search
Back to results

TMS in the Treatment of the Sequelae of Closed Brain Injury

Primary Purpose

Depression, Closed Head Injury

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
rTMS
Sham rTMS
Sponsored by
Bayside Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Depression focused on measuring Depression, TBI, TMS, Major Depression resulting from a mild to moderate closed head injury

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Be aged 18-60 and have capacity to consent
  2. Currently meet DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (expect for the exclusion of causality by a general medical condition referring to the TBI) and have the persistence of depressive symptoms for at least one month at sufficient severity to warrant the diagnosis.
  3. Have experienced a closed head injury of mild to moderate severity (Glasgow coma scale score (GCS) of greater than 8), preceding their depression, and are at least 3 months post injury. The injury must not have involved specific direct damage to either frontal lobe.
  4. Have a Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale Score of > 20 (moderate - severe depression). Including only a more severely ill group of subjects limits the placebo response rate.
  5. Have had no increase or initiation of new antidepressant (or other psychoactive) therapy in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who have an unstable medical condition, neurological disorder or any history of a seizure disorder or are currently pregnant or lactating.
  2. Patients who have experienced clear structural damage to the left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as documented on MRI scan
  3. Have a current DSM IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence disorder.

Sites / Locations

  • Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

1

2

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Depression Symptom Severity

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cognitive Tasks

Full Information

First Posted
September 17, 2007
Last Updated
October 11, 2020
Sponsor
Bayside Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00531258
Brief Title
TMS in the Treatment of the Sequelae of Closed Brain Injury
Official Title
The Use of Non Invasive Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of the Sequelae of Closed Brain Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Bayside Health

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Depression is very common in people who have experienced a traumatic brain injury. Few treatments have been found to be effective in treating depression in this situation. We intend to investigate the effectiveness of a form of brain stimulation, transcranial magnetic stimulation, which has been found to be effective in treating depression in people who have not undergone a brain injury. By evaluating new methods of treating depression in this population, we hope to increase the options available for treating people in this difficult situation. Furthermore, problems with aspects of thinking are also commonly present post brain injury, as in some individuals with depression. Various brain stimulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been shown to have a positive effect on cognition. We also intend to investigate whether a therapeutic effect on cognitive deficits is present following TMS, in addition to any effects on depression. New treatment protocols will be developed, and understanding of the pathology and treatment of post traumatic brain injury depression will be enhanced.
Detailed Description
It is plausible to propose that the same treatment paradigm may result in an improvement in mood and cognition with the possibility that these changes will be self reinforcing resulting in enhanced quality of life and reduced service demands. The proposal for the use of rTMS in the treatment of post TBI depression is also supported by aetiological models. In particular, rTMS would seem to have considerable potential to improve pathophysiological changes relevant to the treatment of post TBI depression and cognitive dysfunction. Early models of the mechanism of action of rTMS treatment in depression were based on the observation that rTMS is able to produce localised changes in cortical activity [7]. The standard treatment paradigm generally has been found to produce an increase in local prefrontal cortical excitability. However, more recently there has been an increased understanding that rTMS modulates distal brain regions as well and potentially the strength of connections between brain regions. It has been proposed that its therapeutic effects in non TBI-related depression occur through modulation of dorsal frontal - subcortical limbic connectivity and potentially the actual integrity and strength of connections between these regions. If this is the case, altering cortical - cortical or cortical - subcortical connectivity may lead to therapeutic benefits in post TBI depression due to likely involvement of white matter changes in the development of TBI related mood disorder. Aims/Objectives/Hypothesis/es Primary Aim: To assess the effectiveness of rTMS in treating depression post traumatic brain injury. Secondary Aim: To gain preliminary data as to the possible effectiveness of rTMS in treating cognitive deficits post traumatic brain injury. Hypothesis 1: Active bilateral sequential rTMS will lead to an improvement in the symptoms of post TBI depression, as measured by MADRS scores, when compared to sham treatment Hypothesis 2: Active bilateral sequential rTMS will lead to an improvement in cognitive executive functioning in individuals post TBI, when compared to sham treatment Hypothesis 3: Active bilateral sequential rTMS will lead to an improvement in life satisfaction and level of functioning in individuals post TBI, when compared to sham treatment. Methodology Experimental Design and Randomisation Procedures The study has been designed to allow the reporting of results in a manner consistent with the international CONSORT guidelines. The study will involve a 4-week (20 session) randomized double-blind clinical trial with 2 treatment arms conducted at the Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre in Melbourne. Randomization will occur via the generation of a computer number sequence. Subjects will be randomized immediately prior to the commencement of the first treatment session, after the measurement of bilateral resting motor thresholds with standard means. The main study phase (phase 1) will involve the 4 week randomized controlled trial conducted under strict double-blind conditions. Fidelity of the blinding process will be assessed at the end of this period with patients and raters. Phase 2 will involve the provision of open label treatment to patients who received sham treatment and wish to receive 'active' rTMS. Responders to active treatment from phase 1 or 2 (defined as a 50% reduction in MADRS scores persisting for 1 week following the end of acute treatment) will enter phase 3, a 6 month maintenance phase. During this time, a single rTMS treatment session will be provided every week for 2 months and then every 2 weeks for 4 months. Acute treatment for up to 4 weeks will be reinstated if there is a persistent (2 week) increase in MADRS score of >25%.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Depression, Closed Head Injury
Keywords
Depression, TBI, TMS, Major Depression resulting from a mild to moderate closed head injury

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
21 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
rTMS
Intervention Description
Bilateral rTMS
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham rTMS
Intervention Description
sham rTMS
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Depression Symptom Severity
Time Frame
4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cognitive Tasks
Time Frame
4 Weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Be aged 18-60 and have capacity to consent Currently meet DSM-IV criteria for a diagnosis of major depressive disorder (expect for the exclusion of causality by a general medical condition referring to the TBI) and have the persistence of depressive symptoms for at least one month at sufficient severity to warrant the diagnosis. Have experienced a closed head injury of mild to moderate severity (Glasgow coma scale score (GCS) of greater than 8), preceding their depression, and are at least 3 months post injury. The injury must not have involved specific direct damage to either frontal lobe. Have a Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale Score of > 20 (moderate - severe depression). Including only a more severely ill group of subjects limits the placebo response rate. Have had no increase or initiation of new antidepressant (or other psychoactive) therapy in the 4 weeks prior to enrolment. Exclusion Criteria: Patients who have an unstable medical condition, neurological disorder or any history of a seizure disorder or are currently pregnant or lactating. Patients who have experienced clear structural damage to the left or right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as documented on MRI scan Have a current DSM IV diagnosis of alcohol or substance dependence disorder.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul B Fitzgerald, MBBS, FRANZCP, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre
City
Prahran
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3181
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

TMS in the Treatment of the Sequelae of Closed Brain Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs