search
Back to results

The Safety and Efficacy of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Pollen Allergic Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma

Primary Purpose

Rhinitis, Asthma, Allergy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ALK Alutard birch or 5-grasses
ALK diluent 0,3% human albumin
Sponsored by
Karolinska Institutet
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rhinitis

Eligibility Criteria

16 Years - 50 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic rhinitis due to grass or birch pollen
  • Mild to moderate asthma with a positive methacholine challenge
  • Accepted and signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with total symptom relief.
  • Previously SCIT but no symptom improvement at all.
  • Sensitizations to house dust mite or furry animals, with ongoing exposure and symptoms.
  • Severe atopic dermatitis.
  • Patients with significant diseases other than allergic rhinitis. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
  • Patients with a respiratory tract infection in the past 4 weeks prior to Visit 2.
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or subdermal implants).
  • Known autoimmune or collagen disease
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Hepatic disease
  • Known renal insufficiency
  • Cancer
  • Hematologic disease
  • Chronic infectious disease
  • Any medication with a possible side-effect of interfering with the immune response
  • Previous immuno- or chemotherapy
  • Disease or conditions rendering the treatment of anaphylactic reactions difficult (symptomatic coronary heart diseases, severe arterial hypertension and treatment with β-blockers)
  • Major metabolic disease
  • Known or suspected allergy to the study product
  • Obesity with BMI > 30 since subcutaneous fat makes ultrasound imaging of lymph nodes harder which may risk the correct placement of injection.
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, abuse alcohol or drugs within 2 years prior to Visit 1.
  • Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or six half lives, whichever is greater, prior to Visit 1.
  • Mental incapability of coping with the study
  • Withdrawal of informed consent

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Placebo Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Placebo

    Active treatment

    Arm Description

    ALK diluent 0,3% human albumin'

    Intervention: Drug ALK Alutard birch or 5-grasses. Grass pollen suspension or birch pollen suspension

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in Symptoms Score After Nasal Allergen Challenge
    0,1 ml of ALK Aquagen birch or timothy 10 000 SQU/ml is deposited in each nostril and allergy symptoms are recorded. Symptoms during NPTs were scored according to the Lebel scoring scale. Symtom scores at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after nasal administration of the allergenextract were summed to represent the symptom-score at each nasal challenge (at inclusion, 12 months after inclusion and for the active patients 24 months after inclusion). The scoring system identifies nasal, eye, and ear symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus, watery eyes, and itchy ears, each graded on a scale from 0 to 3 points, and a total score was summarized after subtracting the starting score (min score is 0 and maximum score is 54 + the number of sneezes). Higher scores mean worse outcome.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS
    Treatment effect was evaluated by asking the patients to compare their allergic symptoms during the last pollen season with the pollen season before treatment on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (unchanged symptoms, no improvement) to 10 (total symptom relief, complete recovery).
    Change in Quality of Life
    Difference before and after treatment in Quality of Life. Quality of life was assessed using the Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, giving a score ranging from 1 to 7, and a change in score of 0.5 points is considered clinically relevant. Lower value is considered worse outcome.
    Change in Allergen-specific Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels Compared to Before Treatment
    Allergen-specific IgE levels were measured by ImmunoCAP (Thermo Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) for birch (t3) and timothy grass (g6) pollen according to the manufacturer's instructions. A cutoff level ≥ 0.35 kUA/L was considered positive.
    Change in Asthma Symptom Scores
    Asthma control 4 weeks before follow-up was estimated with the asthma control test. The score is based on a questionnaire with 5 questions concerning the patients asthma. Each question can be given a score from 1 to 5 points. The answers for each question is added together, where a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 25 can be obtained. Higher scores indicate improved outcome and a score of 19 or less suggests poorly controlled asthma.
    Change in Pulmonary Function Measurement (Spirometry)
    FEV1 were measured according to international guidelines and results presented in % of predicted values according to the patients height, gender, age and weight.
    Changes in Airway Inflammation Assessed by Exhaled Nitric Oxide
    Nitric oxide in exhaled air, p.p.b. were measured according to international guidelines, and higher values indicate worse outcome.
    Change in Symptom and Medication-score
    Modified Symptom scores and Medication score were calculated taking into account the frequency: daily (4 points); every second day (3 points); 1 to 3 days per week (2 points); occasionally (1 point); never (0 points), for the following symptoms: blocked nose, rhinorrhea, fatigue, sneezing, and asthma symptoms, and for the following medications used: local and systemic antihistamines, nasal steroids, asthma medication, and eye drops. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20 points for symptoms and 16 points for medication could be obtained. Higher values indicate worse outcome.
    Changes in Response to a Bronchial Challenge With Methacholine
    Methacholine challenge to test the bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the airways of the included subjects. The subject will inhale increasing doses of methacholine. Spirometry is performed before and between each inhalation. The cumulative dose of methacholine needed to elicit at 20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20) is reported. Lower values indicate worse outcome.
    Change in Allergen-specific Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) G and Ig4 Levels Compared to Before Treatment
    Allergen-specific IgG and IgG4 level was measured by ImmunoCAP (Thermo Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) for birch (t3) and timothy grass (g6) pollen according to the manufacturer's instructions. A cutoff 2 mg/L for IgG and 0.05 mg/L for IgG4 was considered positive.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 6, 2017
    Last Updated
    September 25, 2020
    Sponsor
    Karolinska Institutet
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03394508
    Brief Title
    The Safety and Efficacy of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Pollen Allergic Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma
    Official Title
    The Safety and Efficacy of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Pollen Allergic Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 2013 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Karolinska Institutet

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The study evaluates the safety and efficacy of intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy given to adolescents and young adults who are allergic to grass or birch pollen and have mild or moderate asthma. Patients will be treated with three intralymphatic injections; 1000 SQ-U x3 with 4-5 weeks interval, or placebo with 4-5 weeks interval. The patients receiving treatment will be given a fourth injection one year after the initial injections. The study is conducted in collaboration between Professor Lars Olof Cardell (ENT), prof Gunilla Hedlin (Pediatrics) and prof Marianne van Hage (Immunology)".
    Detailed Description
    30 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis due to birch or grass pollen are included. Study subjects are randomized to intralymphatic injections with placebo or ALK Alutard 5-grasses / birch or placebo. The patients receiving treatment will be given a fourth injection one year after the initial injections.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Rhinitis, Asthma, Allergy

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 2, Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    30 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Placebo
    Arm Type
    Placebo Comparator
    Arm Description
    ALK diluent 0,3% human albumin'
    Arm Title
    Active treatment
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Intervention: Drug ALK Alutard birch or 5-grasses. Grass pollen suspension or birch pollen suspension
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    ALK Alutard birch or 5-grasses
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    ALK Alutard birch pollen or ALK Alutard grass pollen
    Intervention Description
    Intralymphatic injection with 1000 units. 3 injections with 4-5 weeks interval (0,1 ml) and one additional booster injection with 1000 units before the second pollen season.
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    ALK diluent 0,3% human albumin
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Human albumin
    Intervention Description
    Intralymphatic injection with 0.1 ml. 3 injections with 4-5 weeks interval
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Symptoms Score After Nasal Allergen Challenge
    Description
    0,1 ml of ALK Aquagen birch or timothy 10 000 SQU/ml is deposited in each nostril and allergy symptoms are recorded. Symptoms during NPTs were scored according to the Lebel scoring scale. Symtom scores at 5, 15, and 30 minutes after nasal administration of the allergenextract were summed to represent the symptom-score at each nasal challenge (at inclusion, 12 months after inclusion and for the active patients 24 months after inclusion). The scoring system identifies nasal, eye, and ear symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus, watery eyes, and itchy ears, each graded on a scale from 0 to 3 points, and a total score was summarized after subtracting the starting score (min score is 0 and maximum score is 54 + the number of sneezes). Higher scores mean worse outcome.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change on Visual Analogue Scale (VAS
    Description
    Treatment effect was evaluated by asking the patients to compare their allergic symptoms during the last pollen season with the pollen season before treatment on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (unchanged symptoms, no improvement) to 10 (total symptom relief, complete recovery).
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Quality of Life
    Description
    Difference before and after treatment in Quality of Life. Quality of life was assessed using the Juniper Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, giving a score ranging from 1 to 7, and a change in score of 0.5 points is considered clinically relevant. Lower value is considered worse outcome.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Allergen-specific Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels Compared to Before Treatment
    Description
    Allergen-specific IgE levels were measured by ImmunoCAP (Thermo Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) for birch (t3) and timothy grass (g6) pollen according to the manufacturer's instructions. A cutoff level ≥ 0.35 kUA/L was considered positive.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Asthma Symptom Scores
    Description
    Asthma control 4 weeks before follow-up was estimated with the asthma control test. The score is based on a questionnaire with 5 questions concerning the patients asthma. Each question can be given a score from 1 to 5 points. The answers for each question is added together, where a minimum score of 5 and a maximum score of 25 can be obtained. Higher scores indicate improved outcome and a score of 19 or less suggests poorly controlled asthma.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Pulmonary Function Measurement (Spirometry)
    Description
    FEV1 were measured according to international guidelines and results presented in % of predicted values according to the patients height, gender, age and weight.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Changes in Airway Inflammation Assessed by Exhaled Nitric Oxide
    Description
    Nitric oxide in exhaled air, p.p.b. were measured according to international guidelines, and higher values indicate worse outcome.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Symptom and Medication-score
    Description
    Modified Symptom scores and Medication score were calculated taking into account the frequency: daily (4 points); every second day (3 points); 1 to 3 days per week (2 points); occasionally (1 point); never (0 points), for the following symptoms: blocked nose, rhinorrhea, fatigue, sneezing, and asthma symptoms, and for the following medications used: local and systemic antihistamines, nasal steroids, asthma medication, and eye drops. A minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 20 points for symptoms and 16 points for medication could be obtained. Higher values indicate worse outcome.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Changes in Response to a Bronchial Challenge With Methacholine
    Description
    Methacholine challenge to test the bronchial hyperresponsiveness in the airways of the included subjects. The subject will inhale increasing doses of methacholine. Spirometry is performed before and between each inhalation. The cumulative dose of methacholine needed to elicit at 20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20) is reported. Lower values indicate worse outcome.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).
    Title
    Change in Allergen-specific Serum Immunoglobulin (Ig) G and Ig4 Levels Compared to Before Treatment
    Description
    Allergen-specific IgG and IgG4 level was measured by ImmunoCAP (Thermo Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) for birch (t3) and timothy grass (g6) pollen according to the manufacturer's instructions. A cutoff 2 mg/L for IgG and 0.05 mg/L for IgG4 was considered positive.
    Time Frame
    At inclusion (pre-treatment), 12 months after inclusion (after first pollen season) and for the active treated patients 24 months after inclusion (after the second pollen season).

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    16 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    50 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Allergic rhinitis due to grass or birch pollen Mild to moderate asthma with a positive methacholine challenge Accepted and signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Previously subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) with total symptom relief. Previously SCIT but no symptom improvement at all. Sensitizations to house dust mite or furry animals, with ongoing exposure and symptoms. Severe atopic dermatitis. Patients with significant diseases other than allergic rhinitis. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study. Patients with a respiratory tract infection in the past 4 weeks prior to Visit 2. Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or subdermal implants). Known autoimmune or collagen disease Cardiovascular disease Hepatic disease Known renal insufficiency Cancer Hematologic disease Chronic infectious disease Any medication with a possible side-effect of interfering with the immune response Previous immuno- or chemotherapy Disease or conditions rendering the treatment of anaphylactic reactions difficult (symptomatic coronary heart diseases, severe arterial hypertension and treatment with β-blockers) Major metabolic disease Known or suspected allergy to the study product Obesity with BMI > 30 since subcutaneous fat makes ultrasound imaging of lymph nodes harder which may risk the correct placement of injection. Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, abuse alcohol or drugs within 2 years prior to Visit 1. Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or six half lives, whichever is greater, prior to Visit 1. Mental incapability of coping with the study Withdrawal of informed consent

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    26706294
    Citation
    Patterson AM, Bonny AE, Shiels WE 2nd, Erwin EA. Three-injection intralymphatic immunotherapy in adolescents and young adults with grass pollen rhinoconjunctivitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Feb;116(2):168-70. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Dec 17. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24035151
    Citation
    Witten M, Malling HJ, Blom L, Poulsen BC, Poulsen LK. Is intralymphatic immunotherapy ready for clinical use in patients with grass pollen allergy? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Nov;132(5):1248-1252.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.07.033. Epub 2013 Sep 13. No abstract available.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23374268
    Citation
    Hylander T, Latif L, Petersson-Westin U, Cardell LO. Intralymphatic allergen-specific immunotherapy: an effective and safe alternative treatment route for pollen-induced allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Feb;131(2):412-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.10.056.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22464647
    Citation
    Senti G, Crameri R, Kuster D, Johansen P, Martinez-Gomez JM, Graf N, Steiner M, Hothorn LA, Gronlund H, Tivig C, Zaleska A, Soyer O, van Hage M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Rose H, Kundig TM. Intralymphatic immunotherapy for cat allergy induces tolerance after only 3 injections. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 May;129(5):1290-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.026. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26817454
    Citation
    Hylander T, Larsson O, Petersson-Westin U, Eriksson M, Kumlien Georen S, Winqvist O, Cardell LO. Intralymphatic immunotherapy of pollen-induced rhinoconjunctivitis: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Respir Res. 2016 Jan 27;17:10. doi: 10.1186/s12931-016-0324-9.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    The Safety and Efficacy of Intralymphatic Immunotherapy in Pollen Allergic Adolescents and Young Adults With Asthma

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs