search
Back to results

The Efficacy and Safety of Fotona Smooth® Device for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

Primary Purpose

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System with sham handpience
Sponsored by
Cork University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stress Urinary Incontinence

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Female, 18 years of age or older,
  • Clinical and UDS diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence,
  • No significant improvement in urinary incontinence from at least one previous conservative treatments, such as behavioral measures, pelvic floor muscle training or the use of absorbent pads

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pre-existing bladder pathology including prior radiation treatment
  2. Pregnancy
  3. BMI>35
  4. Radical pelvic surgery or previous incontinence surgery
  5. Urinary tract infection or other active infections of urinary tract or bladder
  6. Endometriosis
  7. Any form of pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage 2, according to POP-Q
  8. Diagnosis of urge incontinence
  9. Diagnosis of collagen disorders e.g. benign joint hypermobility / Elhers-Danlos / Marfans etc.
  10. Incomplete bladder emptying
  11. Vesicovaginal fistula
  12. Fecal incontinence
  13. Unwillingness or inability to complete follow-up schedule
  14. Unwillingness or inability to give Informed Consent
  15. Failure to comply with diary requirements during extended baseline period

Sites / Locations

  • Lutheran Hospital Hagen-Haspe
  • University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital
  • Cork Womens Clinic
  • University Clinical Centre
  • Inselspital Bern, University Hospital
  • Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld
  • Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
  • Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS foundation trust
  • King's College Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System

Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System with Sham handpience

Arm Description

Active treatment with Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System

Sham treatment with a sham handpiece and parameter presentations masked

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Efficacy: Reduction in 1-hour pad weight between active and sham groups
Reduction in 1-hour pad weight at 6 months post-treatment in active group vs the sham treated group at 6 months post treatment
Safety: Incidence and severity of device related Adverse Events
Incidence and severity of device related Adverse Events (i.e., infections, edema, superficial burns, increased vaginal discharge, de novo urge incontinence).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Durability of the effect
Reduction in 1hr pad test weight in the treated group at 12 month follow-up vs. pad weight in the same group at baseline
Improvement
Change in mean Cough Stress test score at 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Change in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)
Change in mean KHQ from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Change in mean PISQ-12 test scores
Change in mean PISQ-12 test scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.
Subjective assessment of pain
Patient reported assessment of pain during treatment
Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score
Change in mean ICIQ-SF from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment

Full Information

First Posted
March 20, 2017
Last Updated
June 11, 2019
Sponsor
Cork University Hospital
Collaborators
Fotona d.o.o.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03098992
Brief Title
The Efficacy and Safety of Fotona Smooth® Device for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence
Official Title
Post-market, Prospective, Randomised, Sham-controlled Clinical Trial Designed to Confirm the Efficacy and Safety of the Fotona Smooth® Device to Treat Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Cork University Hospital
Collaborators
Fotona d.o.o.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
There are many existing treatments of female stress urinary incontinence such as the use of adult absorbent pads and diapers, behavioral training, including bladder training, pelvic muscle exercises, biofeedback, urethral plugs, intravaginal prosthesis, electrical stimulation, periurethral injections, and reconstructive surgery. However, there is still a lack of effective minimally invasive treatment options that are independent of patient compliance. One emerging approach of minimally invasive SUI therapy is pelvic floor reinforcement using laser therapy. The primary objective of this post-marketing study is to confirm the effectiveness and safety of the FotonaSmooth® device in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in a large number of females using objective and subjective methods. Patients with stress incontinence will be assigned to two groups, an active group, where the Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System will be used, and a sham group where a very low laser setting will be used, and parameter presentations will be masked. Participants will be adult females, 18 years old and older with clinical and urodynamic diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence,who have had no significant improvement in urinary incontinence from at least one previous conservative treatment, such as behavioral measures, pelvic floor muscle training or the use of absorbent pads
Detailed Description
Prospective, randomized, 2-treatment, sham-controlled, single (patient only) blinded, study design using convenience sampling to enroll subjects as they present and are found to be eligible per the inclusion/exclusion criteria. This multicenter clinical trial utilizes a randomized assignment allocation schedule stratified by clinical site. Allocation rule pertains to the ratio of subjects in each treatment arm. Sampling rules pertain to the number of subjects in each active treatment arm. Two treatment arms enrolled on a 2:1 ratio: Active arm is the Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System and the control arm is a sham treatment with a very low laser setting and parameter presentations masked. The active arm subjects will be followed out to 12 months post-treatment. The sham arm subjects will be followed out to 6 months and then offered the active treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stress Urinary Incontinence

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
135 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Active treatment with Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System
Arm Title
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System with Sham handpience
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham treatment with a sham handpiece and parameter presentations masked
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System
Intervention Description
Treatment of urodynamic proven stress urinary incontinence using the Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System in the active arm
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Fotona Dynamis Er:YAG Laser System with sham handpience
Intervention Description
Sham treatment with a sham handpiece and parameter presentations masked
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy: Reduction in 1-hour pad weight between active and sham groups
Description
Reduction in 1-hour pad weight at 6 months post-treatment in active group vs the sham treated group at 6 months post treatment
Time Frame
6 months post-treatment
Title
Safety: Incidence and severity of device related Adverse Events
Description
Incidence and severity of device related Adverse Events (i.e., infections, edema, superficial burns, increased vaginal discharge, de novo urge incontinence).
Time Frame
6 months post-treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Durability of the effect
Description
Reduction in 1hr pad test weight in the treated group at 12 month follow-up vs. pad weight in the same group at baseline
Time Frame
12 months post-treatment
Title
Improvement
Description
Change in mean Cough Stress test score at 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Time Frame
6 and 12 months post-treatment
Title
Change in King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ)
Description
Change in mean KHQ from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Time Frame
from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.
Title
Change in mean PISQ-12 test scores
Description
Change in mean PISQ-12 test scores from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.
Time Frame
from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.
Title
Subjective assessment of pain
Description
Patient reported assessment of pain during treatment
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Change in International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score
Description
Change in mean ICIQ-SF from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment
Time Frame
from baseline to 6 and 12 months post-treatment.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult Female, 18 years of age or older, Clinical and UDS diagnosis of Stress Urinary Incontinence, No significant improvement in urinary incontinence from at least one previous conservative treatments, such as behavioral measures, pelvic floor muscle training or the use of absorbent pads Exclusion Criteria: Pre-existing bladder pathology including prior radiation treatment Pregnancy BMI>35 Radical pelvic surgery or previous incontinence surgery Urinary tract infection or other active infections of urinary tract or bladder Endometriosis Any form of pelvic organ prolapse greater than stage 2, according to POP-Q Diagnosis of urge incontinence Diagnosis of collagen disorders e.g. benign joint hypermobility / Elhers-Danlos / Marfans etc. Incomplete bladder emptying Vesicovaginal fistula Fecal incontinence Unwillingness or inability to complete follow-up schedule Unwillingness or inability to give Informed Consent Failure to comply with diary requirements during extended baseline period
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Barry O'Reilly, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University College Cork
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Lutheran Hospital Hagen-Haspe
City
Hagen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital
City
Athens
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Cork Womens Clinic
City
Cork
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
University Clinical Centre
City
Ljubljana
Country
Slovenia
Facility Name
Inselspital Bern, University Hospital
City
Bern
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Cantonal Hospital Frauenfeld
City
Frauenfeld
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
City
Basingstoke
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS foundation trust
City
Birmingham
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
King's College Hospital
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Efficacy and Safety of Fotona Smooth® Device for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs