search
Back to results

The Effect of Implant Coating (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup (Biomet)
Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA (Biomet)
Sponsored by
University of Aarhus
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis focused on measuring Prosthesis fixation, hip arthroplasty

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis
  2. Radiographically and clinically adequate bone quality with regard to a total hip prosthesis, including osteoporosis-Dexa-Scanning verification.
  3. Age 55 to 75 years
  4. Informed written consent

Exclusion Criteria:

Orthopaedic

  1. Other disease of affected hip than primary coxarthrosis at time of inclusion 1.1. Secondary osteoarthritis 1.1.1. sequelae after acetabular fracture 1.1.2. hip-near femoral fracture 1.1.3. calve perthe 1.1.4. dysplasia (severe) 1.1.5. other 1.2 Atraumatic caput necrosis
  2. Neuromuscular or vascular condition in one or the other lower extremity
  3. Immobilization postoperative for long periods, for instance because of other serious diseases, alloplasties of the other lower-extremity joint, etc (decided by investigator)
  4. Reoperation of affected hip because of 4.1 luxation (with closed or open reduction) 4.2 deep infection 4.3 fracture 4.4 aseptic loosening 4.5 other
  5. Body Mass Index (BMI) at time of inclusion 81-84 5.1 ≥ 35 kg/m2 (grade 2+3 85, Obese Class I 81) 5.2 < 18,5 kg/m2 81-84
  6. Insufficient RSA marker spread or rigidity Operative
  7. Use of component other than Bimetric femoral stem (HA porous-coated without collar)
  8. Unsuitable bone quality for uncemented hip alloplasty, evaluated preoperatively
  9. Complications peroperatively on insertion of hip alloplasty that necessitate deviation for the described operative procedure (see section: "Operative procedure"), among others 9.1 per- and postoperative fracture 9.2 bone graft used peroperatively (treatment of bone defects, cysts, etc.) 9.3 screw fixation of the acetabulum 9.4 gluteal detachment or extensive femoral exposure 9.5 trochanter osteotomy 9.6 Under-reaming 1-2 mm (cup size is one mm larger than the reamer, i.e. reaming 51 mm, cup 52 mm) 9.7 Other Radiographic
  10. Cup placement 10.1 Cup inclination in AP (anteroposterior) plan >56 degrees and <35 degrees as evaluated on roentgenogram Medical
  11. Osteoporosis 11.1. previously diagnosed 11.2. project-related preoperative DEXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ) scan Patients with osteoporosis on the scan (T-score < -2.5) are excluded from the study with referral to medical osteoporosis treatment. Patients with osteopenia (T-score < -1) are included in the project with referral to osteoporosis prophylactic treatment. Patients with osteopenia at project inclusion are DEXA re-scanned at the 2 year follow up.
  12. Arthritis 12.1. rheumatoid arthritis 12.2. psoriasis arthritis 12.3. other arthritides
  13. Metabolic bone disease 13.1. hyperparathyroidism 13.2. Paget bone disease 13.3. renal osteodystrophy 13.4. other
  14. Reduced kidney function thereby influencing bone metabolism
  15. Previous treatment of skeleton with radiation therapy
  16. Cancer Pharmaceuticals
  17. Pharmaceuticals that effect calcium-phosphorus metabolism and bone density 87-98, either through intermittent administration or as a constant dose 17.1. glucocorticoids (systemic) beyond short-term treatment (<5 days) 17.2. immunosuppression/modulation (cyclosporine, methotrexate, etc.) Compliance related
  18. Absent patient compliance with treatment and follow-up investigations
  19. Abuse that the investigator feels would weaken compliance 19.1. alcohol abuse 19.2. medication abuse
  20. Psychological instability (including patient in treatment lithium/antidepressants/neuroleptics/ antipsychotic drugs) which the investigator feels would weaken compliance

Sites / Locations

  • Aarhus University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup

Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA

Arm Description

Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup: A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster)

Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA: A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Radiographic: Migration of the acetabular component (mm, degree) with Model-Based RSA (m-RSA)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Reoperation of affected hips
Postoperative complications (up to 5 years)
HOOS (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score)
OHS (Oxford Hip Score)
HHS (Harris Hip Score) on Range Of Motion (ROM)
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) at rest and load
EQ-5D (EuroQol)
Radiologic osteolysis

Full Information

First Posted
November 6, 2012
Last Updated
December 13, 2022
Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Biomet Denmark Aps, Project coordinator Orthopaedic Centre, Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02311179
Brief Title
The Effect of Implant Coating (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup
Official Title
The Effect of Implant Coating With Hydroxyapatite Deposited Electrochemically (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
January 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Collaborators
Biomet Denmark Aps, Project coordinator Orthopaedic Centre, Aarhus, Aarhus University Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study focuses on the effect of the hydroxyapatite coating with BoneMaster on the fixation of the hip prosthesis in primary hip alloplasty. A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray is used. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) and will be compared with an identical cup without hydroxyapatite.
Detailed Description
This study focuses on the effect of the hydroxyapatite coating with BoneMaster on the fixation of the hip prosthesis in primary hip alloplasty. A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray is used. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) and will be compared with an identical cup without hydroxyapatite. A 5-year radiologic analysis of migration will be carried out with the object of detecting prognostic evidence of prosthesis loosening. Migration is determined by Roentgen Stereo-photogrammetric Analysis (RSA) on stereoroentgenography. Simultaneously, the patients will be monitored by using the clinical outcome measure HOOS (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score), OHS (Oxford Hip Score), EQ-5D (EuroQol), HHS (Harris Hip Score) on range of motion, VAS (Visual Analog Scale), postoperative complications and reoperation. Hypothesis: We expect that the Exceed cup with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) is superior or equal compared to a similar cup without hydroxyapatite regarding mechanical stability (RSA) (clinical outcome)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis
Keywords
Prosthesis fixation, hip arthroplasty

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
56 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup: A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray. The surface is coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster)
Arm Title
Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA: A hemispheric joint cup of the type Exceed cup (Biomet) characterized by a porous surface of titanium plasma spray
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Prosthesis, BoneMaster-Exceed cup (Biomet)
Intervention Description
Patients will be randomized preoperatively to 1) Exceed cup coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) or 2) Exceed cup coated without hydroxyapatite coating.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Prosthesis Exceed cup without HA (Biomet)
Intervention Description
Patients will be randomized preoperatively to 1) Exceed cup coated with hydroxyapatite deposited electrochemically (BoneMaster) or 2) Exceed cup coated without hydroxyapatite coating.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Radiographic: Migration of the acetabular component (mm, degree) with Model-Based RSA (m-RSA)
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Reoperation of affected hips
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
Postoperative complications (up to 5 years)
Time Frame
End of study
Title
HOOS (Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score)
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
OHS (Oxford Hip Score)
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
HHS (Harris Hip Score) on Range Of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
VAS (Visual Analog Scale) at rest and load
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
EQ-5D (EuroQol)
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)
Title
Radiologic osteolysis
Time Frame
End of study (up to 5 years)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic radiographic osteoarthritis Radiographically and clinically adequate bone quality with regard to a total hip prosthesis, including osteoporosis-Dexa-Scanning verification. Age 55 to 75 years Informed written consent Exclusion Criteria: Orthopaedic Other disease of affected hip than primary coxarthrosis at time of inclusion 1.1. Secondary osteoarthritis 1.1.1. sequelae after acetabular fracture 1.1.2. hip-near femoral fracture 1.1.3. calve perthe 1.1.4. dysplasia (severe) 1.1.5. other 1.2 Atraumatic caput necrosis Neuromuscular or vascular condition in one or the other lower extremity Immobilization postoperative for long periods, for instance because of other serious diseases, alloplasties of the other lower-extremity joint, etc (decided by investigator) Reoperation of affected hip because of 4.1 luxation (with closed or open reduction) 4.2 deep infection 4.3 fracture 4.4 aseptic loosening 4.5 other Body Mass Index (BMI) at time of inclusion 81-84 5.1 ≥ 35 kg/m2 (grade 2+3 85, Obese Class I 81) 5.2 < 18,5 kg/m2 81-84 Insufficient RSA marker spread or rigidity Operative Use of component other than Bimetric femoral stem (HA porous-coated without collar) Unsuitable bone quality for uncemented hip alloplasty, evaluated preoperatively Complications peroperatively on insertion of hip alloplasty that necessitate deviation for the described operative procedure (see section: "Operative procedure"), among others 9.1 per- and postoperative fracture 9.2 bone graft used peroperatively (treatment of bone defects, cysts, etc.) 9.3 screw fixation of the acetabulum 9.4 gluteal detachment or extensive femoral exposure 9.5 trochanter osteotomy 9.6 Under-reaming 1-2 mm (cup size is one mm larger than the reamer, i.e. reaming 51 mm, cup 52 mm) 9.7 Other Radiographic Cup placement 10.1 Cup inclination in AP (anteroposterior) plan >56 degrees and <35 degrees as evaluated on roentgenogram Medical Osteoporosis 11.1. previously diagnosed 11.2. project-related preoperative DEXA (dual energy x-ray absorptiometry ) scan Patients with osteoporosis on the scan (T-score < -2.5) are excluded from the study with referral to medical osteoporosis treatment. Patients with osteopenia (T-score < -1) are included in the project with referral to osteoporosis prophylactic treatment. Patients with osteopenia at project inclusion are DEXA re-scanned at the 2 year follow up. Arthritis 12.1. rheumatoid arthritis 12.2. psoriasis arthritis 12.3. other arthritides Metabolic bone disease 13.1. hyperparathyroidism 13.2. Paget bone disease 13.3. renal osteodystrophy 13.4. other Reduced kidney function thereby influencing bone metabolism Previous treatment of skeleton with radiation therapy Cancer Pharmaceuticals Pharmaceuticals that effect calcium-phosphorus metabolism and bone density 87-98, either through intermittent administration or as a constant dose 17.1. glucocorticoids (systemic) beyond short-term treatment (<5 days) 17.2. immunosuppression/modulation (cyclosporine, methotrexate, etc.) Compliance related Absent patient compliance with treatment and follow-up investigations Abuse that the investigator feels would weaken compliance 19.1. alcohol abuse 19.2. medication abuse Psychological instability (including patient in treatment lithium/antidepressants/neuroleptics/ antipsychotic drugs) which the investigator feels would weaken compliance
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kjeld Soballe, Prof, dr med
Organizational Affiliation
Aarhus University Hospital
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of Implant Coating (BoneMaster) on Migration and Clinical Outcome in Hip Arthroplasty With the Exceed Cup

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs