search
Back to results

Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid (MASTIME)

Primary Purpose

Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, Infant, Newborn, Disease, Neonatal Resuscitation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endotracheal suctioning
No endotracheal suctioning
Sponsored by
University Hospital Padova
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Meconium Aspiration Syndrome focused on measuring Infant newborn, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, Neonatal Resuscitation, Positive Pressure Ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be eligible to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No exclusion criteria

Sites / Locations

  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, University of Padova
  • University of Padova

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Endotracheal suctioning

No endotracheal suctioning

Arm Description

Procedure includes: Endotracheal intubation-Suctioning-Endotracheal intubation again and initiation of positive pressure ventilation

Procedure includes: Initiation of positive pressure ventilation without endotracheal suctioning

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time of initiation of positive pressure ventilation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 29, 2019
Last Updated
April 2, 2020
Sponsor
University Hospital Padova
Collaborators
University of Padova
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04076189
Brief Title
Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid
Acronym
MASTIME
Official Title
Time of Initiation of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid: a Cross-over Randomized, Control Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 16, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 24, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 24, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital Padova
Collaborators
University of Padova

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored. Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin. Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.
Detailed Description
Background: Meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) complicates 3 to 14% of pregnancies, causing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) in 5-10% of neonates born. Due to lack of evidence of benefits of endotracheal suctioning at birth in non-vigorous infants, recent neonatal resuscitation guidelines do not recommend it as a routine and they suggest to start ventilation within the first minute of life, which may be critical to reverse asphyxia and stabilize the neonate. There are concerns regarding the safety and efficacy of this change in practice because it is not based on large randomized controlled trials. Besides that, the delay in the beginning of the PPV in these babies has not been previously explored. Objective: to compare the time of PPV initiation between performing immediate laryngoscopy with intubation and suctioning and performing immediate PPV without intubation in a manikin. Methods: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be randomly assigned to AB arm (endotracheal suction, followed by the procedure without endotracheal suction) and to BA arm (reverse sequence), with a washout period of 6 hour. During each simulation, an external observer will record the time of PPV initiation. The primary outcome measure will be the time of PPV initiation in the endotracheal suction arm compared to the control arm.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, Infant, Newborn, Disease, Neonatal Resuscitation
Keywords
Infant newborn, Meconium Aspiration Syndrome, Neonatal Resuscitation, Positive Pressure Ventilation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Endotracheal suctioning
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Procedure includes: Endotracheal intubation-Suctioning-Endotracheal intubation again and initiation of positive pressure ventilation
Arm Title
No endotracheal suctioning
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Procedure includes: Initiation of positive pressure ventilation without endotracheal suctioning
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endotracheal suctioning
Intervention Description
Procedure includes: Endotracheal intubation-Suctioning-Endotracheal intubation again and initiation of positive pressure ventilation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
No endotracheal suctioning
Intervention Description
Procedure includes: immediate initiation of positive pressure ventilation without intubation and tracheal suctioning
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time of initiation of positive pressure ventilation
Time Frame
3 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Level III NICU consultants, residents, and fellows trained in advanced airway management will be eligible to participate in the study Exclusion Criteria: No exclusion criteria
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, University of Padova
City
Padova
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
Facility Name
University of Padova
City
Padova
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26477415
Citation
Wyllie J, Bruinenberg J, Roehr CC, Rudiger M, Trevisanuto D, Urlesberger B. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 7. Resuscitation and support of transition of babies at birth. Resuscitation. 2015 Oct;95:249-63. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.029. Epub 2015 Oct 15. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26473001
Citation
Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, Simon WM, Weiner GM, Zaichkin JG. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 3;132(18 Suppl 2):S543-60. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000267. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25661412
Citation
Chettri S, Adhisivam B, Bhat BV. Endotracheal Suction for Nonvigorous Neonates Born through Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2015 May;166(5):1208-1213.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.076. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27255954
Citation
Nangia S, Sunder S, Biswas R, Saili A. Endotracheal suction in term non vigorous meconium stained neonates-A pilot study. Resuscitation. 2016 Aug;105:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.05.015. Epub 2016 May 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30385640
Citation
Chiruvolu A, Miklis KK, Chen E, Petrey B, Desai S. Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support. Pediatrics. 2018 Dec;142(6):e20181485. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-1485. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Time of Positive Pressure Ventilation in Non-vigorous Infants Born Through Meconium-stained Amniotic Fluid

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs