Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Primary Purpose
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tipifarnib;Zarnestra; R115777
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Acute Myeloid Leukemia focused on measuring Myeloid leukemia acute disease, Tipifarnib, Bone marrow aspirate
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or > 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2. Exclusion Criteria: Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) Central nervous system leukemia Uncontrolled systemic infection Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse Known allergy to imidazole drugs.
Sites / Locations
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Overall survival
Secondary Outcome Measures
Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00093990
First Posted
October 7, 2004
Last Updated
September 13, 2016
Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00093990
Brief Title
Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Official Title
A Randomized Study of Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care (Including Hydroxyurea) in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) in Subjects 70 Years or Older (Farnesyl Transferase Inhibition Global Human Trials AML 301 [F.I.G.H.T. AML 301])
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2004 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
Study Completion Date
October 2007 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Name of the Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of tipifarnib in patients aged 70 or more with acute myeloid leukemia. Tipifarnib belongs to a class of drugs called Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitors (FTI). It blocks proteins that make leukemia cells grow.
Detailed Description
This study tests the safety and effectiveness of the experimental drug, tipifarnib in older patients who have acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The purpose of this study is to test if tipifarnib can make patients with leukemia live longer. In this study, half the patients will receive tipifarnib and half of the patients will receive the standard treatment. The standard treatment will help to control the symptoms of AML and may include hydroxyurea to lower levels of circulating leukemia cells. Tipifarnib or the standard treatment will be given until the patient's leukemia gets better, or until they experience unacceptable side effects, or until the patient or study doctor decide to stop the study medication. Patients assigned to tipifarnib will be given tipifarnib tablets. Patients should take 6 tablets with food in the morning and 6 tablets with food in the evening, for 21 days in a row. Patients will not take tipifarnib for the next 7 days. This 28 day period is called a cycle. The rest period may be extended beyond 7 days depending on how well the patients tolerate the treatment. Patients will return to the study clinic every week and to visit their study doctor at least every two weeks. A blood draw for routine tests will be done every week. Depending on how your disease is doing, a bone marrow aspiration may be done at the end of every cycle. When patients finish treatment with the study medication, or if they leave the study early, they will be asked to see your doctor for one last visit. Routine laboratory tests will be done. After this visit the study doctor will continue to check with patients to see how they are doing and if they have started a new treatment for leukemia. This check will be made every 30 days and may be made by phone to the patient or to their health care provider. Tipifarnib; six 100 mg in a film coated, compressed tablets are given orally twice a day at for 21 consecutive days on a 28-day cycle schedule.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Keywords
Myeloid leukemia acute disease, Tipifarnib, Bone marrow aspirate
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
457 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tipifarnib;Zarnestra; R115777
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare patients treated with tipifarnib and patients treated with best supportive care: progression-free survival; complete remission rate; rate of morphologic leukemia-free state; one-year survival estimate and health resources utilization.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Newly diagnosed or re-lapsing AML
Patient not medically fit for combination induction chemotherapy
Pathologic confirmation of AML (= or > 20% bone marrow leukemic blasts)
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1, or 2.
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous cytotoxic or biologic treatment for AML
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL)
Central nervous system leukemia
Uncontrolled systemic infection
Uncompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation
Symptomatic neuropathy of grade 2 or worse
Known allergy to imidazole drugs.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.
Official's Role
Study Director
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19470696
Citation
Harousseau JL, Martinelli G, Jedrzejczak WW, Brandwein JM, Bordessoule D, Masszi T, Ossenkoppele GJ, Alexeeva JA, Beutel G, Maertens J, Vidriales MB, Dombret H, Thomas X, Burnett AK, Robak T, Khuageva NK, Golenkov AK, Tothova E, Mollgard L, Park YC, Bessems A, De Porre P, Howes AJ; FIGHT-AML-301 Investigators. A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older. Blood. 2009 Aug 6;114(6):1166-73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198093. Epub 2009 May 21.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Tipifarnib Versus Best Supportive Care in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs