search
Back to results

The Effect of a Point-of-care Sputum Specimen Assay at the Emergency Department for Patients Suspected of Pneumonia

Primary Purpose

Pneumonia, Bacterial

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
POC-PCR
Sponsored by
University of Southern Denmark
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pneumonia, Bacterial focused on measuring Emergency department, Antibiotics, Sputum

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency department patients suspected of pneumonia by the attending physician and with at least one of the following symptoms: dyspnea, cough, expectoration, chest tightness or fever and indication for chest x-ray

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit.
  • Admission within the last 14 days
  • Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission
  • Pregnant women
  • Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 <200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital of Southern Jutland

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Standard care

POC-PCR analysis supplied with a recommended action list developed by a microbiologist

Arm Description

A treating physician must perform a clinical assessment within half an hour of patient arrival. This assessment includes the decision whether the patient is suspected of having pneumonia and if this is the case, a sputum specimen and chest x-ray will be ordered. Patients with suspected pneumonia who can deliver a sputum specimen will be randomly allocated with a 1:1 computer-generated randomization schedule with permuting blocks in relation to optimal therapeutical intervention strategy. All standard care sputum samples will be cultured and analysed according to the sites' standard procedures. Under standard care, the treating physician alone decides on the optimal therapeutical intervention.

Along with standard analyses, the specimens will be analysed with POC-PCR and the treating physician will receive an action-list with the results from POC-PCR.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Antibiotic treatment at 4-hour plan
The primary outcome is to determine the effectiveness of POC-PCR sputum analysis on antibiotic prescription, the treatment will either be registered as targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment at four hours after admission. This is a binary outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment
Transfer to the intensive care unit will be recorded during the current hospitalization as a binary variable (transferred/not-transferred)
Length of hospital stay
Defined as the time (in days) spent in hospital during the current admission. Measured in days from admission to hospital discharge. Discharge date minus admission date.
30-days mortality
Mortality within 30 days from admission to the Emergency Department
Readmission
If a subject is admitted over a 30 day period after the current hospitalization discharge measured as a binary outcome Re-admissions/not re-admissions.
In-hospital mortality
Patient mortality during the current hospitalization. Binary outcome - Died/ Not died
Antibiotic treatment at 48 hour
The treatment will either be registered as targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment 48 hours after admission. This is a binary outcome.
Antibiotic treatment at discharge from hospital
The treatment will either be registered as a targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment after the patient is discharged from the hospital. This is a binary outcome.
Bacterial agents and viruses from the microbiological results
The bacterial agents and viruses from the Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (Biomérieux) and standard sputum culture for the two microbiological analysis will be presented as descriptive statistics.

Full Information

First Posted
November 19, 2020
Last Updated
September 13, 2022
Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04651712
Brief Title
The Effect of a Point-of-care Sputum Specimen Assay at the Emergency Department for Patients Suspected of Pneumonia
Official Title
The Effect of a Point-of-care Sputum Specimen Assay on Antibiotic Treatment of Patients Admitted Acutely With Suspected Pneumonia: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 28, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 1, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern Denmark

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Antibiotic resistance has been identified by the WHO as one of the biggest threats to the health of the world population. In Denmark, there has been an increasing focus on optimizing antibiotic consumption in recent years, but despite significant efforts, total consumption has increased in the hospital sector, especially regarding consumption and in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Currently, a pneumonia diagnosis is primarily based on clinical symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, chest pain, fever and sputum production, combined with X-ray of the lungs, relevant blood tests and microbiological analysis of sputum samples. X-ray is however an imprecise diagnostic tool, and sputum assays responses are available after 2 days. Sputum can be cultivated to determine the bacterial agent. However, the sputum samples are often of poor quality and many patients cannot deliver a sample. A recently published Danish study shows, that only half of the patients at the ED have sputum samples collected for culturing and none of them had the antibiotic treatment adjusted based on the microbiological results of the sputum. This study's hypothesis is that point-of-care-polymerase chain reaction (POC-PCR) is superior to standard care on the prescription of targeted pneumonia treatment.
Detailed Description
The diagnosis of pneumonia is challenged by nonspecific symptoms, uncertain diagnostic methods, poor prognostic tools and waiting time for test results up to several days. A patient's length of stay in a Danish Emergency Department rarely exceeds 48 hours. Within this period the patient is examined, treated and discharged either home or to another department. Therefore, rapid molecular detection of respiratory pathogens is needed to add value to the management of the diagnostics of pneumonia and could reduce the initial use of antibiotics. Molecular diagnostic tests based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays generate high sensitive analyses in one hour from specimen collection. The Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (Biomérieux) can identify 18 bacterial agents including 3 atypical pathogens 9 viruses and 7 antimicrobial resistance genes. This point-of-care (POC) test is promising, as bacterial pathogens often coexist with viruses or are identified with mixed infections. However, the high specificity of molecular diagnostics can challenge the interpretation of clinically significant agents and demands interpretation by highly qualified specialists. Therefore, the POC-PCR combined with advice from a microbiologist has the potential to optimize therapeutic regimens and reduce prescriptions of inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics in the initial management of pneumonia. This study aims to investigate how effective the addition of POC-PCR analysis of sputum is to the diagnostic set-up for community-acquired pneumonia on antibiotic prescription at 4 hours after admission without consequent adverse advents to identify the effect of POC-PCR on prescribed antibiotic treatment 48 hours after admission and 24 hours after discharge to investigate the agreement between POC-PCR and sputum culture on microbiological analysis

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pneumonia, Bacterial
Keywords
Emergency department, Antibiotics, Sputum

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Masking Description
The patients will be blinded, and the investigator will be blinded to POC-PCR results, data management and analysis, but not allocation. Outcome assessors will not be blinded
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
290 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Standard care
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
A treating physician must perform a clinical assessment within half an hour of patient arrival. This assessment includes the decision whether the patient is suspected of having pneumonia and if this is the case, a sputum specimen and chest x-ray will be ordered. Patients with suspected pneumonia who can deliver a sputum specimen will be randomly allocated with a 1:1 computer-generated randomization schedule with permuting blocks in relation to optimal therapeutical intervention strategy. All standard care sputum samples will be cultured and analysed according to the sites' standard procedures. Under standard care, the treating physician alone decides on the optimal therapeutical intervention.
Arm Title
POC-PCR analysis supplied with a recommended action list developed by a microbiologist
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Along with standard analyses, the specimens will be analysed with POC-PCR and the treating physician will receive an action-list with the results from POC-PCR.
Intervention Type
Diagnostic Test
Intervention Name(s)
POC-PCR
Intervention Description
The result of the POC-PCR will be presented by the study assistant to the treating physician within four hours upon admission. The treating physician will along with the result receive a recommended action list, developed by microbiologists.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Antibiotic treatment at 4-hour plan
Description
The primary outcome is to determine the effectiveness of POC-PCR sputum analysis on antibiotic prescription, the treatment will either be registered as targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment at four hours after admission. This is a binary outcome.
Time Frame
4 hours after admission
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intensive care unit (ICU) treatment
Description
Transfer to the intensive care unit will be recorded during the current hospitalization as a binary variable (transferred/not-transferred)
Time Frame
within 60 days from admission to the emergency department
Title
Length of hospital stay
Description
Defined as the time (in days) spent in hospital during the current admission. Measured in days from admission to hospital discharge. Discharge date minus admission date.
Time Frame
within 60 days from current admission to the emergency department
Title
30-days mortality
Description
Mortality within 30 days from admission to the Emergency Department
Time Frame
30 days from the admission to the emergency department
Title
Readmission
Description
If a subject is admitted over a 30 day period after the current hospitalization discharge measured as a binary outcome Re-admissions/not re-admissions.
Time Frame
within 30 days from the discharge to the hospital
Title
In-hospital mortality
Description
Patient mortality during the current hospitalization. Binary outcome - Died/ Not died
Time Frame
within 60 days from admission to the emergency department
Title
Antibiotic treatment at 48 hour
Description
The treatment will either be registered as targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment 48 hours after admission. This is a binary outcome.
Time Frame
48 hours after admission
Title
Antibiotic treatment at discharge from hospital
Description
The treatment will either be registered as a targeted or non-targeted antibiotic treatment after the patient is discharged from the hospital. This is a binary outcome.
Time Frame
24 hours after hospital discharge
Title
Bacterial agents and viruses from the microbiological results
Description
The bacterial agents and viruses from the Biofire® FilmArray® Pneumonia Panel plus (Biomérieux) and standard sputum culture for the two microbiological analysis will be presented as descriptive statistics.
Time Frame
Within the first 7 days from specimen collection
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
CURB-65 score for pneumonia severity
Description
Confusion of new onset, Blood Urea nitrogen greater than 7 mmol/L (19 mg/dL), respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute or greater, blood pressure less than 90 mmHg systolic or diastolic blood pressure 60 mmHg or less and age 65 or older
Time Frame
within 4 hours from admission
Title
Pneumonia severity index (PSI)
Description
Risk classes to predict the severity of pneumonia. Scores are given based on demographics, comorbidity, clinical measurements and physical Exam Findings (<70 = Risk Class II, 71-90 = Risk Class III, 91-130 = Risk Class IV, >130 = Risk Class V)
Time Frame
within 4 hours from admission
Title
Number of clostridium infections
Description
Identify through patient records if the patient was infected with clostridium difficille, binary outcome yes/no
Time Frame
measured 40 days after discharge from the emergency department
Title
Procalcitonin (PCT), Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR), YKL-40 and Krebs von den Lungen (KL-6)
Description
Measurement of serum PCT and suPAR are collected in connection to routine blood tests within 1 hour from admission
Time Frame
results within 4 hour from admission
Title
90 days mortality
Description
binary
Time Frame
Within 90 days from admission to emergency department

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Emergency department patients suspected of pneumonia by the attending physician and with at least one of the following symptoms: dyspnea, cough, expectoration, chest tightness or fever and indication for chest x-ray Exclusion Criteria: If the attending physician considers that participation will delay a life-saving treatment or patient needs direct transfer to the intensive care unit. Admission within the last 14 days Verified COVID-19 disease within 14 days before admission Pregnant women Severe immunodeficiencies: Primary immunodeficiencies and secondary immunodeficiencies (HIV positive CD4 <200, Patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment (ATC L04A), Corticosteroid treatment (>20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent for >14 days within the last 30 days), Chemotherapy within 30 days)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christian Backer Mogensen, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital of Southern Denmark
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital of Southern Jutland
City
Aabenraa
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31253624
Citation
Skjot-Arkil H, Mogensen CB, Lassen AT, Johansen IS, Chen M, Petersen P, Andersen KV, Ellermann-Eriksen S, Moller JM, Ludwig M, Fuglsang-Damgaard D, Nielsen FE, Petersen DB, Jensen US, Rosenvinge FS. Carrier prevalence and risk factors for colonisation of multiresistant bacteria in Danish emergency departments: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e029000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029000.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24898129
Citation
Sogaard M, Nielsen RB, Schonheyder HC, Norgaard M, Thomsen RW. Nationwide trends in pneumonia hospitalization rates and mortality, Denmark 1997-2011. Respir Med. 2014 Aug;108(8):1214-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20729232
Citation
Welte T, Torres A, Nathwani D. Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe. Thorax. 2012 Jan;67(1):71-9. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.129502. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16061709
Citation
van der Eerden MM, Vlaspolder F, de Graaff CS, Groot T, Bronsveld W, Jansen HM, Boersma WG. Comparison between pathogen directed antibiotic treatment and empirical broad spectrum antibiotic treatment in patients with community acquired pneumonia: a prospective randomised study. Thorax. 2005 Aug;60(8):672-8. doi: 10.1136/thx.2004.030411.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26126606
Citation
Becerra MB, Becerra BJ, Banta JE, Safdar N. Impact of Clostridium difficile infection among pneumonia and urinary tract infection hospitalizations: an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Jul 1;15:254. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0925-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12006433
Citation
Ewig S, Schlochtermeier M, Goke N, Niederman MS. Applying sputum as a diagnostic tool in pneumonia: limited yield, minimal impact on treatment decisions. Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1486-92. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1486.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11049763
Citation
Roson B, Carratala J, Verdaguer R, Dorca J, Manresa F, Gudiol F. Prospective study of the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in the initial approach to community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization. Clin Infect Dis. 2000 Oct;31(4):869-74. doi: 10.1086/318151. Epub 2000 Oct 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29150897
Citation
Hadfield J, Bennett L. Determining best outcomes from community-acquired pneumonia and how to achieve them. Respirology. 2018 Feb;23(2):138-147. doi: 10.1111/resp.13218. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
34593497
Citation
Skjot-Arkil H, Heltborg A, Lorentzen MH, Cartuliares MB, Hertz MA, Graumann O, Rosenvinge FS, Petersen ERB, Ostergaard C, Laursen CB, Skovsted TA, Posth S, Chen M, Mogensen CB. Improved diagnostics of infectious diseases in emergency departments: a protocol of a multifaceted multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e049606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049606.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of a Point-of-care Sputum Specimen Assay at the Emergency Department for Patients Suspected of Pneumonia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs