search
Back to results

The Zenflow Spring System Feasibility and Safety Study (ZEST)

Primary Purpose

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Zenflow Spring System
Sponsored by
Zenflow, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 50 to 80 years of age
  2. Baseline IPSS score > 13, and a baseline Quality of Life (Qol) question score > 3
  3. Prostate volume 25 - 80 cc by Trans Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS), measured within past 90 days
  4. Anterior prostatic urethral length 2.5 - 4.0 cm by cystoscopy, as measured from bladder neck to verumontanum. TRUS will be accepted as a primary screening measure.
  5. Failed or intolerant to medication regimen for the treatment of LUTS.

Exclusion Criteria:

New Zealand only: A maximum of 5 participants in acute or chronic urinary retention may be included in the study provided they meet other entry criteria. Exclusion exemptions for these patients are described in 4a, 5a and they are exempt from #6.

Participants will be excluded from participating in this trial if they meet any of the following criteria:

  1. Obstructive median prostatic lobe or high bladder neck
  2. Urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, or bladder neck obstruction - either current, or recurrent requiring 2 or more dilatations
  3. Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) (age 50-70 PSA ≥4; age 70+ PSA ≥6.5) unless negative biopsy within last 3 months, or a positive biopsy
  4. Post-void residual volume (PVR) > 250 ml, if not in acute retention 4a. No maximum post void residual volume required if patient in acute or chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients)
  5. Peak urinary flow rate > 12 ml/second, with ≥ 125 ml voided volume at baseline. 5a. No maximum urinary flow or minimum voided volume required if participant in acute or chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients)
  6. History of chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients)
  7. History of neurogenic bladder
  8. Compromised renal function (e.g., serum creatinine > 1.8 mg/dl)
  9. Concomitant Urinary Tract Infection (UTI)
  10. Concomitant bladder stones
  11. Confirmed or suspected prostate/bladder cancer
  12. Previous pelvic irradiation or radical pelvic surgery
  13. Previous prostate surgery, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate
  14. Chronic prostatitis, or recurring prostatitis within the past 12 months
  15. Serious concurrent medical conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes
  16. Known allergy to nickel
  17. Life expectancy less than 12 months
  18. Use of concomitant medications (e.g., anticholinergics, antispasmodics or antidepressants) affecting bladder function
  19. Anti-coagulant, anti-platelet, or thrombolytic medication other than Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) or Clopidogrel. ASA and Clopidogrel must be ceased 7 days prior to the procedure.
  20. 5--reductase inhibitors within 6 months of pre-treatment evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued for entrance into or throughout the study).
  21. -blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued for entrance into or throughout the study).
  22. Future fertility concerns
  23. Any severe illness that might prevent study completion or would confound study results

Sites / Locations

  • MBAL "Tokuda Bolnitsa Sofia" AD
  • RoundHay Medical Center
  • Tauranga Urology Research Ltd

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Treatment Group

Arm Description

Receives intervention with the Zenflow Spring System.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Device Success defined as both 1) deliverability of the implant and 2) freedom from unanticipated adverse events (UAEs) not listed in the protocol or AEs that meet the protocol definition of Serious AEs.
Frequency of Device Success is assessed by subject, for both successful device placement in the target anatomy and absence of serious or unanticipated adverse events through discharge.
Occurrence of device and/or procedure related Adverse Events as determined by investigator and independent medical reviewer
Frequency and severity of any device or procedure related adverse events, by subject.
Occurrence of Adverse Event specific to indwelling catheterization, descriptive analysis
Frequency of indwelling catheterization = or > 7 days following placement of the investigational device.
Effectiveness of implant measured through symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS)
Subjects should demonstrate improvement of > or = to 3 point reduction from baseline measurement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of Sexual Health using the Sexual Health in Men (SHIM) questionnaire
Observational assessment of subject scores on SHIM at the 6 months and 12 months visit, compared to baseline.
Assessment of Incontinence, using the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire
Observational assessment of subject scores on ISI at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months compared to baseline.
Observation of pain using a validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire
Observational assessment of subject reports of pain on the VAS questionnaire, at discharge and follow up visits up to 3 months, compared to baseline.
Improvement in Uroflowmetry compared to baseline
Uroflowmetry is measured at 3 months post implantation and compared to baseline
Effectiveness of implant measured through symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS)
Observation of IPSS scores compared to baseline at 12 months follow up.
Effectiveness of the treatment by assessing need for further treatment to alleviate symptoms of BPH.
Observation of incidence of repeat invasive treatment for LUTS through 12 months post-procedure

Full Information

First Posted
May 9, 2016
Last Updated
February 4, 2019
Sponsor
Zenflow, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02786290
Brief Title
The Zenflow Spring System Feasibility and Safety Study
Acronym
ZEST
Official Title
The Zenflow Spring System Feasibility and Safety Study (ZEST)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Zenflow, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a First in Human study to assess the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the Zenflow Spring System in relieving the symptoms of obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH).
Detailed Description
The purpose of the Zenflow Study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a novel prostatic urethral implant for the treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) that arise due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), secondary to the presence of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH). Effectiveness will also be measured. It is intended that the features of the Zenflow Spring will provide an effective office-based treatment and management therapy for BPH with little or no side effects.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Receives intervention with the Zenflow Spring System.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Zenflow Spring System
Intervention Description
The Zenflow Spring is a nitinol urethral implant for the treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) that arise due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), secondary to the presence of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH). The device is intended to be a permanent implant however it may be removed if necessary.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Device Success defined as both 1) deliverability of the implant and 2) freedom from unanticipated adverse events (UAEs) not listed in the protocol or AEs that meet the protocol definition of Serious AEs.
Description
Frequency of Device Success is assessed by subject, for both successful device placement in the target anatomy and absence of serious or unanticipated adverse events through discharge.
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Occurrence of device and/or procedure related Adverse Events as determined by investigator and independent medical reviewer
Description
Frequency and severity of any device or procedure related adverse events, by subject.
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Occurrence of Adverse Event specific to indwelling catheterization, descriptive analysis
Description
Frequency of indwelling catheterization = or > 7 days following placement of the investigational device.
Time Frame
Seven days following implantation of the investigational device
Title
Effectiveness of implant measured through symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS)
Description
Subjects should demonstrate improvement of > or = to 3 point reduction from baseline measurement.
Time Frame
3 months following device placement
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of Sexual Health using the Sexual Health in Men (SHIM) questionnaire
Description
Observational assessment of subject scores on SHIM at the 6 months and 12 months visit, compared to baseline.
Time Frame
6 months, 12-,24-,36-, months post implantation
Title
Assessment of Incontinence, using the Incontinence Severity Index (ISI) questionnaire
Description
Observational assessment of subject scores on ISI at 2 weeks, 1 month and 3 months compared to baseline.
Time Frame
2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months
Title
Observation of pain using a validated Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) questionnaire
Description
Observational assessment of subject reports of pain on the VAS questionnaire, at discharge and follow up visits up to 3 months, compared to baseline.
Time Frame
through 3 month follow-up
Title
Improvement in Uroflowmetry compared to baseline
Description
Uroflowmetry is measured at 3 months post implantation and compared to baseline
Time Frame
3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-months post implantation
Title
Effectiveness of implant measured through symptom improvement (International Prostate Symptom Score - IPSS)
Description
Observation of IPSS scores compared to baseline at 12 months follow up.
Time Frame
12 months 24 months and 36 months
Title
Effectiveness of the treatment by assessing need for further treatment to alleviate symptoms of BPH.
Description
Observation of incidence of repeat invasive treatment for LUTS through 12 months post-procedure
Time Frame
12 months 24 months and 36 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 50 to 80 years of age Baseline IPSS score > 13, and a baseline Quality of Life (Qol) question score > 3 Prostate volume 25 - 80 cc by Trans Rectal Ultrasound (TRUS), measured within past 90 days Anterior prostatic urethral length 2.5 - 4.0 cm by cystoscopy, as measured from bladder neck to verumontanum. TRUS will be accepted as a primary screening measure. Failed or intolerant to medication regimen for the treatment of LUTS. Exclusion Criteria: New Zealand only: A maximum of 5 participants in acute or chronic urinary retention may be included in the study provided they meet other entry criteria. Exclusion exemptions for these patients are described in 4a, 5a and they are exempt from #6. Participants will be excluded from participating in this trial if they meet any of the following criteria: Obstructive median prostatic lobe or high bladder neck Urethral stricture, meatal stenosis, or bladder neck obstruction - either current, or recurrent requiring 2 or more dilatations Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) (age 50-70 PSA ≥4; age 70+ PSA ≥6.5) unless negative biopsy within last 3 months, or a positive biopsy Post-void residual volume (PVR) > 250 ml, if not in acute retention 4a. No maximum post void residual volume required if patient in acute or chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients) Peak urinary flow rate > 12 ml/second, with ≥ 125 ml voided volume at baseline. 5a. No maximum urinary flow or minimum voided volume required if participant in acute or chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients) History of chronic urinary retention. (New Zealand Only, up to 5 patients) History of neurogenic bladder Compromised renal function (e.g., serum creatinine > 1.8 mg/dl) Concomitant Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Concomitant bladder stones Confirmed or suspected prostate/bladder cancer Previous pelvic irradiation or radical pelvic surgery Previous prostate surgery, stent implantations, laser prostatectomy, hyperthermia or another invasive treatment to the prostate Chronic prostatitis, or recurring prostatitis within the past 12 months Serious concurrent medical conditions such as uncontrolled diabetes Known allergy to nickel Life expectancy less than 12 months Use of concomitant medications (e.g., anticholinergics, antispasmodics or antidepressants) affecting bladder function Anti-coagulant, anti-platelet, or thrombolytic medication other than Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) or Clopidogrel. ASA and Clopidogrel must be ceased 7 days prior to the procedure. 5--reductase inhibitors within 6 months of pre-treatment evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued for entrance into or throughout the study). -blockers within 2 weeks of pre-treatment evaluation unless evidence of same drug dose for at least 6 months with a stable voiding pattern (the drug dose should not be altered or discontinued for entrance into or throughout the study). Future fertility concerns Any severe illness that might prevent study completion or would confound study results
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Gilling, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Tauranga Urology Research Ltd.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
MBAL "Tokuda Bolnitsa Sofia" AD
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1407
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
RoundHay Medical Center
City
Nelson South
State/Province
Nelson
ZIP/Postal Code
7010
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Tauranga Urology Research Ltd
City
Tauranga
ZIP/Postal Code
3140
Country
New Zealand

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22003475
Citation
Charles J, Valenti L, Britt H. BPH - management in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2011 Oct;40(10):757.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21728939
Citation
Woo HH, Gillman MP, Gardiner R, Marshall V, Lynch WJ. A practical approach to the management of lower urinary tract symptoms among men. Med J Aust. 2011 Jul 4;195(1):34-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2011.tb03185.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15871733
Citation
Milani S, Djavan B. Lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: latest update on alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists. BJU Int. 2005 Jun;95 Suppl 4:29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05485.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17070355
Citation
Schelin S, Geertsen U, Walter S, Spangberg A, Duelund-Jacobsen J, Kroyer K, Hjertberg H, Vatne V, Richthoff J, Nordling J. Feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP/prostate enucleation surgery in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent urinary retention: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Urology. 2006 Oct;68(4):795-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2426477
Citation
Bruskewitz RC, Larsen EH, Madsen PO, Dorflinger T. 3-year followup of urinary symptoms after transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol. 1986 Sep;136(3):613-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)44991-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26283011
Citation
Thomas JA, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyere F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitan C, Knispel H, Bachmann A. A Multicenter Randomized Noninferiority Trial Comparing GreenLight-XPS Laser Vaporization of the Prostate and Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Obstruction: Two-yr Outcomes of the GOLIATH Study. Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.054. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18499179
Citation
Reich O, Gratzke C, Bachmann A, Seitz M, Schlenker B, Hermanek P, Lack N, Stief CG; Urology Section of the Bavarian Working Group for Quality Assurance. Morbidity, mortality and early outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective multicenter evaluation of 10,654 patients. J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):246-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.058. Epub 2008 May 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21088938
Citation
Mandeville J, Gnessin E, Lingeman JE. New advances in benign prostatic hyperplasia: laser therapy. Curr Urol Rep. 2011 Feb;12(1):56-61. doi: 10.1007/s11934-010-0153-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17499427
Citation
Ahyai SA, Lehrich K, Kuntz RM. Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: 3-year follow-up results of a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2007 Nov;52(5):1456-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.053. Epub 2007 Apr 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24331152
Citation
Bachmann A, Tubaro A, Barber N, d'Ancona F, Muir G, Witzsch U, Grimm MO, Benejam J, Stolzenburg JU, Riddick A, Pahernik S, Roelink H, Ameye F, Saussine C, Bruyere F, Loidl W, Larner T, Gogoi NK, Hindley R, Muschter R, Thorpe A, Shrotri N, Graham S, Hamann M, Miller K, Schostak M, Capitan C, Knispel H, Thomas JA. 180-W XPS GreenLight laser vaporisation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: 6-month safety and efficacy results of a European Multicentre Randomised Trial--the GOLIATH study. Eur Urol. 2014 May;65(5):931-42. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.040. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24475799
Citation
Gao YA, Huang Y, Zhang R, Yang YD, Zhang Q, Hou M, Wang Y. Benign prostatic hyperplasia: prostatic arterial embolization versus transurethral resection of the prostate--a prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial. Radiology. 2014 Mar;270(3):920-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13122803. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16790044
Citation
Bouza C, Lopez T, Magro A, Navalpotro L, Amate JM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of Transurethral Needle Ablation in symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. BMC Urol. 2006 Jun 21;6:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-6-14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26068624
Citation
Roehrborn CG, Rukstalis DB, Barkin J, Gange SN, Shore ND, Giddens JL, Bolton DM, Cowan BE, Cantwell AL, McVary KT, Te AE, Gholami SS, Moseley WG, Chin PT, Dowling WT, Freedman SJ, Incze PF, Coffield KS, Borges FD, Rashid P. Three year results of the prostatic urethral L.I.F.T. study. Can J Urol. 2015 Jun;22(3):7772-82.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26497347
Citation
Peyton CC, Badlani GH. The management of prostatic obstruction with urethral stents. Can J Urol. 2015 Oct;22 Suppl 1:75-81.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1722799
Citation
Oesterling JE. A permanent, epithelializing stent for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Preliminary results. J Androl. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):423-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12133055
Citation
Perry MJ, Roodhouse AJ, Gidlow AB, Spicer TG, Ellis BW. Thermo-expandable intraprostatic stents in bladder outlet obstruction: an 8-year study. BJU Int. 2002 Aug;90(3):216-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02888.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17296408
Citation
Shore ND, Dineen MK, Saslawsky MJ, Lumerman JH, Corica AP. A temporary intraurethral prostatic stent relieves prostatic obstruction following transurethral microwave thermotherapy. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1040-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.059.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26472166
Citation
Yildiz G, Bahouth Z, Halachmi S, Meyer G, Nativ O, Moskovitz B. Allium TPS--A New Prostatic Stent for the Treatment of Patients with Benign Prostatic Obstruction: The First Report. J Endourol. 2016 Mar;30(3):319-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0593. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22983316
Citation
Song HY, Kim CS, Jeong IG, Yoo D, Kim JH, Nam DH, Bae JI, Park JH. Placement of retrievable self-expandable metallic stents with barbs into patients with obstructive prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013 Mar;23(3):780-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2650-8. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17437773
Citation
Armitage JN, Cathcart PJ, Rashidian A, De Nigris E, Emberton M, van der Meulen JH. Epithelializing stent for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review of the literature. J Urol. 2007 May;177(5):1619-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.005.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

The Zenflow Spring System Feasibility and Safety Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs