search
Back to results

The Role of Lifestyle Factors in Breast Cancer-Related Outcomes

Primary Purpose

Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention
Best Practice
Cognitive Intervention
Computer-Assisted Intervention
Counseling
Exercise Intervention
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Questionnaire Administration
Sponsored by
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women with stage II or III breast cancer that will be scheduled to undergo a 4 to 6-week course of radiotherapy
  • Participants must be able to read, write, and speak English
  • Participants must be oriented to person, place, and time
  • Participants must also meet at least two of the following criteria related to lifestyle: 1) consume less than 3 servings of fruit and vegetable/day; 2) engage in less than 75 minutes moderate/vigorous activity per week, defined as anything that causes small increases in breathing or heart rate for a sustained amount of time (e.g., brisk walking, bicycling); and 3) engage in a mind-body practice less than 4 times a month
  • Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) of 24.45 or higher as assessed in the medical record

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a recurrent breast cancer diagnosis
  • Patients with another primary cancer diagnosis within 5 years of consent, not including non-melanoma skin cancers
  • Patients who have any major psychiatric diagnoses or thought disorder (e.g. schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder, dementia)
  • Patients with communication barriers (e.g., hard of hearing)
  • Patients with extreme mobility issues (e.g. unable to get in and out of a chair unassisted)
  • Patients with poorly or uncontrolled diabetes in the opinion of the physician(s)

Sites / Locations

  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm I (IO interventions)

Arm II (standard of care)

Arm Description

Patients undergo up to 7 different IO intervention sessions per week during their 6-week course of radiotherapy for between 1 and 3 hours each session, in addition to, up to 6 aerobic training sessions per week and one grocery store trip during the course of the program. IO intervention programs consist of nutritional coaching, behavioral therapy, yoga and meditation practice, resistance training, and a weekly meal sharing and cooking class. Patients then have weekly meetings with the study psychologist on the computer for 6 months, followed by a monthly meeting on the computer from 6-12 months, and 2 hour meetings at all follow-up appointments during the first year after radiotherapy.

Patients undergo standard of care.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Disease-free survival (DFS)
Will analyze DFS, using a multivariate comparison of DFS for each group using a Cox proportional hazards analysis. Will consider the following as potential covariates in the analysis (tumor and nodal status, menopausal status at diagnosis, tumor factors, treatment regimen, etc). Will obtain estimates for hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the effect of the study arm and each covariate.
Changes in biological pathways
Will use generalized linear mixed model regression (GLMM). Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Changes in dietary patterns
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Changes in fitness levels
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Changes in heart rate variability
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Changes in quality of life (including fatigue and sleep disturbances)
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
March 4, 2014
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02079662
Brief Title
The Role of Lifestyle Factors in Breast Cancer-Related Outcomes
Official Title
Integrative Oncology Program in Improving Cancer-Related Outcomes in Patients With Stage II or III Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
June 13, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial studies an integrative oncology (making changes in lifestyle and behavior) program in improving cancer-related outcomes in patients with stage II or III breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. An integrative oncology program consisting of dietary recommendations, physical activity, stress management, social support, and control of environmental contaminants may modify cancer-related biological processes, influence long-term treatment results, and improve the quality of life of patients.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine whether the Integrative Oncology group (IO) has increased disease-free survival (time to recurrence) than the standard of care control group (SC). II. Compare group differences over time in biological pathways including: immune function, endocrine function, insulin and glucose metabolism, cancer-related pathways (from peripheral blood), antioxidant capacity, and nutrient levels. III. Examine group differences in overall survival. IV. Compare group differences over time in dietary patterns and fitness levels. V. Determine whether the IO group has improved patient reported outcomes including fatigue, sleep disturbances, radiotherapy toxicity (dermatitis, skin ulceration, pruritis, etc.), gut microbiome, other aspects of Quality of Life (QOL), mental health, social support, and measures of positive growth. VI. Compare group differences over time in heart rate variability. VII. Determine cost-effectiveness analysis and work and/or home productivity. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Compare group differences over time in healthy breast tissue biomarkers acquired from fine needle aspirations. II. Compare group differences in spouse or caregiver work productivity. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo up to 7 different IO intervention sessions per week during their 6-week course of radiotherapy for between 1 and 3 hours each session, in addition to, up to 6 aerobic training sessions per week and one grocery store trip during the course of the program. IO intervention programs consist of nutritional coaching, behavioral therapy, yoga and meditation practice, resistance training, and a weekly meal sharing and cooking class. Patients then have weekly meetings with the study psychologist on the computer for 6 months, followed by a monthly meeting on the computer from 6-12 months, and 2 hour meetings at all follow-up appointments during the first year after radiotherapy. ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 and 12 months and then annually for up to 4 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v7, Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v7

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
110 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm I (IO interventions)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo up to 7 different IO intervention sessions per week during their 6-week course of radiotherapy for between 1 and 3 hours each session, in addition to, up to 6 aerobic training sessions per week and one grocery store trip during the course of the program. IO intervention programs consist of nutritional coaching, behavioral therapy, yoga and meditation practice, resistance training, and a weekly meal sharing and cooking class. Patients then have weekly meetings with the study psychologist on the computer for 6 months, followed by a monthly meeting on the computer from 6-12 months, and 2 hour meetings at all follow-up appointments during the first year after radiotherapy.
Arm Title
Arm II (standard of care)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients undergo standard of care.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention
Intervention Description
Undergo IO intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Best Practice
Other Intervention Name(s)
standard of care, standard therapy
Intervention Description
Undergo standard of care
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive Intervention
Intervention Description
Undergo IO intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Computer-Assisted Intervention
Intervention Description
Undergo IO intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Counseling
Other Intervention Name(s)
Counseling Intervention
Intervention Description
Undergo counseling
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Exercise Intervention
Intervention Description
Undergo IO intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Intervention Description
Correlative studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Description
Will analyze DFS, using a multivariate comparison of DFS for each group using a Cox proportional hazards analysis. Will consider the following as potential covariates in the analysis (tumor and nodal status, menopausal status at diagnosis, tumor factors, treatment regimen, etc). Will obtain estimates for hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the effect of the study arm and each covariate.
Time Frame
Up to 5 years
Title
Changes in biological pathways
Description
Will use generalized linear mixed model regression (GLMM). Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Time Frame
Baseline to 5 years
Title
Changes in dietary patterns
Description
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Time Frame
Baseline to 5 years
Title
Changes in fitness levels
Description
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Time Frame
Baseline to 5 years
Title
Changes in heart rate variability
Description
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Time Frame
Baseline to 5 years
Title
Changes in quality of life (including fatigue and sleep disturbances)
Description
Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.
Time Frame
Baseline to 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women with stage II or III breast cancer that will be scheduled to undergo a 4 to 6-week course of radiotherapy Participants must be able to read, write, and speak English Participants must be oriented to person, place, and time Participants must also meet at least two of the following criteria related to lifestyle: 1) consume less than 3 servings of fruit and vegetable/day; 2) engage in less than 75 minutes moderate/vigorous activity per week, defined as anything that causes small increases in breathing or heart rate for a sustained amount of time (e.g., brisk walking, bicycling); and 3) engage in a mind-body practice less than 4 times a month Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) of 24.45 or higher as assessed in the medical record Exclusion Criteria: Patients with a recurrent breast cancer diagnosis Patients with another primary cancer diagnosis within 5 years of consent, not including non-melanoma skin cancers Patients who have any major psychiatric diagnoses or thought disorder (e.g. schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder, dementia) Patients with communication barriers (e.g., hard of hearing) Patients with extreme mobility issues (e.g. unable to get in and out of a chair unassisted) Patients with poorly or uncontrolled diabetes in the opinion of the physician(s)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lorenzo Cohen
Organizational Affiliation
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
M D Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.mdanderson.org
Description
University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Website

Learn more about this trial

The Role of Lifestyle Factors in Breast Cancer-Related Outcomes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs