The Efficacy and Safety of Accufuser Omnibus® (Elastomeric Infusion Pump); Comparative Clinical Trial
Primary Purpose
Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
The domestic PCA equipment 'Accufuser Omnibus®'
Imported PCA equipment 'Infusor SV®, Baxter, USA'
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer focused on measuring Patient controlled analgesia equipment, efficacy, safety, Accufuser Omnibus®, Upper abdominal surgery, laparotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- scheduled for upper abdominal surgery due to upper gastrointestinal cancer under laparotomy and plan on using epidural PCA 2
- ASA class I-II
- adults aged between 20 to 70 years
- voluntarily give written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who do not give consent to the researchers
- Patients who have allergies to the medication used for pain control, that is, the local anesthesia or opioid analgesic
- Patients who have a tendency to hemorrhage to be determined by clinical observations such as purple spots and test figures (when the PT or aPTT value is more than 1.5 times that of the normal value; platelet figures are decreased to 100,000 or lower
- Patients who have renal insufficiency or hepatic insufficiency
- Patients who do not want or fail to qualify for an epidural PCA
- Patients who are unable to express the degree of pain
- Patients who cannot understand Korean either by listening or reading
- Patients who have active infectious diseases or neurological diseases
- Patients who have an infection in the area to be punctured to mount the epidural catheter
Sites / Locations
- Departmnent of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicne Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
domestic PCA equipment
imported PCA equipment
Arm Description
Patient controlled analgesia by the domestic PCA equipment
Patient controlled analgesia by imported PCA equipment
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Efficacy: Analgesic effect, Accuracy of bolus 2 mL administration
Analgesic effect for 48 hours after surgery
Accuracy of bolus 2 mL administration
frequency of administrating rescue analgesic for 48 hours after surgery
number of pressing bolus
accuracy of total administrated amount
The degree of pain was evaluated with VNRS (verbal numerical rating scale, 0; no pain, 10; severe pain), and this was recorded for all seven visits.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Safety: Frequency of complications occurring after bolus
Frequency of complications occurring after bolus
frequency of complications occurring during the entire research period
equipment malfunction
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01976494
First Posted
October 21, 2013
Last Updated
June 18, 2015
Sponsor
Yonsei University
Collaborators
Small and Medium Business Administration
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01976494
Brief Title
The Efficacy and Safety of Accufuser Omnibus® (Elastomeric Infusion Pump); Comparative Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Yonsei University
Collaborators
Small and Medium Business Administration
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Acute post-operative pain causes not only discomfort for the patient, but delays recovery by increasing the morbidity of the circulatory system, respiratory system, and immune system, so pain control is one of the important objectives in peri-operative patient management. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is a piece of equipment for which the patient can personally control the administration of an analgesic. It is generally used in postoperative pain management because it is a method which can heighten patient satisfaction by reducing complications and obtaining the appropriate level of pain relief. Usually, it is designed to administer an analgesic at a steady speed, and the patient can administer additional medication by pressing a button when the pain is severe. Here, to prevent complications from excessive administration of an analgesic, repeated administration is not allowed within a certain time interval. The PCA equipment can be categorized as electronic and physical according to the force which operates the drug injection pump. Electronic equipment uses electrical energy to apply vermicular movement to the fluid tube to administer the analgesic. Physical equipment is disposable equipment designed to fill an elastomer reservoir bag expanding the material, and its elasticity returns to the original length used to administer the analgesic. The physical equipment is easy to carry and movement is comfortable because there is no need for additional electronic equipment or devices. There is also no need for special training to operate the equipment, and the action mechanism is simple so there is less opportunity for malfunction. The disposable physical equipment accounts for approximately 70% of the domestic market share and it is preferred over the electronic equipment. On the other hand, contrary to the electronic equipment, the physical PCA equipment has the disadvantage of not providing information regarding the history of the equipment's use. The early physical PCA equipment was very simple and only had the function of continually administering medication at a set speed. Hence, it was not sufficient to function as 'patient controlled' pain control equipment. Then, the function of an additional administration button was added so that the patient can personally decide whether to administer an additional amount of analgesic. At the same time, the physical PCA equipment has improved to prevent excessive administration by setting a lock-out time as a safety measure. The following development was Accufuser Selectuss®, where a function was added to select the administration speed from three options. In this way, the physical PCA equipment has continued to evolve in the direction of enhancing safety, convenience, and clinical effectiveness. The advantage of pain control using PCA equipment is that the patient can personally control additional the administration of an analgesic by pressing a button. In the case of existing or imported products, it is designed to administer a bolus by pressing the button, and the pressure presses the PVC bag filled with medication under the button to administer the bolus. Compared to the intravenous route, using an epidural as a PCA administration route has superior analgesic effect, so it can reduce the amount of opioid analgesic administered. On the other hand, the disadvantage is that it has to pass through a narrow and long epidural catheter to deliver the medication to the epidural space which has a relatively higher resistance. Woo Young Medical experimented with their own product Accufuser plus® (Woo Young Medical, Korea), and the results showed that the time taken to empty the bolus bag was approximately 40-80 seconds depending on the dosage. The pressure when a person presses the bolus button on the PCA equipment was repeatedly measured to obtain a mean value, and this pressure was constantly maintained by a machine to measure the time taken to empty the bolus bag. Clinically, it is not easy to continually press the button for 40-80 seconds, so it is difficult to exclude the possibility that the bolus was not administered properly. In addition, when excessive pressure is applied, there is the possibility that the bolus bag may burst. The domestically developed products and Accufuser Omnibus® (Woo Young Medical, Korea) was developed for the purpose of supplementing bolus failure which can occur when using epidural PCA. Within the bolus module, a second elastomeric balloon is installed behind the first bolus bag so the patient does not have to press the bolus button for a long time.
Therefore, this research focused on the effectiveness and safety of the domestic product Accufuser Omnibus® (Woo Young Medical, Korea) regarding whether the bolus is sufficiently delivered when it is administered through the epidural route, and compared the results through a comparative clinical trial with imported physical PCA equipment (Infusor SV®, Baxter, USA).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer
Keywords
Patient controlled analgesia equipment, efficacy, safety, Accufuser Omnibus®, Upper abdominal surgery, laparotomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
86 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
domestic PCA equipment
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patient controlled analgesia by the domestic PCA equipment
Arm Title
imported PCA equipment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patient controlled analgesia by imported PCA equipment
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
The domestic PCA equipment 'Accufuser Omnibus®'
Intervention Description
Subject patient selection: the purpose and method of this research will be explained to the patients who satisfy the exclusion criteria before surgery, and written consent regarding research participation will be obtained.
Use of PCA equipment by patients is determined by randomization. Regardless of the PCA equipment type, the basal rate and bolus dose are equally set to 2 mL/hr and 2 mL for the entire research period.
Epidural PCA regime: normal saline added to 0.75% ropivacaine 40 mL and fentanyl 15-20 mcg/kg for a total volume of 100 ml.
After pretreatment, the chest epidural catheter is mounted in the pretreatment room or operating room. The catheter tip is adjusted to be fixed between T6-7 or T7-8.
After mounting the catheter, a test dose of 1% lidocaine 3 ml and epinephrine 1:200.000 is injected. Ten minutes later, sensory loss and skin dermatome will be checked using an alcohol swab.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Imported PCA equipment 'Infusor SV®, Baxter, USA'
Intervention Description
Subject patient selection: the purpose and method of this research will be explained to the patients who satisfy the exclusion criteria before surgery, and written consent regarding research participation will be obtained.
Use of PCA equipment by patients is determined by randomization. Regardless of the PCA equipment type, the basal rate and bolus dose are equally set to 2 mL/hr and 2 mL for the entire research period.
Epidural PCA regime: normal saline added to 0.75% ropivacaine 40 mL and fentanyl 15-20 mcg/kg for a total volume of 100 ml.
After pretreatment, the chest epidural catheter is mounted in the pretreatment room or operating room. The catheter tip is adjusted to be fixed between T6-7 or T7-8.
After mounting the catheter, a test dose of 1% lidocaine 3 ml and epinephrine 1:200.000 is injected. Ten minutes later, sensory loss and skin dermatome will be checked using an alcohol swab.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy: Analgesic effect, Accuracy of bolus 2 mL administration
Description
Analgesic effect for 48 hours after surgery
Accuracy of bolus 2 mL administration
frequency of administrating rescue analgesic for 48 hours after surgery
number of pressing bolus
accuracy of total administrated amount
The degree of pain was evaluated with VNRS (verbal numerical rating scale, 0; no pain, 10; severe pain), and this was recorded for all seven visits.
Time Frame
6 hours after completing surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety: Frequency of complications occurring after bolus
Description
Frequency of complications occurring after bolus
frequency of complications occurring during the entire research period
equipment malfunction
Time Frame
6 hours after completing surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
scheduled for upper abdominal surgery due to upper gastrointestinal cancer under laparotomy and plan on using epidural PCA 2
ASA class I-II
adults aged between 20 to 70 years
voluntarily give written consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who do not give consent to the researchers
Patients who have allergies to the medication used for pain control, that is, the local anesthesia or opioid analgesic
Patients who have a tendency to hemorrhage to be determined by clinical observations such as purple spots and test figures (when the PT or aPTT value is more than 1.5 times that of the normal value; platelet figures are decreased to 100,000 or lower
Patients who have renal insufficiency or hepatic insufficiency
Patients who do not want or fail to qualify for an epidural PCA
Patients who are unable to express the degree of pain
Patients who cannot understand Korean either by listening or reading
Patients who have active infectious diseases or neurological diseases
Patients who have an infection in the area to be punctured to mount the epidural catheter
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Departmnent of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicne Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
120-752
Country
Korea, Republic of
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
The Efficacy and Safety of Accufuser Omnibus® (Elastomeric Infusion Pump); Comparative Clinical Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs