The Efficacy and Safety Study of Rikkunshito in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia
Primary Purpose
Functional Dyspepsia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rikkunshito
Rikkunshito placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Functional Dyspepsia focused on measuring Rikkunshito, Double blind, Functional dyspepsia (FD)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-Patients diagnosed with FD according to the ROME III criteria i) Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to obtaining informed consent ii) Have not received upper endoscopy within the last 6 months prior to enrollment and do not have evidence of structural/organic disease iii) Must have one or more of the following symptoms:
- Bothersome postprandial fullness
- Early satiation
- Epigastric pain
- Epigastric burning
- At least one of the FD-related symptoms on the Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale (bothersome postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning) is ≥4, whereas heartburn is ≤3.
- Total score of depression-related symptoms on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HAD) is ≤10.
- Type of visit: Outpatient
- Provides voluntary informed consent after receiving adequate explanation and demonstrates thorough understanding of the nature of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed ulcer (excluding scars) or malignant tumor in the upper GI
- Suspected organic lesions in the hepato-biliary-pancreatic regions such as cholelithiasis, hepatitis, pancreatitis
- History of upper GI resection
- Serious complications (liver, kidney, heart, or blood disease or metabolic disease)
- Less than a year since testing positive for H. pylori or have undergone a successful eradication therapy
- Use of prohibited medications
- Neuropsychiatric disorders
- Use of or planned use of any investigational drugs
- Unable to take drugs orally
- History of allergic reactions to Kampo medicines
- Pregnant or lactating women or those who are planning to conceive during the study period
- Deemed ineligible by principal investigator or sub-investigator
Sites / Locations
- Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Rikkunshito Placebo
Rikkunshito
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Patient's Evaluation of Symptomatic Improvement by Overall Treatment Efficacy (OTE)
Patient's Evaluation of Symptomatic Improvement by OTE is classified into the following 7 categories:
Significantly improved
Improved
Slightly improved
No change
Slightly worse
Worse
Much worse
The numbers of patients at the final evaluation (i.e, the latest evaluable time point of the all patients including discontinued patients) are shown by category.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (Modified FSSG)
The modified FSSG questionnaire is composed of 7 questions regarding GERD symptoms (Questions 1-7, scored from 0 to 4) ranging between 0-28, lower value represents a better outcome, and 7 questions regarding dyspeptic symptoms (Questions 8-14, each question scored from 0 to 4) ranging between 0-28, lower value represents a better outcome, and a total scores, ranging from 0 to 56, lower value represents a better outcome of the all questions (Questions 1-14). Each question was assigned a score based on the frequency of symptoms.
The point scores of modified FSSG are calculated from changes from baseline in each score for all symptoms (sum of point scores from Questions 1-14), GERD symptoms, and dyspeptic symptoms at final evaluation.
Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM)
PAGI-SYM questionnaire is composed of the following 6 categories that consisted of Questions 1 to 20 (each question composed of 6 subscales, i.e., point scores from 0 to 5, lower value represents a better outcome). Subscale scores are calculated by averaging across items in each category. A total score (lower value represents a better outcome, ranging from 0 to 5) is calculated as the mean of the subscale scores.
Heartburn/Regurgitation, Nausea/Vomiting, Postprandial Fullness/Early satiety, Bloating, Upper Abdominal Pain, and Lower Abdominal Pain
The point scores of PAGI-SYM are calculated from changes from baseline in total score and each category score at final evaluation.
Change From Baseline in Global Overall Symptom (GOS)
The GOS scale are calculated by a total score of a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = no problem to 7 = a very severe problem over 8 questions. The point scores of GOS are calculated from changes from baseline at final evaluation.
Change From Baseline in Short-form Health Survey-8 (SF-8)
The SF-8 scores comprised of Physical component summary (PCS) scores (ranging between 5.32-70.69, higher value represents a better outcome) and Mental component summary (MCS) scores (ranging between 10.11-74.51, higher value represents a better outcome), and a total scores of PCS and MCS using a formula specified in SF-8 Scoring Algorithm.
The point scores of SF-8 are calculated from changes from baseline in PCS and MCS at final evaluation.
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
The HAD is a 14-item scale with 2 subscales of depression (Question 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13) and anxiety (Question 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 3 (ranging from 0 to 21, lower value represents a better outcome).
The point scores of HAD are calculated from changes from baseline in overall (sum of scores for depression and anxiety, i.e., total point score ranging from 0 to 42, lower value represents a better outcome), depression, and anxiety at final evaluation.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02037776
Brief Title
The Efficacy and Safety Study of Rikkunshito in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia
Official Title
Double-blind Trial With Rikkunshito Versus Placebo on Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia: Multi-center Study (DREAM Study)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 3, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 25, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 25, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Osaka City University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of Rikkunshito compared to placebo in Japanese subjects with Functional Dyspepsia (FD).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Functional Dyspepsia
Keywords
Rikkunshito, Double blind, Functional dyspepsia (FD)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
128 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Rikkunshito Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Title
Rikkunshito
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rikkunshito
Other Intervention Name(s)
Tsumura Rikkunshito
Intervention Description
- Oral administration of rikkunshito (2.5 g t.i.d) before meals for 8 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rikkunshito placebo
Intervention Description
- Oral administration of rikkunshito placebo (2.5 g t.i.d) before meals for 8 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patient's Evaluation of Symptomatic Improvement by Overall Treatment Efficacy (OTE)
Description
Patient's Evaluation of Symptomatic Improvement by OTE is classified into the following 7 categories:
Significantly improved
Improved
Slightly improved
No change
Slightly worse
Worse
Much worse
The numbers of patients at the final evaluation (i.e, the latest evaluable time point of the all patients including discontinued patients) are shown by category.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Modified Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) (Modified FSSG)
Description
The modified FSSG questionnaire is composed of 7 questions regarding GERD symptoms (Questions 1-7, scored from 0 to 4) ranging between 0-28, lower value represents a better outcome, and 7 questions regarding dyspeptic symptoms (Questions 8-14, each question scored from 0 to 4) ranging between 0-28, lower value represents a better outcome, and a total scores, ranging from 0 to 56, lower value represents a better outcome of the all questions (Questions 1-14). Each question was assigned a score based on the frequency of symptoms.
The point scores of modified FSSG are calculated from changes from baseline in each score for all symptoms (sum of point scores from Questions 1-14), GERD symptoms, and dyspeptic symptoms at final evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in the Patient Assessment of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom Severity Index (PAGI-SYM)
Description
PAGI-SYM questionnaire is composed of the following 6 categories that consisted of Questions 1 to 20 (each question composed of 6 subscales, i.e., point scores from 0 to 5, lower value represents a better outcome). Subscale scores are calculated by averaging across items in each category. A total score (lower value represents a better outcome, ranging from 0 to 5) is calculated as the mean of the subscale scores.
Heartburn/Regurgitation, Nausea/Vomiting, Postprandial Fullness/Early satiety, Bloating, Upper Abdominal Pain, and Lower Abdominal Pain
The point scores of PAGI-SYM are calculated from changes from baseline in total score and each category score at final evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in Global Overall Symptom (GOS)
Description
The GOS scale are calculated by a total score of a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 1 = no problem to 7 = a very severe problem over 8 questions. The point scores of GOS are calculated from changes from baseline at final evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in Short-form Health Survey-8 (SF-8)
Description
The SF-8 scores comprised of Physical component summary (PCS) scores (ranging between 5.32-70.69, higher value represents a better outcome) and Mental component summary (MCS) scores (ranging between 10.11-74.51, higher value represents a better outcome), and a total scores of PCS and MCS using a formula specified in SF-8 Scoring Algorithm.
The point scores of SF-8 are calculated from changes from baseline in PCS and MCS at final evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 8
Title
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)
Description
The HAD is a 14-item scale with 2 subscales of depression (Question 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, and 13) and anxiety (Question 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0 to 3 (ranging from 0 to 21, lower value represents a better outcome).
The point scores of HAD are calculated from changes from baseline in overall (sum of scores for depression and anxiety, i.e., total point score ranging from 0 to 42, lower value represents a better outcome), depression, and anxiety at final evaluation.
Time Frame
Baseline and week 8
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
-Patients diagnosed with FD according to the ROME III criteria i) Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to obtaining informed consent ii) Have not received upper endoscopy within the last 6 months prior to enrollment and do not have evidence of structural/organic disease iii) Must have one or more of the following symptoms:
Bothersome postprandial fullness
Early satiation
Epigastric pain
Epigastric burning
At least one of the FD-related symptoms on the Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale (bothersome postprandial fullness, early satiation, epigastric pain, epigastric burning) is ≥4, whereas heartburn is ≤3.
Total score of depression-related symptoms on Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score (HAD) is ≤10.
Type of visit: Outpatient
Provides voluntary informed consent after receiving adequate explanation and demonstrates thorough understanding of the nature of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Confirmed ulcer (excluding scars) or malignant tumor in the upper GI
Suspected organic lesions in the hepato-biliary-pancreatic regions such as cholelithiasis, hepatitis, pancreatitis
History of upper GI resection
Serious complications (liver, kidney, heart, or blood disease or metabolic disease)
Less than a year since testing positive for H. pylori or have undergone a successful eradication therapy
Use of prohibited medications
Neuropsychiatric disorders
Use of or planned use of any investigational drugs
Unable to take drugs orally
History of allergic reactions to Kampo medicines
Pregnant or lactating women or those who are planning to conceive during the study period
Deemed ineligible by principal investigator or sub-investigator
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tetsuo Arakawa
Organizational Affiliation
Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine
City
Abeno-ku
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
545-8585
Country
Japan
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
The Efficacy and Safety Study of Rikkunshito in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs