The Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy - A Feasibility Study
Primary Purpose
Low Back Pain, Mechanical
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Manual therapy
Evidence-informed home management booklet
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Low Back Pain, Mechanical focused on measuring Manual Therapy, Fluoroscope, Mechanics, Kinematics
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), without leg pain, of at least 2 weeks duration, but no more than 4 weeks duration
- Patients between the ages of 18 and 65
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who cannot understand written English and unable to provide full informed consent.
- Patients who are currently involved in another research study
- Patients with a BMI over 30 (less likely to obtain the required information from the images)
- Pregnancy or potentially pregnant
- Previous ionising radiation exposure within the last 6 months greater than 8mSv.
- Previous lumbar spine surgery, as well as recent abdominal or pelvic surgery (within the last 12 months).
- Scoliosis or positive Adams forward Bending Test for Scoliosis.
- Diagnosed Osteoporosis (Bone Density Scan)
- Patients with a numeric pain scale of 8 or more, or 2 or less, taken at the New Patient Examination Appointment.
- Manual therapy already received for this episode of NSLBP
- Litigation or compensation pending
- Diagnosis of depression (by a medical doctor) within the last 12 months.
Sites / Locations
- Bournemouth University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Manual Therapy Arm
Non-Manual Therapy Arm
Arm Description
The group will receive manual therapy, as well as an evidence-informed home management booklet.
The group will receive an evidence-informed home management booklet only.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Ratio of presenting patients and eligible patients
Ratio of the number of patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain vs. number of eligible patients (according to eligibility criteria)
Ratio of patients approached vs. number of participants who consent to trial
Rate of conversion from number of patients approached (who are eligible for the trial) to number of participants who consent to be a part of the trial.
Incidence of participant withdrawal
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who withdraw from the trial (where the participant withdraws from the trial)
Incidence of participant being withdrawn
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who have been withdraw from the trial (where the practitioner withdraws the participant from the trial)
Participant compliance in arm one
Ratio of total participants in arm one vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm one)
Participant compliance in arm two
Ratio of total participants in arm two vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm two)
Number of participants who experienced adverse or serious adverse events
Ratio of total number of participants (in both groups) vs. serious adverse events, as well as adverse events.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Bournemouth Questionnaire
Baseline and follow up Bournemouth Questionnaire scores. Scale data from 0 - 70, where 0 is the best outcome and 70 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 26.
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24
Baseline and follow up Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24. Scale data from 0 - 24, where 0 is the best outcome and 24 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 5.
Inter-vertebral range of angular motion
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). QF systems combines fluoroscopy, with a computer-based process which tracks the vertebrae motion and calculates inter-vertebral movement variables.
Inter-vertebral range of angular motion is scale data measured in degrees.
Sagittal translation
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Sagittal translation is scale data measured in millimetres.
Laxity
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Laxity is scale data and represents initial attainment rate.
Anterior disc height
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Anterior disc height is scale data measured in millimetres.
Motion Sharing Inequality (MSI)
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSI is scale data and calculated as the average of the maximum distances between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.
Motion Sharing Variability (MSV)
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSV is scale data and calculated as the square root of the variance between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04155970
First Posted
November 1, 2019
Last Updated
March 24, 2021
Sponsor
Bournemouth University
Collaborators
AECC University College
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04155970
Brief Title
The Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy - A Feasibility Study
Official Title
In Patients With Acute Non-specific Low Back Pain, do Lumbar Inter-vertebral Motion Variables Change Following a Course of Manual Therapy: A Feasibility Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 6, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 19, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 19, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bournemouth University
Collaborators
AECC University College
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a full-scale trial to explore if there is a change in intervertebral movement following a course of manual therapy in patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP).
Research Questions:
In patients with acute NSLBP, does lumbar intervertebral movement change following a course of manual therapy?
In patients with acute NSLBP, do those who respond to manual therapy (established by patient reported outcomes measures) have different intervertebral movement to those who do not?
Detailed Description
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a leading cause of disability and work-days lost worldwide. Yet, in most cases we do not know the specific cause. It is thought to be due to abnormal movement between the spinal bones (vertebrae). The investigators can now measure movement between vertebrae using low-dose quantitative fluoroscopy (QF), or motion x-ray videos. QF is a reliable method of measuring spinal movement which is non-invasive and does not expose the patient to a lot of radiation. In this study, QF will be used as a measuring tool to measure spinal movement in patients with acute NSLBP before manual therapy versus after manual therapy to explore if there is a change in spinal movement. Research suggests that some patients respond to manual therapy and some do not, a secondary question in this study is to explore if there are differences in spinal movement between those who respond to manual therapy (measured using pain and disability questionnaires) and those who do not.
This study is a feasibility study to determine whether the study can be carried out as a full-scale trial. Participants will be recruited from the AECC University College (AECC UC) Clinic. Following an examination, patients with acute low back pain, and who are eligible for the study will be invited to join. Participants will proceed with initial measurements which include validated questionnaires and QF. Following these measurements participants will be randomised into two groups, each containing 15 participants. Both groups will receive an evidence-informed home management booklet, the manual therapy group will receive five manual therapy treatments in two weeks. Participants will return for follow-up measurements two weeks after baseline measurements.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain, Mechanical
Keywords
Manual Therapy, Fluoroscope, Mechanics, Kinematics
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The outcome assessor is blinded as to which intervention each participant received.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Manual Therapy Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group will receive manual therapy, as well as an evidence-informed home management booklet.
Arm Title
Non-Manual Therapy Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group will receive an evidence-informed home management booklet only.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Manual therapy
Intervention Description
Manual therapy, which includes spinal manipulation; spinal mobilisation; light massage; and trigger point therapy.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Evidence-informed home management booklet
Other Intervention Name(s)
Low back pain self help booklet
Intervention Description
The home management booklet includes advice on posture, over the counter pain medication, cold and heat packs. The booklet also includes a section on patient reassurance and where to seek help from a medical professional in an emergency.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ratio of presenting patients and eligible patients
Description
Ratio of the number of patients seeking care for acute non-specific low back pain vs. number of eligible patients (according to eligibility criteria)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Ratio of patients approached vs. number of participants who consent to trial
Description
Rate of conversion from number of patients approached (who are eligible for the trial) to number of participants who consent to be a part of the trial.
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Incidence of participant withdrawal
Description
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who withdraw from the trial (where the participant withdraws from the trial)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Incidence of participant being withdrawn
Description
Total participant number in the trial vs. number of participants who have been withdraw from the trial (where the practitioner withdraws the participant from the trial)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Participant compliance in arm one
Description
Ratio of total participants in arm one vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm one)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Participant compliance in arm two
Description
Ratio of total participants in arm two vs. number of participants who were non-compliant with the intervention (in arm two)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Number of participants who experienced adverse or serious adverse events
Description
Ratio of total number of participants (in both groups) vs. serious adverse events, as well as adverse events.
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bournemouth Questionnaire
Description
Baseline and follow up Bournemouth Questionnaire scores. Scale data from 0 - 70, where 0 is the best outcome and 70 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 26.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24
Description
Baseline and follow up Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire - 24. Scale data from 0 - 24, where 0 is the best outcome and 24 is the worst outcome. Minimally Important Change = 5.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Inter-vertebral range of angular motion
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). QF systems combines fluoroscopy, with a computer-based process which tracks the vertebrae motion and calculates inter-vertebral movement variables.
Inter-vertebral range of angular motion is scale data measured in degrees.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Sagittal translation
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Sagittal translation is scale data measured in millimetres.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Laxity
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Laxity is scale data and represents initial attainment rate.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Anterior disc height
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). Anterior disc height is scale data measured in millimetres.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Motion Sharing Inequality (MSI)
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSI is scale data and calculated as the average of the maximum distances between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.
Time Frame
2 weeks
Title
Motion Sharing Variability (MSV)
Description
Baseline and follow up measurement taken from Quantitative Fluoroscopy (QF). MSV is scale data and calculated as the square root of the variance between levels (L2-L5) at all data points.
Time Frame
2 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with acute non-specific low back pain (NSLBP), without leg pain, of at least 2 weeks duration, but no more than 4 weeks duration
Patients between the ages of 18 and 65
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who cannot understand written English and unable to provide full informed consent.
Patients who are currently involved in another research study
Patients with a BMI over 30 (less likely to obtain the required information from the images)
Pregnancy or potentially pregnant
Previous ionising radiation exposure within the last 6 months greater than 8mSv.
Previous lumbar spine surgery, as well as recent abdominal or pelvic surgery (within the last 12 months).
Scoliosis or positive Adams forward Bending Test for Scoliosis.
Diagnosed Osteoporosis (Bone Density Scan)
Patients with a numeric pain scale of 8 or more, or 2 or less, taken at the New Patient Examination Appointment.
Manual therapy already received for this episode of NSLBP
Litigation or compensation pending
Diagnosis of depression (by a medical doctor) within the last 12 months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip Sewell
Organizational Affiliation
Head of Department - Design & Engineering
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bournemouth University
City
Bournemouth
State/Province
Dorset
ZIP/Postal Code
BH12 5BB
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Once the project is complete, the final anonymised dataset captured during the study will be uploaded to BORDaR (Bournemouth Online Research Data Repository). This is in the interest of open data sharing.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
An embargo will be placed on the final dataset until the study (and PhD) is complete and the results of the study have been published. In the interest of open data sharing, the data will be available indefinitely.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Request for anonymised dataset will need to be submitted through BORDaR (Bournemouth Online Research Data Repository)
IPD Sharing URL
http://bordar.bournemouth.ac.uk/
Learn more about this trial
The Biomechanical Effects of Manual Therapy - A Feasibility Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs