search
Back to results

Tele-HF: Yale Heart Failure Telemonitoring Study

Primary Purpose

Congestive Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Telemonitoring
Sponsored by
Yale University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Congestive Heart Failure focused on measuring heart failure, CHF, telemedicine, disease management

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: age 18 years or older hospitalized for heart failure within the past 30 days access to telephone line Exclusion Criteria: not expected to survive 6 months due to irreversible, life-threatening condition has or scheduled for cardiac transplant or LVAD scheduled for CABG or PCI within 90 days severe valvular disease Folstein MMSE score less than 20 resident of a nursing home currently a prisoner does not speak English or Spanish

Sites / Locations

  • Cardiology Associates
  • UC Irvine Medical Center
  • UCLA Harbor Medical Center
  • Department of Cardiology at Bridgeport Hospital
  • Cardiology Associates of New Haven
  • Howard University Hospital
  • Integrated Care / Cardiovascular Consultants of South Florida
  • Piedmont Hospital Research Institute
  • Morehouse School of Medicine/Cardiology
  • Emory University
  • The Queen's Medical Center
  • Loyola University Medical Center
  • Indiana Heart Physicians
  • Iowa City Heart Center
  • Chabert Medical Center
  • Heart Clinic of Louisiana
  • Cardiology Associates, LLC
  • Truman Medical Center/Cardiology
  • St. Luke's Hospital / Mid-America Heart Institute
  • Washington University
  • Cardiology Diagnostics
  • Cooper Health System Cardiology
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center / Cardiology Associates
  • New York University/Cardiology
  • Forsyth Medical Center
  • MetroHealth Medical Center, Heart & Vascular Center
  • The Dayton Heart Center
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Cardiology Specialists, Ltd.
  • Baylor University Medical Center
  • Sentara Cardiology Consultants, Ltd.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

UC

TM

Arm Description

Usual HF guideline-base care

Telemonitoring group plus usual guideline-based HF care

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of all-cause hospital readmission or death during the 6-month follow-up period.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of all-cause hospital readmissions
Number of office visits with clinician receiving information from the telemonitoring system
Survival after index hospitalization
Cost of inpatient medical care
Health status
Patient satisfaction with care
Patients' self-management of heart failure
Post index discharge hospital days
Post index discharge hospital days/follow up days alive

Full Information

First Posted
March 13, 2006
Last Updated
March 27, 2020
Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00303212
Brief Title
Tele-HF: Yale Heart Failure Telemonitoring Study
Official Title
A Study of Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of telemonitoring compared with usual guideline-based care in preventing hospitalization for heart failure patients.
Detailed Description
Heart failure (HF) is a common, costly condition characterized by recurrent periods of clinical decompensation that often lead to repeated hospitalizations (1, 2). Despite advances in the care of patients with HF, population-based outcomes such as mortality and hospitalization rates have not improved substantially over the past decade (3). Episodic, infrequent, outpatient visits are the only usual opportunities for clinicians to detect and treat early signs of HF decompensation; this constitutes a major gap in the current medical model. Moreover, opportunities for patients to take an active role in managing their own conditions occur infrequently. Disease management has emerged as a possible solution to the need for better patient surveillance and engagement. It typically involves multidisciplinary efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of care for patients with chronic conditions, with interventions designed to foster adherence of clinicians to scientific guidelines and patients to treatment plans. However, traditional disease-management programs are generally resource-intensive (often relying on nurse case management), difficult to scale for a large population, and inefficient in providing daily patient monitoring. Telemonitoring, which bridges clinicians and patients with communication technology, holds promise for closing the gap in HF care (4). This technology has the potential for standardized, widespread implementation (and long-term maintenance) in the near future because it can be easily applied to large patient populations and integrated into the current medical care system. Supporting this potential, preliminary evaluations have suggested that telemonitoring is feasible across a broad spectrum of typical HF patients, relatively inexpensive on a per-patient basis, and highly effective in improving health outcomes. Thus, this approach is ready for rigorous evaluation. Accordingly, we propose an office-based, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (Tele-HF study) to determine the effectiveness of a telemonitoring strategy in decreasing hospital readmissions and death in patients with HF. Many HF patients experience deterioration in their health status and an increase in weight and symptoms over a period of days and weeks before ultimately presenting to medical attention and requiring hospitalization. Our premise is that a frequent monitoring system can alert clinicians to the early signs and symptoms of decompensation, providing the opportunity for intervention before the patient becomes severely ill and requires hospitalization. Moreover, such a system can engage patients in their care and provide instruction about beneficial self-care strategies. This intervention is not intended to substitute for communication relating to acute care or acute, sudden changes in health status. In these cases, patients are instructed to make direct and immediate contact with their doctor or hospital. We will use the Pharos Tel-AssuranceTM, an in-home communication system that allows patients to transmit information to their clinicians and provides education to enable patients to actively participate in managing their condition. The system uses conventional telephone lines and does not require the patient to have Internet access. Patients are asked a pre-programmed series of questions and the system automatically uploads the responses to a secure data center. A clinician in each practice can then log on to a secure Internet site using a Web browser to review the patients' responses. The system thus serves as an interface between patients at home and their clinicians, facilitating monitoring of chronic conditions and patient education. While many vendors have potential tools to implement this study, we chose to use Pharos Tel-AssuranceTM because it is simple to use, does not require any equipment in patients' homes and substantial preliminary data suggest high patient and clinician satisfaction with its use. The investigators have no financial interest in this company. Primary Aim Our primary aim is to determine whether telemonitoring by community-based cardiology office practices reduces the risk of hospital readmission (for any cause) or death after an initial "index hospitalization" for HF. We hypothesize that, among patients recently discharged after a hospitalization for HF, telemonitoring will decrease the rate of rehospitalization or death over 6 months by at least 15% (relative risk reduction). This would yield an absolute risk reduction of 7.5%, so that 1 major adverse event would be averted for every 13 patients. We have chosen all-cause readmission as part of our primary outcome because poorly controlled HF can result in admissions for a variety of reasons, as the patient becomes weak and susceptible to falls, mental status changes, renal dysfunction, and other debilitating conditions that can result in hospitalization. In addition, from a societal and health system perspective, the overall risk of readmission is more important than disease-specific readmission. Moreover, prior studies suggest that telemonitoring can reduce this outcome. Secondary Aims In our secondary aims we will determine whether telemonitoring will: Reduce the rate of all-cause hospital readmission Reduce the rate of hospital readmission for HF Reduce the total number of all-cause and HF-specific hospital readmissions Increase office visits with the clinician receiving information from the telemonitoring system Improve survival after index hospitalization Reduce the cost of inpatient medical care Improve health status Improve patient satisfaction with care Improve patients' self-management of HF Sub-Group Analyses The following sub-group analyses will be conducted: Age Sex Race HFPEF vs depressed EF Education Insurance status Self-reported access to care Baseline self-efficacy and self-care Socioeconomic Status Site characteristics

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Congestive Heart Failure
Keywords
heart failure, CHF, telemedicine, disease management

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1660 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
UC
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Usual HF guideline-base care
Arm Title
TM
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Telemonitoring group plus usual guideline-based HF care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Telemonitoring
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tel-Assurance
Intervention Description
Participants in the intervention group are instructed to make a daily toll-free call to an automated telemonitoring system being provided by Pharos Innovations® (Chicago, IL) for 6 months.On each call patients hear a pre-recorded voice that goes through a series of questions about symptoms and the patient's daily weight. Information from the telemonitoring system is automatically downloaded to a secure Internet site for review by clinicians at each practice site.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of all-cause hospital readmission or death during the 6-month follow-up period.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of all-cause hospital readmissions
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Number of office visits with clinician receiving information from the telemonitoring system
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Survival after index hospitalization
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Cost of inpatient medical care
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Health status
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Patient satisfaction with care
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Patients' self-management of heart failure
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Post index discharge hospital days
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Post index discharge hospital days/follow up days alive
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age 18 years or older hospitalized for heart failure within the past 30 days access to telephone line Exclusion Criteria: not expected to survive 6 months due to irreversible, life-threatening condition has or scheduled for cardiac transplant or LVAD scheduled for CABG or PCI within 90 days severe valvular disease Folstein MMSE score less than 20 resident of a nursing home currently a prisoner does not speak English or Spanish
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Harlan M. Krumholz, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sarwat I Chaudhry, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jennifer Mattera, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Yale University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cardiology Associates
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
UC Irvine Medical Center
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA Harbor Medical Center
City
Torrance
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90502
Country
United States
Facility Name
Department of Cardiology at Bridgeport Hospital
City
Bridgeport
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Associates of New Haven
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06437
Country
United States
Facility Name
Howard University Hospital
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20059
Country
United States
Facility Name
Integrated Care / Cardiovascular Consultants of South Florida
City
Tamarac
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33321
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Hospital Research Institute
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morehouse School of Medicine/Cardiology
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30310
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Queen's Medical Center
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96813
Country
United States
Facility Name
Loyola University Medical Center
City
Maywood
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60153
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Heart Physicians
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46237
Country
United States
Facility Name
Iowa City Heart Center
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52245
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chabert Medical Center
City
Houma
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70363
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Clinic of Louisiana
City
Marrero
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70072
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Associates, LLC
City
Tupelo
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
38801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Truman Medical Center/Cardiology
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64108
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Luke's Hospital / Mid-America Heart Institute
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Diagnostics
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cooper Health System Cardiology
City
Camden
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center / Cardiology Associates
City
Paterson
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07503
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York University/Cardiology
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forsyth Medical Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
MetroHealth Medical Center, Heart & Vascular Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Dayton Heart Center
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45414
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15260
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiology Specialists, Ltd.
City
Westerly
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
70363
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor University Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sentara Cardiology Consultants, Ltd.
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29237746
Citation
Jayaram NM, Khariton Y, Krumholz HM, Chaudhry SI, Mattera J, Tang F, Herrin J, Hodshon B, Spertus JA. Impact of Telemonitoring on Health Status. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Dec;10(12):e004148. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004148.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28420352
Citation
Steventon A, Chaudhry SI, Lin Z, Mattera JA, Krumholz HM. Assessing the reliability of self-reported weight for the management of heart failure: application of fraud detection methods to a randomised trial of telemonitoring. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0426-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28263938
Citation
Mortazavi BJ, Downing NS, Bucholz EM, Dharmarajan K, Manhapra A, Li SX, Negahban SN, Krumholz HM. Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Heart Failure Readmissions. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 Nov;9(6):629-640. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003039. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26656140
Citation
Krumholz HM, Chaudhry SI, Spertus JA, Mattera JA, Hodshon B, Herrin J. Do Non-Clinical Factors Improve Prediction of Readmission Risk?: Results From the Tele-HF Study. JACC Heart Fail. 2016 Jan;4(1):12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26160368
Citation
Qian F, Parzynski CS, Chaudhry SI, Hannan EL, Shaw BA, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM. Racial Differences in Heart Failure Outcomes: Evidence From the Tele-HF Trial (Telemonitoring to Improve Heart Failure Outcomes). JACC Heart Fail. 2015 Jul;3(7):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.03.005.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25074375
Citation
Bikdeli B, Wayda B, Bao H, Ross JS, Xu X, Chaudhry SI, Spertus JA, Bernheim SM, Lindenauer PK, Krumholz HM. Place of residence and outcomes of patients with heart failure: analysis from the telemonitoring to improve heart failure outcomes trial. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):749-56. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000911. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21080835
Citation
Chaudhry SI, Mattera JA, Curtis JP, Spertus JA, Herrin J, Lin Z, Phillips CO, Hodshon BV, Cooper LS, Krumholz HM. Telemonitoring in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2010 Dec 9;363(24):2301-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010029. Epub 2010 Nov 16. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2011 Feb 3;364(5):490. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 7;369(19):1869.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tele-HF: Yale Heart Failure Telemonitoring Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs