search
Back to results

Tissue Adhesive vs. Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery (TASC)

Primary Purpose

Wound Complication, Complications; Cesarean Section

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tissue Adhesive
Sterile strips
Sponsored by
NorthShore University HealthSystem
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Wound Complication

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women undergoing Pfannenstiel Cesarean delivery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent in English
  • Planned use of staples for skin closure
  • Unavailability of research personnel to accomplish consent and randomization at the time of cesarean

Sites / Locations

  • University of Chicago
  • NorthShore Evanston Hospital
  • NorthShore Highland Park Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Tissue Adhesive

Steri-Strips

Arm Description

Tissue Adhesive will be placed over subcuticular suture closure.

Sterile strips will be placed over subcuticular suture closure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Wound Complication
Wound drainage, Cellulitis, Abscess, Hematoma, Seroma or Separation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Readmission for Wound Complication
Satisfaction With Cesarean Scar
The investigators will be using a modified validated Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) which assessed scar-related pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, irregularity and overall satisfaction with the scar. Each item on the PSAS has a 10-point scale, with 10 indicating the highest symptom severity or lowest satisfaction. The median score for each item was compared between groups. Please see website in links section for more details on this assessment tool.
Number of Participants Who Required an Office or Emergency Department Visit for Wound Complication
The investigators will review medical records to assess for ambulatory visits for wound complaints
Operative Time
The investigators will review operative records to assess operative time
Number of Participants Requiring Antibiotic Treatment for Wound Complication
The investigators will review medical records to assess for antibiotic prescriptions for wound complications

Full Information

First Posted
July 12, 2016
Last Updated
July 22, 2019
Sponsor
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Collaborators
University of Chicago
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02838017
Brief Title
Tissue Adhesive vs. Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery
Acronym
TASC
Official Title
Tissue Adhesive Compared to Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Based on results of an interim analysis, the study was halted for futility
Study Start Date
November 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Collaborators
University of Chicago

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The goal of this project is to identify a strategy to reduce wound complications in women who undergo cesarean delivery by Pfannenstiel skin incision. Currently, many Pfannenstiel skin incisions are closed by subcuticular sutures followed by either placement of sterile strips or tissue A\adhesive. Either sterile strips or tissue adhesive can be placed over the wound as a covering but it is unclear which may reduce wound complication rates. The hypothesis of this study is that tissue adhesive will result in a reduction in wound complication rates when compared to sterile strips. Previously published studies in non-obstetric populations have identified tissue adhesive as a potential intervention to reduce wound complications. The eligible population for this study will include women at NorthShore University HealthSystem Evanston Hospital and University of Chicago Hospital who will undergo primary or repeat cesarean delivery via Pfannenstiel skin incision. Women in the study will be randomized to receive either sterile strips or tissue adhesive. The primary outcome to be evaluated will be a composite of wound complication which will include drainage, cellulitis, hematoma, seroma and/or wound separation (partial or complete). Secondary endpoints to be investigated include cosmetic outcome, patient satisfaction, cost comparison, and difference in operative times.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Wound Complication, Complications; Cesarean Section

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
504 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Tissue Adhesive
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tissue Adhesive will be placed over subcuticular suture closure.
Arm Title
Steri-Strips
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Sterile strips will be placed over subcuticular suture closure.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Tissue Adhesive
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dermabond, Dermaflex, 2-octyl cyanoacrylate
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sterile strips
Other Intervention Name(s)
Steri-Strips
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Wound Complication
Description
Wound drainage, Cellulitis, Abscess, Hematoma, Seroma or Separation
Time Frame
6-8 weeks from cesarean delivery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Readmission for Wound Complication
Time Frame
Within 8 weeks from cesarean delivery
Title
Satisfaction With Cesarean Scar
Description
The investigators will be using a modified validated Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) which assessed scar-related pain, itchiness, color, stiffness, irregularity and overall satisfaction with the scar. Each item on the PSAS has a 10-point scale, with 10 indicating the highest symptom severity or lowest satisfaction. The median score for each item was compared between groups. Please see website in links section for more details on this assessment tool.
Time Frame
6-8 weeks from cesarean delivery
Title
Number of Participants Who Required an Office or Emergency Department Visit for Wound Complication
Description
The investigators will review medical records to assess for ambulatory visits for wound complaints
Time Frame
Within 8 weeks of delivery
Title
Operative Time
Description
The investigators will review operative records to assess operative time
Time Frame
At time of delivery
Title
Number of Participants Requiring Antibiotic Treatment for Wound Complication
Description
The investigators will review medical records to assess for antibiotic prescriptions for wound complications
Time Frame
Within 8 weeks of delivery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women undergoing Pfannenstiel Cesarean delivery Exclusion Criteria: Inability to provide informed consent in English Planned use of staples for skin closure Unavailability of research personnel to accomplish consent and randomization at the time of cesarean
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Beth Plunkett, MD
Organizational Affiliation
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lena Braginsky, MD
Organizational Affiliation
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore Evanston Hospital
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
NorthShore Highland Park Hospital
City
Highland Park
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60035
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification, will be available upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Available immediately after publication with no end date.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Investigators may request data by contacting lbraginsky@northshore.org
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18034920
Citation
Souza EC, Fitaroni RB, Januzelli DM, Macruz HM, Camacho JC, Souza MR. Use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate for skin closure of sternal incisions in cardiac surgery: observations of microbial barrier effects. Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jan;24(1):151-5. doi: 10.1185/030079908x253807.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25479008
Citation
Mackeen AD, Packard RE, Ota E, Berghella V, Baxter JK. Timing of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics for preventing postpartum infectious morbidity in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 5;(12):CD009516. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009516.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20878942
Citation
Noorani A, Rabey N, Walsh SR, Davies RJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of preoperative antisepsis with chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine in clean-contaminated surgery. Br J Surg. 2010 Nov;97(11):1614-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7214.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25004353
Citation
Stamilio DM, Scifres CM. Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;124(2 Pt 1):227-232. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000384. Erratum In: Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;128(3):660.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22108085
Citation
Tipton AM, Cohen SA, Chelmow D. Wound infection in the obese pregnant woman. Semin Perinatol. 2011 Dec;35(6):345-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2011.05.020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28796687
Citation
Buresch AM, Van Arsdale A, Ferzli M, Sahasrabudhe N, Sun M, Bernstein J, Bernstein PS, Ngai IM, Garry DJ. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):521-526. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002200.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28153666
Citation
Daykan Y, Sharon-Weiner M, Pasternak Y, Tzadikevitch-Geffen K, Markovitch O, Sukenik-Halevy R, Biron-Shental T. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;216(4):406.e1-406.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31306319
Citation
Braginsky L, Javellana M, Cleveland E, Elue R, Wang C, Boyle D, Plunkett BA. Tissue Adhesive Compared With Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;134(2):295-301. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003367.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tissue Adhesive vs. Sterile Strips After Cesarean Delivery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs