search
Back to results

The Cherokee Study: Cherokee Health for Elderly Residents With Osteoarthritis of the Knee (Cherokee)

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Diet & Exercise
Attention Control
Sponsored by
Wake Forest University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Knee Pain, Exercise, Diet, Weight Loss

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age ≥ 50
  • Knee Pain plus American College of Radiology (ACR) Criteria for Knee Osteoarthritis
  • BMI = 25 ≥ kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant co-morbid disease that would threaten safety or impair ability to participate in interventions or testing (Blindness; Type 1 diabetes; Severe coronary artery disease)
  • Not sufficiently overweight or obese, BMI < 27 kg/m2
  • Not having knee pain
  • Inability to finish 3-month study or unlikely to be compliant (Planning to leave area > 1 month during the next 3 months; Unwilling to change eating or physical activity habits; Unwilling to discontinue pain medication use for 3 days prior to testing visit)
  • Living > 30 minutes from the intervention site
  • Age, age < 50
  • Other conditions that may prohibit the effective delivery of the intervention (Unable to provide own transportation to exercise center; Unable to read or write)

Sites / Locations

  • Ginger Welch Complex
  • Wake Forest University/Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Diet & Exercise

Attention Control

Arm Description

Participants will attend an exercise class 3 days/week for 3 months. The exercise program will consist of a 15-minute aerobic phase, a 20-minute strength training phase, a second 15-minute aerobic phase, and a 10 minute cool down phase. Participant's will also attend individual and group diet sessions. Each participant will be prescribed an individual walking prescription by the exercise leader, which will be adjusted accordingly, as each participant progresses throughout the 3 months. The exercise will be of moderate intensity. Alternate forms of aerobic exercise, such as but not limited to stationary bike, elliptical trainer, or treadmill walking, can be used in place of over-ground walking. This choice could be based on participant preference, the limitations of the exercise facility, or the participant's pain level.

The attention control intervention will cover an 3 month period. There will be two face to face group meetings over the 3 months, with one meeting each at months 1 and 3; and during the other months (month 2) participants will receive a combination of text messages, emails, and phone calls based on continued monitoring of participant needs and delivered via their preferred mode of contact.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Change in Knee pain
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention-control group - The pain index assesses participants' pain on the same scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The pain subscale consists of 5 items and total scores can range from 0-20, with larger scores indicating greater pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Change in Function
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention-control group - participants indicate on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) the degree of difficulty experienced in the last week due to knee OA. Individual scores for the 17 items are totaled to generate a summary score that could range from 0-68, with higher scores indicating poorer function
Health Related Quality of Life (SF-36)
Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state - The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability -The SF-36 measures eight scales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Component analyses showed that there are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS). All scales do contribute in different proportions to the scoring of both PCS and MCS measures.
Distance walked - Mobility (six minute walk)
To determine whether a pragmatic, community-based, 3-month, diet-induced weight-loss and exercise intervention improves 6-minute walk distance (an accepted measure of mobility) in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention control group.
Cost-effectiveness
Resource utilization will be collected by questionnaire, with domains including visits to clinicians (physicians, nurses, physical therapists, others), tests, medications, injections, surgery, alternative therapies. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment index (WPAI) will be used to assess absenteeism and reduced productivity while at work

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2021
Last Updated
June 22, 2023
Sponsor
Wake Forest University
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04946344
Brief Title
The Cherokee Study: Cherokee Health for Elderly Residents With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Acronym
Cherokee
Official Title
Cherokee Health for Elderly Residents With Osteoarthritis of the Knee in the Eastern Band
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 12, 2022 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 20, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 20, 2023 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Wake Forest University
Collaborators
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study aims to develop and demonstrate the effectiveness of a systematic, practical, cost-effective diet-induced weight loss and exercise intervention in Cherokee, North Caroling that will recruit American Indian participants; that can reduce pain and improve other clinical outcomes in knee OA patients. This pragmatic community-based trial will determine if the investigators previous findings translate to real-world settings and will address common concerns about barriers to effectiveness/ implementation.
Detailed Description
Obesity is a modifiable risk factor for knee osteoarthritis (OA), and weight loss is an effective non-pharmacologic treatment to reduce pain. Recently, the investigators determined that under ideal, highly controlled circumstances, a diet-induced weight loss of 10% combined with exercise was significantly better at reducing pain than either intervention alone. Compared to the investigators previous longterm weight loss and exercise trials of knee OA, the diet-induced weight loss and exercise group was twice as effective at relieving pain. Whether the investigators results can be generalized to less rigorously monitored patient cohorts is unknown. Thus the challenge the investigators now face is to provide the practical means to implement this proven treatment in the community setting. This study aims to develop and demonstrate the effectiveness of a systematic, practical, cost-effective diet-induced weight loss and exercise intervention in both urban and rural communities that can reduce pain and improve other clinical outcomes in knee OA patients. Participants will be 30 ambulatory, community-dwelling, overweight and obese men and women who meet the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for knee OA. The primary aim is to determine whether a pragmatic, community-based 3-month diet-induced weight loss and exercise intervention implemented in Cherokee, North Carolina significantly decreases knee pain in overweight and obese adults with knee OA relative to an attention control group. Secondary aims will determine whether this intervention improves self-reported function, health-related quality of life, and mobility. The investigators will also establish the cost-effectiveness of this pragmatic, community-based, multimodal diet-induced weight-loss and exercise program by conducting cost-effectiveness and budgetary impact analyses using data from the current trial in a validated computer-simulated model of knee OA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Knee Pain, Exercise, Diet, Weight Loss

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
30 ambulatory, community-dwelling persons that meet the ACR clinical criteria for knee osteoarthritis
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Diet & Exercise
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will attend an exercise class 3 days/week for 3 months. The exercise program will consist of a 15-minute aerobic phase, a 20-minute strength training phase, a second 15-minute aerobic phase, and a 10 minute cool down phase. Participant's will also attend individual and group diet sessions. Each participant will be prescribed an individual walking prescription by the exercise leader, which will be adjusted accordingly, as each participant progresses throughout the 3 months. The exercise will be of moderate intensity. Alternate forms of aerobic exercise, such as but not limited to stationary bike, elliptical trainer, or treadmill walking, can be used in place of over-ground walking. This choice could be based on participant preference, the limitations of the exercise facility, or the participant's pain level.
Arm Title
Attention Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The attention control intervention will cover an 3 month period. There will be two face to face group meetings over the 3 months, with one meeting each at months 1 and 3; and during the other months (month 2) participants will receive a combination of text messages, emails, and phone calls based on continued monitoring of participant needs and delivered via their preferred mode of contact.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Diet & Exercise
Intervention Description
Participants will attend exercise and diet classes.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Attention Control
Intervention Description
Participants will attend healthy living classes and receive phone calls/emails/texts.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Change in Knee pain
Description
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention-control group - The pain index assesses participants' pain on the same scale, ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme). The pain subscale consists of 5 items and total scores can range from 0-20, with larger scores indicating greater pain.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) - Change in Function
Description
Western Ontario McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention-control group - participants indicate on a scale from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) the degree of difficulty experienced in the last week due to knee OA. Individual scores for the 17 items are totaled to generate a summary score that could range from 0-68, with higher scores indicating poorer function
Time Frame
From Baseline through Month 3
Title
Health Related Quality of Life (SF-36)
Description
Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state - The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability -The SF-36 measures eight scales: physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Component analyses showed that there are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS). All scales do contribute in different proportions to the scoring of both PCS and MCS measures.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Distance walked - Mobility (six minute walk)
Description
To determine whether a pragmatic, community-based, 3-month, diet-induced weight-loss and exercise intervention improves 6-minute walk distance (an accepted measure of mobility) in overweight and obese adults with knee OA compared to an attention control group.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Description
Resource utilization will be collected by questionnaire, with domains including visits to clinicians (physicians, nurses, physical therapists, others), tests, medications, injections, surgery, alternative therapies. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment index (WPAI) will be used to assess absenteeism and reduced productivity while at work
Time Frame
Month 3
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) - balance
Description
A score lower than 10 indicates one or more mobility limitations. A score lower than 10 is predictive of all-cause mortality
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) - walking speed
Description
A score lower than 10 indicates one or more mobility limitations. A score lower than 10 is predictive of all-cause mortality
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) - chair rise
Description
A score lower than 10 indicates one or more mobility limitations. A score lower than 10 is predictive of all-cause mortality
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) - stair activity
Description
Ascending and descending stair activity measured by the time (in seconds) it takes to ascend and descend a flight of 8 steps with 20cm (8 inch) step height
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
EuroQol Quality of Life
Description
Evaluates the generic quality of life developed in Europe and widely used. The EuroQol Quality (EQ)-five dimensions (5D) descriptive system is a preference-based Health-related quality of life (HRQL) measure with one question for each of the five dimensions that include mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The walking efficacy for duration scale
Description
Duration is a measure to determine participants' beliefs in their physical capability to successfully complete incremental 5-minute intervals (5 to 40 minutes) at a moderately fast pace For each item, participants indicate their confidence to execute the behavior on a 100-point percentage scale comprised of 10-point increments, ranging from 0% (not at all confident) to 100% (highly confident). Total strength for each measure of self-efficacy is then calculated by summing the confidence ratings and dividing by the total number of items in the scale, resulting in a maximum possible efficacy score of 100
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The Positive and Negative Affect (PANAS)
Description
Measures both positive and negative affect, leading to more insightful outlooks regarding participants' feeling states. This scale consists of 20 items that reflect the intensity of how the participant "feels" right now
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The gait efficacy/environmental efficacy scale
Description
Will ask the participants' confidence in performing certain activities
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Satisfaction with life scale
Description
Focused to assess global life satisfaction - Participants indicate how much they agree or disagree with each of the 5 items using a 7-point scale that ranges from 7 strongly agree to 1 strongly disagree
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire (WEL)
Description
A 20-item measure employed to assess self-efficacy for weight management - 10-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not confident) to 9 (very confident) to resist the desire to eat.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Description
Will measure the degree to which people perceive their lives as stressful - PSS-10 scores are obtained by reversing the scores on the four positive items: For example, 0=4, 1=3, 2=2, etc. and then summing across all 10 items. Items 4, 5, 7, and 8 are the positively stated items. Scores around 13 are considered average. Higher scores indicate higher stress.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The adherence self-efficacy questionnaire
Description
Assess beliefs in one's ability (confidence) to continue exercising at various intensities and frequencies - This 12-item scale assessed patient confidence to carry out important treatment-related behaviors related to adhering to treatment plans, including medication regimen adherence and following plans for nutrition, exercise, etc, in the face of barriers - Higher scores indicate a greater level of self-efficacy
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Description
People are asked to indicate the degree to which they have the above thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain using the 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) scale. A total score is yielded (ranging from 0-52), along with three subscale scores assessing rumination, magnification and helplessness
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Description
The KOOS questionnaire will be used to assess the patient's opinion about their knee and associated problems. The KOOS evaluates both short-term and long-term consequences of knee injury and also consequences of primary osteoarthritis (OA) - the mean score of the individual items of each subscale and divide by 4 (the highest possible score for a single answer option). Traditionally in orthopedics, 100 indicates no problems and 0 indicates extreme problems
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)
Description
The ICOAP assesses pain in individuals with knee osteoarthritis taking into account both constant and intermittent pain experiences - the 11 items are scored from 0-4 with 0 being no pain and 4 being extreme pain - maximum score = 100
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
(DHQ) Dietary History Questionnaire
Description
The diet history method is a detailed retrospective dietary assessment which obtains details of individual foods, and comprehensive information about foods eaten less regularly
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Description
The BRFSS is a cross-sectional telephone survey that measures health literacy - the nation's premier system of health-related telephone surveys that collect state data about U.S. residents regarding their health-related risk behaviors, chronic health conditions, and use of preventive services.
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)
Description
The PASE assesses the types of activities typically chosen by older adults (walking, recreational activities, exercise, housework, yard work, and caring for others. It uses frequency, duration, and intensity level of activity over the previous week to assign a score, ranging from 0 to 793, with higher scores indicating greater physical activity -Total PASE scores are computed by multiplying activity weights by activity frequencies
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA)
Description
During the MOCA, a health professional asks a patient a series of questions designed to test a range of everyday mental skills. The maximum MOCA score is 30 points. A score of 20 to 24 suggests mild dementia, 13 to 20 suggests moderate dementia, and less than 12 indicates severe dementia
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3
Title
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Description
The score is the sum of the 20 questions. Possible range is 0-60. If more than four questions are missing answers, do not score the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) questionnaire. A score of 16 points or more is considered depressed
Time Frame
Baseline and Month 3

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: age ≥ 50 Knee Pain plus American College of Radiology (ACR) Criteria for Knee Osteoarthritis BMI = 25 ≥ kg/m2 Exclusion Criteria: Significant co-morbid disease that would threaten safety or impair ability to participate in interventions or testing (Blindness; Type 1 diabetes; Severe coronary artery disease) Not sufficiently overweight or obese, BMI < 27 kg/m2 Not having knee pain Inability to finish 3-month study or unlikely to be compliant (Planning to leave area > 1 month during the next 3 months; Unwilling to change eating or physical activity habits; Unwilling to discontinue pain medication use for 3 days prior to testing visit) Living > 30 minutes from the intervention site Age, age < 50 Other conditions that may prohibit the effective delivery of the intervention (Unable to provide own transportation to exercise center; Unable to read or write)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephen P Messier, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Wake Forest University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ginger Welch Complex
City
Cherokee
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28719
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University/Wake Forest University Health Sciences
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All of the individual data that has been collected during the trial after it has been deidentified will be available.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will become available 6 months after study analysis has been completed.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Persons wishing to receive data must submit a formal request to the study team. Consultation with the leaders of tribe is required and approval must be given prior to data access.

Learn more about this trial

The Cherokee Study: Cherokee Health for Elderly Residents With Osteoarthritis of the Knee

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs