search
Back to results

The Efficacy of PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PX0612
Di-Calcium Phosphate
Sponsored by
Pharmabiotix Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea focused on measuring IBS-D, diarrhea predominant

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • 18 - 65 years old
  • Signed informed consent
  • Mild to moderate (using Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)) IBS-Diarrhea patient:

    • IBS definition will be based on Rome criteria;

The symptoms of IBS must persist for at least 3 months and must include:

  1. Abdominal pain or discomfort which is relieved by defecation, and/or associated with a change in frequency of stool and/or consistency of stool
  2. At least two of the following, at least a quarter of occasions or days (25%):

A. Altered stool frequency (> 3 bowel movements/day or < 3 bowel movements/week) B. Altered stool form (lumpy/hard or loose/watery stools) C. Altered stool passage (straining, urgency or feeling of incomplete evacuation) D. Passage of mucus E. Bloating or feeling of abdominal distention

Note: Diarrhea is defined as having loose watery stools at least three times per day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient will be excluded from the study if:

    • Assessment by the treating investigator showed an evidence for cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, hematologic/immunologic, head, ears, eyes, nose and throat, dermatologic/psychiatric, allergy, major surgery or other diseases as revealed by history, physical examination and existing laboratory assessments which may interfere with the administration or 5 | P a g e

PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome:

assessment of study medication. This should be confirmed by a pre-study medical examination performed 2 weeks prior the study.

  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Females at child bearing age will be excluded unless they are using acceptable birth control measures (i.e. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine contraceptive devices, sexual abstinence or a vasectomized partner)
  • Patients requiring treatments with non-permitted medication (i.e. 5-HT3 antagonist, spasmolytics, anticholinergics, cholestyramine, anti flatulence agents, metoclopramide, gastric-anti secretory agents (proton pump inhibitors; for indications other than Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)), narcotics, anti-diarrheal drugs, and systemic steroids)
  • Patients requiring the use of antibiotics either in medicine form of natural (e.g. grapefruit seed extract, olive leaf extract, oil of oregano, colloidal silver and highly concentrated garlic preparations)
  • Exercise and the use of complementary and alternative medicine for IBS symptoms (i.e. peppermint oil, cognitive behavior therapy) during the study should be maintained at the same level prior to the study.
  • Patients exceeding the treatment limits of permitted medication [(more than 2 days/week during the study period): alginate, antacids and analgesics (limited to acetaminophen ≤ 1000 mg/day, acetylsalicylic acid or NSAIDS no more than 2 tablets/day), (stable dose throughout the study period, anti-depressants (must be on a stable dose > 3 months), fiber supplements, psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid, gastric anti secretory agents (only for GERD patients who are on a stable dose > 3 months; patients should be able to differentiate between IBS and GERD symptoms), acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 325 mg/day, sedatives. Deliverance medications: Mild laxatives only if necessary.]. Any other medications can be used without limits based on the clinical judgment of the treating investigator.
  • Being in another clinical trial 4 weeks before entering the study
  • Constipated IBS patients
  • IBS-Diarrhea patients with un-treated lactose intolerance
  • Regular use of probiotics or using other probiotics during the course of the study
  • Patients allergic to milk or soy products
  • Patients using catheters
  • Patients presented with rectal bleeding, weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, nocturnal symptoms and a family history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and celiac spruce
  • Patients over 50 diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome who have not had a colonoscopy in the last 5 years
  • Patients who have allergies for the active ingredients or any of the exepients
  • Patients presented with any immune-compromised condition (such as AIDS, lymphoma, long term corticosteroid treatment)
  • Patients presented with nausea, vomiting and fever 6 |

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alberta Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Probiotic PX0612

Di-Calcium Phosphate

Arm Description

PX0612 is a probiotic contained in a veggie capsule.

Patients in the 'placebo' group will receive the placebo capsules. The main ingredient in the placebo capsule is Di-Calcium Phosphate

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in the Bowel Movements (Stool Frequency) Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
For each patient stool frequency was measured as a number of bowel movements per day. To compare stool frequency before and after the treatment, the average for the first 2 run-in weeks (day 1 - day 14) and the last 2 weeks (day 78 - day 91) was calculated. A higher mean score indicates a better outcome, a greater reduction in bowel movements/day and is a positive change. Placebo group- min: -.43 max: 1.43 Study group- min: -.43 max: 1.50

Secondary Outcome Measures

Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Mean change in heartburn between baseline (days 1-14) and weeks 10 and 11 (days 78-91) between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in heartburn, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of heartburn (0= no heartburn, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 3.00 Treatment group- Min: -2.00 Max: 2.00
Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms- Vomiting Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
vomit scale used was from 0-4, the higher the number, the worse the outcome Mean change in vomiting between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in vomiting, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of vomiting(0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: 0 Max: 0 Treatment group- Min: -3.00 Max: 0
Changes in the Patient's Assessment of Their Quality of Life Using Short Form(SF)-36 Health Survey PCS (Physical Component Score)
Differences in quality of life phusical component score using SF-36 between the 'intervention' group and the 'placebo' group over the study period. Baseline PCS scores were compared to the end of the study time point. The mean difference between the 2 time points was measured. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Scoring is based on software program. Placebo group- Min: -16.16 Max: 6.25 Treatment group- Min: -16.42 Max: 5.46 The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Differences in Abdominal Pain/Discomfort Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Outcome measure is the mean change of abdominal pain, on a scale of 0-4 (0= no pain, 4= incapacitating pain), between baseline and Weeks 10 and 11. A larger change in average abdominal pain indicates a greater reduction in mean abdominal pain score, better outcome. Min=-.067 for treatment group Min= -.99 for placebo group Max= 1.14 for treatment group Max= 1.63 for placebo group The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Differences in Stool Consistency Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
The stool consistency before and after the treatment was compared, the average for the first 2 run-in weeks (day 1 - day 14) and the last 2 weeks (day 78 - day 91) was calculated. A higher mean outcome indicates a greater reduction in loose stool/diarrhea (better outcome). Bristol Stool Chart (1=severe constipation to 7 =severe diarrhea) was the scale used for measurement. The participant reported outcomes were averaged at above time points for comparison. Min for placebo group: -.70 Max for treatment group: 2.57 Max for placebo group: 1.88 The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Differences in Stool Frequency Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Number of stools/day
Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms- Early Satiety
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Change in rate of early satiety on a scale from 0-4 (higher the score, the worse the outcome) Mean change in early satiety between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in early satiety, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of early satiety (0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 1.00 Treatment group- Min: -2.00 Max: 2.00
The Difference in Change of Postprandial Fullness Severity
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in postprandial fullness between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in a postprandial fullness, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of postprandial fullness (0= no postprandial fullness, 4= incapacitating postprandial fullness). Placebo group- Min: -1.00 Max: 2.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 2.00
Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Prolonged Digestion
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in prolonged digestion between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in prolonged digestion, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of prolonged digestion (0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 1.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 3.00
Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom of Nausea
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in nausea between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in nausea, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of nausea(0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: 0.00 Max: 2.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 1.00
FBDSI (Functional Bowel Disease Severity Index)
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in FBDSI score between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in bowel disease severity, better outcome. Functional Bowel Disease Severity Index was the scale used to determine this outcome. The range on this scale is from 0-500, with 500 indicating the most severe functional bowel disease. Placebo group- Min: -10.00 Max: 350.00 Treatment group- Min: 0 Max: 300.00

Full Information

First Posted
April 9, 2015
Last Updated
June 10, 2020
Sponsor
Pharmabiotix Inc
Collaborators
University of Alberta
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02431533
Brief Title
The Efficacy of PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Official Title
The Efficacy of PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pharmabiotix Inc
Collaborators
University of Alberta

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
IBS is a disorder of movement in the gut. People who have IBS may have diarrhea, constipation, or alternating bouts of both. IBS is not caused by injury or illness. Often the only way doctors can diagnose it is to rule out other conditions through testing.
Detailed Description
Probiotics, particularly Bifidobacterium infantis, Sacchromyces boulardii, Lactobacillus plantarum and combination probiotics may help regulate how often people with IBS have bowel movements. Probiotics may also help relieve bloating from gas. Research is continuing to determine which probiotics are best to treat IBS. PX0612 PX0612 is a probiotic which is composed of the following ingredients contained in a veggie capsule, being one dose: Bacillus coagulans 200 million colony forming units 16.0mg Bacillus subtilis 100 million colony forming units 4.8mg Enterococcus faecium 100 million colony forming units 0.6mg Fructo-oligosacharride a nutrient for the packaged product 600.0mg Total 621.4 mg Bacillus coagulans is a non-pathogenic, Gram positive, spore forming bacteria that produces lactic acid. Though not normally found in the gut. Bacillus coagulans strains have been used as general nutritional supplements and agents to control constipation and diarrhea in humans and animals.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea
Keywords
IBS-D, diarrhea predominant

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Probiotic PX0612
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PX0612 is a probiotic contained in a veggie capsule.
Arm Title
Di-Calcium Phosphate
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Patients in the 'placebo' group will receive the placebo capsules. The main ingredient in the placebo capsule is Di-Calcium Phosphate
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
PX0612
Intervention Description
PX0612 is a probiotic contained in a veggie capsule.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
Di-Calcium Phosphate
Intervention Description
Patients in the 'placebo' group will receive the placebo capsules. The main ingredient in the placebo capsule is Di-Calcium Phosphate
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Bowel Movements (Stool Frequency) Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
For each patient stool frequency was measured as a number of bowel movements per day. To compare stool frequency before and after the treatment, the average for the first 2 run-in weeks (day 1 - day 14) and the last 2 weeks (day 78 - day 91) was calculated. A higher mean score indicates a better outcome, a greater reduction in bowel movements/day and is a positive change. Placebo group- min: -.43 max: 1.43 Study group- min: -.43 max: 1.50
Time Frame
Baseline (days 1-14) compared to Weeks 10 and 11 of treatment (days 78-91)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
Mean change in heartburn between baseline (days 1-14) and weeks 10 and 11 (days 78-91) between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in heartburn, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of heartburn (0= no heartburn, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 3.00 Treatment group- Min: -2.00 Max: 2.00
Time Frame
Baseline (days 1-14) compared to Weeks 10 and 11 of treatment (days 78-91)
Title
Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms- Vomiting Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
vomit scale used was from 0-4, the higher the number, the worse the outcome Mean change in vomiting between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in vomiting, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of vomiting(0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: 0 Max: 0 Treatment group- Min: -3.00 Max: 0
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12
Title
Changes in the Patient's Assessment of Their Quality of Life Using Short Form(SF)-36 Health Survey PCS (Physical Component Score)
Description
Differences in quality of life phusical component score using SF-36 between the 'intervention' group and the 'placebo' group over the study period. Baseline PCS scores were compared to the end of the study time point. The mean difference between the 2 time points was measured. The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. Scoring is based on software program. Placebo group- Min: -16.16 Max: 6.25 Treatment group- Min: -16.42 Max: 5.46 The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12 (end of study)
Title
Differences in Abdominal Pain/Discomfort Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
Outcome measure is the mean change of abdominal pain, on a scale of 0-4 (0= no pain, 4= incapacitating pain), between baseline and Weeks 10 and 11. A larger change in average abdominal pain indicates a greater reduction in mean abdominal pain score, better outcome. Min=-.067 for treatment group Min= -.99 for placebo group Max= 1.14 for treatment group Max= 1.63 for placebo group The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Time Frame
Baseline (days 1-14) compared to Weeks 10 and 11 of treatment (days 78-92)
Title
Differences in Stool Consistency Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
The stool consistency before and after the treatment was compared, the average for the first 2 run-in weeks (day 1 - day 14) and the last 2 weeks (day 78 - day 91) was calculated. A higher mean outcome indicates a greater reduction in loose stool/diarrhea (better outcome). Bristol Stool Chart (1=severe constipation to 7 =severe diarrhea) was the scale used for measurement. The participant reported outcomes were averaged at above time points for comparison. Min for placebo group: -.70 Max for treatment group: 2.57 Max for placebo group: 1.88 The total number of participants analyzed in each group differs as a result of the number of participants that either withdrew or were withdrawn in the study. Data were analyzed and compared for participants that completed the study.
Time Frame
Baseline (days 1-14) compared to Weeks 10 and 11 of treatment (days 78-92)
Title
Differences in Stool Frequency Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period.
Description
Number of stools/day
Time Frame
Baseline (days 1-14) compared to Weeks 10 and 11 of treatment (days 78-92)
Title
Differences in Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms- Early Satiety
Description
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Change in rate of early satiety on a scale from 0-4 (higher the score, the worse the outcome) Mean change in early satiety between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in early satiety, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of early satiety (0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 1.00 Treatment group- Min: -2.00 Max: 2.00
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12
Title
The Difference in Change of Postprandial Fullness Severity
Description
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in postprandial fullness between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in a postprandial fullness, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of postprandial fullness (0= no postprandial fullness, 4= incapacitating postprandial fullness). Placebo group- Min: -1.00 Max: 2.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 2.00
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12
Title
Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Prolonged Digestion
Description
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in prolonged digestion between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in prolonged digestion, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of prolonged digestion (0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: -2.00 Max: 1.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 3.00
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12
Title
Upper Gastrointestinal Symptom of Nausea
Description
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in nausea between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in nausea, better outcome. Analog Scale from 0-4 was used by participants to rate upper GI symptoms of nausea(0= none, 4= incapacitating). Placebo group- Min: 0.00 Max: 2.00 Treatment group- Min: -1.00 Max: 1.00
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 12
Title
FBDSI (Functional Bowel Disease Severity Index)
Description
Differences Between the 'Intervention' Group and the 'Placebo' Group Over the Study Period. Mean change in FBDSI score between baseline and week 12 between the two groups. A higher mean value indicates a greater reduction in bowel disease severity, better outcome. Functional Bowel Disease Severity Index was the scale used to determine this outcome. The range on this scale is from 0-500, with 500 indicating the most severe functional bowel disease. Placebo group- Min: -10.00 Max: 350.00 Treatment group- Min: 0 Max: 300.00
Time Frame
Baseline compared to Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female 18 - 65 years old Signed informed consent Mild to moderate (using Functional Bowel Disorder Severity Index (FBDSI)) IBS-Diarrhea patient: IBS definition will be based on Rome criteria; The symptoms of IBS must persist for at least 3 months and must include: Abdominal pain or discomfort which is relieved by defecation, and/or associated with a change in frequency of stool and/or consistency of stool At least two of the following, at least a quarter of occasions or days (25%): A. Altered stool frequency (> 3 bowel movements/day or < 3 bowel movements/week) B. Altered stool form (lumpy/hard or loose/watery stools) C. Altered stool passage (straining, urgency or feeling of incomplete evacuation) D. Passage of mucus E. Bloating or feeling of abdominal distention Note: Diarrhea is defined as having loose watery stools at least three times per day Exclusion Criteria: The patient will be excluded from the study if: Assessment by the treating investigator showed an evidence for cardiovascular, respiratory, urogenital, gastrointestinal/hepatic, hematologic/immunologic, head, ears, eyes, nose and throat, dermatologic/psychiatric, allergy, major surgery or other diseases as revealed by history, physical examination and existing laboratory assessments which may interfere with the administration or 5 | P a g e PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: assessment of study medication. This should be confirmed by a pre-study medical examination performed 2 weeks prior the study. Pregnant or lactating Females at child bearing age will be excluded unless they are using acceptable birth control measures (i.e. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine contraceptive devices, sexual abstinence or a vasectomized partner) Patients requiring treatments with non-permitted medication (i.e. 5-HT3 antagonist, spasmolytics, anticholinergics, cholestyramine, anti flatulence agents, metoclopramide, gastric-anti secretory agents (proton pump inhibitors; for indications other than Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)), narcotics, anti-diarrheal drugs, and systemic steroids) Patients requiring the use of antibiotics either in medicine form of natural (e.g. grapefruit seed extract, olive leaf extract, oil of oregano, colloidal silver and highly concentrated garlic preparations) Exercise and the use of complementary and alternative medicine for IBS symptoms (i.e. peppermint oil, cognitive behavior therapy) during the study should be maintained at the same level prior to the study. Patients exceeding the treatment limits of permitted medication [(more than 2 days/week during the study period): alginate, antacids and analgesics (limited to acetaminophen ≤ 1000 mg/day, acetylsalicylic acid or NSAIDS no more than 2 tablets/day), (stable dose throughout the study period, anti-depressants (must be on a stable dose > 3 months), fiber supplements, psyllium hydrophilic mucilloid, gastric anti secretory agents (only for GERD patients who are on a stable dose > 3 months; patients should be able to differentiate between IBS and GERD symptoms), acetylsalicylic acid ≤ 325 mg/day, sedatives. Deliverance medications: Mild laxatives only if necessary.]. Any other medications can be used without limits based on the clinical judgment of the treating investigator. Being in another clinical trial 4 weeks before entering the study Constipated IBS patients IBS-Diarrhea patients with un-treated lactose intolerance Regular use of probiotics or using other probiotics during the course of the study Patients allergic to milk or soy products Patients using catheters Patients presented with rectal bleeding, weight loss, iron deficiency anemia, nocturnal symptoms and a family history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and celiac spruce Patients over 50 diagnosed with Irritable Bowel Syndrome who have not had a colonoscopy in the last 5 years Patients who have allergies for the active ingredients or any of the exepients Patients presented with any immune-compromised condition (such as AIDS, lymphoma, long term corticosteroid treatment) Patients presented with nausea, vomiting and fever 6 |
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lawrence Richer
Organizational Affiliation
University of Alberta
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alberta Hospital
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 2B7
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16678561
Citation
Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, Houghton LA, Mearin F, Spiller RC. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1480-91. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.061. Erratum In: Gastroenterology. 2006 Aug;131(2):688.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12650794
Citation
Longstreth GF, Wilson A, Knight K, Wong J, Chiou CF, Barghout V, Frech F, Ofman JJ. Irritable bowel syndrome, health care use, and costs: a U.S. managed care perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;98(3):600-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07296.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10429736
Citation
Drossman DA. Review article: an integrated approach to the irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1999 May;13 Suppl 2:3-14. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.0130s2003.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16696786
Citation
Schoenfeld P, Talley NJ. Measuring successful treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: is "satisfactory relief " enough? Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;101(5):1066-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00519.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20140275
Citation
Dolin BJ. Effects of a proprietary Bacillus coagulans preparation on symptoms of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;31(10):655-9. doi: 10.1358/mf.2009.31.10.1441078.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Efficacy of PX0612 In The Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs