be on a 2-cycle stable dose prior to experiment (first SC visit). Individuals who do not take BTX are also allowed to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any surgical intervention or musculoskeletal impairment that would interfere with participation (eg., neck fusion, deep brain stimulation, peripheral denervation)
  2. secondary dystonia (eg., Parkinson syndrome)
  3. any neurologic or psychiatric disability that would interfere with participation
  4. pregnancy
  5. history of seizure within the last two years

Sites / Locations

  • University of Minnesota

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation

Cerebellum stimulation

Combined M1 and Cerebellum stimulation

Sham stimulation

Arm Description

Treatment by transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the motor cortex for all treatment sessions with Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability)

Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the cerebellum at every session with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits)

Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be placed with M1 anode contralateral + cerebellum anode. M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1)

transcranial direct current stimulation will be given in placebo form. Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD. TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment.
Cortical Excitability as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Single and paired pulse testing to assess GABAergic and glutaminergic network function

Full Information

First Posted
June 30, 2014
Last Updated
September 29, 2017
Sponsor
University of Minnesota
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02180139
Brief Title
tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
Official Title
Optimizing tDCS in Cervical Dystonia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study was withdrawn due to lack of funding and staff availability.
Study Start Date
September 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Minnesota

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Dystonia is a devastating disorder defined by involuntary, sustained muscle contractions or abnormal postures that can affect any part of the body. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most pervasive form of dystonia affecting 60-90,000 individuals in the United States alone and is characterized by involuntary twisting of the neck. The symptoms of CD are disabling, disfiguring, painful, and have a strongly negative impact on quality of life, including social withdrawal and depression. At present, there is no treatment that has been shown to have long term benefit in CD. Standard of care (SOC) is botulinum toxin, which temporarily paralyzes affected muscles, resulting in reduced muscle spasms. This treatment has many undesirable side effects, variable effectiveness, is expensive, and must be repeated every 3 months throughout the lifespan. Physical therapy based treatments aimed at retraining posture or stretching dystonic muscles are largely ineffective and not typically delivered as a part of standard of care. There is an urgent need for novel and effective therapies. Emerging technologies, specifically non-invasive brain stimulation (NBS), have demonstrated compelling evidence to make a meaningful impact in the lives of people with CD. In this study, individuals with cervical dystonia will be randomly assigned to receive tDCS for 15 minutes daily for 4 days in 1 of 4 stimulation location groups. Hypothesis 1: One location of stimulation will result in clear benefit with at least 1 standard deviation (SD) improvement in the CDQ-24, the primary outcome measure, at 1-week follow-up. Hypothesis 2: The cortical silent period will be the most sensitive measure investigated and will demonstrate significant increase in inhibition as determined by an elongation of silent period in the affected upper trapezius muscle. Hypothesis 3: The stimulation location determined to be most effective in Objective 1 will produce the greatest physiologic change in inhibition increase. Hypothesis 4: The hypothesis for this aim is if certain characteristics can predict response to treatment, a strong association will be seen between baseline measure(s) and the primary outcome measure. A thorough assessment of characteristics including: age, sex, duration of symptoms, genotyping for two specific polymorphisms, botulinum toxin history, baseline measures of outcome variables, measures of brain excitability, and genetic testing will predict response.
Detailed Description
Study Purpose This study will investigate the use of an experimental research device called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). tDCS is a way to stimulate the brain with potential therapeutic benefits. It works by either increasing or decreasing brain excitability. This is done by delivering a current to the outside of the head. This weak electrical current then passes through the skull and modulates the underlying brain tissue. Genetic factors may contribute to the effectiveness of this intervention; therefore, a saliva sample will be collected to assess the status of two genes: Brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and apolipoprotein E4. Our purpose is to determine the best location of stimulation for tDCS that improves the symptoms and quality of life in people with CD. The results of this study will help to identify alternative interventions for people with cervical dystonia. Brain excitability will be measured using an additional form of non-invasive brain stimulation, specifically by a device called a transcranial magnetic stimulator. By applying a magnetic field to the outside of the head, electrical currents are produced within the brain that can transiently affect brain activity and be recorded though electrodes on your skin. Using this procedure, different areas of the brain can be studied to gain a greater understanding of the brain physiology in patients with cervical dystonia. Procedures Intervention: Briefly, non-invasive brain stimulation can be delivered safely and painlessly via different mechanisms with the goal of either exciting or inhibiting the underlying brain issue. In focal dystonia, as indicated above, there is thought to be a lack of inhibition, thus settings are typically used to increase inhibition. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is one device that has been shown to be safe and effective at modulating excitation and inhibition in humans and has been used extensively in a variety of research applications for over 10 years. In addition to the potential physiologic benefit of altering excitability, tDCS is a particularly practical technique for use in people with CD, because it does not require one's head to remain still, thus not applying additional stress to the impaired neck. An investigator will deliver tDCS using a constant current of 2 milliamps (mA) using a direct current stimulator (TCT Research Limited, Hong Kong) via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days. Electrode placement will be at one of four locations referenced in terms of dystonic head-turn resting position (i.e. if head turns to the left, the primary muscles involved are on the left, so contralateral M1 would be the right hemisphere): 1) Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability); 2) Cerebellum with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits); 3) M1+cerebellum: M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1); or 4) Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS (Gandiga et al. 2006). Pre-testing (Day1) will occur 10 weeks post standard care (SC) visit, so the participant will be near most impaired level of functioning prior to 12 week visit for botulinum (BTX) injection. tDCS will be delivered on day 1 and each subsequent day for 4 days. Posttesting will occur on Day5 and then 1 week later prior to SC visit (follow up- day 12). The primary endpoint of interest is follow up at one week. Cortical Excitability Testing: Before and after intervention, single-pulse TMS will be delivered with a figure of eight coil (90 mm wing diameter) (MagStim Co., Whitland, Dyfed, Wales), positioned over M1. The 'hotspot' over the M1 contralateral to the direction of dystonic head turn will be used to collect motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in cervical muscles (upper trapezius) ipsilateral to head turn will be located and marked on the scalp. Various measures will be collected according to established methods to assess cortical excitability by single and paired pulse TMS. Clinical assessment: Severity of CD will be assessed before and after the intervention. Behavioral measures will be administered by an investigator, blinded to intervention and will be assessed pre and post each intervention and at follow up. The primary endpoint of interest is the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire CDQ-24. This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern. Secondary measures are TWSTRS and visual analog scale. CDQ-24: The CDQ-24 contains 24 items with 5 subscales: stigma, emotional well-being, pain, activities of daily living and social/family life. Internal consistency and reliability is satisfactory for all sub-scales and total score with good sensitivity and high test/retest reliability (Muller, 2004). TWSTRS. Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD (Consky et al., 1990). TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63)(Salvia et al., 2006). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period. Visual Analog Scale (VAS). At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment. Adverse reactions. Adverse reactions will be recorded using established reporting forms. Genetic Testing: At the last session, a saliva sample will be collected for genetic screening for BDNF and apolipoprotein E4 polymorphisms. We will collect approximately 2 ml (less than one-half teaspoon) of saliva by asking the subject to spit into a tube. It may take up to 30 minutes to provide a saliva sample, however, most people typically require less time (approximately 5 minutes). Collection of saliva using Oragene Discover is non-invasive and there are no anticipated personal risks of injury.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Dystonia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment by transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the motor cortex for all treatment sessions with Bilateral M1 with cathode to contralateral M1 and anode to ipsilateral M1, 15 minutes (Goal: decrease contralateral M1 excitability)
Arm Title
Cerebellum stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be targeted to the cerebellum at every session with anode to ipsilateral cerebellum with cathode to ipsilateral side of face, 15 minutes (Goal: increase ipsilateral cerebellum activation which exerts inhibitory effect on motor circuits)
Arm Title
Combined M1 and Cerebellum stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation will be placed with M1 anode contralateral + cerebellum anode. M1 will first be 'primed' with anode on contralateral M1, cathode on face, for 10 min, followed immediately by 15 min of cerebellar stimulation as in #2. (Goal: prime the contralateral M1 with increased excitability to engage a potentially larger effect from the following ipsilateral cerebellar stimulation that will be excited to exert inhibitory effect on the motor circuits including M1)
Arm Title
Sham stimulation
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
transcranial direct current stimulation will be given in placebo form. Sham stimulation: electrode placement will be same as M1. Sham tDCS will be applied by ramping down current intensity to 0 after 30 seconds following standard practice for sham tDCS.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
transcranial direct current stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial Technologies, TCT Research Limited, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Intervention Description
tDCS using a constant current of 2 mA via two 35 cm2 saline soaked sponge electrodes. Treatment is 1x/day for 4 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
Description
This primary outcome was selected because it is a patient-rated, disease-specific assessment of quality of life, which we feel should be the primary issue of concern.
Time Frame
up to Day 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS)
Description
Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale is an outcome measure used to rate severity, disability and pain in CD. TWSTRS utilizes three sub-scores of physician-based severity (0-35), patient-based disability (0-30) and pain (0-20) with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. Inter-observer reliability is excellent (rs=99) and good for disability and pain measurements (r˃0.88). The global severity scale was moderate (rs=0.63). TWSTRS exam will be videotaped for posthoc assessment by investigator blinded to group and testing period.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Title
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Description
At the end of each intervention session participants will be asked to rate the ease of movement and perceived pain during cervical rotation in the contralateral direction to their head turn using VAS for self-assessment.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Title
Cortical Excitability as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Description
Single and paired pulse testing to assess GABAergic and glutaminergic network function
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 5, Day 6
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Adverse reactions
Description
Adverse reactions will be recorded using established reporting forms.
Time Frame
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4 (all days with intervention)
Title
Genetic Testing
Description
At the last session, a saliva sample will be collected for genetic screening for BDNF and apolipoprotein E4 polymorphisms. We will collect approximately 2 ml (less than one-half teaspoon) of saliva by asking the subject to spit into a tube. It may take up to 30 minutes to provide a saliva sample, however, most people typically require less time (approximately 5 minutes). Collection of saliva using Oragene Discover is non-invasive and there are no anticipated personal risks of injury.
Time Frame
Day 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 21-65 years of age Segmental dystonia, defined as dystonia in the neck plus another region is allowed, but CD must be primary source of disability. Medications for dystonia are allowed, but they must be on a stable dose for the duration of the experiment. Individuals may be receiving BTX injections, but must be on a 2-cycle stable dose prior to experiment (first SC visit). Individuals who do not take BTX are also allowed to participate. Exclusion Criteria: Any surgical intervention or musculoskeletal impairment that would interfere with participation (eg., neck fusion, deep brain stimulation, peripheral denervation) secondary dystonia (eg., Parkinson syndrome) any neurologic or psychiatric disability that would interfere with participation pregnancy history of seizure within the last two years
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teresa J Kimberley, PT, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Minnesota
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16427357
Citation
Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Apr;117(4):845-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15090572
Citation
Muller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Consky, E. S., Basinski, A., Belle, L., Ranawaya, R., & Lang, A. E. (1990). The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS): assessment of validity and inter-rater reliability. Neurology, 40(suppl 1), 445.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16427167
Citation
Salvia P, Champagne O, Feipel V, Rooze M, de Beyl DZ. Clinical and goniometric evaluation of patients with spasmodic torticollis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2006 May;21(4):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.11.011. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

tDCS in Cervical Dystonia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs