search
Back to results

The Impact of Botox® During Robotic Rehabilitation of the Wrist Following Stroke

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botox®
saline solution
Sponsored by
New York Presbyterian Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring hemiparesis, robotics, stroke, Botox®, rehabilitation, wrist spasticity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • > 6 months post-stroke
  • Single stroke
  • Ashworth Scale of > 2 but < 4 for wrist flexors and pronators
  • Able to follow multiple step directions
  • Completed all active occupational therapy
  • Motor strength > 1/5 at the wrist extension and supination
  • Passive ROM of 0-45 degrees at wrist flexion and extension, 0-20 degrees at radial deviation, 0-20 degrees at ulnar deviation, 0-45 degrees at pronation and supination
  • No Botox® injection in the wrist/forearm muscles for at least 12 months
  • Naïve to robotics study protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Joint contracture and wrist or forearm

Sites / Locations

  • New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell campus

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Botox®

Saline

Arm Description

this group will receive an injection of botox in the wrist flexors and forearm pronators

This group will receive an injection of saline solution in the same muscle groups as the treatment group (wrist flexors and pronators).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change scores on Fugl Meyer- Upper Extremity Section
The Fugl Meyer assess quality of movement of the limb at an impairment level.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change on kinematic analysis
Kinematic information is recorded during administration of the assessment mode of the InMotion 3 wrist robotic device. Movements of the wrist (flexion,extension,ulnar/radial deviation) and forearm (pronation, supination)are recorded for subsequent analysis. Kinematic parameters such as smoothness, position and velocity of movement are examined pre and post injection. The information is extracted from the robotics device and analyzed via computer programs.

Full Information

First Posted
March 11, 2010
Last Updated
April 22, 2011
Sponsor
New York Presbyterian Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01088230
Brief Title
The Impact of Botox® During Robotic Rehabilitation of the Wrist Following Stroke
Official Title
The Impact of Botox® During Robotic Rehabilitation of the Wrist Following Stroke: A Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
New York Presbyterian Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see whether treating subjects for wrist rehabilitation following stroke with Botox® and robotic therapy is more effective than treatment with robotic therapy alone and no Botox®.
Detailed Description
This study will explore new ways to facilitate rehabilitation of wrist function after stroke. One of the challenges of recovery is muscle stiffness or excessive muscle tone that often limits exercise or therapy progress. Taking this into account, the investigators propose treating the wrist and forearm with a combination of a one-time Botox® injection and a 6-week robotic therapy protocol to maximize recovery. Botox® is a drug that is injected directly into a muscle to temporarily relax the muscle. Botox® is commonly used to decrease muscle tone in tight muscles in the stroke population. Robotics therapy provides highly repetitive mass practice with visual and haptic feedback. Subjects will be randomized to two groups. Group A will receive the Botox® injection and group B will receive a placebo saline injection. Both groups will receive the same robotics therapy protocol. Subjects and investigators will be blinded to group assignment. The investigators would like to know if there are trends between groups in a variety of outcome measures depending on what intervention they received. The investigators predict that the treatment group will have better results than the control group on the Fugl Meyer, our primary outcome measure. The investigators hope the results of this pilot study will guide development of a larger clinical trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
hemiparesis, robotics, stroke, Botox®, rehabilitation, wrist spasticity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
12 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Botox®
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
this group will receive an injection of botox in the wrist flexors and forearm pronators
Arm Title
Saline
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
This group will receive an injection of saline solution in the same muscle groups as the treatment group (wrist flexors and pronators).
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Botox®
Other Intervention Name(s)
botulinum toxin serotype-A
Intervention Description
the treatment group will receive a one time injection of Botox® at the wrist flexors and pronators of the affected arm. Each subject will receive a standard dose of 150 units total, 50u each to the flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris, and 25u each for the pronator teres and pronator quadratus muscle groups.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
saline solution
Other Intervention Name(s)
salt water
Intervention Description
the control group will receive a one time injection of salt water in the flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris, and the pronator teres and pronator quadratus muscle groups.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change scores on Fugl Meyer- Upper Extremity Section
Description
The Fugl Meyer assess quality of movement of the limb at an impairment level.
Time Frame
at baseline and discharge
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change on kinematic analysis
Description
Kinematic information is recorded during administration of the assessment mode of the InMotion 3 wrist robotic device. Movements of the wrist (flexion,extension,ulnar/radial deviation) and forearm (pronation, supination)are recorded for subsequent analysis. Kinematic parameters such as smoothness, position and velocity of movement are examined pre and post injection. The information is extracted from the robotics device and analyzed via computer programs.
Time Frame
before injection and one week post injection

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: > 6 months post-stroke Single stroke Ashworth Scale of > 2 but < 4 for wrist flexors and pronators Able to follow multiple step directions Completed all active occupational therapy Motor strength > 1/5 at the wrist extension and supination Passive ROM of 0-45 degrees at wrist flexion and extension, 0-20 degrees at radial deviation, 0-20 degrees at ulnar deviation, 0-45 degrees at pronation and supination No Botox® injection in the wrist/forearm muscles for at least 12 months Naïve to robotics study protocol Exclusion Criteria: Joint contracture and wrist or forearm
Facility Information:
Facility Name
New York Presbyterian Hospital- Weill Cornell campus
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19407231
Citation
Caty GD, Detrembleur C, Bleyenheuft C, Deltombe T, Lejeune TM. Effect of upper limb botulinum toxin injections on impairment, activity, participation, and quality of life among stroke patients. Stroke. 2009 Jul;40(7):2589-91. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.544346. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18617860
Citation
Fasoli SE, Fragala-Pinkham M, Hughes R, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Stein J. Robotic therapy and botulinum toxin type A: a novel intervention approach for cerebral palsy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Dec;87(12):1022-5. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31817fb346.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19841830
Citation
Frascarelli F, Masia L, Di Rosa G, Petrarca M, Cappa P, Castelli E. Robot-mediated and clinical scales evaluation after upper limb botulinum toxin type A injection in children with hemiplegia. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(12):988-94. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0412.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17709993
Citation
Levy CE, Giuffrida C, Richards L, Wu S, Davis S, Nadeau SE. Botulinum toxin a, evidence-based exercise therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy for upper-limb hemiparesis attributable to stroke: a preliminary study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Sep;86(9):696-706. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31813e2b4d.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
https://s010.med.cornell.edu/nyp/rehabmed/stroke_registry.html
Description
click here for to sign up for future stroke studies at NYPH

Learn more about this trial

The Impact of Botox® During Robotic Rehabilitation of the Wrist Following Stroke

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs