search
Back to results

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT)

Primary Purpose

Subjective Tinnitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Conventional sound generator (SG)
Placebo sound generator (placebo SG)
Standard of Care (SC)
Directive Counseling (DC)
Directive Counseling (DC)
Sponsored by
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Subjective Tinnitus focused on measuring tinnitus, tinnitus retraining therapy, standard of care, directive counseling, sound therapy, tinnitus questionnaire, tinnitus handicap inventory

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or above
  • Subjective severe tinnitus, defined as a score on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) greater than or equal to 40
  • Eligible for care at a Department of Defense Clinical Center
  • Speaks English well enough to complete a series of questionnaires and benefit from counseling

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Involvement in pending tinnitus-related financial claims or litigation except that associated with usual Veterans' Administration retirement claims
  • Tinnitus of less than 12 months duration
  • Treatment for tinnitus within previous 12 months
  • Routine unavoidable exposure to hazardous noise
  • Use of a cancer chemotherapeutic drug within previous 12 months
  • Treatment for head or neck injury within previous 24 months
  • Treatment for an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition within previous 12 months resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment
  • Requirement for use of an ototoxic drug
  • Hearing impairment, defined by audiometric thresholds > 30 dB HL at and below 2,000 Hz and > 40 dB HL at 4,000 and 8,000 Hz
  • Required use of hearing aids
  • Fluctuating hearing loss at a level that would interfere with the reliability of study results
  • One or more prominent spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, defined as the presence of a spontaneous otoacoustic emission spike that is 3 or more times larger than the measured variation in amplitude across the remaining frequency range and/or if the emission corresponds in pitch to the tinnitus pitch
  • Pulsatile somatosounds suggesting presence of abnormal vasculature or high blood pressure contributing to the tinnitus
  • Feigning tinnitus or hearing loss
  • Evidence by audiological testing of a treatable etiology of the tinnitus, such as conductive hearing impairment as shown by pure-tone thresholds, abnormal acoustic immittance, abnormal stapedial reflex test, or abnormal auditory brainstem response
  • Predisposing disease with tinnitus symptoms amenable to medical or surgical intervention, including but not limited to; chronic otitis media, otosclerosis, vestibular disorder or dizziness, Eustachian tube, middle ear, or inner ear disease, Lyme disease or ear autoimmune disease, malocclusion or temporomandibular joint disease, uncontrolled allergies, aberrant ear, head, or neck blood vasculature or glomus tumor, neurological condition such as multiple sclerosis or ear-related demyelinating disease, perilymphatic fistula, or facial weakness or paralysis
  • Meniere's disease
  • Uncontrolled diabetes, defined as blood glucose consistently ≥ 200 mg/dl or an HBA1c above 8%
  • Evidence from any laboratory study that suggests an etiology for the tinnitus that is treatable, including, but not limited to, abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) or thyroid hormone (T3 or T4) levels, positive fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test, or positive Lyme titer
  • Evidence of a tumor contributing to the tinnitus, including an acoustic neuroma (or vestibular schwannoma), cerebellopontine angle tumor, skull base tumor, or any other type of tumor that the examining physician believes is responsible for the tinnitus
  • Diagnosis of traumatic head or brain injury requiring treatment
  • Diagnosis of an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition requiring treatment and resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment
  • Inability or unwillingness of patient to comply with study requirements
  • Unwillingness of Clinical Center Director to randomize the patient to treatment due to the presence of any condition, physical, mental or social, which is likely to affect the patient returning for follow-up visits on schedule or which is likely to impair his or her performance on the functional tests
  • Inability or unwillingness of patient to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton
  • Naval Medical Center
  • David Grant Medical Center
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
  • Wilford Hall Medical Center
  • Portsmouth Naval Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Other

Arm Label

TRT

Partial TRT

Standard of Care (SC)

Arm Description

TRT includes treatment with a conventional sound generator (SG) and directive counseling (DC)

Partial TRT includes treatment with a placebo sound generator (placebo SG) and directive counseling (DC).

The standard of care arm includes care as typically delivered in US military medical centers

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months
The TQ is a tinnitus-specific health-related quality of life instrument with 52 statements that the respondent marks as true, partly true, or not true. The TQ is scored from 0 to 102, with higher scores indicating more of an impact of the tinnitus on quality of life. Subscales include emotional distress, intrusiveness, auditory perceptual difficulties, sleep disturbance,and somatic complaints.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months
The TFI is a tinnitus-specific health -related quality of life instrument. Subscales include intrusiveness, reduced sense of control, cognitive interference, sleep disturbance, auditory difficulties (related to tinnitus), relaxation interference, reduced quality of life, and emotional distress. The total and each subscale score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicated a greater impact of tinnitus on quality of life.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) Score From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months Follow-up
Change in THI score from baseline to 3 months follow-up. The THI is a tinnitus-specific health-related quality of life instrument. Subscales include the functional (scored 0 to 44), emotional (scored 0 to 36) and catastrophic (scored 0 to 20). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a greater impact of tinnitus on quality of life.
Change in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Interview Visual Analogue Scales at 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months Follow-up
10 point visual analog scale asking "How much of a problem is tinnitus?" on a scale from 0 "no problem at all" to 10 "as much as you can imagine"
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Emotional Distress Sub-scale Scores From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire emotional distress sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 38 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Intrusiveness Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire intrusiveness sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing greater intrusiveness of the tinnitus.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Auditory Perceptual Difficulties Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire auditory perceptual sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing greater auditory difficulties.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Sleep Disturbance Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire sleep disturbance sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 8 with higher scores representing greater sleep disturbance.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Somatic Complaint Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire somatic complaint sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 8 with higher scores representing greater somatic complaints.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Intrusiveness Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index intrusiveness sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater intrusiveness of the tinnitus.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Reduced Sense of Control Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index reduced sense of control sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater reduction of control.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Cognitive Interference Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index cognitive interference sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater cognitive interference.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Sleep Disturbance Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index sleep disturbance sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater sleep disturbance.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Auditory Difficulties Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index auditory difficulties sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater auditory difficulties.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Relaxation Interference Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index relaxation interference sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater relaxation interference.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Emotional Distress Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index emotional distress sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Reduced Quality of Life Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index reduced quality of life sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater reduction in quality of life.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Functional Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory functional sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 44 with higher scores representing greater functional difficulties.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Emotional Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory emotional sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Catastrophic Sub-scale Scores.
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory catastrophic sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores representing greater catastrophic effect of the tinnitus.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2010
Last Updated
October 24, 2018
Sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center, 59th Medical Wing, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego, United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01177137
Brief Title
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial
Acronym
TRTT
Official Title
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Collaborators
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, David Grant U.S. Air Force Medical Center, 59th Medical Wing, United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego, United States Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary purpose of the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT) is to assess the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) as a treatment for severe debilitating tinnitus. TRT is a non-medical intervention that uses directive counseling (DC) and sound therapy (ST)to habituate the patient's associated negative emotional reactions to tinnitus, its perception, and ultimately, its impact on the patient's life.
Detailed Description
The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT), funded by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, is a multi-center randomized clinical trial testing the efficacy of tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) versus standard-of-care (SC) treatment in individuals who have self-perceived intolerable tinnitus. TRT is a non-medical intervention that uses directive counseling (DC) and low-level sound therapy (ST) achieved through sound generators (SGs) to habituate the patient's associated negative emotional reactions (annoyance) to tinnitus, its perception (awareness) and, ultimately, its impact on the participant's life. Study participants will include active and retired military personnel of the U. S. Armed Forces and their dependents who suffer from severe tinnitus. The study will be conducted at flagship Air Force, and Navy Medical Centers. This trial will evaluate the efficacy of TRT and its components (DC and ST) versus the standard of care (SC) as administered in the military by comparing the efficacy of: (1) TRT (DC and ST achieved using conventional sound generators) versus SC; (2) TRT versus partial TRT (DC and placebo sound generators) to evaluate the separate effect of sound therapy, under the assumption that placebo noise generator will not provide any meaningful sound therapy beyond that found in SC; (3) partial TRT versus SC to evaluate the separate effect of DC. Eligibility will be determined at the Baseline Eligibility Visit, which will consist of a medical and tinnitus history, physical examination, and baseline audiological/tinnitus/hyperacusis evaluation. Study participants will also complete a series of quality of life and psychological profile tests. Study Audiologists will administer the randomly assigned treatment. Follow-up visits at Clinical Centers will take place at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months and include completion of tinnitus outcome questionnaires at all visits. Psychometric testing and audiological/tinnitus/hyperacusis evaluation will take place at the 6, 12, and 18 month visits. Evaluation of audiometric pure tone and loudness discomfort level also will take place at treatment visits. The primary outcome to be measured in the TRTT will be change in scores on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) longitudinally assessed between baseline and follow-up (i.e., at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months following treatment). Secondary outcomes include changes in the sub-scales of the TQ, change in scores from the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI), and TRT visual analogue scales, and change in the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). Psychometric secondary outcomes also include change in psychoacoustic variables related to the tinnitus sensation, including tinnitus pitch and loudness match, and loudness discomfort level. The TRTT is designed to have sufficient power to detect a minimal clinically important difference in the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) i.e., a 10 point difference between TRT and SC groups on change in TQ global scores longitudinally assessed over the course of follow-up and a 7-point difference on TQ score by TRT components, DC and ST.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Subjective Tinnitus
Keywords
tinnitus, tinnitus retraining therapy, standard of care, directive counseling, sound therapy, tinnitus questionnaire, tinnitus handicap inventory

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
151 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TRT
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
TRT includes treatment with a conventional sound generator (SG) and directive counseling (DC)
Arm Title
Partial TRT
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Partial TRT includes treatment with a placebo sound generator (placebo SG) and directive counseling (DC).
Arm Title
Standard of Care (SC)
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
The standard of care arm includes care as typically delivered in US military medical centers
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional sound generator (SG)
Intervention Description
Conventional SGs: Tranquil model sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate low-level noise, which is set at or just below the patient's mixing point (i.e., the noise level that just blends with the study participant's tinnitus)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo sound generator (placebo SG)
Intervention Description
Tranquil model placebo sound generators (General Hearing Instruments, Inc.) are either inside or outside-the-ear devices that generate a sound different from the active devices.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care (SC)
Intervention Description
The standard of care treatment will be similar to that typically provided to patients with severe tinnitus at participating military medical centers and as described in the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Preferred Practice Patterns in Audiology (ASHA, 2006). Tinnitus management will be based on the patient's complaints, history, audiologic evaluation, and self-assessment. The goal of the tinnitus management is to reduce negative cognitive, affective, physical, and behavioral reactions to tinnitus and to improve the patient's well-being and quality of life. Specific treatment recommendations will be individualized to reflect the participant's concerns and abilities, as well as his or her engagement in the decision-making process regarding treatment options.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Directive Counseling (DC)
Intervention Description
Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Directive Counseling (DC)
Intervention Description
Directive Counseling (DC): two-hour educational session during which the patient is given information regarding the nature of the tinnitus problem and related problems such as hearing loss and sound intolerance; visual aids to review the audiological/tinnitus/ hyperacusis evaluation, provide instruction on anatomy and physiology of hearing and tinnitus, introduce the Jastreboff neurophysiological model of tinnitus and related concepts of habituation, and describe and recommend the use of ST and environmental sound in the habituation process.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months
Description
The TQ is a tinnitus-specific health-related quality of life instrument with 52 statements that the respondent marks as true, partly true, or not true. The TQ is scored from 0 to 102, with higher scores indicating more of an impact of the tinnitus on quality of life. Subscales include emotional distress, intrusiveness, auditory perceptual difficulties, sleep disturbance,and somatic complaints.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months
Description
The TFI is a tinnitus-specific health -related quality of life instrument. Subscales include intrusiveness, reduced sense of control, cognitive interference, sleep disturbance, auditory difficulties (related to tinnitus), relaxation interference, reduced quality of life, and emotional distress. The total and each subscale score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicated a greater impact of tinnitus on quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months
Title
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) Score From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months Follow-up
Description
Change in THI score from baseline to 3 months follow-up. The THI is a tinnitus-specific health-related quality of life instrument. Subscales include the functional (scored 0 to 44), emotional (scored 0 to 36) and catastrophic (scored 0 to 20). The total score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a greater impact of tinnitus on quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3. 6. 12. and 18 months
Title
Change in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Interview Visual Analogue Scales at 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months Follow-up
Description
10 point visual analog scale asking "How much of a problem is tinnitus?" on a scale from 0 "no problem at all" to 10 "as much as you can imagine"
Time Frame
Baseline to 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Emotional Distress Sub-scale Scores From Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 Months.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire emotional distress sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 38 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Intrusiveness Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire intrusiveness sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing greater intrusiveness of the tinnitus.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Auditory Perceptual Difficulties Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire auditory perceptual sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing greater auditory difficulties.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Sleep Disturbance Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire sleep disturbance sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 8 with higher scores representing greater sleep disturbance.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire Somatic Complaint Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Questionnaire somatic complaint sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 8 with higher scores representing greater somatic complaints.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Intrusiveness Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index intrusiveness sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater intrusiveness of the tinnitus.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Reduced Sense of Control Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index reduced sense of control sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater reduction of control.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Cognitive Interference Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index cognitive interference sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater cognitive interference.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Sleep Disturbance Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index sleep disturbance sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater sleep disturbance.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Auditory Difficulties Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index auditory difficulties sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater auditory difficulties.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Relaxation Interference Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index relaxation interference sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater relaxation interference.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Emotional Distress Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index emotional distress sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index Reduced Quality of Life Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Functional Index reduced quality of life sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing greater reduction in quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Functional Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory functional sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 44 with higher scores representing greater functional difficulties.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Emotional Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory emotional sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 36 with higher scores representing greater emotional distress.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up
Title
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory Catastrophic Sub-scale Scores.
Description
Change in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory catastrophic sub-scale from baseline to follow-up. Sub-scale scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores representing greater catastrophic effect of the tinnitus.
Time Frame
Baseline to 3, 6, 12, and 18 months follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 years or above Subjective severe tinnitus, defined as a score on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) greater than or equal to 40 Eligible for care at a Department of Defense Clinical Center Speaks English well enough to complete a series of questionnaires and benefit from counseling Exclusion Criteria: Involvement in pending tinnitus-related financial claims or litigation except that associated with usual Veterans' Administration retirement claims Tinnitus of less than 12 months duration Treatment for tinnitus within previous 12 months Routine unavoidable exposure to hazardous noise Use of a cancer chemotherapeutic drug within previous 12 months Treatment for head or neck injury within previous 24 months Treatment for an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition within previous 12 months resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment Requirement for use of an ototoxic drug Hearing impairment, defined by audiometric thresholds > 30 dB HL at and below 2,000 Hz and > 40 dB HL at 4,000 and 8,000 Hz Required use of hearing aids Fluctuating hearing loss at a level that would interfere with the reliability of study results One or more prominent spontaneous otoacoustic emissions, defined as the presence of a spontaneous otoacoustic emission spike that is 3 or more times larger than the measured variation in amplitude across the remaining frequency range and/or if the emission corresponds in pitch to the tinnitus pitch Pulsatile somatosounds suggesting presence of abnormal vasculature or high blood pressure contributing to the tinnitus Feigning tinnitus or hearing loss Evidence by audiological testing of a treatable etiology of the tinnitus, such as conductive hearing impairment as shown by pure-tone thresholds, abnormal acoustic immittance, abnormal stapedial reflex test, or abnormal auditory brainstem response Predisposing disease with tinnitus symptoms amenable to medical or surgical intervention, including but not limited to; chronic otitis media, otosclerosis, vestibular disorder or dizziness, Eustachian tube, middle ear, or inner ear disease, Lyme disease or ear autoimmune disease, malocclusion or temporomandibular joint disease, uncontrolled allergies, aberrant ear, head, or neck blood vasculature or glomus tumor, neurological condition such as multiple sclerosis or ear-related demyelinating disease, perilymphatic fistula, or facial weakness or paralysis Meniere's disease Uncontrolled diabetes, defined as blood glucose consistently ≥ 200 mg/dl or an HBA1c above 8% Evidence from any laboratory study that suggests an etiology for the tinnitus that is treatable, including, but not limited to, abnormal thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) or thyroid hormone (T3 or T4) levels, positive fluorescent treponemal antibody (FTA) test, or positive Lyme titer Evidence of a tumor contributing to the tinnitus, including an acoustic neuroma (or vestibular schwannoma), cerebellopontine angle tumor, skull base tumor, or any other type of tumor that the examining physician believes is responsible for the tinnitus Diagnosis of traumatic head or brain injury requiring treatment Diagnosis of an emotional, psychological, or psychiatric condition requiring treatment and resulting in inability to participate in the trial or complete all followup visits, as assessed by best clinical judgment Inability or unwillingness of patient to comply with study requirements Unwillingness of Clinical Center Director to randomize the patient to treatment due to the presence of any condition, physical, mental or social, which is likely to affect the patient returning for follow-up visits on schedule or which is likely to impair his or her performance on the functional tests Inability or unwillingness of patient to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
C. Craig Formby, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Roberta W Scherer, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton
City
Camp Pendleton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92055-5191
Country
United States
Facility Name
Naval Medical Center
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92134
Country
United States
Facility Name
David Grant Medical Center
City
Travis Air Force Base
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94535
Country
United States
Facility Name
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20889
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wilford Hall Medical Center
City
Lackland Air Force Base
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78236-5300
Country
United States
Facility Name
Portsmouth Naval Medical Center
City
Portsmouth
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23705-2103
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Requests for limited datasets may be made to the TRTT Data Coordinating Center
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25319676
Citation
Scherer RW, Formby C, Gold S, Erdman S, Rodhe C, Carlson M, Shade D, Tucker M, Sensinger LM, Hughes G, Conley GS, Downey N, Eades C, Jylkka M, Haber-Perez A, Harper C, Russell SK, Sierra-Irizarry B, Sullivan M; Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group. The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial (TRTT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Oct 15;15:396. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-396.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23571304
Citation
Formby C, Scherer R; TRTT Study Group. Rationale for the tinnitus retraining therapy trial. Noise Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;15(63):134-42. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.110299.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35073492
Citation
Formby C, Yang X, Scherer RW. Contributions of Counseling and Sound Generator Use in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Treatment Response Dynamics Assessed in a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Feb 9;65(2):816-828. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00210. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32703244
Citation
Scherer RW, Erdman SA, Gold S, Formby C; TRTT Research Group. Treatment fidelity in the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial. Trials. 2020 Jul 23;21(1):670. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04530-9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31120533
Citation
Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial Research Group; Scherer RW, Formby C. Effect of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy vs Standard of Care on Tinnitus-Related Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jul 1;145(7):597-608. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0821.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29792074
Citation
Scherer RW, Sensinger LD, Sierra-Irizarry B, Formby C; TRTT Research Group. Lessons learned conducting a multi-center trial with a military population: The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial. Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;15(5):429-435. doi: 10.1177/1740774518777709. Epub 2018 May 23.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs