search
Back to results

The Use of Bioelectrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

Primary Purpose

Erectile Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bioelectric stimulation
Sponsored by
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Erectile Dysfunction

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men with known ED (defined as a score of less than 22 on the IIEF-5)
  • who had been in a stable relationship for more than 6 months
  • not taking any ED medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • neurogenic ED (due to spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, prostatectomy)
  • hypogonadism (total testosterone < 300 ng/ dl)
  • decompensated diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose > 200 mg/dl and/or glycated hemoglobin > 8%)
  • decompensated systemic arterial hypertension (SBP > 160 and/or DBP > 100)
  • morbid obesity
  • diagnosis of coronary heart disease and/or cerebrovascular disease
  • inability to understand the study objectives/technique or to provide informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Mundo do Assoalho Pélvico

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

intervention (IG1)

intervention (MyoStim group)

control (CG)

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Erectile function
Erectile Function With International Index of Erectile Function-5 Questionnaire: The IIEF-5 questionnaire score determined the presence and severity of ED: absent (> 21), mild (17-21), mild / moderate (12-16), moderate (8-11) and severe (<8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 21, 2020
Last Updated
April 24, 2020
Sponsor
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04363918
Brief Title
The Use of Bioelectrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction
Official Title
The Use of Bioelectrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 1, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Erectile dysfunction (ED), as defined by the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine, is the consistent and recurrent inability to acquire or sustain an erection of sufficient rigidity and duration to engage in satisfactory sexual intercourse. In the search for other approaches to treat ED the use of bioelectrical stimulation (BES) has been successfully introduced and applied in clinical studies. In the search for other approaches to treat ED the use of bioelectrical stimulation (BES) has been successfully introduced and applied in clinical studies.
Detailed Description
The investigators randomized 30 male patients, aged 40 to 75 years, with known ED (defined as a score of less than 22 on the IIEF-5), who had been in a stable relationship for more than 6 months and not taking any ED medication. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: intervention (IG1), intervention (MyoStim group) or control (CG). The IG1 received FES therapy (50 Hz/500 μs) for a total of 4 weeks, divided into two weekly sessions lasting 15 minutes each, with intensity set lower than the motor threshold that was assessed individually. The MyoStim group received a combination of low frequency BES and microcurrente for a total of 4 weeks, divided in two weekly sessions lasting 45 minutes each with intensity set lower than the motor threshold that was assessed individually which was delivered via two patch electrodes placed on the dorsum surface of the penis and connected to a desk top Mettler model 240 Bioelectric Stimulator, which was adjusted to reach each of the signals included in the protocol. In all three groups two self-adhesive electrodes measuring 3 cm each were used. One electrode was placed at the base of the penis, while the second was attached 2 cm below the first one. The control group was treated with placebo FES machine (the red light functioning but there was no power). Both groups attended sessions twice a week for a period of 4 weeks, for a total of 8 FES sessions. Erectile function was assessed by the validated International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) and Erection Hardness Score (EHS) instruments. All of the questionnaires were applied before and immediately after the treatment. The instruments were completed by a blinded investigator, according to the protocol to which the patient had been randomized. Only the physiotherapist who applied the technique was aware of group allocation. Participants had no treatment costs. The IG1 received actual stimulation for only the VEGF signal during the each treatment period, while the multi-signal MyoStim group received actual stimulation at precise frequencies for the five proteins which were changed every 5-15 minutes including. All subjects completed all 8 treatments and the study questionnaires and metrics of ED before and at the end of the study. The study was unblinded when the last enrolled patient had completed their 4 weeks of treatment. The study included an opportunity for all patients randomized to the Control group to then receive the full four-week, 8 session treatment, for whichever of the two active treatment arms, VEGF alone or Myostim, was shown to be most effective. MyoStim treatment was clearly superior to the other treatment arms and all ten Control subjects elected to complete the full 4-week treatment with the MyoStim protocol in an open-label cross-over design. These ten subjects were then added to the original cohort assigned to MyoStim, for a total of 20 patients in the MyoStim arm. The statistical analysis was completed for the original treatment assignments with 10 subjects in each group and the total of 20 MyoStim subjects versus VEGF alone or Control.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Erectile Dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
intervention (IG1)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
intervention (MyoStim group)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
control (CG)
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
bioelectric stimulation
Intervention Description
bioelectric stimulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Erectile function
Description
Erectile Function With International Index of Erectile Function-5 Questionnaire: The IIEF-5 questionnaire score determined the presence and severity of ED: absent (> 21), mild (17-21), mild / moderate (12-16), moderate (8-11) and severe (<8)
Time Frame
8 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: men with known ED (defined as a score of less than 22 on the IIEF-5) who had been in a stable relationship for more than 6 months not taking any ED medication. Exclusion Criteria: neurogenic ED (due to spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, prostatectomy) hypogonadism (total testosterone < 300 ng/ dl) decompensated diabetes mellitus (fasting blood glucose > 200 mg/dl and/or glycated hemoglobin > 8%) decompensated systemic arterial hypertension (SBP > 160 and/or DBP > 100) morbid obesity diagnosis of coronary heart disease and/or cerebrovascular disease inability to understand the study objectives/technique or to provide informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandre Fornari, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Federal University of Health Science of Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mundo do Assoalho Pélvico
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
RS
ZIP/Postal Code
90540040
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

The Use of Bioelectrical Stimulation in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs