The DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs PTA in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia (SAVAL)
Primary Purpose
Critical Limb Ischemia
Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee
Standard PTA Control Arm
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Critical Limb Ischemia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF)
- Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule
- Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot
- Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator
Intra-procedure Inclusion Criteria:
- Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies).
- Target lesion(s) must be at least 4cm above the ankle joint
- A single target lesion per vessel, in up to 2 vessels, in a single limb
- Degree of stenosis ≥ 70% by visual angiographic assessment
- Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 - 3.25mm for phase A RCT
- RVD is between 2.5 - 3.75mm for phase B non-randomized (Note: RVD is dependent on stent size being used. Refer to DFU for specific requirements)
- Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 70 mm for phase A RCT prior to the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap. (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one DES BTK stent, if randomized to stent)
- Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase A RCT after the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents, if randomized to stent)
- Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase B non-randomized (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents)
- Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the stenting limit zone (4cm above the ankle joint)
- Target lesion(s) is located in an area that may be stented without blocking access to patent main branches
- Treatment of all above the knee inflow lesion(s) is successful prior to treatment of the target lesion
- Guidewire has successfully crossed the target lesion(s)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy ≤ 1year
- Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
- Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb
- Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass)
- Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s)
- Failed PTA of target lesion/vessel ≤ 60 days prior to the procedure date
- Renal failure as measured by a GFR ≤ 30ml/min per 1.73m2, measured ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
- Subject has a platelet count ≤ 50 or ≥ 600 X 103/µL ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
- NYHA class IV heart failure
- Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease (ie, unstable angina)
- History of myocardial infarction or thrombolysis ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
- Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (eg, embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
- Subject is currently taking Canagliflozin
- Body Mass Index (BMI) <18
- Active septicemia or bacteremia
- Coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability
- Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
- Known allergies to stent or stent components
- Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the interventional procedure
- Known hypersensitivity to heparin
- Subject is on a high dose of steroids or is on immunosuppressive therapy
- Subject is currently participating, or plans to participate in, another investigational trial that may confound the results of this trial (unless written approval is received from the Boston Scientific study team)
Intra-procedure Exclusion Criteria
- Angiographic evidence of intra-arterial acute/subacute thrombus or presence of atheroembolism
- Treatment required in > 2 target vessels (Note: a target lesion originating in one vessel and extending into another vessel is considered 1 target vessel)
- Treatment requires the use of alternate therapy in the target vessel(s)/lesion(s), (eg, atherectomy, cutting balloon, re-entry devices, laser, radiation therapy)
- Aneurysm is present in the target vessel(s)
- Extremely calcified lesions
Sites / Locations
- St. Bernards Medical Center
- Arkansas Heart Hospital
- University of California, San Francisco
- Colorado VA
- Bradenton Cardiology
- Willis Knighton Bossier Medical Center - Grace Research, LLC
- Cardiovascular Institute of the South Clinical Research Corporation
- Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation Prevention
- United Heart and Vascular Clinic
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Hackensack University Medical Center
- Holy Name Medical Center
- New Mexico Heart Institute, PA
- New York University Medical Center
- Mount Sinai Medical Center
- Amputation Prevention Center of North Carolina
- NC Heart and Vascular Research, LLC
- Wake Medical Center
- Cleveland Clinic
- OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital
- Integris Baptist Medical Center
- Saint Vincent Consultants in Cardiovascular Diseases at St. Vincent Hospital
- Jackson-Madison County General Hospital
- Heart Hospital of Austin
- Texas Tech University Health
- THR Presbyterian Plano
- AZ Sint-Blasius
- ZOL Genk (Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg)
- UZ Gent (Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent)
- CHU Nantes
- Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
- Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
- Clinique Pasteur
- Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center
- Kokura Memorial Hospital
- Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
- Kansai Rosai Hospital
- Nara Medical University Hospital
- Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
- Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Medical Hospital
- Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
- HAGA Ziekenhuis (Haga Ziekenhuis van Den Haag)
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
DES BTK
Conventional PTA
Arm Description
Treatment with DES BTK
Treatment with standard PTA
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)
The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03551496
First Posted
May 15, 2018
Last Updated
October 6, 2023
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03551496
Brief Title
The DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs PTA in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
Acronym
SAVAL
Official Title
A Randomized Trial Comparing the Drug-Eluting Stent (DES) Below-the-Knee (BTK) Vascular Stent System (DES BTK Vascular Stent System) vs Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty (PTA) Treating Infrapopliteal Lesions in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 31, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 21, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 30, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Single phased global, prospective, multicenter clinical trial designed to demonstrate a superior patency rate and acceptable safety in below the knee arteries with lesions treated with the DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs. percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA).
Detailed Description
A global, prospective, multicenter, 2:1 randomized trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the DES BTK Vascular Stent System compared to standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty to treat infrapopliteal artery lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia(CLI).
Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized/enrolled to support a 2:1 randomization.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Limb Ischemia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Approximately 201 subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion for phase A RCT. Randomizations will be stratified by investigational center and lesion length with 2 subjects receiving the DES BTK for every 1 subject receiving treatment with standard PTA.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
A review of the wound assessment data will be completed by independent reviewer(s) who will be blinded to the randomized therapy.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
201 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
DES BTK
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with DES BTK
Arm Title
Conventional PTA
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Treatment with standard PTA
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Drug Eluting Stent - Below the Knee
Intervention Description
Treatment arm with DES-BTK, starting with one size of the device - 3.5 mm X 80 mm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Standard PTA Control Arm
Intervention Description
The PTA device used must be market-released in the investigational center's geography and the size (ie, diameter, balloon length and catheter length) will be determined by the investigator.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Description
Twelve-Month Primary Patency defined as a binary endpoint to be determined via duplex ultrasound (DUS) measuring flow at the 12-month follow-up visit, in the absence of clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass of the target lesion. Data table consists of the number of participants with flow as assessed by DUS.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Participants Free From Major Adverse Events (MAE)
Description
The primary safety endpoint assesses freedom from major adverse events (MAE) at 12 months post-procedure. (MAE is defined as: above ankle amputation in index limb; major re-intervention; and perioperative (30 day) mortality)
Time Frame
12 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Assisted Primary Patency
Description
Assisted primary patency defined as the percentage (%) of lesions without clinically-driven TLR and those with clinically-driven TLR (not due to complete occlusion or by-pass) which show flow by DUS without restenosis.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Driven Target Lesion Revascularization
Description
Clinically-driven target lesion revascularization is defined as any surgical or percutaneous intervention to the target lesion after the index procedure if:
Occurring within 5mm proximal or distal to the original treatment segment with diameter stenosis ≥50% by quantitative angiography and if participant has recurrent symptoms OR
In-lesion diameter stenosis less than 50% might also be considered a MAE by the CEC if the subject has recurrent symptoms.
Recurrent symptoms are defined as having ≥ 1 change in Rutherford Classification or associated with decreased ABI/TBI of ≥20% or ≥ 0.15 in the treated segment.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Major Amputation (Defined as Amputation of the Lower Limb at the Ankle Level or Above)
Description
Rates of amputation of the lower limb at the ankle level or above
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire.
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality-of-life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 5 responses. The responses record 5 levels of severity (no problems/slight problems/moderate problems/severe problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension). The levels are assigned a numeric code 1-5 (eg, 1= no problems and 5= extreme problems).
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Participant Quality-of-Life Changes Via Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) Questionnaire.
Description
Changes in quality of life is measured using the Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol) questionnaire, which is a 25 item questionnaire used to measure the quality-of-life in patients with lower limb ischemia. The tool is sub-divided into 5 domains: pain, symptoms, activities, social and emotional.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Baseline Wounds Assessed as Healed
Description
Wounds assessed for healed status by Independent Wound Assessors, blinded to randomized treatment.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Rate of Primary Sustained Clinical Improvement as Assessed by Changes in Rutherford Classification From Baseline
Description
Endpoint determined to be a success when there is an improvement in Rutherford Classification of one or more categories as compared to pre-procedure without the need for repeat TLR. Rutherford Classifications:
i. Category 0 - Asymptomatic ii. Category 1 - Mild claudication iii. Category 2 - Moderate claudication iv. Category 3 - Severe claudication v. Category 4 - Ischemic rest pain vi. Category 5 - Minor tissue loss - nonhealing ulcer, focal gangrene vii. Category 6 - Major tissue loss - extending above transmetatarsal (TM) level
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Major, Serious, Non-serious, Unanticipated, Device-related and Procedure-related Adverse Events
Description
Adverse events (AEs) to be classified as major (defined as above ankle amputation of the index limb, major re-intervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) and perioperative (30 day) mortality), serious, non-serious, unanticipated, procedure-related and device-related.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
Title
Number of Participants Who Were Admitted to the Hospital Within 30 Days After the Index Procedure.
Description
Hospitalizations related to Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) due to target lesion revascularization (TLR)/target vessel revascularization (TVR) or Target Limb Major Amputation or Procedure/Device related Adverse Events
Time Frame
Up to 30 days post procedure
Title
Number of Participants With Hemodynamic Improvement
Description
Hemodynamic improvement is defined as improvement of ankle-brachial index (ABI) by ≥0.10 or to an ABI ≥0.90 as compared to pre-procedure value without the need for repeat revascularization.
Time Frame
12 months post procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is 18 years or older and has signed and dated the trial informed consent form (ICF)
Subject is willing and able to comply with the trial testing, procedures and follow-up schedule
Subject has chronic, symptomatic lower limb ischemia, determined by Rutherford categories 4 or 5 in the target limb, with wound(s) confined to toes/forefoot
Subject is a male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active must be using, or agree to use, a medically-acceptable method of birth control as confirmed by the investigator
Intra-procedure Inclusion Criteria:
Stenotic, restenotic or occlusive target lesion(s) located in the tibioperoneal trunk, anterior tibial, posterior tibial and/or peroneal artery(ies).
Target lesion(s) must be at least 4cm above the ankle joint
A single target lesion per vessel, in up to 2 vessels, in a single limb
Degree of stenosis ≥ 70% by visual angiographic assessment
Reference vessel diameter is between 2.5 - 3.25mm for phase A RCT
Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 70 mm for phase A RCT prior to the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap. (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with one DES BTK stent, if randomized to stent)
Total target lesion length (or series of lesion segments) to be treated is ≤ 140 mm for phase A RCT after the data monitoring committee's approval for stent overlap (Note: Lesion segment(s) must be fully covered with up to two DES BTK stents, if randomized to stent)
Target vessel(s) reconstitute(s) at or above the stenting limit zone (4cm above the ankle joint)
Target lesion(s) is located in an area that may be stented without blocking access to patent main branches
Treatment of all above the knee inflow lesion(s) is successful prior to treatment of the target lesion
Guidewire has successfully crossed the target lesion(s)
Exclusion Criteria:
Life expectancy ≤ 1year
Stroke ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
Prior or planned major amputation in the target limb
Previous surgery in the target vessel(s) (including prior ipsilateral crural bypass)
Previously implanted stent in the target vessel(s)
Failed PTA of target lesion/vessel ≤ 60 days prior to the procedure date
Renal failure as measured by a GFR ≤ 30ml/min per 1.73m2, measured ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
Subject has a platelet count ≤ 50 or ≥ 600 X 103/µL ≤ 30 days prior to the procedure date
NYHA class IV heart failure
Subject has symptomatic coronary artery disease (ie, unstable angina)
History of myocardial infarction or thrombolysis ≤ 90 days prior to the procedure date
Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (eg, embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
Subject is currently taking Canagliflozin
Body Mass Index (BMI) <18
Active septicemia or bacteremia
Coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability
Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
Known allergies to stent or stent components
Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the interventional procedure
Known hypersensitivity to heparin
Subject is on a high dose of steroids or is on immunosuppressive therapy
Subject is currently participating, or plans to participate in, another investigational trial that may confound the results of this trial (unless written approval is received from the Boston Scientific study team)
Intra-procedure Exclusion Criteria
Angiographic evidence of intra-arterial acute/subacute thrombus or presence of atheroembolism
Treatment required in > 2 target vessels (Note: a target lesion originating in one vessel and extending into another vessel is considered 1 target vessel)
Treatment requires the use of alternate therapy in the target vessel(s)/lesion(s), (eg, atherectomy, cutting balloon, re-entry devices, laser, radiation therapy)
Aneurysm is present in the target vessel(s)
Extremely calcified lesions
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jihad Mustapha, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation Prevention
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hendrik van Overhagen, MD
Organizational Affiliation
HAGA Ziekenhuis (HagaZiekenhuis van Den Haag)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick Geraghty, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Masato Nakamura, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center - Division of Cardiovascular Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St. Bernards Medical Center
City
Jonesboro
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arkansas Heart Hospital
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72211
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, San Francisco
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Colorado VA
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bradenton Cardiology
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Willis Knighton Bossier Medical Center - Grace Research, LLC
City
Bossier City
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
71111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiovascular Institute of the South Clinical Research Corporation
City
Houma
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Cardiac & Vascular Centers for Amputation Prevention
City
Grand Rapids
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49525
Country
United States
Facility Name
United Heart and Vascular Clinic
City
Saint Paul
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hackensack University Medical Center
City
Hackensack
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holy Name Medical Center
City
Teaneck
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07666
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Mexico Heart Institute, PA
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Amputation Prevention Center of North Carolina
City
Cary
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27518
Country
United States
Facility Name
NC Heart and Vascular Research, LLC
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Medical Center
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
OhioHealth Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Integris Baptist Medical Center
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saint Vincent Consultants in Cardiovascular Diseases at St. Vincent Hospital
City
Erie
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16544
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jackson-Madison County General Hospital
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Hospital of Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Tech University Health
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79430
Country
United States
Facility Name
THR Presbyterian Plano
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
AZ Sint-Blasius
City
Dendermonde
ZIP/Postal Code
9200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
ZOL Genk (Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg)
City
Genk
ZIP/Postal Code
3600
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Gent (Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent)
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CHU Nantes
City
Nantes
ZIP/Postal Code
44000
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Paris Saint Joseph
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75014
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75015
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Pasteur
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31076
Country
France
Facility Name
Tokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical Center
City
Urayasu-shi
State/Province
Chiba-ken
ZIP/Postal Code
279-0001
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kokura Memorial Hospital
City
Kitakyushu
State/Province
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
802-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Asahikawa Medical University Hospital
City
Asahikawa-shi
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
078-8510
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kansai Rosai Hospital
City
Amagasaki
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
660-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nara Medical University Hospital
City
Kashihara
State/Province
Nara
ZIP/Postal Code
634-8522
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
City
Kishiwada
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
596-8522
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Medical Hospital
City
Bunkyō-Ku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
113-8510
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Toho University Ohashi Medical Center
City
Meguro
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
153-8515
Country
Japan
Facility Name
HAGA Ziekenhuis (Haga Ziekenhuis van Den Haag)
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2566
Country
Netherlands
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28465288
Citation
Kolte D, Kennedy KF, Shishehbor MH, Abbott JD, Khera S, Soukas P, Mamdani ST, Hyder ON, Drachman DE, Aronow HD. Thirty-Day Readmissions After Endovascular or Surgical Therapy for Critical Limb Ischemia: Analysis of the 2013 to 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Databases. Circulation. 2017 Jul 11;136(2):167-176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027625. Epub 2017 May 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19897335
Citation
Conte MS, Geraghty PJ, Bradbury AW, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Moneta GL, Nehler MR, Powell RJ, Sidawy AN. Suggested objective performance goals and clinical trial design for evaluating catheter-based treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec;50(6):1462-73.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.09.044. Epub 2009 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23194941
Citation
Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, Koppensteiner R, Commeau P, Bosiers M, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Siablis D, Lammer J, Van Ransbeeck M, Qureshi AC, Stoll HP; ACHILLES Investigators. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.989.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26861113
Citation
Spreen MI, Martens JM, Hansen BE, Knippenberg B, Verhey E, van Dijk LC, de Vries JP, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EJ, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WP, van Overhagen H. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002376.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26858079
Citation
Kinlay S. Management of Critical Limb Ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e001946. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.001946.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25439329
Citation
Elsayed S, Clavijo LC. Critical limb ischemia. Cardiol Clin. 2015 Feb;33(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23336860
Citation
Conte MS. Critical appraisal of surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2 Suppl):8S-13S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.05.114.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25045160
Citation
Gray BH, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Dieter RS, Jaff MR, White CJ; Peripheral Vascular Disease Committee for the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. SCAI expert consensus statement for infrapopliteal arterial intervention appropriate use. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Oct 1;84(4):539-45. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25395. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16325694
Citation
Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillepsie I, Ruckley CV, Raab G, Storkey H; BASIL trial participants. Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005 Dec 3;366(9501):1925-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67704-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28602580
Citation
Popplewell MA, Davies HOB, Narayanswami J, Renton M, Sharp A, Bate G, Patel S, Deeks J, Bradbury AW. A Comparison of Outcomes in Patients with Infrapopliteal Disease Randomised to Vein Bypass or Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Bypass vs. Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Aug;54(2):195-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23993107
Citation
Sadaghianloo N, Jean-Baptiste E, Declemy S, Mousnier A, Brizzi S, Hassen-Khodja R. Percutaneous angioplasty of long tibial occlusions in critical limb ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct;27(7):894-903. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.02.008.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22169682
Citation
Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, Torsello G, Zeller T, Deloose K, Schmidt A, Tessarek J, Vinck E, Schwartz LB. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28411244
Citation
Spreen MI, Martens JM, Knippenberg B, van Dijk LC, de Vries JPM, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EPA, Bijlstra OD, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WPTM, van Overhagen H. Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 14;6(4):e004877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004877.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24637579
Citation
de Weger VA, Beijnen JH, Schellens JH. Cellular and clinical pharmacology of the taxanes docetaxel and paclitaxel--a review. Anticancer Drugs. 2014 May;25(5):488-94. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000093. Erratum In: Anticancer Drugs. 2015 Feb;26(2):240.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25615282
Citation
Ng VG, Mena C, Pietras C, Lansky AJ. Local delivery of paclitaxel in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015 Mar;45(3):333-45. doi: 10.1111/eci.12407. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21419649
Citation
Dake MD, Van Alstine WG, Zhou Q, Ragheb AO. Polymer-free paclitaxel-coated Zilver PTX Stents--evaluation of pharmacokinetics and comparative safety in porcine arteries. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2011 May;22(5):603-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2010.12.027. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26839391
Citation
Banerjee S, Sarode K, Mohammad A, Gigliotti O, Baig MS, Tsai S, Shammas NW, Prasad A, Abu-Fadel M, Klein A, Armstrong EJ, Jeon-Slaughter H, Brilakis ES, Bhatt DL. Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Thrombosis: Report From the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002730. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002730. Erratum In: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;9(10 ):
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26663663
Citation
Federman DG, Ladiiznski B, Dardik A, Kelly M, Shapshak D, Ueno CM, Mostow EN, Richmond NA, Hopf HW. Wound Healing Society 2014 update on guidelines for arterial ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2016 Jan-Feb;24(1):127-35. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12395. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
The DES BTK Vascular Stent System vs PTA in Subjects With Critical Limb Ischemia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs