search
Back to results

TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)

Primary Purpose

Degenerative Disc Disease, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Hungary
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Osteo3 ZP Putty
Sponsored by
OssDsign
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Disc Disease focused on measuring synthetic bone graft, TLIF, Fusion

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has been diagnosed with DDD (as defined below), degenerative spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis at one spinal level:

DDD defined as one or more of the following: instability as defined by greater than or equal to 3 mm translation or greater than or equal to 5 degrees angulation, decreased disc height, on average by greater than or equal to 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level, scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum or annulus fibrosis, herniated nucleus pulposus or vacuum phenomenon.

  • The subject has failed at least six months of non-operative treatment prior to clinical study enrolment (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, bracing, traction, drug therapy, etc) and is a candidate for spinal fusion surgery over one vertebral level between, and including, L2 to S1 (i.e. second lumbar to first sacral).
  • The subject is 40-65 years old.
  • The subject is, in the Investigator's opinion, psychosocially healthy and physically able to fully comply with this protocol, including the post-operative regimen, required follow up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has diagnosis of symptomatic DDD, spondylolisthesis, or lumbar spinal stenosis at more than one level.
  • Subject has had prior surgery at any lumbar level.
  • Subject has systemic infection or infection at the surgical site.
  • History of significant metabolic bone disease such as osteomalacia, autoimmune disease including rheumatoid arthritis, renal disease, hepatic disease, peripheral vascular disease, insulin dependent diabetes, Paget's disease at the involved spinal level(s) or upper motor neuron disease (positive Babinski sign).
  • Subject has a medical condition that would interfere with post-operative assessments and care (i.e. psychiatric disease, paraplegia, quadriplegia, etc.).
  • Subject is in poor general health or any concurrent disease process that would place the subject in excessive risk to surgery (e.g. significant circulatory, pulmonary problems, or cardiac disease).
  • Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow up.
  • The subject is known to be pregnant/breastfeeding at the time of enrolment or plans to become pregnant during their participation in the clinical study.
  • Subject is participating in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational clinical study, which could confound results.
  • Morbid obesity defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40.
  • Has or has had a tumour or fracture at the involved level.
  • Subject has a condition or requires post-operative medications that may interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (i.e. NSAIDS, oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, methotrexate, etc.), or that effect the rate of bone metabolism unless they have undergone a 14 day wash out period prior to surgery.
  • Subject is taking medication for treatment of osteoporosis and/or in the Investigator's opinion, spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated.
  • Subject has a T-score of less than -2.5 is therefore diagnostic of osteoporosis.
  • Subject is involved in on-going litigation concerning their medical condition.
  • Subject has a known allergy to silicon.
  • Long-term use (longer than 3 months) of opiates.

Sites / Locations

  • Buda Health Center, Királyhágó u. 1-3.

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Subject group

Arm Description

undergoing instrumented TLIF using investigational product as synthetic bone graft

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety: Incidence of device-related serious adverse events
Incidence of device-related serious adverse events. Success measured as no treatment-related events occurring in 24 months post-surgery.
Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery
Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery. Assessed as any evidence of bridging bone observed joining the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. Scored using a simple scoring of yes, no or not known if cannot be seen.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire to assess Quality of life
Validated off-the-shelf questionnaire asking patients questions about their ability to perform basic life tasks. It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section contains six statements and each statement describes a greater degree of difficulty in that activity than the preceding statement. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The scores for all sections are added together, giving a possible score of 50. The total is doubled and expressed as a percentage.
Visual Analog Score to measure pain
Subject will score their pain from 0 to 100 by making a mark on a 10cm line where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable. The change in score from baseline (pre-surgical score) will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change.
SF-36 short form to assess change in how the subjects back pain has affected their quality of life.
It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into eleven sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Subject will score each section and the resulting scores are entered into a validated software evaluation tool which produces a result out of 100, allowing percentage change to be assessed from baseline (pre-surgical) score. Change in score will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change.
Maintenance or Improvement in Neurological function
The subject will be assessed for neurological function by physical examination. Success = maintenance or improvement in neurological function compared to baseline scores for all Neurological assessments described as separate outcome measures below (Outcome measures 9 - 14 below). Subject will be considered to have clinical success if all neurological outcomes (outcomes 9-14) are maintained or improved from baseline assessments.
Safety: Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events
Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events (AEs) recorded will be described for the 24 months post surgery period
Bone Fusion Success
Presence of bone fusion assessed by CT scans at 3, 6 months and 24 months. Scored as yes or no for presence of a bridge of bone between the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. The results will be reported as percentage of subjects fused at the various timepoints below.
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of sensory response at dermatomal levels operated in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Sensory - Decreased sensation will be assessed by evaluating sensation response (e.g., to pin prick, light touch or vibration) for the involved dermatomal levels. The examination method chosen to make these assessments will be left to the discretion of the Investigator. Sensory function will be scored as 0 = Absent, 1 = Impaired, 2 = Normal
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement in patellar and Achilles deep tendon reflexes in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Reflex - Reflexes of both legs will be evaluated by assessing patellar (knee jerk) and Achilles (ankle jerk) deep tendon reflexes. The Investigator will be asked to indicate whether the knee and ankle reflex response for each leg is normal, decreased, absent or increased.
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of muscle strength at all muscle sites assessed in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Muscle Strength - Muscle strength of both legs will be assessed bilaterally at the following muscle sites: hip flexors (iliopsoas musculature); knee extensors (quadriceps); ankle dorsiflexors (tibialis transforaminal); ankle plantar flexors (gastrocnemius); and long toe extensors (extensor halluces longus) using the following clinical scale. The worst assessment (no evidence of contractility) will be assigned the lowest clinical score 0 out of 5 while full range of motion against gravity, full resistance will be assigned the highest clinical score 5 out of 5. The following scale will be used to assess muscle strength: No evidence of contractility 0 Slight contractility, no movement 1 Full range of motion, gravity eliminated (passive movement) 2 Full range of motion with gravity 3 Full range of motion against gravity, some resistance 4 Full range of motion against gravity, full resistance 5
Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative straight leg raising response or improvement of a positive straight leg raising response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result.
Straight Leg Raising - The ability of the subject to undergo passive straight leg raising manoeuvres while in the supine position will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative straight leg raise (SLR) for each leg.
Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative femoral stretch response or improvement of a positive femoral stretch response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result
Femoral Stretch - The ability of the subject to undergo passive femoral stretch manoeuvres while lying on one side will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative femoral stretch for each leg.
Absence of Babinski's sign
Presence or absence of Babinski's sign will be recorded. Absence of Babsinki's sign is considered normal and a success.

Full Information

First Posted
September 9, 2021
Last Updated
March 22, 2023
Sponsor
OssDsign
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05114135
Brief Title
TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)
Official Title
First-in-man Safety and Performance of OSTEO3 ZP PUTTY in Subjects Undergoing Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 7, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
OssDsign

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
In recent years there has been an increase in interest from surgeons in the use of synthetic bone graft substitutes to avoid the need of sourcing allograft or iliac crest autograft for use in spinal fusion procedures. This will be an open label, prospective, first in man, single-centre clinical study to evaluate the safety and performance of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures with instrumentation. Safety and performance data obtained in this clinical study will be used to estimate clinical success rates achieved with the use of Osteo3 ZP Putty synthetic bone graft in TLIF procedures. No comparative control group is intended. The study is expected to run for approximately three years with each subject being followed up for a two- year post-operative period. The target is to recruit approximately 17 subjects to this clinical study, allowing for some subject attrition to get 15 evaluable.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Disc Disease, Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
Keywords
synthetic bone graft, TLIF, Fusion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
40-65-year-old adults requiring one level instrumented spine fusion
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
17 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Subject group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
undergoing instrumented TLIF using investigational product as synthetic bone graft
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Osteo3 ZP Putty
Other Intervention Name(s)
OssDsign Catalyst
Intervention Description
Transforminal Interbody Fusion at one spinal level (L2-S1)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety: Incidence of device-related serious adverse events
Description
Incidence of device-related serious adverse events. Success measured as no treatment-related events occurring in 24 months post-surgery.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery
Description
Percentage of subjects with evidence of interbody fusion being achieved in 12 months post-surgery. Assessed as any evidence of bridging bone observed joining the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. Scored using a simple scoring of yes, no or not known if cannot be seen.
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Oswestry Disability Index questionnaire to assess Quality of life
Description
Validated off-the-shelf questionnaire asking patients questions about their ability to perform basic life tasks. It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section contains six statements and each statement describes a greater degree of difficulty in that activity than the preceding statement. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The scores for all sections are added together, giving a possible score of 50. The total is doubled and expressed as a percentage.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Visual Analog Score to measure pain
Description
Subject will score their pain from 0 to 100 by making a mark on a 10cm line where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst pain imaginable. The change in score from baseline (pre-surgical score) will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
SF-36 short form to assess change in how the subjects back pain has affected their quality of life.
Description
It will be used to assess both the subject's back pain and how that pain affects the subject's ability to manage in everyday life. The questionnaire is divided into eleven sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Subject will score each section and the resulting scores are entered into a validated software evaluation tool which produces a result out of 100, allowing percentage change to be assessed from baseline (pre-surgical) score. Change in score will be assessed at the time points below and reported as a percentage change.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Maintenance or Improvement in Neurological function
Description
The subject will be assessed for neurological function by physical examination. Success = maintenance or improvement in neurological function compared to baseline scores for all Neurological assessments described as separate outcome measures below (Outcome measures 9 - 14 below). Subject will be considered to have clinical success if all neurological outcomes (outcomes 9-14) are maintained or improved from baseline assessments.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Safety: Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events
Description
Incidence rate and type of device-related Adverse events (AEs) recorded will be described for the 24 months post surgery period
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Bone Fusion Success
Description
Presence of bone fusion assessed by CT scans at 3, 6 months and 24 months. Scored as yes or no for presence of a bridge of bone between the superior and inferior vertebral bodies. The results will be reported as percentage of subjects fused at the various timepoints below.
Time Frame
3, 6 and 24 months
Title
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of sensory response at dermatomal levels operated in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Description
Sensory - Decreased sensation will be assessed by evaluating sensation response (e.g., to pin prick, light touch or vibration) for the involved dermatomal levels. The examination method chosen to make these assessments will be left to the discretion of the Investigator. Sensory function will be scored as 0 = Absent, 1 = Impaired, 2 = Normal
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement in patellar and Achilles deep tendon reflexes in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Description
Reflex - Reflexes of both legs will be evaluated by assessing patellar (knee jerk) and Achilles (ankle jerk) deep tendon reflexes. The Investigator will be asked to indicate whether the knee and ankle reflex response for each leg is normal, decreased, absent or increased.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Neurological outcome - Maintenance or improvement of muscle strength at all muscle sites assessed in each leg when compared to baseline scores
Description
Muscle Strength - Muscle strength of both legs will be assessed bilaterally at the following muscle sites: hip flexors (iliopsoas musculature); knee extensors (quadriceps); ankle dorsiflexors (tibialis transforaminal); ankle plantar flexors (gastrocnemius); and long toe extensors (extensor halluces longus) using the following clinical scale. The worst assessment (no evidence of contractility) will be assigned the lowest clinical score 0 out of 5 while full range of motion against gravity, full resistance will be assigned the highest clinical score 5 out of 5. The following scale will be used to assess muscle strength: No evidence of contractility 0 Slight contractility, no movement 1 Full range of motion, gravity eliminated (passive movement) 2 Full range of motion with gravity 3 Full range of motion against gravity, some resistance 4 Full range of motion against gravity, full resistance 5
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative straight leg raising response or improvement of a positive straight leg raising response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result.
Description
Straight Leg Raising - The ability of the subject to undergo passive straight leg raising manoeuvres while in the supine position will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative straight leg raise (SLR) for each leg.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Neurological outcome - Maintenance of a negative femoral stretch response or improvement of a positive femoral stretch response to negative in each leg when compared to the baseline result
Description
Femoral Stretch - The ability of the subject to undergo passive femoral stretch manoeuvres while lying on one side will be assessed for both legs. The results will be recorded as a positive or negative femoral stretch for each leg.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)
Title
Absence of Babinski's sign
Description
Presence or absence of Babinski's sign will be recorded. Absence of Babsinki's sign is considered normal and a success.
Time Frame
3,6,12 and 24 months (unless fused at 12 months)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has been diagnosed with DDD (as defined below), degenerative spondylolisthesis or lumbar spinal stenosis at one spinal level: DDD defined as one or more of the following: instability as defined by greater than or equal to 3 mm translation or greater than or equal to 5 degrees angulation, decreased disc height, on average by greater than or equal to 2 mm, but dependent upon the spinal level, scarring/thickening of ligamentum flavum or annulus fibrosis, herniated nucleus pulposus or vacuum phenomenon. The subject has failed at least six months of non-operative treatment prior to clinical study enrolment (e.g. bed rest, physical therapy, bracing, traction, drug therapy, etc) and is a candidate for spinal fusion surgery over one vertebral level between, and including, L2 to S1 (i.e. second lumbar to first sacral). The subject is 40-65 years old. The subject is, in the Investigator's opinion, psychosocially healthy and physically able to fully comply with this protocol, including the post-operative regimen, required follow up visits, the filling out of required forms, and have the ability to understand and give written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Subject has diagnosis of symptomatic DDD, spondylolisthesis, or lumbar spinal stenosis at more than one level. Subject has had prior surgery at any lumbar level. Subject has systemic infection or infection at the surgical site. History of significant metabolic bone disease such as osteomalacia, autoimmune disease including rheumatoid arthritis, renal disease, hepatic disease, peripheral vascular disease, insulin dependent diabetes, Paget's disease at the involved spinal level(s) or upper motor neuron disease (positive Babinski sign). Subject has a medical condition that would interfere with post-operative assessments and care (i.e. psychiatric disease, paraplegia, quadriplegia, etc.). Subject is in poor general health or any concurrent disease process that would place the subject in excessive risk to surgery (e.g. significant circulatory, pulmonary problems, or cardiac disease). Subject has a history (present or past) of substance abuse (recreational drugs, prescription drugs or alcohol) that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with protocol assessments and/or with the subject's ability to complete the protocol required follow up. The subject is known to be pregnant/breastfeeding at the time of enrolment or plans to become pregnant during their participation in the clinical study. Subject is participating in, or has completed within the last 30 days, another investigational clinical study, which could confound results. Morbid obesity defined as a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 40. Has or has had a tumour or fracture at the involved level. Subject has a condition or requires post-operative medications that may interfere with bone/soft tissue healing (i.e. NSAIDS, oral or parenteral glucocorticoids, immunosuppressants, methotrexate, etc.), or that effect the rate of bone metabolism unless they have undergone a 14 day wash out period prior to surgery. Subject is taking medication for treatment of osteoporosis and/or in the Investigator's opinion, spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated. Subject has a T-score of less than -2.5 is therefore diagnostic of osteoporosis. Subject is involved in on-going litigation concerning their medical condition. Subject has a known allergy to silicon. Long-term use (longer than 3 months) of opiates.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter P Varga, MD
Organizational Affiliation
National Spine Centrer, Buda Health Center, Budapest
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Buda Health Center, Királyhágó u. 1-3.
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1126
Country
Hungary

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is not a plan to make IPD available

Learn more about this trial

TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs