The Effect of Lacosamide in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Primary Purpose
Neuropathic Pain, Neuropathy;Peripheral, Neuropathy, Painful
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lacosamide
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Neuropathic Pain
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain for at least 3 months (Finnerup et al. 2016)
- Average pain intensity of at least 4 and not above 9 on a 0-10 NRS during the 7-day baseline week (Dworkin et al. 2012).
- Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Other causes of pain in the same area, or other concomitant pain that cannot be distinguished from the neuropathic pain
- Patient who cannot cooperate or are unable to complete the project and patients who do not speak Danish.
- Known and current cardiac conduction disturbance (2⁰ or 3⁰ atrioventricular (AV) block, prolonged QTc interval > 450 ms, heart rate <50 or >110 bpm, a QRS interval >120ms (ECG required)), significant cardiac, renal or liver disease or other severe illness. In patients treated with pregabalin also PQ interval > 0,2s and cardiac disease. Sitting diastolic blood pressure below 50 mmHg or above 105 mmHg.
- Major depressive episode within 6 months, recurrent depressive disorder or other significant psychiatric disease, alcohol, illicit drug or drug abuse.
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Woman of childbearing potential, unless they use and acceptable effective contraception measure as defined in the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG) during the study and at least 2 weeks after, or if their male partner is vasectomized and their sole partners. Negative pregnancy test is required.
- Known allergy to lacosamide or excipients.
- Concomitant pain treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, topical analgesics (lidocaine, capsaicin), lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, cannabinoids or strong opioids that cannot be discontinued. Other treatment for neuropathic pain are allowed in a stable dose (from 14 days before randomization to completion of the trial), if they cannot be tapered off completely.
- Concomitant treatment with products known to be associated with PQ (PR) prolongation other than pregabalin.
- Patients inappropriate for placebo
- Planned surgery
- Use of sodium channel blockers within at least five half-lives and investigational drugs within 30 days.
- Patients on controlled sodium diet, unless the amount of sodium in the capsules is acceptable for their diet.
- The score "yes" on item 4 or item 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), if the ideation occurred in the past 6 months, or "yes on any item of the Suicidal Behaviour section, except for the "Non-suicidal Self Injurious Behaviour" if this behaviour occurred in the past 2 years.
Sites / Locations
- Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Lacosamide
Placebo
Arm Description
Lacosamide (50 mg) are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.
Placebo are given as capsules, same as lacosamide, and taken orally twice a day, without active ingredient.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Pain intensity
The difference in the mean value of the patient's daily ratings of average pain intensity in the baseline week and the last week during treatment as experienced during the past 24 hours rated on a 0-10 point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).
The primary objective is to compare the change in pain intensity from baseline to last week of lacosamide treatment in patients with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype in the PP population.
The supportive objective is to compare the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo in the two phenotype groups in the PP population. Although we do not expect a phenotype difference in the response to placebo, a comparison of the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo is needed to justify that the phenotype is a predictive biomarker for the effect of lacosamide.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain relief
(complete, good, moderate, mild, none, worse pain) . Measured at last visit/end of treatment period.
Use of escape medicine (paracetamol) during treatment period.
Number of paracetamol tablets during the 12 weeks treatment period.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03777956
First Posted
December 14, 2018
Last Updated
February 15, 2023
Sponsor
Danish Pain Research Center
Collaborators
Odense University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03777956
Brief Title
The Effect of Lacosamide in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
Official Title
The Effect of Lacosamide in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Phenotype-stratified Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
COVID 19 and recruitment problems
Study Start Date
January 15, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 3, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 3, 2022 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Danish Pain Research Center
Collaborators
Odense University Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study is to compare the change in pain intensity during treatment with a sodium-channel blocker (lacosamide) in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype.
Detailed Description
The main purpose of this study is to compare the change in pain intensity during treatment with a sodium-channel blocker (lacosamide) in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype. As this is a mechanistic study, the main purpose is to compare the change in pain intensity in patients who receive an expected sufficiently effective dose of lacosamide. As supportive evidence for a drug-specific predictive biomarker, the purpose is also to compare the change in pain intensity during lacosamide vs. placebo for the two phenotypes.
We hypothesize that the sodium-channel blocker lacosamide will be more effective in patients with the irritable nociceptor than those without the non-irritable nociceptor phenotype, and that lacosamide is more effective than placebo in patients with the irritable nociceptor phenotype.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Neuropathic Pain, Neuropathy;Peripheral, Neuropathy, Painful, Neuropathy, Diabetic, Neuropathy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
63 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Lacosamide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Lacosamide (50 mg) are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo are given as capsules, same as lacosamide, and taken orally twice a day, without active ingredient.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lacosamide
Intervention Description
Lacosamide (50 mg) and identical placebo are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day, up to 200 mg b.i.d.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Identical placebo are given as capsules and taken orally twice a day.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain intensity
Description
The difference in the mean value of the patient's daily ratings of average pain intensity in the baseline week and the last week during treatment as experienced during the past 24 hours rated on a 0-10 point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain).
The primary objective is to compare the change in pain intensity from baseline to last week of lacosamide treatment in patients with and without the irritable nociceptor phenotype in the PP population.
The supportive objective is to compare the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo in the two phenotype groups in the PP population. Although we do not expect a phenotype difference in the response to placebo, a comparison of the effect of lacosamide vs. placebo is needed to justify that the phenotype is a predictive biomarker for the effect of lacosamide.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain relief
Description
(complete, good, moderate, mild, none, worse pain) . Measured at last visit/end of treatment period.
Time Frame
12 weeks
Title
Use of escape medicine (paracetamol) during treatment period.
Description
Number of paracetamol tablets during the 12 weeks treatment period.
Time Frame
12 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age ≥ 18 years.
Probable or definite peripheral neuropathic pain for at least 3 months (Finnerup et al. 2016)
Average pain intensity of at least 4 and not above 9 on a 0-10 NRS during the 7-day baseline week (Dworkin et al. 2012).
Written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other causes of pain in the same area, or other concomitant pain that cannot be distinguished from the neuropathic pain
Patient who cannot cooperate or are unable to complete the project and patients who do not speak Danish.
Known and current cardiac conduction disturbance (2⁰ or 3⁰ atrioventricular (AV) block, prolonged QTc interval > 450 ms, heart rate <50 or >110 bpm, a QRS interval >120ms (ECG required)), significant cardiac, renal or liver disease or other severe illness. In patients treated with pregabalin also PQ interval > 0,2s and cardiac disease. Sitting diastolic blood pressure below 50 mmHg or above 105 mmHg.
Major depressive episode within 6 months, recurrent depressive disorder or other significant psychiatric disease, alcohol, illicit drug or drug abuse.
Pregnancy or lactation
Woman of childbearing potential, unless they use and acceptable effective contraception measure as defined in the Clinical Trials Facilitation Group (CTFG) during the study and at least 2 weeks after, or if their male partner is vasectomized and their sole partners. Negative pregnancy test is required.
Known allergy to lacosamide or excipients.
Concomitant pain treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, topical analgesics (lidocaine, capsaicin), lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, cannabinoids or strong opioids that cannot be discontinued. Other treatment for neuropathic pain are allowed in a stable dose (from 14 days before randomization to completion of the trial), if they cannot be tapered off completely.
Concomitant treatment with products known to be associated with PQ (PR) prolongation other than pregabalin.
Patients inappropriate for placebo
Planned surgery
Use of sodium channel blockers within at least five half-lives and investigational drugs within 30 days.
Patients on controlled sodium diet, unless the amount of sodium in the capsules is acceptable for their diet.
The score "yes" on item 4 or item 5 of the Suicidal Ideation section of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), if the ideation occurred in the past 6 months, or "yes on any item of the Suicidal Behaviour section, except for the "Non-suicidal Self Injurious Behaviour" if this behaviour occurred in the past 2 years.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nanna B Finnerup, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Danish Pain Research Center
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Danish Pain Research Center, Aarhus University Hospital
City
Aarhus
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Denmark
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27115670
Citation
Finnerup NB, Haroutounian S, Kamerman P, Baron R, Bennett DLH, Bouhassira D, Cruccu G, Freeman R, Hansson P, Nurmikko T, Raja SN, Rice ASC, Serra J, Smith BH, Treede RD, Jensen TS. Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice. Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-1606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22494920
Citation
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Peirce-Sandner S, Burke LB, Farrar JT, Gilron I, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Raja SN, Rappaport BA, Rowbotham MC, Backonja MM, Baron R, Bellamy N, Bhagwagar Z, Costello A, Cowan P, Fang WC, Hertz S, Jay GW, Junor R, Kerns RD, Kerwin R, Kopecky EA, Lissin D, Malamut R, Markman JD, McDermott MP, Munera C, Porter L, Rauschkolb C, Rice ASC, Sampaio C, Skljarevski V, Sommerville K, Stacey BR, Steigerwald I, Tobias J, Trentacosti AM, Wasan AD, Wells GA, Williams J, Witter J, Ziegler D. Considerations for improving assay sensitivity in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2012 Jun;153(6):1148-1158. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31604475
Citation
Carmland ME, Kreutzfeldt M, Holbech JV, Andersen NT, Jensen TS, Bach FW, Sindrup SH, Finnerup NB. Effect of lacosamide in peripheral neuropathic pain: study protocol for a randomized, placebo-controlled, phenotype-stratified trial. Trials. 2019 Oct 11;20(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3695-7.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
The Effect of Lacosamide in Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs