search
Back to results

The Synapse Project

Primary Purpose

Alzheimer Disease

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
UCB-J
Sponsored by
University of Wisconsin, Madison
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Alzheimer Disease

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitively unimpaired adults-

    • Aged 55 - 89
    • Normal cognition (results of most recent testing with the source cohort indicate the participant is cognitively unimpaired as judged by consensus or expert review)
    • In good general health with no conditions/medications affecting cognition or imaging
    • Willing to undergo [C-11]UCB-J, [C-11]PiB, and [F-18]MK6240 PET scans
    • An adequate MRI exam within 12 months prior to baseline. An MRI will be performed if not already available.
  • Mild dementia and amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment-

    • Aged 50 years or older
    • Abnormal cognitive status of MCI or dementia as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria
    • MCI's must be affected in the memory domain but may also have other affected domains
    • Willing to undergo [C-11]UCB-J, [C-11]PiB, and [F-18]MK6240 PET scans
    • An adequate MRI exam within 12 months prior to baseline. This MRI exam will come from ADRC/WRAP studies. Clinical MRI's (ones obtained outside of the research program) will not be adequate. An MRI will be performed if not already available from within the research program.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For women, pregnant, lactating or breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant
  • Evidence of unstable or untreated clinically significant gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, hematological, neoplastic, endocrine, alternative neurological, immunodeficiency, pulmonary, or other disorder or disease.
  • Stable, treated chronic medical conditions like hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, non-metastatic dermatologic or prostatic cancer, etc. are acceptable as long as they do not, in the study investigator's opinion, contribute to cognitive dysfunction or limit participation in study procedures.
  • Any illness or other consideration that makes it unlikely that the subject will be able to complete the 24-month study.
  • Current or prior history (within past 5 years) of significant alcohol or substance abuse as determined by the investigator.
  • Psychiatric disorders that may interfere with the study including current major Axis I DSM-V disorders including but not limited to severe Major depression, current or history of bipolar I disorder, or schizophrenia.
  • Current use of the anti-seizure medication Levetiracetam, also known as Keppra, Spritam or Roweepra
  • MRI exclusion criteria include findings from previous MRI's within the ADRC/WRAP research program that may be responsible for neurologic status of the subject such as evidence of cerebrovascular disease with multiple infarcts, infectious disease, space-occupying lesion, normal pressure hydrocephalus, CNS trauma, or any other structural abnormality that may impact cognition or image analysis, as judged by the investigator.
  • MRI-incompatible implants or devices such as certain cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators, insulin pumps, cochlear implants, metallic ocular foreign body, implanted neural stimulators, CNS aneurysm clips and other medical implants that have not been certified for MRI, or history of claustrophobia in MRI that prevents completion of MRI protocol.
  • Lack of decisional capacity at the time of informed consent
  • Lumbar puncture exclusion criteria include: previous lumbar spine surgery, currently taking blood-thinning anti-platelet medications, taking immunosuppressive medications, currently being treated or were recently treated for an infection or virus within the last 2 to 3 months.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cognitively unimpaired

Mild Cognitive Impairment

Mild dementia

Arm Description

Results of most recent testing with the source cohort indicate the participant is cognitively unimpaired as judged by consensus or expert review.

Abnormal cognitive status of MCI as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria.

Abnormal cognitive status of dementia as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs cognitively unimpaired (CU)) for medial temporal lobe (MTL) UCB-J distribution volume ratio (DVR) and hippocampal volume
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) has better mild cognitive impairment/probable AD dementia (MCI/AD) prediction accuracy than the hippocampal volume ROC AUC.
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J and hippocampal cingulum neurite density index
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the hippocampal cingulum neurite density index ROC AUC.
Annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Linear mixed effects regression will model UCB-J DVR as a function of time since baseline.
Baseline diagnosis group differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Baseline diagnosis (CU vs MCI/probable AD dementia) group differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.
Amyloid positivity status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Amyloid positivity status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model. Amyloid positivity status will be determined from amyloid PET.
Tau positivity status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Tau positivity status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model. Tau positivity status will be determined from tau PET.
MTL UCB-J DVR baseline differences in a cognitive performance age slope in non-demented participants
Linear mixed effects will be used to model non-demented participants' MTL UCB-J DVR baseline differences in a cognitive performance age slope via an MTL UCB-J DVR baseline x age interaction term with education and sex controlled. Cognitive performance will be assessed using a cognitive composite index comprised of episodic memory, learning, and executive functioning tests.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for medial temporal lobe (MTL) UCB-J distribution volume ratio (DVR) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain protein (NfL)
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better mild cognitive impairment/probable AD dementia (MCI/AD) prediction accuracy than the CSF NfL ROC AUC.
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J DVR and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-tau
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the CSF T-tau ROC AUC.
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J and CSF neurogranin
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the CSF neurogranin ROC AUC.
Sex differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Sex differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.
Age differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Age differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated in a linear mixed effects model.
APOE4 allele status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
APOE4 allele status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.

Full Information

First Posted
April 28, 2021
Last Updated
March 30, 2023
Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04871074
Brief Title
The Synapse Project
Official Title
SV2A PET Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
November 18, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overarching goal of this project is to use [C-11]UCB-J to obtain spatial information on neuronal synapse abundance and inform Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. The investigators propose to collect longitudinal amyloid, tau, and Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) positron emission tomography (PET) in participants in the Wisconsin Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) and Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention (WRAP) across the clinical stages of AD, including cognitively unimpaired biomarker negative, unimpaired biomarker positive, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia due to AD.
Detailed Description
Synaptic loss is a major feature of symptomatic AD. Conversely, abundance of synapses may confer resilience to cognitive decline in the presence of AD pathology. The pathology-defining features of AD are amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles and their presence and distribution can be spatially estimated in-vivo with amyloid and tau PET. Although these biomarkers can inform on the degree and location of pathology, they do not provide an indicator of their effect on collocated or extended in-network neural damage including synaptic density. SV2A is expressed ubiquitously in synapses and the capability of assessing SV2A in vivo may provide a direct indicator of synaptic health. Such information would be of high importance for staging the level of synaptic loss or conversely synaptic abundance in the AD continuum and may potentially improve prognostic precision. The PET radioligand [C-11]UCB-J is a marker of SV2A. The overarching goal of this project is to use [C-11]UCB-J to obtain spatial information on neuronal synapse abundance and inform upon disease progression. The investigators propose to collect longitudinal amyloid, tau, and SV2A PET in participants in the Wisconsin ADRC and WRAP across the clinical stages of AD, including cognitively unimpaired biomarker negative, unimpaired biomarker positive, MCI, and dementia due to AD. Specific Aim 1). Determine the extent to which [C-11]UCB-J provides unique information from MRI regarding neurodegeneration. Approach: The investigators will recruit N=60 cognitively unimpaired participants, N=30 MCI participants, and N=30 participants with AD dementia to undergo PET imaging with [C-11]UCB-J. MRI will include anatomic and diffusion connectivity MRI. When available, ancillary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) indicators of neurodegeneration and synapse function will be examined for relationships with UCB-J. Specific Aim 2). Determine the rate of synapse loss as reflected by [C-11]UCB-J signal across all participants. Rationale: Trajectories of synaptic loss are unknown in vivo. Approach: The investigators will determine the longitudinal trajectories of regional synapse loss that are observed over time among participants who undergo repeat [C-11]UCB-J (separated by two years, same participants scanned for Aim 1). The investigators will also examine trajectories by amyloid and tau load. Quantifying longitudinal synaptic loss is expected to eventually facilitate the identification of individuals who are progressing to dementia, as well as inform upon changes that are normal for age. Specific Aim 3). Determine the extent to which [C-11]UCB-J associates with cognitive decline. Rationale: The investigators expect that lower baseline SV2A density and longitudinal decline in SV2A density in the medial temporal lobe will be associated with faster progression of cognitive decline. The investigators will also test the extent to which harboring multiple pathologies (↑amyloid, ↑tau, and ↓SV2A density) contributes to cognitive decline. Approach: The investigators will examine core indices of cognitive status and continuous measures of cognitive function from the source cohorts and utilize mixed effects models to ascertain the effect of UCB-J amyloid and tau on cognition. Specific Aim 4). Determine factors which impact synapse loss. Rationale: Several risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia have been identified including potentially modifiable factors such as insulin resistance and vascular risk factors. Approach: The investigators will determine cross-sectional and longitudinal trajectories of regional synapse loss in relation to risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia. In order to determine insulin resistance, the investigators will perform blood draw and assess fasting glucose and insulin values to determine the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR). The impact of potentially modifiable risk factors on synapse loss in vivo is currently unknown. This aim will address this gap in knowledge, results which may translate to strategies for reducing dementia risk.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Alzheimer Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cognitively unimpaired
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Results of most recent testing with the source cohort indicate the participant is cognitively unimpaired as judged by consensus or expert review.
Arm Title
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Abnormal cognitive status of MCI as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria.
Arm Title
Mild dementia
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Abnormal cognitive status of dementia as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
UCB-J
Intervention Description
PET imaging with UCB-J
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs cognitively unimpaired (CU)) for medial temporal lobe (MTL) UCB-J distribution volume ratio (DVR) and hippocampal volume
Description
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC) has better mild cognitive impairment/probable AD dementia (MCI/AD) prediction accuracy than the hippocampal volume ROC AUC.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J and hippocampal cingulum neurite density index
Description
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the hippocampal cingulum neurite density index ROC AUC.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Linear mixed effects regression will model UCB-J DVR as a function of time since baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline and 2 years
Title
Baseline diagnosis group differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Baseline diagnosis (CU vs MCI/probable AD dementia) group differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Title
Amyloid positivity status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Amyloid positivity status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model. Amyloid positivity status will be determined from amyloid PET.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Title
Tau positivity status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Tau positivity status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model. Tau positivity status will be determined from tau PET.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Title
MTL UCB-J DVR baseline differences in a cognitive performance age slope in non-demented participants
Description
Linear mixed effects will be used to model non-demented participants' MTL UCB-J DVR baseline differences in a cognitive performance age slope via an MTL UCB-J DVR baseline x age interaction term with education and sex controlled. Cognitive performance will be assessed using a cognitive composite index comprised of episodic memory, learning, and executive functioning tests.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for medial temporal lobe (MTL) UCB-J distribution volume ratio (DVR) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light chain protein (NfL)
Description
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better mild cognitive impairment/probable AD dementia (MCI/AD) prediction accuracy than the CSF NfL ROC AUC.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J DVR and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) T-tau
Description
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the CSF T-tau ROC AUC.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Difference between ROC AUCs (MCI/AD vs CU) for MTL UCB-J and CSF neurogranin
Description
DeLong's method will test whether the MTL UCB-J ROC AUC has better MCI/AD prediction accuracy than the CSF neurogranin ROC AUC.
Time Frame
baseline
Title
Sex differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Sex differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Title
Age differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
Age differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated in a linear mixed effects model.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years
Title
APOE4 allele status differences in annual rate of change in UCB-J DVR
Description
APOE4 allele status differences in rate of UCB-J DVR change will be estimated via group x time interaction term in a linear mixed effects model.
Time Frame
baseline and 2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cognitively unimpaired adults- Aged 55 - 89 Normal cognition (results of most recent testing with the source cohort indicate the participant is cognitively unimpaired as judged by consensus or expert review) In good general health with no conditions/medications affecting cognition or imaging Willing to undergo [C-11]UCB-J, [C-11]PiB, and [F-18]MK6240 PET scans An adequate MRI exam within 12 months prior to baseline. An MRI will be performed if not already available. Mild dementia and amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment- Aged 50 years or older Abnormal cognitive status of MCI or dementia as judged by consensus or expert review using NIA-AA 2018 criteria MCI's must be affected in the memory domain but may also have other affected domains Willing to undergo [C-11]UCB-J, [C-11]PiB, and [F-18]MK6240 PET scans An adequate MRI exam within 12 months prior to baseline. This MRI exam will come from ADRC/WRAP studies. Clinical MRI's (ones obtained outside of the research program) will not be adequate. An MRI will be performed if not already available from within the research program. Exclusion Criteria: For women, pregnant, lactating or breastfeeding, or intention to become pregnant Evidence of unstable or untreated clinically significant gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, hematological, neoplastic, endocrine, alternative neurological, immunodeficiency, pulmonary, or other disorder or disease. Stable, treated chronic medical conditions like hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, non-metastatic dermatologic or prostatic cancer, etc. are acceptable as long as they do not, in the study investigator's opinion, contribute to cognitive dysfunction or limit participation in study procedures. Any illness or other consideration that makes it unlikely that the subject will be able to complete the 24-month study. Current or prior history (within past 5 years) of significant alcohol or substance abuse as determined by the investigator. Psychiatric disorders that may interfere with the study including current major Axis I DSM-V disorders including but not limited to severe Major depression, current or history of bipolar I disorder, or schizophrenia. Current use of the anti-seizure medication Levetiracetam, also known as Keppra, Spritam or Roweepra MRI exclusion criteria include findings from previous MRI's within the ADRC/WRAP research program that may be responsible for neurologic status of the subject such as evidence of cerebrovascular disease with multiple infarcts, infectious disease, space-occupying lesion, normal pressure hydrocephalus, CNS trauma, or any other structural abnormality that may impact cognition or image analysis, as judged by the investigator. MRI-incompatible implants or devices such as certain cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators, insulin pumps, cochlear implants, metallic ocular foreign body, implanted neural stimulators, CNS aneurysm clips and other medical implants that have not been certified for MRI, or history of claustrophobia in MRI that prevents completion of MRI protocol. Lack of decisional capacity at the time of informed consent Lumbar puncture exclusion criteria include: previous lumbar spine surgery, currently taking blood-thinning anti-platelet medications, taking immunosuppressive medications, currently being treated or were recently treated for an infection or virus within the last 2 to 3 months.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Barbara Bendlin, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53792
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Synapse Project

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs