The Effect of Cannabis in Pancreatic Cancer
Primary Purpose
Neoplasms Pancreatic, Cachexia; Cancer, Cannabis
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
THC and CBD Mixture
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Neoplasms Pancreatic
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult, palliative pancreatic cancer diagnosis, weight loss > 5%, understand and read Danish.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Regular use of cannabis, psychiatric disorders, alcohol abuse, life expectancy < 6 months
Sites / Locations
- Department of clinical oncology, Næstved-Roskilde Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
No Intervention
Arm Label
THC and CBD Mixture
Control
Arm Description
32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, intervention with oral drops of THC, 25mg/ml and CBD 50mg/ml, daily administered for 4 weeks
32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, no experimental treatment,
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Energy and protein intake
Dietary history (% of estimated needs - NRS 2002)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Lean body mass
Bioimpedance (% of body weight, kg)
Appetite 1
VAS (cm on 10 cm scale)
Appetite 2
Dietary history (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Appetite 3
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Appetite 4
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Quality of life 1
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Quality of life 2
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Quality of life 3
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Pain 1
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Pain 2
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Pain 3
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Mortality (8 weeks)
Patient records, national register
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03245658
First Posted
March 21, 2017
Last Updated
August 9, 2017
Sponsor
Jens Rikardt Andersen
Collaborators
Augustinus Fonden, Københavns Universitet, Familien Hede Nielsens Fond
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03245658
Brief Title
The Effect of Cannabis in Pancreatic Cancer
Official Title
The Effect of Medical Cannabis Inpatients With Palliative Pancreatic Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 6, 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 6, 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 6, 2018 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Jens Rikardt Andersen
Collaborators
Augustinus Fonden, Københavns Universitet, Familien Hede Nielsens Fond
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The prevalence of malnutrition is overwhelming in pancreatic cancer patients, >80% experience a weight loss >10% of their habitual weight, which may develop into cancer cachexia. Cachexia may cause decreased quality of life, increased mortality and morbidity e.g. poorer response to antitumor treatment, longer length of stay, higher complications rate and shorter life expectancy. There is currently no effective treatment of cancer cachexia, but clinical research in medical cannabis show promising results. The cannabinoids THC and CBD show the highest pharmacological effect, but cannabis consists of >70 cannabinoids. THC and CBD exert their effect on the endocannabinoid system which modulate physiological systems such as pain, inflammation, appetite and energy balance. Thus, this potential orexigenic effect from THC and CBD may improve the nutritional state in patients with pancreatic cancer. Taking the above scientific rationale and the lack of evidence into account, the relevance of this clinical trial appears high.
This clinical trial is an eight-week crossover design examining the effects of the cannabinoids THC and CBD on energy- and protein intake and lean body mass as a measure of appetite, nausea and quality of life. A characterization of the metabolism is analysed through a metabolomics analysis.
Detailed Description
The aim is to investigate the effect of the cannabinoids THC (tetrahydrocannabinol) and CBD (cannabidiol) on energy- and protein intake and lean body mass in patients with pancreatic cancer. A metabolomics analysis is conducted to determine the simultaneous and quantitative intracellular metabolites when medical cannabis is administered in patients with pancreatic cancer.
The clinical trial is designed as a crossover intervention trial with a four week intervention period and a four week control period. The study subjects are instructed to administer individual titered doses of medical cannabis during the intervention period. Dietary history, height, weight, bio- impedance, VAS scales and quality of life measurements are conducted at baseline, every second week and at the end of the clinical trial. Six study subjects are invited to a semi-structured interview. Blood samples and urine samples are used for the metabolomics analysis thus a research biobank is established.
Study population: 32 study subjects diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in palliative care are included. Inclusions criteria: adult, weight loss > 5% of habitual weight. Able to understand and read Danish. Exclusion criteria: regular use of cannabis, psychiatric disorders e.g. Anorexia Nervosa, alcohol abuse, life expectancy
Descriptive statistics is used to characterize the study population. The statistical analysis is carried out in R-Project and all primary data are analyzed as intention-to-treat. P value 90% of patients with pancreatic cancer in the palliative phase experience reduced energy- and protein intake. The quantity of the reduction is, however, very poorly described and appear to depend on cancer progression.
The trial which is approved by the Research Ethics Committee is expected to commence May 2017 after approval by the Danish Medicines Agency and the Data Protection Agency. The clinical trial finish no later than February the 6th 2018. The specified time limit is due to the trial is also basis for a master's thesis in Clinical Nutrition at the Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen. A PhD based on this master thesis will proceed afterwards. Taking into account the patients' usual control times and to minimize dropout, patient inclusion takes place ongoing, so that there is a control- and intervention period at the same time. Outcome measurements including anthropometry and dietary interviews are carried out at baseline, every two weeks and at the termination of each period. Quality of life measurements and VAS scales are filled out weekly in both periods. The semi-structured interview is carried out at the end of the clinical trial.
The results are going to be published, this applies to both positive, inconclusive and negative results. The clinical trial is registered in the two trial databases ClinicalTrials.gov and EudraCT (clinicaltrialsregister.eu). Scientific articles based on the findings are submitted to relevant journals such as The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2014 Impact Factor: 6.770). The results are furthermore used in a master's thesis in Clinical Nutrition at the Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen by Ninette Renee Jensen and Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen. The results will be presented at congresses. reported in scientific articles, in the master"s thesis, in the information material, on the department's website, at the public master ́s thesis defense as well as at future congresses, or wherever desired. When the clinical trial is completed a report is sent to relevant authorities including the Research Ethics Committee and the Danish Medicines Agency within 90 days of completion.
Necessary permits from the Data Protection Agency, the Danish Medicines Agency and the Research Ethics Committee are obtained before the initiation of the clinical trial. The protocol is approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Side effects caused by medical cannabis varies in the literature, thus an individual titration period is implemented. No fatal cases have been reported with the use of medical cannabis in human clinical trials. Potential beneficial effects are expected when the study subjects are being treated with medical cannabis, since a gain in appetite and quality of life is expected through a modulation in the endocannabinoid system. Patients are informed that the drug is discontinued after the intervention period. The two master's thesis students review patient charts weekly to evaluate potential side effects to the drug. The clinical trial is terminated immediately in case of serious side effects. Relevant information material is handed out to the study subjects.
Upon loss of muscle mass and function as seen in cancer cachexia, the administration of individually titrated doses of medical cannabis could hypothetically slow down the condition further, by affecting any negative protein - and energy balance through the endocannabinoid system. When relieving cancer cachexia and improving steady-state, we expect improved prognosis's for the included patients
The overall objective of the study is that it must be orientated towards clinical significance, so that it can be implemented in clinical practice, thus benefit patients with cancer. The short-term goal is that the patients in this trial experience positive effects in terms of increased appetite and quality of life. Positive effects may contribute to increased research into this area thus resulting in improved evidence. In the longer term, the aim is that the results from this study may contribute to a treatment protocol on malnutrition recommending the use of medical cannabis based on high scientific evidence, so a larger group of patients with cancer may benefit. The results from the study may be used for recommendations on doses, side effects and likely beneficial effects when administer medical cannabis. The metabolomics analysis can contribute to a improved understanding of the cancer cachexia pathophysiology and management in a more experimental matter.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neoplasms Pancreatic, Cachexia; Cancer, Cannabis, Appetite Loss, Palliative Medicine, Morbidity, Mortality
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
THC and CBD Mixture
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, intervention with oral drops of THC, 25mg/ml and CBD 50mg/ml, daily administered for 4 weeks
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
32 patients with palliative pancreatic cancer, no experimental treatment,
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
THC and CBD Mixture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Medical cannabis oral drops
Intervention Description
Individually titrated doses on daily basis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Energy and protein intake
Description
Dietary history (% of estimated needs - NRS 2002)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lean body mass
Description
Bioimpedance (% of body weight, kg)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Appetite 1
Description
VAS (cm on 10 cm scale)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Appetite 2
Description
Dietary history (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Appetite 3
Description
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Appetite 4
Description
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Quality of life 1
Description
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Quality of life 2
Description
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Quality of life 3
Description
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Pain 1
Description
EORTC QLQ-C30 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Pain 2
Description
EORTC QLQ-PAN26 (score, standard for the Quality of Life entity)
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Pain 3
Description
VAS (VAS (cm on 10 cm scale))
Time Frame
The outcome measure will be assessed at day 0 and at week 4
Title
Mortality (8 weeks)
Description
Patient records, national register
Time Frame
8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult, palliative pancreatic cancer diagnosis, weight loss > 5%, understand and read Danish.
Exclusion Criteria:
Regular use of cannabis, psychiatric disorders, alcohol abuse, life expectancy < 6 months
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD, MPA
Phone
004523346654
Email
jra@nexs.ku.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen, Msc stud
Phone
004540461306
Email
gdz384@alumni.ku.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD, MPA
Organizational Affiliation
University of Copenhagen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of clinical oncology, Næstved-Roskilde Hospital
City
Naestved
ZIP/Postal Code
4700
Country
Denmark
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD, MPA
Phone
004523346654
Email
jra@nexs.ku.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rikke Lundsgaard Nielsen, Msc stud
Phone
004540461306
Email
gdz384@alumni.ku.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jens Rikardt Andersen, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16317825
Citation
Perras C. Sativex for the management of multiple sclerosis symptoms. Issues Emerg Health Technol. 2005 Sep;(72):1-4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
27403414
Citation
Gartner S, Kruger J, Aghdassi AA, Steveling A, Simon P, Lerch MM, Mayerle J. Nutrition in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review. Gastrointest Tumors. 2016 May;2(4):195-202. doi: 10.1159/000442873. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18728826
Citation
Ware MA, Daeninck P, Maida V. A review of nabilone in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):99-107. doi: 10.2147/tcrm.s1132.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12648025
Citation
Grotenhermen F. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cannabinoids. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(4):327-60. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342040-00003.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17566383
Citation
Slatkin NE. Cannabinoids in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: beyond prevention of acute emesis. J Support Oncol. 2007 May;5(5 Suppl 3):1-9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23141881
Citation
Johnson JR, Lossignol D, Burnell-Nugent M, Fallon MT. An open-label extension study to investigate the long-term safety and tolerability of THC/CBD oromucosal spray and oromucosal THC spray in patients with terminal cancer-related pain refractory to strong opioid analgesics. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Aug;46(2):207-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.07.014. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19896326
Citation
Johnson JR, Burnell-Nugent M, Lossignol D, Ganae-Motan ED, Potts R, Fallon MT. Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of THC:CBD extract and THC extract in patients with intractable cancer-related pain. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Feb;39(2):167-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.008. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26883879
Citation
Reuter SE, Martin JH. Pharmacokinetics of Cannabis in Cancer Cachexia-Anorexia Syndrome. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2016 Jul;55(7):807-812. doi: 10.1007/s40262-015-0363-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22076835
Citation
Gamage TF, Lichtman AH. The endocannabinoid system: role in energy regulation. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2012 Jan;58(1):144-8. doi: 10.1002/pbc.23367.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19587829
Citation
Fox KM, Brooks JM, Gandra SR, Markus R, Chiou CF. Estimation of Cachexia among Cancer Patients Based on Four Definitions. J Oncol. 2009;2009:693458. doi: 10.1155/2009/693458. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19883531
Citation
Gullett N, Rossi P, Kucuk O, Johnstone PA. Cancer-induced cachexia: a guide for the oncologist. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2009 Fall;7(4):155-69.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20076976
Citation
Blum D, Omlin A, Fearon K, Baracos V, Radbruch L, Kaasa S, Strasser F; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative. Evolving classification systems for cancer cachexia: ready for clinical practice? Support Care Cancer. 2010 Mar;18(3):273-9. doi: 10.1007/s00520-009-0800-6.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
The Effect of Cannabis in Pancreatic Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs