search
Back to results

The Effect of Pain Education on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain

Primary Purpose

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pain neuroscience education
Red flag education
Sponsored by
Teesside University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional health services research trial for Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice focused on measuring Education, Healthcare professional students

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: No previous pain education

  • Pre-registration student at Teesside University in one of following six disciplines: paramedics, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, midwifery, nursing, diagnostic radiography.

Exclusion Criteria: In depth previous pain education

  • Disciplines other than those listed above

Sites / Locations

  • Teesside University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Pain neuroscience education

Red flag education

Arm Description

Intervention: Pain neuroscience education group. One-off, 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.

Intervention: Red flags education group. One-off 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

HC-PAIRS questionnaire
Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale - assessing attitudes and beliefs towards pain using a 13 item validated questionnaire. High score is a worse outcome. Scores range from 13-91.
Revised Neurophysiology Quiz
Measures knowledge of pain physiology using a 12 point validated questionnaire. Low score is poor sign. Scores range from 0-12.
Case vignette
Measures clinical practise behaviours in pain management. A validated proxy measure of clinical behaviour, MCQ weighted as appropriate or inappropriate according to current national clinical guidelines. A low score is good, and scores range from 4 to 20.
Red flag knowledge
Measures knowledge of red flags. Low score is a poor sign. Scores range from 0-10.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
October 9, 2018
Last Updated
March 19, 2020
Sponsor
Teesside University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03710837
Brief Title
The Effect of Pain Education on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain
Official Title
The Effect of Pain Education on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain, Clinical Recommendations and Attitudes Towards People With Chronic Pain: a Mixed-methods Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 1, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 15, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Teesside University

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Chronic pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide affecting just under 28 million people in the UK. Chronic pain conditions require a biopsychosocial rather than a biomedical model of care. Biomedical management lacks evidence of effectiveness but also has the potential to exacerbate the condition by raising fears and anxiety about potential pathological abnormalities. Healthcare professionals often hold negative beliefs about people with chronic pain and view the condition within a biomedical framework. These negative attitudes can be observed at the pre-registration training stage of the health professionals' career. Thus, the pre-registration phase is an important point where an individual's understanding of, and beliefs about, pain and people with pain may be shaped for the future. The need for improved and better education of healthcare professionals to support best practice for low back pain with the aim of integrating professionals' management of low back pain and fostering innovation in practice is well recognised. This study seeks to quantify the benefits of pain education in knowledge, attitudes and beliefs. The findings may encourage other pre-registration institutions to deliver pain education in a more directed way and simultaneously support the International Association for the Study of Pain's (IASP) proposed integration pain education into existing curriculum.
Detailed Description
In 2011 Briggs et al described pain education at undergraduate level for healthcare professionals as 'woefully inadequate'. Pain Neurophysiology Education (PNE) can improve undergraduates' pain understanding/management, however previous RCTs used single discipline groups and immediate follow-up. Investigation of the effectiveness of this education on students across the multi-professional team with medium-to-long-term follow-up will provide important new information on the generalisability of existing data and whether or not any changes in pain understanding/management are maintained over time. This study aims to contribute to the development of neuromusculoskeletal physiotherapy by identifying whether or not this education, which aims to up skill healthcare professionals of the future, is effective and can change their behaviours in practice to enhance patient care in chronic pain management. PNE has been shown to be useful in patient care in conjunction with other treatment methods. If this intervention is successful in altering pain attitudes and knowledge in keeping with modern science then students may feel more confident and able to manage pain post qualification. The findings of this study will support or refute the addition of PNE into healthcare professional undergraduate programmes.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Keywords
Education, Healthcare professional students

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Health Services Research
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Multi disciplinary randomised controlled trial
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participant information is pseudonymised using student numbers only. As soon is data is generated data will be fully anonymised.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
37 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pain neuroscience education
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention: Pain neuroscience education group. One-off, 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.
Arm Title
Red flag education
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention: Red flags education group. One-off 70 minute duration session delivered by Dr Cormac Ryan.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Pain neuroscience education
Other Intervention Name(s)
Red flag education
Intervention Description
Two different lectures covering essential clinical skills but one designed to explore the hypothesis
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Red flag education
Other Intervention Name(s)
Pain neuroscience education
Intervention Description
Two different lectures covering essential clinical skills but one designed to explore the hypothesis
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
HC-PAIRS questionnaire
Description
Health Care Providers Pain and Impairment Relationship Scale - assessing attitudes and beliefs towards pain using a 13 item validated questionnaire. High score is a worse outcome. Scores range from 13-91.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Revised Neurophysiology Quiz
Description
Measures knowledge of pain physiology using a 12 point validated questionnaire. Low score is poor sign. Scores range from 0-12.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Case vignette
Description
Measures clinical practise behaviours in pain management. A validated proxy measure of clinical behaviour, MCQ weighted as appropriate or inappropriate according to current national clinical guidelines. A low score is good, and scores range from 4 to 20.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Red flag knowledge
Description
Measures knowledge of red flags. Low score is a poor sign. Scores range from 0-10.
Time Frame
6 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: No previous pain education Pre-registration student at Teesside University in one of following six disciplines: paramedics, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, midwifery, nursing, diagnostic radiography. Exclusion Criteria: In depth previous pain education Disciplines other than those listed above
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Denis Martin, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Professor at Teesside University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Teesside University
City
Middlesbrough
ZIP/Postal Code
TS1 3BX
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Effect of Pain Education on Multidisciplinary Healthcare Students' Understanding of Chronic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs