search
Back to results

The Use of Furosemide in Patients on Dialysis

Primary Purpose

End Stage Renal Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Withdrawal of furosemide
furosemide administration
Sponsored by
Unity Health Toronto
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for End Stage Renal Disease focused on measuring Hemodialysis, Response to Furosemide

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:all patients taking Furosemide -

Exclusion Criteria:Patients not willing to give consent

-

Sites / Locations

  • St Michael's HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Withdrawal of Furosemide

Administration of furosemide

Arm Description

The patient's Furosemide will be withdrawn

The patient will receive furosemide 120 mgms daily

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

24 hour urine sodium and water excretion
The patients 24 hour sodium and water excretion on and off the medication (which they had already been taking) will be compared for effectiveness of the drug. The hypothesis is that the urine sodium concentration off the drug, will predict the response and thus be of diagnostic value for other patients

Secondary Outcome Measures

Interdialytic weight gain
The interdialytic weight gain on and off the drug will be compared

Full Information

First Posted
March 19, 2013
Last Updated
August 9, 2016
Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01815892
Brief Title
The Use of Furosemide in Patients on Dialysis
Official Title
The Determinants of the Effectiveness of the Use of Furosemide in Patients on Dialysis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2015 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Unity Health Toronto

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Patients often begin dialysis taking diuretics (stimulate the kidney to excrete salt and water). Once on dialysis, these drugs are often continued. Whether these drugs are still needed, or even effective is often unclear.This study,by evaluating the composition of the patients' urine when off the drug, will predict which patients should benefit from the drug. By comparing their 24 hour volume both off and on the drug, the impact of the drug will be established. The results will allow the prediction of which patients, in the future, should take the drug. The hypothesis is: Among dialysis recipients, evaluation of the random urine sodium concentration will help predict the likelihood of a positive response to Furosemide, as manifested by an increased urine volume and sodium excretion.
Detailed Description
Patients often begin dialysis on a significant dose of diuretic due to the retention of sodium and water in the predialysis phase of their chronic kidney disease (CKD). The quandary often faced by the care team is whether or not the diuretic should be continued on dialysis, particularly after they have been on dialysis for a period of time. For the appropriate dialysis patient, a daily dose of furosemide,, minimizes the interdialytic weight gain, may result in better blood pressure (BP) control and may lower the risk of heart failure. Furthermore, there may be a favourable impact on cardiac remodeling and cardiac morbidity and mortality. The diuretic may also increase the excretion of potassium, thereby reducing the likelihood of hyperkalemia. Patients with significant renal sodium reabsorption would be the ones who would be expected to respond to furosemide. Thus patients whose urine [Na] is less than 80 mM are reabsorbing significant amounts of filtered Na (glomerular filtrate [Na] would be between 130 and 140mM) and thus might be expected to respond to furosemide. (This is premised on the assumption that the urine [Na] does not vary much during the day in chronic dialysis recipients, but this will be established during the course of the study.) The patients Dry Weight will be optimized prior to entry into study according to usual care: this involves integrating BP data, the central venous pressure as assessed by the internal jugular vein, and patient symptoms (eg,dyspnea during the interdialytic interval,prolonged lightheadedness/presyncope/fatigue after dialysis).. Patients on dialysis who are taking furosemide will be asked to stop their furosemide for 2 weeks, and their dry weight maintained with ultrafiltration on dialysis alone. After 2 weeks, to establish whether there is any diurnal variation in the urine [Na] they will collect their urine in separate containers, appropriately labeled with the date and time, during the 24 hr period ending pre dialysis after the long interdialytic interval. These collections will also determine whether there is any diurnal variation in [Na], the individual urine [Na], as well as indicate the 24 hour urine volume and Na excretion off the furosemide. All urine samples will be assayed for the concentration of Na, K, and creatinine, as well as their volume. Thereafter, each patient will be given furosemide 120 mgm every morning for 2 weeks and they will collect the urine voided with each voiding (labeling with the time voided) in separate containers during the 24 hr period ending pre dialysis after the long interdialytic interval after 2 weeks . These collections will answer whether there is any diurnal variation in [Na] while on furosemide, as well as determine the 24 hour urine volume and Na excretion on the furosemide. The results will determine whether those patients taking furosemide are indeed benefitting from it (Na, K and H2O excretion) and will help one to predict whether patients not taking furosemide, might indeed benefit from taking it. At the conclusion of the 2-week period of furosemide therapy, the patient's primary nephrologist will determine the need for continuing this agent and if a decision is made to continue furosemide, the dose would be at the discretion of the nephrologist. The primary outcome is the increase in urine volume and 24 hour sodium excretion in response to the furosemide therapy

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Renal Disease
Keywords
Hemodialysis, Response to Furosemide

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
51 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Withdrawal of Furosemide
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The patient's Furosemide will be withdrawn
Arm Title
Administration of furosemide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The patient will receive furosemide 120 mgms daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Withdrawal of furosemide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lasix
Intervention Description
The patient (previously on furosemide) will have the furosemide stopped for 2 weeks. The interdialytic weight gain, BP and 24 hour urine volume and sodium excretion will be measured
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
furosemide administration
Other Intervention Name(s)
lasix
Intervention Description
The patient will receive 120 mgm furosemide daily for 2 weeks and the interdialytic weight gain, BP and 24 hr urine volume and sodium excretion will be measured.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
24 hour urine sodium and water excretion
Description
The patients 24 hour sodium and water excretion on and off the medication (which they had already been taking) will be compared for effectiveness of the drug. The hypothesis is that the urine sodium concentration off the drug, will predict the response and thus be of diagnostic value for other patients
Time Frame
2 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Interdialytic weight gain
Description
The interdialytic weight gain on and off the drug will be compared
Time Frame
2 weeks
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
The patients' BP on and off the drug will be compared
Description
The patients pre dialysis BP as well as the 48 hr ambulatory BP (if the patient is willing) will be compared in both phases of the study.
Time Frame
2 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:all patients taking Furosemide - Exclusion Criteria:Patients not willing to give consent -
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Marc B Goldstein, MD
Phone
416 864 5290
Email
goldsteinma@smh.ca
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc B Goldstein, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Unity Health Toronto
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5B 1W8
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc B Goldstein, MD
Phone
416 864 5290
Email
goldsteinma@smh.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc B Goldstein, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

The Use of Furosemide in Patients on Dialysis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs