search
Back to results

The Canada Lymph Node Score: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial (CLNS)

Primary Purpose

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Selective Targeted Sampling
Systematic Sampling
Sponsored by
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer focused on measuring Endobronchial Ultrasound, Diagnostic Imaging, Feasibility, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical N0-N1 Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Referred to have EBUS for staging of confirmed or suspected NSCLC
  • Completed both a CT and PET scans
  • cN0-cN1 disease indicated on CT and PET scans

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cN0 disease, peripheral tumours and tumours < 2 cm in diameter (they do not require staging)
  • Evidence of cN2 disease or higher on CT and PET scan

Sites / Locations

  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Systematic Sampling

Selective Targeted Sampling

Arm Description

Patients will undergo systematic sampling of lymph node stations in the mediastinum with a minimum sampling of 3 stations: 4R, 4L and 7, as is the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion. CLNS is not used for this arm.

Patients will first undergo endosonographic assessment of 3 mediastinal lymph node stations (i.e. 4R, 4L, and 7) using the four criteria of the CLNS. Lymph node stations that exhibit a CLNS >1/4 will be biopsied as is standard of care. Lymph node stations with CLNS ≤ 1/4 will be marked as "not requiring biopsy" but will be biopsied nevertheless, so that there is no deviation from the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recruitment Rate
Minimum acceptable recruitment rate is 70%
Procedure Length
Calculated in minutes. Recorded for both treatment arms.
Diagnostic Accuracy
The proportion of patients in whom the treatment (CLNS or biopsy) yielded the same diagnosis as the pathology report out of the total number of patients that have received the treatment. Recorded for both treatment arms.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Prevalence of Each Possible CLNS
The CLNS has five possible scores: 0/4, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4. The number of lymph nodes with each score will be recorded for the Experimental Arm (Targeted Sampling).
Frequency of Biopsies
Number of times lymph nodes had to be sampled with a transbronchial needle per EBUS procedure. Recorded for both treatment arms.
Percent of Inconclusive Biopsies
Number of biopsies that provided an inconclusive diagnosis out of total number of biopsies obtained. Recorded for each treatment arm.
Adverse Events
Number of AEs has classified by the Ottawa TM&M System
Accrual Period
Duration of time to reach sample size

Full Information

First Posted
February 19, 2019
Last Updated
June 12, 2020
Sponsor
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Collaborators
McMaster University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03859349
Brief Title
The Canada Lymph Node Score: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym
CLNS
Official Title
Routine Systematic Sampling vs. Targeted Sampling of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes Prior to Lung Cancer Treatment: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 6, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 8, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Collaborators
McMaster University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
For patients diagnosed with early stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) on preoperative computerized tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans, surgical resection is usually the preferred method of treatment. However, to be eligible for surgery, current guidelines require that the cancer has not spread to the lymph nodes in the chest cavity. To evaluate these lymph nodes, the standard of care is to undergo an endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) procedure, where all the visible lymph nodes in the chest are biopsied (sampled) with a needle. Unfortunately, these biopsies are often inconclusive, especially in patients who have no evidence of mediastinal lymph node spread on pre-operative imaging. Currently, the standard of care mandates that inconclusive biopsies should be repeated, either through another EBUS, or through more invasive procedures. Repeat inconclusive biopsies are oftentimes inconclusive as well; leading to a vicious cycle of inconclusive results, a delay in treatment, morbidity for the patient, and increased costs to the healthcare system. To circumvent this issue, the investigators have developed, validated and published a 4-point score, the Canada Lymph Node Score (CLNS), which uses four features observed during EBUS to predict whether the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes or not. Research has demonstrated that lymph nodes which appear benign on both CT and PET scan that also have a CLNS of ≤1/4 are almost certainly benign. As such, it is believed that these "triple normal" lymph do not require biopsy (or repeat biopsy). The investigators are challenging the current standard of care in lung cancer, which mandates that all the lymph nodes in the chest need to be biopsied (i.e. Systematic Sampling) before surgery, by proposing that triple normal lymph nodes can be omitted, and only those with cancer potential should be biopsied (i.e. Targeted Sampling).To prove this hypothesis, a randomized controlled trial comparing Systematic Sampling to Targeted Sampling is required. A feasibility trial is proposed to determine whether this large-scale randomized trial will be possible.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Keywords
Endobronchial Ultrasound, Diagnostic Imaging, Feasibility, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical N0-N1 Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
All participants who provide consent for participation and who fulfil eligibility criteria will be randomized with a unique randomization sequence derived from the random permuted block design (with blocks of varying sizes) in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will randomized to either Systematic Sampling (Control) or Targeted Sampling (Experimental).
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
Trial participants will remain blinded to their randomized treatment. Additionally, the biostatistician performing the analysis will be blinded as to which intervention arm participants were allocated to, as the group allocations will be coded as Group A and Group B. Provided this is an endoscopic trial, endoscopist blinding will not be feasible. Nonetheless, all patients deemed surgical candidates after EBUS will have their pathology compared to EBUS staging in order to ensure appropriate diagnosis. Pathologists performing such pathology report will be blinded to which intervention arm participants are allocated to.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
38 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Systematic Sampling
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will undergo systematic sampling of lymph node stations in the mediastinum with a minimum sampling of 3 stations: 4R, 4L and 7, as is the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion. CLNS is not used for this arm.
Arm Title
Selective Targeted Sampling
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will first undergo endosonographic assessment of 3 mediastinal lymph node stations (i.e. 4R, 4L, and 7) using the four criteria of the CLNS. Lymph node stations that exhibit a CLNS >1/4 will be biopsied as is standard of care. Lymph node stations with CLNS ≤ 1/4 will be marked as "not requiring biopsy" but will be biopsied nevertheless, so that there is no deviation from the standard of care. Other stations may be included at the endoscopist's discretion.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Selective Targeted Sampling
Other Intervention Name(s)
STS, CLNS
Intervention Description
After CLNS assessment, patients with proven malignant mediastinal lymph nodes will be referred for chemoradiation and patients with proven benign mediastinal lymph nodes will undergo surgical resection as per standard of care guidelines. Final pathology from the resected specimen will be considered the gold standard for analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
Systematic Sampling
Other Intervention Name(s)
Routine Mediastinal Staging, SS
Intervention Description
Following routine biopsy of lymph nodes, patients with proven malignant mediastinal lymph nodes will be referred for chemoradiation and patients with proven benign mediastinal lymph nodes will undergo surgical resection as per standard of care guidelines. Final pathology from the resected specimen will be considered the gold standard for analysis of sensitivity and specificity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recruitment Rate
Description
Minimum acceptable recruitment rate is 70%
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Procedure Length
Description
Calculated in minutes. Recorded for both treatment arms.
Time Frame
1 Day
Title
Diagnostic Accuracy
Description
The proportion of patients in whom the treatment (CLNS or biopsy) yielded the same diagnosis as the pathology report out of the total number of patients that have received the treatment. Recorded for both treatment arms.
Time Frame
1 Year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Prevalence of Each Possible CLNS
Description
The CLNS has five possible scores: 0/4, 1/4, 2/4, 3/4 and 4/4. The number of lymph nodes with each score will be recorded for the Experimental Arm (Targeted Sampling).
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Frequency of Biopsies
Description
Number of times lymph nodes had to be sampled with a transbronchial needle per EBUS procedure. Recorded for both treatment arms.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Percent of Inconclusive Biopsies
Description
Number of biopsies that provided an inconclusive diagnosis out of total number of biopsies obtained. Recorded for each treatment arm.
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Adverse Events
Description
Number of AEs has classified by the Ottawa TM&M System
Time Frame
1 Year
Title
Accrual Period
Description
Duration of time to reach sample size
Time Frame
1 Year

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Referred to have EBUS for staging of confirmed or suspected NSCLC Completed both a CT and PET scans cN0-cN1 disease indicated on CT and PET scans Exclusion Criteria: Patients with cN0 disease, peripheral tumours and tumours < 2 cm in diameter (they do not require staging) Evidence of cN2 disease or higher on CT and PET scan
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Waël C Hanna, MDCM, MBA, FRCSC
Organizational Affiliation
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton / McMaster University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8N 4A6
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35031139
Citation
Sullivan KA, Farrokhyar F, Leontiadis GI, Patel YS, Churchill IF, Hylton DA, Xie F, Seely AJE, Spicer J, Kidane B, Turner SR, Yasufuku K, Hanna WC. Routine systematic sampling versus targeted sampling during endobronchial ultrasound: A randomized feasibility trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jul;164(1):254-261.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.062. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Canada Lymph Node Score: A Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs