The Purpose of This Research Study is to See if Combining Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-paclitaxel Chemotherapy Treatments With a Direct Tumor Therapy Yittrium-90 (Y-90) Will Work Better Together to Shrink Tumors and Control Cancer
Primary Purpose
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Induction Chemotherapy Triplet Therapy
Concurrent Y-90 treatment
Consolidation Doublet Therapy:
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult males and females at least 18 years of age
- Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed iCCA that is previously untreated or, if systemic therapy has been rendered for prior disease, has been administered at least 6 months before the development of recurrent or de novo new sites of disease.
- Unresectable disease, as deemed by the Inova multidisciplinary tumor board (i.e. disease that cannot be safely resected with negative margins, leaving 2 adjacent segments of liver with intact portal venous and hepatic arterial inflow and intact biliary and hepatic venous outflow with the future liver remnant of sufficient volume to avoid postoperative liver insufficiency)
- Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 at least 2 cm in size
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1
- Noncirrhotic liver - patients should not have a preexisting diagnosis of cirrhosis either diagnosed via biopsy or with features consistent with cirrhosis on imaging (e.g. shrunken liver with nodularity consistent with cirrhosis). Child-Pugh score must be less than 5.
- No evidence of extrahepatic disease, except for regional adenopathy that would be resected as part of a standard oncologic surgical procedure
- Adequate organ function as indicated by the following laboratory values (Table 1)
- Ability to complete testing in the protocol
- Able and willing to consent to protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Extrahepatic or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
- Gallbladder cancer
- Pancreatic or ampullary cancer
- Portal vein thrombosis involving the main portal vein or first order right or left portal vein branches
- Extrahepatic disease, other than regional lymph nodes that would be removed at time of surgery as part of a routine oncologic procedure for iCCA
- Previous treatment with chemotherapy, intra-arterial or radiotherapy for iCCA is exclusionary, with the exception of adjuvant therapy with capecitabine which is allowed.
- Contraindication to nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or cisplatin
- Contraindication found during work-up angiography, such as lung shunting (lung dose >30 Gy for a single treatment or >50 Gy cumulative), or non-manageable extrahepatic deposition of technetium Tc 99m macroaggregated albumin on scintigraphy performed after planning angiography
- > 75% hepatic tumor burden
- Inability to protect non-target arteries to intestines or solid organs from radioembolization
- Serum albumin < 3 g/dL
- Serum bilirubin > 2 mg/dL, serum aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase > 5 times upper limit of normal
- Concomitant illness that would prevent adequate patient assessment or in the investigators' opinion pose an added risk for study participants.
- Life-threatening intercurrent illness
- Anticipated poor compliance
- Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated
- Persons with decisional incapacity/cognitive impairment
- Any history or evidence of severe illness or any other condition that would make the patient, in the opinion of the investigator unsuitable for the study
- Subject is enrolled in a separate interventional clinical trial
Sites / Locations
- Keary Janet
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy with Yittrium-90
Arm Description
single arm - Induction Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel Triplet Chemotherapy followed by Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and yttrium-90 (Y-90) Radioembolization
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Assessing the objective response rate (ORR) at 6 months in patients with locally advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
Best response in terms of tumor shrinkage (by RECIST 1.1 criteria including complete + partial responses) obtained during protocol therapy.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Assessing Progression Free Survival (PFS)
time from treatment initiation to disease progression, death or last patient contact
Hepatic Progression-Free Survival (HPFS)
time from treatment initiation to hepatic disease progression, death or last patient contact
Overall Survival (OS)
Time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause or last patient contact
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease (by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria) obtained during protocol therapy.
R0 resection rate
Rate of patients that achieve an R0 resection at 6 months.
treatment related impact on quality of life
Self-assessed metric of treatment-related impact on Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire with measures of Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Hepatobiliary Cancer Subscale using a 5 point scale ((0) Not at all (1) A little bit; (2) Somewhat; (3) Quite a bit; (4) Very much). Better performance status, i.e. higher score, is associated with a higher quality of life.
safety and toxicity rate
Development of Treatment Toxicities (grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities persisting beyond 2 weeks despite best supportive care, any grade 3 hematologic toxicities, or any toxicity grade 4 or higher) assessed as per NCI's CTCAE v5.0 criteria.
rate of downstaging to surgery
Rate of downstaging to surgery that occurs during protocol therapy at 6 months.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05422690
Brief Title
The Purpose of This Research Study is to See if Combining Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-paclitaxel Chemotherapy Treatments With a Direct Tumor Therapy Yittrium-90 (Y-90) Will Work Better Together to Shrink Tumors and Control Cancer
Official Title
A Phase II Trial of Induction Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel Triplet Chemotherapy Followed by Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Radioembolization for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
September 30, 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2028 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Inova Health Care Services
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to see if combining gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy treatments with a direct tumor therapy called Yittrium-90, will work better together to shrink the tumor and control cancer.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Treatments are repeated every 21 days. Chemotherapy will be administered on days 1 and 8 of the 21 day cycle. For the first two cycles, treatment will consist of three drugs, gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel.
After these two cycles, the nab-paclitaxel will be removed from the treatment plan and participants will continue on trial with gemcitabine and cisplatin alone for 6 additional cycles (8 total cycles, or 6 months total of treatment). During the 3rd and possibly the 4th cycle, these drugs will be given at a reduced dose as y-90 treatment to the tumors in your liver will also be given. The interventional team will administer y-90 during these cycles as either one dose during cycle 3, or two doses, one during cycle 3 and one during cycle 4 if there is too much cancer to treat all at once.
The remaining cycles of treatment will be with gemcitabine and cisplatin by themselves.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
16 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
gemcitabine, cisplatin and nab-paclitaxel chemotherapy with Yittrium-90
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
single arm - Induction Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-Paclitaxel Triplet Chemotherapy followed by Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and yttrium-90 (Y-90) Radioembolization
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Induction Chemotherapy Triplet Therapy
Intervention Description
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, Cisplatin 25 mg/m2, Nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for two cycles.
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Concurrent Y-90 treatment
Intervention Description
One or two cycles (depending on whether or not one or two sessions of yttrium-90 are indicated as per the treating interventional radiologist) of gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 and cisplatin, 25 mg/m2 given on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Y-90 will be administered on day 3-7 or day 10-21 of the cycle.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Consolidation Doublet Therapy:
Intervention Description
Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and Cisplatin 25 mg/m2 given on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for 4-5 additional cycles. For the cycle directly after Y-90, gemcitabine will be kept at a dose of 300 mg/m2 to minimize risk of toxicity.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessing the objective response rate (ORR) at 6 months in patients with locally advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
Description
Best response in terms of tumor shrinkage (by RECIST 1.1 criteria including complete + partial responses) obtained during protocol therapy.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessing Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
time from treatment initiation to disease progression, death or last patient contact
Time Frame
48 months
Title
Hepatic Progression-Free Survival (HPFS)
Description
time from treatment initiation to hepatic disease progression, death or last patient contact
Time Frame
48 months
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
Time from treatment initiation to death due to any cause or last patient contact
Time Frame
48 months
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
Complete Response + Partial Response + Stable Disease (by RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST criteria) obtained during protocol therapy.
Time Frame
48 months
Title
R0 resection rate
Description
Rate of patients that achieve an R0 resection at 6 months.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
treatment related impact on quality of life
Description
Self-assessed metric of treatment-related impact on Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire with measures of Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, Functional Well-Being, Hepatobiliary Cancer Subscale using a 5 point scale ((0) Not at all (1) A little bit; (2) Somewhat; (3) Quite a bit; (4) Very much). Better performance status, i.e. higher score, is associated with a higher quality of life.
Time Frame
48 months
Title
safety and toxicity rate
Description
Development of Treatment Toxicities (grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities persisting beyond 2 weeks despite best supportive care, any grade 3 hematologic toxicities, or any toxicity grade 4 or higher) assessed as per NCI's CTCAE v5.0 criteria.
Time Frame
48 months
Title
rate of downstaging to surgery
Description
Rate of downstaging to surgery that occurs during protocol therapy at 6 months.
Time Frame
6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult males and females at least 18 years of age
Histologically and/or cytologically confirmed iCCA that is previously untreated or, if systemic therapy has been rendered for prior disease, has been administered at least 6 months before the development of recurrent or de novo new sites of disease.
Unresectable disease, as deemed by the Inova multidisciplinary tumor board (i.e. disease that cannot be safely resected with negative margins, leaving 2 adjacent segments of liver with intact portal venous and hepatic arterial inflow and intact biliary and hepatic venous outflow with the future liver remnant of sufficient volume to avoid postoperative liver insufficiency)
Measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 at least 2 cm in size
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1
Noncirrhotic liver - patients should not have a preexisting diagnosis of cirrhosis either diagnosed via biopsy or with features consistent with cirrhosis on imaging (e.g. shrunken liver with nodularity consistent with cirrhosis). Child-Pugh score must be less than 5.
No evidence of extrahepatic disease, except for regional adenopathy that would be resected as part of a standard oncologic surgical procedure
Adequate organ function as indicated by the following laboratory values (Table 1)
Ability to complete testing in the protocol
Able and willing to consent to protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
Extrahepatic or perihilar cholangiocarcinoma
Gallbladder cancer
Pancreatic or ampullary cancer
Portal vein thrombosis involving the main portal vein or first order right or left portal vein branches
Extrahepatic disease, other than regional lymph nodes that would be removed at time of surgery as part of a routine oncologic procedure for iCCA
Previous treatment with chemotherapy, intra-arterial or radiotherapy for iCCA is exclusionary, with the exception of adjuvant therapy with capecitabine which is allowed.
Contraindication to nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or cisplatin
Contraindication found during work-up angiography, such as lung shunting (lung dose >30 Gy for a single treatment or >50 Gy cumulative), or non-manageable extrahepatic deposition of technetium Tc 99m macroaggregated albumin on scintigraphy performed after planning angiography
> 75% hepatic tumor burden
Inability to protect non-target arteries to intestines or solid organs from radioembolization
Serum albumin < 3 g/dL
Serum bilirubin > 2 mg/dL, serum aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase > 5 times upper limit of normal
Concomitant illness that would prevent adequate patient assessment or in the investigators' opinion pose an added risk for study participants.
Life-threatening intercurrent illness
Anticipated poor compliance
Prisoners or subjects who are involuntarily incarcerated
Persons with decisional incapacity/cognitive impairment
Any history or evidence of severe illness or any other condition that would make the patient, in the opinion of the investigator unsuitable for the study
Subject is enrolled in a separate interventional clinical trial
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Keary Janet, BS
Phone
571-472-0024
Email
keary.janet@inova.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Stephanie Van Bebber, MSc
Phone
571-472-0213
Email
stephanie.vanbebber@inova.org
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arthur A. Winer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Inova Schar Cancer Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Keary Janet
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22031
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Keary Janet, BS
Phone
571-472-0224
Email
keary.janet@inova.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stephanie Van Bebber, MSc
Phone
571-472-0213
Email
Stephanie.VanBebber@inova.org
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Arthur A Winer, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33538338
Citation
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27000463
Citation
Saha SK, Zhu AX, Fuchs CS, Brooks GA. Forty-Year Trends in Cholangiocarcinoma Incidence in the U.S.: Intrahepatic Disease on the Rise. Oncologist. 2016 May;21(5):594-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0446. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22910846
Citation
Ribero D, Pinna AD, Guglielmi A, Ponti A, Nuzzo G, Giulini SM, Aldrighetti L, Calise F, Gerunda GE, Tomatis M, Amisano M, Berloco P, Torzilli G, Capussotti L; Italian Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Study Group. Surgical Approach for Long-term Survival of Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multi-institutional Analysis of 434 Patients. Arch Surg. 2012 Dec;147(12):1107-13. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.1962.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28562348
Citation
Si A, Li J, Xiang H, Zhang S, Bai S, Yang P, Zhang X, Xia Y, Wang K, Yan Z, Lau WY, Shi L, Shen F. Actual over 10-year survival after liver resection for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 4;8(27):44521-44532. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17815.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29277385
Citation
Tarchi P, Tabrizian P, Prigoff J, Schwartz M. Outcomes of resection for solitary </=5 cm intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):698-702. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.09.058. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25552905
Citation
Yeh CN, Hsieh FJ, Chiang KC, Chen JS, Yeh TS, Jan YY, Chen MF. Clinical effect of a positive surgical margin after hepatectomy on survival of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2014 Dec 17;9:163-74. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S74940. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15622001
Citation
Lang H, Sotiropoulos GC, Fruhauf NR, Domland M, Paul A, Kind EM, Malago M, Broelsch CE. Extended hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma (ICC): when is it worthwhile? Single center experience with 27 resections in 50 patients over a 5-year period. Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):134-43. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149426.08580.a1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31954498
Citation
Mazzaferro V, Gorgen A, Roayaie S, Droz Dit Busset M, Sapisochin G. Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020 Feb;72(2):364-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.11.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32090444
Citation
De Martin E, Rayar M, Golse N, Dupeux M, Gelli M, Gnemmi V, Allard MA, Cherqui D, Sa Cunha A, Adam R, Coilly A, Antonini TM, Guettier C, Samuel D, Boudjema K, Boleslawski E, Vibert E. Analysis of Liver Resection Versus Liver Transplantation on Outcome of Small Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma in the Setting of Cirrhosis. Liver Transpl. 2020 Jun;26(6):785-798. doi: 10.1002/lt.25737.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28994423
Citation
Rizvi S, Khan SA, Hallemeier CL, Kelley RK, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma - evolving concepts and therapeutic strategies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb;15(2):95-111. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.157. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33200010
Citation
Akateh C, Ejaz AM, Pawlik TM, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant treatment strategies for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2020 Oct 27;12(10):693-708. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i10.693.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29367874
Citation
Labib PL, Davidson BR, Sharma RA, Pereira SP. Locoregional therapies in cholangiocarcinoma. Hepat Oncol. 2017 Oct;4(4):99-109. doi: 10.2217/hep-2017-0014. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23846786
Citation
Hyder O, Marsh JW, Salem R, Petre EN, Kalva S, Liapi E, Cosgrove D, Neal D, Kamel I, Zhu AX, Sofocleous CT, Geschwind JF, Pawlik TM. Intra-arterial therapy for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institutional analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Nov;20(12):3779-86. doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3127-y. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22261548
Citation
Kuhlmann JB, Euringer W, Spangenberg HC, Breidert M, Blum HE, Harder J, Fischer R. Treatment of unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: conventional transarterial chemoembolization compared with drug eluting bead-transarterial chemoembolization and systemic chemotherapy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Apr;24(4):437-43. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283502241.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28229076
Citation
Sommer CM, Kauczor HU, Pereira PL. Locoregional Therapies of Cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med. 2016 Dec;32(6):414-420. doi: 10.1159/000453010. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25899049
Citation
Han K, Ko HK, Kim KW, Won HJ, Shin YM, Kim PN. Radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul;26(7):943-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.02.024. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25738477
Citation
Pillai K, Akhter J, Chua TC, Shehata M, Alzahrani N, Al-Alem I, Morris DL. Heat sink effect on tumor ablation characteristics as observed in monopolar radiofrequency, bipolar radiofrequency, and microwave, using ex vivo calf liver model. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(9):e580. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000580.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26487951
Citation
Yang L, Shan J, Shan L, Saxena A, Bester L, Morris DL. Trans-arterial embolisation therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015 Oct;6(5):570-88. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.055.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31239717
Citation
Zhen Y, Liu B, Chang Z, Ren H, Liu Z, Zheng J. A pooled analysis of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Jun 7;12:4489-4498. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S202875. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31255499
Citation
White J, Carolan-Rees G, Dale M, Patrick HE, See TC, Bell JK, Manas DM, Crellin A, Slevin NJ, Sharma RA. Yttrium-90 Transarterial Radioembolization for Chemotherapy-Refractory Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Prospective, Observational Study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Aug;30(8):1185-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20678012
Citation
Weigt J, Malfertheiner P. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Aug;4(4):395-7. doi: 10.1586/egh.10.45.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30998813
Citation
Shroff RT, Javle MM, Xiao L, Kaseb AO, Varadhachary GR, Wolff RA, Raghav KPS, Iwasaki M, Masci P, Ramanathan RK, Ahn DH, Bekaii-Saab TS, Borad MJ. Gemcitabine, Cisplatin, and nab-Paclitaxel for the Treatment of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):824-830. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0270.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31670746
Citation
Edeline J, Touchefeu Y, Guiu B, Farge O, Tougeron D, Baumgaertner I, Ayav A, Campillo-Gimenez B, Beuzit L, Pracht M, Lievre A, Le Sourd S, Boudjema K, Rolland Y, Boucher E, Garin E. Radioembolization Plus Chemotherapy for First-line Treatment of Locally Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):51-59. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3702.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
33890170
Citation
Cheng B, Villalobos A, Sethi I, Wagstaff W, Galt J, Brandon D, Schuster DM, Bercu Z, Majdalany B, Kokabi N. Determination of Tumor Dose Response Thresholds in Patients with Chemorefractory Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated with Resin and Glass-based Y90 Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021 Aug;44(8):1194-1203. doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02834-0. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
24461131
Citation
Camacho JC, Kokabi N, Xing M, Prajapati HJ, El-Rayes B, Kim HS. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors and European Association for The Study of the Liver criteria using delayed-phase imaging at an early time point predict survival in patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma following yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):256-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.10.056.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19097774
Citation
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
The Purpose of This Research Study is to See if Combining Gemcitabine, Cisplatin and Nab-paclitaxel Chemotherapy Treatments With a Direct Tumor Therapy Yittrium-90 (Y-90) Will Work Better Together to Shrink Tumors and Control Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs