search
Back to results

The Movement of Botulinum Toxin Through the Lateral Gastrocnemius Muscle in Humans: An Expanded Examination

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Muscle Spasticity

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botox
Sponsored by
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, spasticity

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Experimental Group:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and female aged 30-75
  • Diagnosis of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic, first occurrence or recurrent)
  • Clinically significant lower extremity spasticity as assessed by PI that would benefit from BT treatment
  • Ambulatory with or without device and without assistance at household or greater level
  • Indication to inject gastrocnemius muscle (any combination of spastic lower extremity muscle injections are acceptable)
  • Goal of treatment may include improvement of gait, ankle range of motion, ankle foot orthosis fit, heel strike, ankle position in stance phase, decreased clonus, or relief from painful muscle spasms
  • Naïve to BT of any serotype in any lower extremity muscle
  • Naïve to phenol or alcohol treatment in any lower extremity muscle

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of concomitant neurological disease (central or peripheral) other than stroke
  • Contraindication to intramuscular injection of BT
  • Medically unstable as determined by PI
  • Have an intrathecal baclofen pump
  • Contraindication for MRI (Subjects with MRI-compatible hip replacements may participate, but not those with total knee replacements due to artifact)

Sites / Locations

  • NewYork Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Exp 2 & 3 - Arm 1

Exp 2 & 3 - Arm 2

Arm Description

If within-subject design is adopted, subjects will receive one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic LGM and one standard BT injection of of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic MGM. If between-subjects design is adopted, subjects will receive one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic LGM.

If within-subject study design is adopted, subjects will receive one standard BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic LGM and one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic MGM. If between-subjects design is adopted, subjects will receive one standard BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic LGM.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect (BTME) Volume of Abnormal Voxels Per MRI Slice in Muscles After Research Injections
BTME volume is calculated by counting the number of abnormal voxels (each voxel volume is .0015 cc) on MRI2, which have a relaxation time greater than or equal to 3 standard deviations above the baseline mean for a subject and their muscle found on their baseline MRI.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect (BTME) Volume of Abnormal Voxels Per MRI Slice in Muscles After Clinical Injections
Change in volume of BTME in injected muscle after clinical injection recorded on MRI3 compared to BTME volume on MRI 2.

Full Information

First Posted
November 16, 2017
Last Updated
November 30, 2021
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
Allergan
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03367429
Brief Title
The Movement of Botulinum Toxin Through the Lateral Gastrocnemius Muscle in Humans: An Expanded Examination
Official Title
The Movement of Botulinum Toxin Through the Lateral Gastrocnemius Muscle in Humans: An Expanded Examination
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
too difficult to recruit subjects for the study - muscles naive to botulinum toxin were required and seems that wide availability of the toxin has severely depleted potential subjects.
Study Start Date
June 15, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 18, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 18, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
Allergan

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Despite the wide-spread use of botulinum toxin (BT) to treat spasticity (increased muscle tone) in central neurological disease, evidence-based guidance on dosing, dilution, and injection technique is limited. The wide-spread use of BT in spasticity management, expense of these agents, and detrimental impact from movement into non-injected muscles mandates a better understanding of BT movement within muscles. A proof-of-concept paper written by investigators at Weill Cornell Medicine introduced a non-invasive MRI approach with "voxel thresholds" that was able to detect intramuscular effects of BT at 2 and 3 months post-injection of BT. The purpose of the current set of studies is to refine this MRI technique to better visualize the movement of botulinum toxin through muscle. In addition, the investigators plan to explore, using the imaging technique, how spastic muscle and differing dilutions affect BT movement in an effort to support the development of better research techniques to study toxin movement in human muscle.
Detailed Description
The research questions for the present study series are as followed: How does the movement and morphology of BT muscle effect (BTME) differ between standardized, research injections into spastic and non-spastic lateral gastrocnemius muscle (LGM)? How does the movement and morphology of BTME differ between a standardized, research injection into spastic LGM versus an injection using the same dose in a 100% greater dilution? Is there a predictable BTME within a given muscle following lower extremity BT clinical injections based on clinical need? The two hypotheses are as followed: First, it is predicted that BT muscle effect (BTME) will be greater in normal muscle than in spastic muscle. Second, it is predicted that BTME will increase with increasing dilution. The standard BT injection will be an injection of 25 units of onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25cc of saline. The experimental BT injection will be an injection of 25 units of onobutilinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50cc of saline. The clinical BT injection will be an injection of up to 200 units of onobutilinumtoxinA (Botox®) to any clinically indicated muscle or combinations of muscle in the spastic leg. Dose, dilution, and site of injection will be determined by the PI and all parameters of each injection tracked for future reference. At baseline, subjects will receive research injections that are decided based on the research protocol. Given the very small dosage of the research BT injections, the investigators do not anticipate seeing any symptomatic effects in subjects. At 3 months following research injections, subjects will receive clinical injections that are decided based on their clinical need and are anticipated to result in clinical benefit for subjects. All subjects will have an MRI at baseline (MRIB), at 2M (months) following research injections (MRI2), and at 2M following clinical injections (MRI3). Experiment #1 - Pilot: The pilot experiment will be done to inform the study design for the subsequent experiments. For the pilot experiment, after a baseline MRI, 6 subjects will be randomized into three groups (N=2 in each group): standard injection in LGM, experimental injection in LGM, or experimental injection in medial gastrocnemius muscle (MGM). All 6 subjects will receive a standard injection to the non-spastic LGM. Subjects will undergo a second MRI 2 months after the research injections, which will be used to confirm the design of the subsequent experiments. If, for the data from the investigator's pilot study of N=6 subjects, the investigators find on MRI2 a similar appearance and volume of BTME (BTME volume +/- 20%) for both the LGM and MGM receiving the experimental injection and that the BTME is contained within each muscle, the investigators will have the option of proceeding with the within-subject design where each subject serves as his or her own control, receiving either the research or experimental injection in the spastic LGM and the alternative injection in the spastic MGM. If the within-subject design is used, 15 subjects will be recruited. If the BTME volumes for the LGM and MGM receiving the experimental injection are not within +/- 20% of each other, or the investigators see on the MRI that the BTME is not contained within each injected muscle, then a between subject design will be used where subjects will be randomized to receive either the experimental or standard injection to the spastic LGM and 25 subjects will be recruited. Subjects will receive clinical injections 3 months following the research injections and undergo a final MRI 2 months following clinical injections. Recruitment for the subsequent experiments will begin after data analysis from the second MRI in experiment #1 is complete. Experiment #2 (Effect of dilution, answer Research Question #1): If using a within-subject design, subjects will be randomized to receive a standard injection to either the LGM or MGM. The experimental injection will be delivered to the muscle not receiving the standard injection. If using a between-subjects design, subjects will be randomized to receive either a standardized injection in the LGM or an experimental injection in the LGM. On the same day of, but before the injection, the MRIB will be acquired. Using the localization schema proposed in the investigator's proof-of-concept study, the baseline scan will be used to determine the coordinates and depth of the injection into a given muscle. Two months (+/- 1 week) after the injection, subject will report for MRI2 and will be considered finished with Experiment #2. He/she will be scheduled for the "clinical" injection 5 weeks (+/- 1 week) from that time, which will be evaluated in Experiment #4. Experiment #3 (spastic vs. non spastic muscle, answer Research Question #2): Experiment #3 will take place simultaneously and within the same subject population as Experiment #2. Regardless of whether a within- or between subject design is adopted in Experiment #2, all subjects will also receive a standard injection to the non-spastic LGM. The same technique using MRIB for muscle localization and the same protocol for obtaining MRI2 employed in Experiment #2 will be used for Experiment #3, at the same time points. Subjects will be scheduled for the "clinical" injection 5 weeks (+/- 1 week) from the time of MRI2, as mentioned under the description for Experiment #2. Experiment #4: As described previously, all subjects that participated in Experiments #2 and #3 will undergo a cycle of clinically-based BT injections to the spastic lower extremity no sooner than 3 months after the research injections and about 1 month after MRI2. Potentially, any lower extremity muscle or combination of muscles may be injected based on clinical evaluation and need. The investigators reserve the right to limit the total dose of toxin injected to no more than 200 units of onobotulinumtoxinA. This would be a reasonable dose in clinical practice for the first cycle of lower extremity injections in a toxin-naive patient. All subjects will receive a third and final leg MRI3 2 months following the clinical injection, marking the end of this study approximately 5 months after the initial randomization in Experiment #2.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke, Muscle Spasticity
Keywords
stroke, spasticity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
If the within-subject design is used, N=15 and subjects will be randomized 1:1 to receive the standard injection to either the LGM or MGM. The experimental injection will be delivered to the muscle not receiving the standard injection. If the between-subject design must be used, N=25 and subjects will be randomized 2:3 to receive either the experimental or standard injection to the spastic LGM. Please note the following: Standard Injection: 25 units of onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25cc of saline. Experimental Injection: 25 units of onobutilinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50cc of saline.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
4 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exp 2 & 3 - Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
If within-subject design is adopted, subjects will receive one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic LGM and one standard BT injection of of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic MGM. If between-subjects design is adopted, subjects will receive one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic LGM.
Arm Title
Exp 2 & 3 - Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
If within-subject study design is adopted, subjects will receive one standard BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic LGM and one experimental BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.50 cc of saline to their spastic MGM. If between-subjects design is adopted, subjects will receive one standard BT injection of 25 units onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox®) diluted in 0.25 cc of saline to their spastic LGM.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Botox
Intervention Description
THE PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION ATTEMPTED TO OUTLINE A CONTINGINECY PLAN- MOVING TO ONE OF TWO METHODOLOGOIES DPENDING ON PRELIMINARY FINDINGS. UNFORTUNATLEY, OVER 2 YEARS RECRUITMENT WAS GROSSLY INADEQUATE PREVENTING ANY TYPE OF EVEN CURSURY PRELIMINARY DATA ANALYSIS AND FORCING THE EARLY TERMINATION OF THIS STUDY. MICHAEL W. O'DELL, MD
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect (BTME) Volume of Abnormal Voxels Per MRI Slice in Muscles After Research Injections
Description
BTME volume is calculated by counting the number of abnormal voxels (each voxel volume is .0015 cc) on MRI2, which have a relaxation time greater than or equal to 3 standard deviations above the baseline mean for a subject and their muscle found on their baseline MRI.
Time Frame
At MRI 2, 2 Months after Research Injection
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Botulinum Toxin Muscle Effect (BTME) Volume of Abnormal Voxels Per MRI Slice in Muscles After Clinical Injections
Description
Change in volume of BTME in injected muscle after clinical injection recorded on MRI3 compared to BTME volume on MRI 2.
Time Frame
At MRI 3, 2 Months after Clinical Injections

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Experimental Group: Inclusion Criteria: Male and female aged 30-75 Diagnosis of any stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic, first occurrence or recurrent) Clinically significant lower extremity spasticity as assessed by PI that would benefit from BT treatment Ambulatory with or without device and without assistance at household or greater level Indication to inject gastrocnemius muscle (any combination of spastic lower extremity muscle injections are acceptable) Goal of treatment may include improvement of gait, ankle range of motion, ankle foot orthosis fit, heel strike, ankle position in stance phase, decreased clonus, or relief from painful muscle spasms Naïve to BT of any serotype in any lower extremity muscle Naïve to phenol or alcohol treatment in any lower extremity muscle Exclusion Criteria: History of concomitant neurological disease (central or peripheral) other than stroke Contraindication to intramuscular injection of BT Medically unstable as determined by PI Have an intrathecal baclofen pump Contraindication for MRI (Subjects with MRI-compatible hip replacements may participate, but not those with total knee replacements due to artifact)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael O'Dell, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
NewYork Presbyterian Hospital - Weill Cornell Medicine
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

The Movement of Botulinum Toxin Through the Lateral Gastrocnemius Muscle in Humans: An Expanded Examination

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs