search
Back to results

To Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) 0.5mg Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) With Well Controlled and Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus (CONTROL)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Macular Oedema

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Australia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranibizumab
Sponsored by
Marsden Eye Specialists
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Macular Oedema focused on measuring Diabetic macular oedema, Lucentis

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients with diabetes > 21 years of age who have signed an informed consent
  • Patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus (according to ADA or WHO guidelines) with HbA1c levels either < 7.5% or ≥ 10.0% at screening (visit 1) as measured within the last 3 months.
  • Patients with visual impairment due to either focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye who are eligible for laser treatment in the opinion of the investigator. The study eye must fulfill the following criteria at Visit 1 (if both eyes are eligible, the study eye will be selected by the investigator, based on potential for improvement): i) BCVA score between 73 and 39 letters, inclusively, using LogMAR visual acuity testing charts at 4 metres (or at the equivalent appropriate testing distance for the chart size) (approximate Snellen equivalent between 6/12 (20/40) and 6/48 (20/160); ii) the decrease in vision is due to DME but not due to other causes, in the opinion of the investigator
  • OCT foveal centre point thickness ≥ 350µm on Spectral Domain OCT (≥300 µm on Time domain OCT / STRATUS)
  • Medication for the management of diabetes should have been stable within the 3 months prior to randomisation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant conditions in the study eye which could, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment
  • Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in either eye
  • Any active infection (e.g. conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, endophthalmitis) in either eye
  • History of uveitis in either eye
  • Structural damage within 1 disc diameter of the center of the macula in the study eye likely to preclude an improvement in visual acuity following the resolution of macular oedema, including (geographic) atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, subretinal fibrosis, laser scar(s), or organized hard exudates plaques
  • Ocular disorders in the study eye that may confound interpretation of study results, compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention during the 12-month study period, including retinal vascular occlusion, retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane, macular hole, or choroidal neovascularization of any cause (e.g., AMD, ocular histoplasmosis, or pathologic myopia)
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (according to investigator's judgment)
  • Neovascularization of the iris in study eye
  • Evidence of vitreomacular traction in study eye, shown either clinically or on OCT
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 6 months (in order to exclude patients with active proliferative disease) or focal/grid laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months prior to study entry
  • Treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs: pegaptanib sodium, anecortave acetate, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept (VEGF-Trap) within 3 months to study eye
  • Intravitreal corticosteroids in either eye within 6 months prior to randomisation
  • Any intraocular surgery in the study eye within 3 months prior to randomisation
  • History of vitrectomy in study eye
  • Phakic study eye with a history of intravitreal corticosteroid treatment (due to the likely late increase in secondary cataract)
  • Ocular conditions in the study eye that is likely to require chronic concomitant therapy with topical ocular or systemically administered corticosteroids
  • History of disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, that might affect the interpretation of the results of the study, or that would renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications
  • Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant OR renal insufficiency with creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl
  • Untreated diabetes mellitus
  • Severe (blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg OR diastolic > 100 mmHg)
  • Current use of or likely need for systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina or optic nerve, including Deferoxamine, Chloroquine/ hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), Tamoxifen, Phenothiazines and Ethambutol
  • Known hypersensitivity to ranibizumab or any component of the ranibizumab formulation
  • Previous participation in any clinical studies of investigational drugs (excluding vitamins and minerals) within 1 month (or a period corresponding to 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whatever is longer) prior to randomisation
  • Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, including women whose career, lifestyle, or sexual orientation precludes intercourse with a male partner and women whose partners have been sterilized by vasectomy or other means, UNLESS they are using two birth control methods. The two methods can be a double barrier method or a barrier method plus a hormonal method. Adequate barrier methods of contraception include: diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device (copper or hormonal), sponge or spermicide. Hormonal contraceptives include any marketed contraceptive agent that includes an estrogen and/or a progestational agent.
  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women.
  • Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures.

Sites / Locations

  • Marsden Eye Specialists

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Well controlled

Poorly controlled

Arm Description

Eligibile people with diabetic macular oedema and HBA1C < 7.5

eligible people with Diabetic macular oedema and HBAIC >10.0

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The primary endpoint for the study will be the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the mean level at Month 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 3, 2018
Last Updated
April 10, 2018
Sponsor
Marsden Eye Specialists
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03495765
Brief Title
To Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) 0.5mg Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) With Well Controlled and Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym
CONTROL
Official Title
An Open-label, Multi-centre, 12-month Study to Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) 0.5mg Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) With Well Controlled and Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus ('CONTROL' Study)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 1, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Marsden Eye Specialists

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of 12 months of Lucentis (ranibizumab) in patients with well controlled compared to those with poorly controlled diabetes using an PRN treatment schedule.
Detailed Description
To demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of Lucentis (ranibizumab) in patients with well controlled compared to those with poorly controlled diabetes. The primary endpoint for the study will be the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Month 12. Two groups of patients, based on HbA1c levels will be entered into the trial - patients with a recent HbA1c level < 7.5 % (the 'well controlled' subgroup) and patients with a recent HbA1c level ≥ 10.0% (the 'poorly controlled' subgroup). Ranibizumab treatment will be administered over the 12-month period, initial 3 monthly injections, followed by 'as needed' protocol using the following principles: Monthly ranibizumab injections would be suspended when: No further BCVA improvement from treatment at the last 2 consecutive follow up visits OR BCVA letter score >84 (6/6) at the last 2 consecutive follow up visits Monthly ranibizumab injections would be reinitiated when: • Decrease in BCVA due to DME progression in the opinion of the investigator Laser treatment could also be administered from 3 months after study initiation, according to the investigators decision, in accordance with ETDRS guidelines, and at intervals of at least 3 months from the last treatment. Visit schedule: Screening visit then monthly visits for 12 visits (total of 13 visits)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Macular Oedema
Keywords
Diabetic macular oedema, Lucentis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
160 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Well controlled
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eligibile people with diabetic macular oedema and HBA1C < 7.5
Arm Title
Poorly controlled
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
eligible people with Diabetic macular oedema and HBAIC >10.0
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis
Intervention Description
Ranibizumab 0.5mcg via intravitreal injection to study eye up to monthly
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The primary endpoint for the study will be the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to the mean level at Month 12.
Time Frame
12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or female patients with diabetes > 21 years of age who have signed an informed consent Patients with either Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus (according to ADA or WHO guidelines) with HbA1c levels either < 7.5% or ≥ 10.0% at screening (visit 1) as measured within the last 3 months. Patients with visual impairment due to either focal or diffuse DME in at least one eye who are eligible for laser treatment in the opinion of the investigator. The study eye must fulfill the following criteria at Visit 1 (if both eyes are eligible, the study eye will be selected by the investigator, based on potential for improvement): i) BCVA score between 73 and 39 letters, inclusively, using LogMAR visual acuity testing charts at 4 metres (or at the equivalent appropriate testing distance for the chart size) (approximate Snellen equivalent between 6/12 (20/40) and 6/48 (20/160); ii) the decrease in vision is due to DME but not due to other causes, in the opinion of the investigator OCT foveal centre point thickness ≥ 350µm on Spectral Domain OCT (≥300 µm on Time domain OCT / STRATUS) Medication for the management of diabetes should have been stable within the 3 months prior to randomisation Exclusion Criteria: Concomitant conditions in the study eye which could, in the opinion of the investigator, prevent the improvement of visual acuity on study treatment Active intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in either eye Any active infection (e.g. conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, endophthalmitis) in either eye History of uveitis in either eye Structural damage within 1 disc diameter of the center of the macula in the study eye likely to preclude an improvement in visual acuity following the resolution of macular oedema, including (geographic) atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium, subretinal fibrosis, laser scar(s), or organized hard exudates plaques Ocular disorders in the study eye that may confound interpretation of study results, compromise visual acuity or require medical or surgical intervention during the 12-month study period, including retinal vascular occlusion, retinal detachment, epiretinal membrane, macular hole, or choroidal neovascularization of any cause (e.g., AMD, ocular histoplasmosis, or pathologic myopia) Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (according to investigator's judgment) Neovascularization of the iris in study eye Evidence of vitreomacular traction in study eye, shown either clinically or on OCT Panretinal laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 6 months (in order to exclude patients with active proliferative disease) or focal/grid laser photocoagulation in the study eye within 3 months prior to study entry Treatment with anti-angiogenic drugs: pegaptanib sodium, anecortave acetate, bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept (VEGF-Trap) within 3 months to study eye Intravitreal corticosteroids in either eye within 6 months prior to randomisation Any intraocular surgery in the study eye within 3 months prior to randomisation History of vitrectomy in study eye Phakic study eye with a history of intravitreal corticosteroid treatment (due to the likely late increase in secondary cataract) Ocular conditions in the study eye that is likely to require chronic concomitant therapy with topical ocular or systemically administered corticosteroids History of disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding giving reasonable suspicion of a disease or condition that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, that might affect the interpretation of the results of the study, or that would renders the patient at high risk from treatment complications Renal failure requiring dialysis or renal transplant OR renal insufficiency with creatinine levels >2.0 mg/dl Untreated diabetes mellitus Severe (blood pressure systolic > 160 mmHg OR diastolic > 100 mmHg) Current use of or likely need for systemic medications known to be toxic to the lens, retina or optic nerve, including Deferoxamine, Chloroquine/ hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil), Tamoxifen, Phenothiazines and Ethambutol Known hypersensitivity to ranibizumab or any component of the ranibizumab formulation Previous participation in any clinical studies of investigational drugs (excluding vitamins and minerals) within 1 month (or a period corresponding to 5 half-lives of the investigational drug, whatever is longer) prior to randomisation Women of child-bearing potential, defined as all women physiologically capable of becoming pregnant, including women whose career, lifestyle, or sexual orientation precludes intercourse with a male partner and women whose partners have been sterilized by vasectomy or other means, UNLESS they are using two birth control methods. The two methods can be a double barrier method or a barrier method plus a hormonal method. Adequate barrier methods of contraception include: diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device (copper or hormonal), sponge or spermicide. Hormonal contraceptives include any marketed contraceptive agent that includes an estrogen and/or a progestational agent. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Marsden Eye Specialists
City
Paramatta
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2150
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

To Evaluate the Comparative Efficacy of Lucentis (Ranibizumab) 0.5mg Intravitreal Injection in Patients With Diabetic Macular Oedema (DME) With Well Controlled and Poorly Controlled Diabetes Mellitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs