search
Back to results

Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi

Primary Purpose

Renal Calculi

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
the tip-flexible ureterorenoscope
the classic flexible ureteroscope
Sponsored by
Ling Li, MD
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Renal Calculi focused on measuring retrograde intrarenal surgery, flexible ureteroscopy, renal calculi

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has provided informed consent and indicated a willingness to comply with study treatments
  • Subject has a diagnosis of renal stones according to computer tomography (CT) and intravenous pyelogram (IVP) results
  • Subject is a surgical candidate for the ureteroscopic approach
  • Subject is 18-80 yrs of age
  • Subject has a single stone < 3 cm in size (IVP), or multiple stones < 3 cm in cumulative size (IVP)
  • Subject has a serum creatinine level within the normal range for the study center

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject needs bilateral procedures within one-stage ureteroscopy
  • Subject has an active urinary tract infection (e.g., cystitis, prostatitis, urethritis, etc.)
  • Subject has been diagnosed with a urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture
  • Subject has been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection related to stone obstruction within two weeks
  • Subject has severe hematuria that might blur the vision of the endoscopy
  • Subject has a disorder of the coagulation cascade system that would put the subject at risk for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding
  • Subject is unable to discontinue anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy preoperatively (3-5 d)
  • Subject has other diseases and could not tolerate the endoscopic surgery
  • Subject has any kind of anatomic abnormality of the urinary system that might have an influence on the surgery
  • Subject has ipsilateral pre-stenting or previous ureteroscopy within six months
  • Subject has been diagnosed with hydronephrosis larger than 3 cm according to the B-scan ultrasonography examination

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    tf-URS

    f-URS

    Arm Description

    Participants in tf-URS group undergo ureteroscopy using the tip-flexible ureterorenoscope.

    Participants in f-URS group undergo ureteroscopy using the classic flexible ureteroscope.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Stone clearance
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries without residual calculus/Total number of participants in each group *100%

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Stone clearance
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries without residual calculus/Total number of participants in each group *100%
    Complication rates
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries suffer complications associated with the surgery (i.e. painess(NRS≥4), hematuria, T≥38℃, serum WBC≥12×〖10〗^9/L ,serum WBC<4×〖10〗^9/L, perforation, etc.)/Total number of participants in each group *100%
    Endoscope deflection loss rates
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with deflection loss>10%/Total number of ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%
    Endoscope Leakage rates
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with leakage of the working channel or the outer shaft/times of the ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%
    Endoscope black dots rates
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with black dots on endoscopic images/times of ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%

    Full Information

    First Posted
    February 12, 2015
    Last Updated
    April 22, 2015
    Sponsor
    Ling Li, MD
    Collaborators
    Changhai Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Ningbo No. 1 Hospital, West China Hospital, Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT02426931
    Brief Title
    Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi
    Official Title
    Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Treatment of Renal Calculi < 3 cm - Efficacity Prospective Randomized Multicentre Trial
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    April 2015 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 2015 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2015 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Ling Li, MD
    Collaborators
    Changhai Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Ningbo No. 1 Hospital, West China Hospital, Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital, Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study evaluates the safety and efficacy of the novel tip-flexible semi-rigid ureterorenoscope for the treatment of renal calculi using a prospective, randomized multicentre trial design. Half of participants will receive retrograde intrarenal surgery using the tip-flexible semi-rigid ureterorenoscope, while the other half participants will receive retrograde intrarenal surgery using the classic flexible ureteroscope.
    Detailed Description
    Retrograde intrarenal surgery using flexible ureteroscope has become the first-line treatment for renal calculi < 3.0 cm and is recommended by the European Association of Urology due to its minimally-invasive nature and satisfactory result. However, some limitations still remain. Poor maneuverability, extra costs for the ureteral access sheath, and high device vulnerability still preclude flexible ureteroscopy from wider distribution. Recently, the investigators present a novel ureterorenoscope, which is composed of a retractable rigid sheath and a semi-rigid ureteroscope with a flexible part on the tip. When the flexible tip of the inner shaft maintains within the sheath, working in the "rigid mode", the tip-flexible semi-rigid ureterorenoscope is capable of passing either the orifice or the physiological tortuosity of the ureter with ease. When the inner shaft is extended beyond the sheath, the endoscope is switched to the "flexible mode", capable of performing an intrarenal approach. This endoscope integrates the classic semi-rigid and flexible ureteroscope both structurally and functionally, and has been approved for clinical application by the China Food and Drug Administration. In this study, transverse comparison is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the tip-flexible semi-rigid ureterorenoscope for the treatment of renal calculi.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Renal Calculi
    Keywords
    retrograde intrarenal surgery, flexible ureteroscopy, renal calculi

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    280 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    tf-URS
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Participants in tf-URS group undergo ureteroscopy using the tip-flexible ureterorenoscope.
    Arm Title
    f-URS
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Participants in f-URS group undergo ureteroscopy using the classic flexible ureteroscope.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    the tip-flexible ureterorenoscope
    Intervention Description
    Ureteroscopy will be conducted using the tip-flexible semi-rigid ureterorenoscope to treat renal calculi. Holmium laser and basket can be used to perform the technique.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    the classic flexible ureteroscope
    Intervention Description
    Ureteroscopy will be conducted using the classic flexible ureteroscope (Flex x2 STORZ, Germany) to treat renal calculi. Holmium laser and basket can be used to perform the technique.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Stone clearance
    Description
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries without residual calculus/Total number of participants in each group *100%
    Time Frame
    12 weeks post-operatively
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Stone clearance
    Description
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries without residual calculus/Total number of participants in each group *100%
    Time Frame
    One day post-operatively
    Title
    Complication rates
    Description
    Number of participants undergo tf-URS or f-URS surgeries suffer complications associated with the surgery (i.e. painess(NRS≥4), hematuria, T≥38℃, serum WBC≥12×〖10〗^9/L ,serum WBC<4×〖10〗^9/L, perforation, etc.)/Total number of participants in each group *100%
    Time Frame
    Within 12 weeks after surgery
    Title
    Endoscope deflection loss rates
    Description
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with deflection loss>10%/Total number of ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%
    Time Frame
    intraoperative
    Title
    Endoscope Leakage rates
    Description
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with leakage of the working channel or the outer shaft/times of the ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%
    Time Frame
    intraoperative
    Title
    Endoscope black dots rates
    Description
    Number of the broken novel ureterorenoscope or the broken classic flexible ureterosocpe with black dots on endoscopic images/times of ureterorenoscope or ureterosocpe used *100%
    Time Frame
    intraoperative

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    75 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Subject has provided informed consent and indicated a willingness to comply with study treatments Subject has a diagnosis of renal stones according to computer tomography (CT) and intravenous pyelogram (IVP) results Subject is a surgical candidate for the ureteroscopic approach Subject is 18-80 yrs of age Subject has a single stone < 3 cm in size (IVP), or multiple stones < 3 cm in cumulative size (IVP) Subject has a serum creatinine level within the normal range for the study center Exclusion Criteria: Subject needs bilateral procedures within one-stage ureteroscopy Subject has an active urinary tract infection (e.g., cystitis, prostatitis, urethritis, etc.) Subject has been diagnosed with a urethral stricture or bladder neck contracture Subject has been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection related to stone obstruction within two weeks Subject has severe hematuria that might blur the vision of the endoscopy Subject has a disorder of the coagulation cascade system that would put the subject at risk for intraoperative or postoperative bleeding Subject is unable to discontinue anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy preoperatively (3-5 d) Subject has other diseases and could not tolerate the endoscopic surgery Subject has any kind of anatomic abnormality of the urinary system that might have an influence on the surgery Subject has ipsilateral pre-stenting or previous ureteroscopy within six months Subject has been diagnosed with hydronephrosis larger than 3 cm according to the B-scan ultrasonography examination
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Ling Li, MD
    Phone
    086-18019766513
    Email
    ejdll@163.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Yonghan Peng, MD
    Phone
    086-13917386896
    Email
    yonghanyhtl@163.com
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Yinghao Sun, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Changhai Hospital
    Official's Role
    Study Chair
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Guohua Zeng, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Hequn Chen, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Yue Cheng, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Ningbo No. 1 Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Kunjie Wang, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    West China Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jianxing Li, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Beijing Tsinghua Changgeng Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Lei Shi, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Xiaofeng Gao, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Changhai Hospital
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    22642568
    Citation
    Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones >2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012 Oct;26(10):1257-63. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0217. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24147820
    Citation
    de la Rosette J, Denstedt J, Geavlete P, Keeley F, Matsuda T, Pearle M, Preminger G, Traxer O; CROES URS Study Group. The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients. J Endourol. 2014 Feb;28(2):131-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0436. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24890883
    Citation
    Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Pushing the boundaries of ureteroscopy: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Urol. 2014 Jul;11(7):373-82. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.118. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23583859
    Citation
    Yoon PD, Chalasani V, Woo HH. Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in reporting and grading complications after urological surgical procedures: analysis of 2010 to 2012. J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1271-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.025. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    20059383
    Citation
    Yinghao S, Yang B, Gao X. The management of renal caliceal calculi with a newly designed ureteroscope: a rigid ureteroscope with a deflectable tip. J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):23-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0030.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21109293
    Citation
    Rebuck DA, Macejko A, Bhalani V, Ramos P, Nadler RB. The natural history of renal stone fragments following ureteroscopy. Urology. 2011 Mar;77(3):564-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.06.056. Epub 2010 Dec 15.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22982421
    Citation
    Traxer O, Thomas A. Prospective evaluation and classification of ureteral wall injuries resulting from insertion of a ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.197. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24035032
    Citation
    Atis G, Arikan O, Gurbuz C, Yildirim A, Erol B, Pelit S, Ulus I, Caskurlu T. Comparison of different ureteroscope sizes in treating ureteral calculi in adult patients. Urology. 2013 Dec;82(6):1231-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.021. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24507782
    Citation
    Perez Castro E, Osther PJ, Jinga V, Razvi H, Stravodimos KG, Parikh K, Kural AR, de la Rosette JJ; CROES Ureteroscopy Global Study Group. Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study. Eur Urol. 2014 Jul;66(1):102-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.01.011. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25361706
    Citation
    Karadag MA, Demir A, Cecen K, Bagcioglu M, Kocaaslan R, Altunrende F. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for the treatment of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective comparative analysis of 124 patients. Urol J. 2014 Nov 1;11(5):1867-72. Erratum In: Urol J. 2015 Jul-Aug;12(4):2294. Sofikerim, Mustafa [Deleted].
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21052986
    Citation
    Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, Michel MS, Knoll T. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011 Jun;39(3):185-8. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18186680
    Citation
    Wendt-Nordahl G, Trojan L, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T. Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1439-44. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0291.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25081354
    Citation
    Geavlete P, Multescu R, Geavlete B. Retrograde flexible ureteroscopic approach of upper urinary tract pathology: What is the status in 2014? Int J Urol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1076-84. doi: 10.1111/iju.12582. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23503877
    Citation
    Bedke J, Leichtle U, Lorenz A, Nagele U, Stenzl A, Kruck S. 1.2 French stone retrieval baskets further enhance irrigation flow in flexible ureterorenoscopy. Urolithiasis. 2013 Apr;41(2):153-7. doi: 10.1007/s00240-012-0540-9. Epub 2013 Jan 5.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24001703
    Citation
    Somani BK, Al-Qahtani SM, de Medina SD, Traxer O. Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser fragmentation for renal stones: comparison between digital and conventional ureteroscope. Urology. 2013 Nov;82(5):1017-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25385490
    Citation
    Ozsoy M, Acar O, Sarica K, Saratlija-Novakovic Z, Fajkovic H, Librenjak D, Esen T, Scheffbuch N, Seitz C. Impact of gender on success and complication rates after ureteroscopy. World J Urol. 2015 Sep;33(9):1297-302. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1435-x. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Tip-flexible Semi-rigid Ureterorenoscope Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy in Renal Calculi

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs