search
Back to results

The Use of Airway Clearance Devices in ALS

Primary Purpose

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC)
Cough Assist
Sponsored by
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis focused on measuring Airway Clearance Devices, High Frequency Chest Compression Devices, Cough Assist

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Suspected, possible, probable, Probable (Lab-Supported), or Definite ALS according to El Escorial Criteria
  2. Males and females age 18 and above
  3. Novel to airway clearance device use
  4. Forced vital capacity ≤ 75% of predicted

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication for pulmonary ventilation scan including allergy to radioisotopes
  2. Any contraindication for use of a pulmonary clearance device

    • Susceptibility to pneumothorax
    • Recent (within 30 days) barotrauma
    • Unstable head or neck injury
    • Active hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability

Sites / Locations

  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Treatment group A

Treatment group B- HFCC and Cough Assist

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to group A will be fitted for and issued a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC) device for home use. Subjects will be instructed to use the HFCC device 2-3 times per day for 15-30 minutes each. Subjects will be instructed to keep a device usage, concomitant medication, and adverse event diary.

Subjects randomized to group B will be fitted for and issued a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC) device and will also be issued a cough assist device. Subjects will be instructed in the use of both devices. The HFCC device should be utilized 2-3 times per day for 15-30 minutes each followed by a session with the cough assist. Subjects will be instructed to keep a device usage, concomitant medication, and adverse event diary.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Subjects With Improved Respiratory Symptoms as Shown by Chest X-Ray Between Baseline and End of Study
A projection radiograph of the chest used to diagnose conditions affecting the chest. Chest X-Ray performed at each study visit. Investigator looked at clinical impression of Chest X-ray to be normal versus abnormal. If there was presence of atelectasis, this indicated a worsening of subject's respiratory symptoms. If subject's Chest X-Ray impression remained the same and continually normal, this indicated no change in respiratory symptoms.
Number of Subjects With Improved Respiratory Symptoms As Shown By Lung Ventilation Scan Between Baseline and End of Study
A nuclear scanning test commonly used to detect abnormalities in air flow. A radioactive tracer gas or mist is inhaled into the lungs. Pictures from the scan indicate areas of the lungs that are not receiving enough air or that retain too much air. Areas of the lung that retain too much air are brighter spots on the film and areas not receiving enough air are dark. Lung scan performed at each study visit. Investigator looked at clinical impression of lung scan to be normal versus abnormal. If there was indication of decreased ventilation, this indicated a worsening of subject's respiratory symptoms. If subject's lung scan impression remained the same and continually normal, this indicated no change in respiratory symptoms.
Number of Participants With Increased McGill Single Item Quality of Life Scale Question Between Baseline and End of Study
Assess the improvement of/ rate of deterioration of the subject's quality of life from baseline to end of study on a rated scale of 1 to 10.
Number of Participants With Improved Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Between Baseline and End of Study
Spirometry will be used to measure FVC. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.
Number of Participants With Improved Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) Between Baseline and End of Study
Spirometry will be used to measure MIP. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.
Number of Participants With Improved Diffusion Capacity Between Baseline and End of Study
Spirometry will be used to measure Diffusion Capacity. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
February 4, 2016
Last Updated
August 12, 2020
Sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02682030
Brief Title
The Use of Airway Clearance Devices in ALS
Official Title
Utilization of Pulmonary Clearance Devices in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigator is examining the use of one airway clearance medical device compared to the use of two airway clearance medical devices together in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). More specifically, the investigator wants to know how effective the use of either a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression (HFCC) device is on its own or the use of both a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression (HFCC) device and Cough Assist together to maintain a healthy airway and clear secretions. The first device is a passive form of mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression (HFCC), which was designed to help clear the airway of mucus and other secretions through mechanical knocking of the chest area. The second device, called a Cough Assist, aids patients to clear mucus and secretions that they would otherwise be unable to clear with coughing. This study will enroll up to 20 people in total at CSMC.
Detailed Description
This 180 day (25.7 weeks) pilot study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of airway clearance devices in adults with ALS. Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups: treatment with a mechanical HCFF device alone or treatment with both a mechanical HFCC device and a cough assist device. This outpatient study includes a screening/baseline visit followed by a 180 day (25.7 weeks) treatment period with three scheduled clinic visits (day 30, day 90, day 180). Pulmonary assessments and ALS outcome measures will be collected at each visit in addition to quality of life assessments and device usage diaries.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Keywords
Airway Clearance Devices, High Frequency Chest Compression Devices, Cough Assist

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
5 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to group A will be fitted for and issued a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC) device for home use. Subjects will be instructed to use the HFCC device 2-3 times per day for 15-30 minutes each. Subjects will be instructed to keep a device usage, concomitant medication, and adverse event diary.
Arm Title
Treatment group B- HFCC and Cough Assist
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to group B will be fitted for and issued a mechanical High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC) device and will also be issued a cough assist device. Subjects will be instructed in the use of both devices. The HFCC device should be utilized 2-3 times per day for 15-30 minutes each followed by a session with the cough assist. Subjects will be instructed to keep a device usage, concomitant medication, and adverse event diary.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
High Frequency Chest Compression Device (HFCC)
Intervention Description
A vest designed to help clear the airway of mucus and other secretions through mechanical knocking of the chest area.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cough Assist
Intervention Description
A device that aids patients to clear mucus and secretions that they would otherwise be unable to clear with coughing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Subjects With Improved Respiratory Symptoms as Shown by Chest X-Ray Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
A projection radiograph of the chest used to diagnose conditions affecting the chest. Chest X-Ray performed at each study visit. Investigator looked at clinical impression of Chest X-ray to be normal versus abnormal. If there was presence of atelectasis, this indicated a worsening of subject's respiratory symptoms. If subject's Chest X-Ray impression remained the same and continually normal, this indicated no change in respiratory symptoms.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 X-rays over 6 months.
Title
Number of Subjects With Improved Respiratory Symptoms As Shown By Lung Ventilation Scan Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
A nuclear scanning test commonly used to detect abnormalities in air flow. A radioactive tracer gas or mist is inhaled into the lungs. Pictures from the scan indicate areas of the lungs that are not receiving enough air or that retain too much air. Areas of the lung that retain too much air are brighter spots on the film and areas not receiving enough air are dark. Lung scan performed at each study visit. Investigator looked at clinical impression of lung scan to be normal versus abnormal. If there was indication of decreased ventilation, this indicated a worsening of subject's respiratory symptoms. If subject's lung scan impression remained the same and continually normal, this indicated no change in respiratory symptoms.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 lung ventilation scans over 6 months.
Title
Number of Participants With Increased McGill Single Item Quality of Life Scale Question Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
Assess the improvement of/ rate of deterioration of the subject's quality of life from baseline to end of study on a rated scale of 1 to 10.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 questionnaires over 6 months.
Title
Number of Participants With Improved Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
Spirometry will be used to measure FVC. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 testing sessions over 6 months.
Title
Number of Participants With Improved Maximal Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
Spirometry will be used to measure MIP. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 testing sessions over 6 months.
Title
Number of Participants With Improved Diffusion Capacity Between Baseline and End of Study
Description
Spirometry will be used to measure Diffusion Capacity. It is the most common of the pulmonary function tests and measures lung function, specifically the measurement of the amount (volume) and/or speed (flow) of air that can be inhaled and exhaled.
Time Frame
1 time at screening/baseline and then at the month 1, month 3, and month 6 study visit for a total of 4 testing sessions over 6 months.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Suspected, possible, probable, Probable (Lab-Supported), or Definite ALS according to El Escorial Criteria Males and females age 18 and above Novel to airway clearance device use Forced vital capacity ≤ 75% of predicted Exclusion Criteria: Any contraindication for pulmonary ventilation scan including allergy to radioisotopes Any contraindication for use of a pulmonary clearance device Susceptibility to pneumothorax Recent (within 30 days) barotrauma Unstable head or neck injury Active hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ashraf Elsayegh, MD, FCCP
Organizational Affiliation
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Use of Airway Clearance Devices in ALS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs