TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Primary Purpose
HIV Infections, HIV-1
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TMC278
efavirenz
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for HIV Infections focused on measuring Antiretroviral, HIV-1, AIDS, TMC278-C215, TMC278-TiDP6-C215, Treatment Naive
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
- Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
- Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is > 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
- Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
- Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
- Patient is HLA-B*5701 negative in case abacavir is included in the patient's treatment regimen.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
- Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
- Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
- Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
- Active TB
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to study or background ARTs
- Specific grade 3 or 4 toxicity
- Kidney impairment: calculated creatinine clearance <50 ml/min
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
002
001
Arm Description
efavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
TMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load less than (<) 50 human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) (ribonucleic acid [RNA]) copies/milliliter (ml) at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 50 copies/ml after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <50 copies/ml).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
The analysis is based on the last observed viral load (VL) data within the Week 48 window. Virologic response is defined as a VL<50 copies/mL (observed case). Missing VL was considered as non-response. Virologic Failure includes subjects who had VL>=50 copies/mL in the Wk 48 window, subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a VL>=50 copies/mL and subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not permitted by the protocol.
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Observed, <50 Copies/mL) at Last On-Treatment Visit (Post-Week 96).
Virological response is defined as (observed) plasma viral load less than 50 human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) copies per mL at the last on-treatment post-Week 96 visit.
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 96. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 and Week 96 in Absolute and Relative CD4+ Cell Counts (Using Imputed Data)
Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was imputed in case of missing values: in case of premature discontinuation, data were imputed with the baseline value after discontinuation (i.e. change=0, Non-Completer [NC] = Failure); otherwise last observation carried forward was applied.
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for the Resistance Determinations by Developing Mutations: First Available On-Treatment Genotypic Data After Failure
Virologic failure for the resistance determinations was defined as lack of virologic response (never having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) and plasma viral load increase of >=0.5 log 10 copies/mL above nadir (i.e., never suppressed), or confirmed loss of virologic response (2 consecutive plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL; i.e., rebounder), or discontinued with a last observed on-treatment plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. For this study, treatment-emergent reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance associated mutations (RAMs) occurring in at least 2 virologic failures (for at least one treatment group) for the following lists are presented: i) Extended list of Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI RAMs) ii) IAS-USA list of Nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI RAMs).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT00543725
First Posted
October 11, 2007
Last Updated
March 3, 2016
Sponsor
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00543725
Brief Title
TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind Trial of TMC278 25mg q.d. Versus Efavirenz 600mg q.d. in Combination With a Background Regimen Containing 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors in Antiretroviral-naive HIV-1 Infected Subjects.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this trial is to compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of TMC278 given at a dose of 25 mg once daily versus efavirenz (EFV) at a dose of 600 mg once daily, when combined with a background regimen containing 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors ( investigator choice of ABC/3TC, TDF/FTC or AZT/3TC) in HIV-1 infected patients who have not yet taken any anti-HIV drugs. The following evaluations will be done: antiviral activity, immunologic changes, and viral geno-/phenotype evolution, relationship of Pharmacokinetics (PK) and PK/Pharmacodynamics and Medical resource utilization and treatment adherence.
Detailed Description
Over the past decade, anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs have been introduced sequentially for use in the clinic. Currently, patients are routinely being treated with 3 or 4 drug combinations including nucleoside/tide analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/NtRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and/or fusion inhibitors. New potent antiretroviral (ARV) compounds that work in people whose HIV-1 virus is resistant to available drugs are urgently needed. This is a Phase III, randomized (study medication is assigned by chance), double-blind (neither the study physician nor the patient knows the name of the study assigned medication), double-dummy, active-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness, safety, and ability to tolerate TMC278 versus efavirenz (EFV). The study will last for 104 weeks which includes a screening period of 4 weeks, a 96-week treatment period, followed by a 4 week follow-up period. Patients will be randomly assigned (like tossing a coin) to TMC278 or to efavirenz in combination with two other anti-HIV drugs of the class nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The hypothesis to be provided in this study is that the investigational drug TMC278 will perform just like efavirenz (EFV) in terms of antiviral effectiveness (i.e., suppressing of the plasma viral load to a level < 50 HIV-1 RNA (ribonucleic acid) copies/mL, in ARV-naïve HIV-infected patients. During the trial, patients' health will be monitored by physical examination, interview to assess health and well being, and laboratory testing on blood and urine samples. Experimental Group: One tablet of TMC278 25 mg daily; plus efavirenz (EFV) placebo; plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; Control Group: One tablet of Placebo daily that looks just like TMC278 plus EFV 600 mg daily plus 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors for 104 weeks.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
HIV Infections, HIV-1
Keywords
Antiretroviral, HIV-1, AIDS, TMC278-C215, TMC278-TiDP6-C215, Treatment Naive
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
680 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
002
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
efavirenz 600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Arm Title
001
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
TMC278 25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TMC278
Intervention Description
25 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
efavirenz
Intervention Description
600 mg tablet once daily for 96 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Description
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load less than (<) 50 human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) (ribonucleic acid [RNA]) copies/milliliter (ml) at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 50 copies/ml after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <50 copies/ml).
Time Frame
Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Description
The analysis is based on the last observed viral load (VL) data within the Week 48 window. Virologic response is defined as a VL<50 copies/mL (observed case). Missing VL was considered as non-response. Virologic Failure includes subjects who had VL>=50 copies/mL in the Wk 48 window, subjects who discontinued early due to lack or loss of efficacy, subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an adverse event, death or lack or loss of efficacy and at the time of discontinuation had a VL>=50 copies/mL and subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not permitted by the protocol.
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Snapshot, <50 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Observed, <50 Copies/mL) at Last On-Treatment Visit (Post-Week 96).
Description
Virological response is defined as (observed) plasma viral load less than 50 human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) ribonucleic acid (RNA) copies per mL at the last on-treatment post-Week 96 visit.
Time Frame
Variable, ranging from 3 months up to maximum 18 months for TMC278 and 12 months for Efavirenz
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 48
Description
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 48. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Time Frame
Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Virological Response (Intent-to-Treat - Time to Loss of Virologic Response [TLOVR], <400 Copies Per mL) at Week 96
Description
Virological response is defined as confirmed plasma viral load < 400 HIV-1 (RNA) copies/mL at Week 96. The TLOVR algorithm was used to derive response. Response needed to be confirmed at 2 consecutive visits and participants who permanently discontinued were considered nonresponders after discontinuation. Resuppression after confirmed virologic failure was considered as failure. Virologic Failure includes participants who were rebounder (confirmed viral load >= 400 copies/mL after being responder) or who were never suppressed (no confirmed viral load <400 copies/mL).
Time Frame
Week 96
Title
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 48 and Week 96 in Absolute and Relative CD4+ Cell Counts (Using Imputed Data)
Description
Change from baseline in CD4+ cell count was imputed in case of missing values: in case of premature discontinuation, data were imputed with the baseline value after discontinuation (i.e. change=0, Non-Completer [NC] = Failure); otherwise last observation carried forward was applied.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 48, and Week 96
Title
Number of Participants With Virologic Failure for the Resistance Determinations by Developing Mutations: First Available On-Treatment Genotypic Data After Failure
Description
Virologic failure for the resistance determinations was defined as lack of virologic response (never having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL) and plasma viral load increase of >=0.5 log 10 copies/mL above nadir (i.e., never suppressed), or confirmed loss of virologic response (2 consecutive plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL; i.e., rebounder), or discontinued with a last observed on-treatment plasma viral load >=50 copies/mL after having had 2 consecutive plasma viral load <50 copies/mL. For this study, treatment-emergent reverse transcriptase (RT) resistance associated mutations (RAMs) occurring in at least 2 virologic failures (for at least one treatment group) for the following lists are presented: i) Extended list of Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI RAMs) ii) IAS-USA list of Nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (N[t]RTI RAMs).
Time Frame
Week 96
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient with documented HIV-1 infection
Patient has never been treated with a therapeutic HIV vaccine or an ARV drug prior to screening
Patient's HIV-1 plasma viral load at screening is > 5,000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL (assayed by RNA PCR standard specimen procedure)
Patient's virus is sensitive to the 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors chosen for treatment
Patient agrees not to start ART before the baseline visit
Patient is HLA-B*5701 negative in case abacavir is included in the patient's treatment regimen.
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous use of ANY ARV drug for ANY length of time
Any documented evidence of NNRTI resistance associated mutations in patient's HIV
Category C AIDS defining illness, except, Stable Kaposi Sarcoma Wasting syndrome if not progressive
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) that is considered not cured
Active TB
Allergy or hypersensitivity to study or background ARTs
Specific grade 3 or 4 toxicity
Kidney impairment: calculated creatinine clearance <50 ml/min
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland Clinical Trial
Organizational Affiliation
Tibotec Pharmaceuticals, Ireland
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
Country
United States
City
Atlantis
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Springfield
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
City
Newark
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Flushing
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Longview
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
City
Darlinghurst
Country
Australia
City
Prahran
Country
Australia
City
Surry Hills
Country
Australia
City
Antwerpen
Country
Belgium
City
Brussels
Country
Belgium
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
City
Campinas
Country
Brazil
City
Distrito Barao Geraldo-Campina
Country
Brazil
City
Pinheiros
Country
Brazil
City
Recife
Country
Brazil
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
Country
Canada
City
Winnipeg
State/Province
Manitoba
Country
Canada
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
City
Providencia
Country
Chile
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
City
Beijing
Country
China
City
Guangzhou
Country
China
City
Shanghai
Country
China
City
San Jose
Country
Costa Rica
City
Clamart
Country
France
City
Le Kremlin Bicetre
Country
France
City
Montpellier
Country
France
City
Paris
Country
France
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
City
Essen
Country
Germany
City
Frankfurt
Country
Germany
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
City
Köln
Country
Germany
City
Mannheim
Country
Germany
City
Chennai
Country
India
City
Nagpur
Country
India
City
Guadalajara N/A
Country
Mexico
City
Mexico City
Country
Mexico
City
Panama City N/A
Country
Panama
City
Panama
Country
Panama
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
City
San Juan
Country
Puerto Rico
City
Moscow N/A
Country
Russian Federation
City
Saint-Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
City
Smolensk
Country
Russian Federation
City
Voronezh
Country
Russian Federation
City
Bloemfontein
Country
South Africa
City
Cape Town
Country
South Africa
City
Dundee
Country
South Africa
City
Johannesburg
Country
South Africa
City
Pretoria N/A
Country
South Africa
City
Westdene Johannesburg Gauteng
Country
South Africa
City
Barcelona N/A
Country
Spain
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
City
Elche
Country
Spain
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23714781
Citation
Rimsky L, Van Eygen V, Hoogstoel A, Stevens M, Boven K, Picchio G, Vingerhoets J. 96-Week resistance analyses of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected adults from the ECHO and THRIVE Phase III trials. Antivir Ther. 2013;18(8):967-77. doi: 10.3851/IMP2636. Epub 2013 May 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22532465
Citation
Nelson M, Amaya G, Clumeck N, Arns da Cunha C, Jayaweera D, Junod P, Li T, Tebas P, Stevens M, Buelens A, Vanveggel S, Boven K; ECHO and THRIVE Study Groups. Efficacy and safety of rilpivirine in treatment-naive, HIV-1-infected patients with hepatitis B virus/hepatitis C virus coinfection enrolled in the Phase III randomized, double-blind ECHO and THRIVE trials. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012 Aug;67(8):2020-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks130. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
21763935
Citation
Cohen CJ, Andrade-Villanueva J, Clotet B, Fourie J, Johnson MA, Ruxrungtham K, Wu H, Zorrilla C, Crauwels H, Rimsky LT, Vanveggel S, Boven K; THRIVE study group. Rilpivirine versus efavirenz with two background nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1 (THRIVE): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011 Jul 16;378(9787):229-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60983-5.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
TMC278-TiDP6-C215: A Clinical Trial in Treatment Naive HIV-subjects Patients Comparing TMC278 to Efavirenz in Combination With 2 Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs