search
Back to results

Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects With Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors (OPAL BEYOND)

Primary Purpose

Psoriatic Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Tofacitinib
Tofacitinib
Placebo
Tofacitinib
Placebo
Tofacitinib
Sponsored by
Pfizer
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Psoriatic Arthritis focused on measuring psoriatic arthritis, tofacitinib, ACR20, HAQ-DI, TNF inhibitor failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Active arthritis at screening/baseline as indicated by >/= 3 tender/painful and 3 swollen joints
  • Active plaque psoriasis at screening
  • Inadequate efficacy or lack of toleration to previously administered TNF inhibitor

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-plaque forms of psoriasis (with exception of nail psoriasis)
  • History of autoimmune rheumatic disease other than PsA; also prior history of or current, rheumatic inflammatory disease other than PsA

Sites / Locations

  • Rheumatology Associates P.C.
  • Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
  • Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
  • Medvin Clinical Research
  • St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
  • Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Drug Information Center
  • UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
  • San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic
  • Stanford Hospital and Clinics
  • New England Research Associates, LLC
  • Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA
  • Millennium Research
  • Arthritis Center, Inc.
  • Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists (IRIS)
  • Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.
  • St. Luke's Clinic - Rheumatology
  • St. Luke's Intermountain Research Center
  • Bluegrass Community Research, Inc
  • Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
  • The Center For Rheumatology And Bone Research
  • Brigham & Women's Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
  • St. Paul Rheumatology, PA
  • Clayton Medical Research
  • Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC)
  • Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
  • Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
  • East Penn Rheumatology Associates, PC
  • Altoona Center for Clinical Research
  • Low Country Rheumatology, PA
  • Arthritis Clinic
  • West Tennessee Research Institute
  • Adriana M. Pop-Moody, M.D., Clinic, P.A.
  • Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
  • Metroplex Clinical Research Center
  • Drug Shipment/Storage: Investigational Drug Services
  • University of Utah Hospital & Clinics
  • Dynacare Laboratories
  • Seattle Rheumatology Associates
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Rheumatology Department
  • Rheumatology Research Unit
  • Emeritus Research Pty Ltd
  • Hospital Erasme - Clinique Universitaire de Bruxelles
  • ReumaClinic
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
  • University Hospital Leuven, Department of Rheumatology
  • ZNA Jan Palfijn
  • CMIP: Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa Ltda /
  • CETAC - DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM (image only)
  • EDUMED - Educacao em Saude SS LTDA.
  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) / UFRGS
  • Clinica Medica Bonfiglioli Ltda. / Clinica Bonfiglioli
  • Radiologia Clínica de Campinas - RCC (Images only)
  • Medical Plus s.r.o.
  • Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien - Secretariat de Rhumatologie
  • Hopital Avicenne
  • Rheumazentrum Prof. Dr. med Gunther Neeck
  • Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
  • Rheumapraxis Steglitz
  • Schlosspark-Klinik
  • Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 3
  • CIRI - Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie Rheumatologie/Immunologie (GmbH)
  • Medizinische Universitatsklinik Freiburg
  • Universitaetsklinikum Des Saarlandes Und Medizinische Fakultaet Der Universitaet Des Saarlandes
  • University Hospital of Cologne
  • Elisabeth Klinik Bigge
  • Hospital Angeles Clinica Londres
  • Grupo Medico Camino S.C.
  • CLIDITER, S.A. de C.V.
  • Universidad La Salle AC
  • Medica Sur, S.A.B. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
  • Centro Integral en Reumatologia SA de CV
  • Grupo Santa Bernardette S.A. de C.V.
  • Centro de Investigacion de Tratamientos Innovadores de Sinaloa, S.C
  • Sanatorio CEMSI Chapultepec (For Emergencies Only)
  • Hospital General de Culiacan "Dr. Bernardo J. Gastelum"
  • Star Medica S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
  • Institute Medico Panamericano, S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
  • Unidad Reumatologica Las Americas SCP
  • Centro de Investigacion Clinica Pensiones
  • Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo
  • Hospital Star Medica Merida (For Emergencies Only)
  • Christus Muguerza del parque, S.A de C.V
  • Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua
  • Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B.Gornikiewicz-Brzez
  • Centrum Radiologii for X-Ray only
  • NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. Med. Barbara Bazela
  • Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony Zaklad Radiologii
  • Przychodnia Specjalistyczna Lekarskiej Spozielni Pracy "Medica" for X-Ray Only
  • Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie "DERMED" Anna Kaszuba
  • NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED S.C.
  • Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab. Pawel Hrycaj
  • Reumatika Centrum Reumatologii nzoz
  • Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Karelia Republic "Republic Hospital n.a.
  • State Autonomic Healthcare Institution City Clinical Hospital # 7
  • SBIH of Moscow "City Clinical Hospital#1 n. a. N.I. Pirogov" of the Healthcare Department of Moscow
  • City Neurological Centre "SibNeyroMed", LLC
  • Limited Liability Company Consultative Diagnostic Rheumatology Center "Healthy Joints"
  • State Budget Educational Institution of Highest Professional Education
  • State Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region
  • MEDMAN s.r.o. - reumatologicka ambulancia
  • Hospital Clinico de Santiago
  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • Hospital Sierrallana
  • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
  • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
  • Hospital Universitaro Y Politecnico La Fe
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
  • Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Kaohsiung Branch
  • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
  • China Medical University Hospital
  • Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
  • The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
  • Bradford Royal Infirmary, BTHFT
  • Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • York Hospital, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Treatment Sequence A

Treatment Sequence B

Treatment Sequence C

Treatment Sequence D

Arm Description

Tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 6 months

Tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 6 months

Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 3 months

Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 3 months

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 20% (ACR20): Month 3
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Month 3
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
ACR50 was calculated as a ≥50% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
ACR70 was calculated as a ≥70% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 20% (ACR20): Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels: Month 3
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain: Month 3
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count: Month 3
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count: Month 3
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC): Week 2, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: ≥20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥30% improvement in tender joint count; and ≥30% improvement in swollen joint count. n=number of responders.
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity and percentage of body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, and scaling evaluated separately for the head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs and then rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis and is assigned a numerical score: 0=no involvement; 1=0% to 9%; 2=10% to 29%; 3=30% to 49%; 4=50% to 69%; 5=70% to 89%; 6=90% to 100%. In each area, the sum of the severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of this area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of the numbers obtained for each of the 4 body areas is the PASI. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI. n=number of responders.
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS): Months 1, 3, and 6
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index: Months 1, 3, and 6
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI): Months 1, 3, and 6
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for a total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates greater severity of enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 10 items of the physical functioning scale represent levels & kinds of limitations between extremes of physical activities, including lifting & carrying groceries; climbing stairs; bending, kneeling, or stooping; walking moderate distances; self-care limitations. The physical functioning items capture the presence & extent of physical limitations using a 3-level response continuum. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-physical Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 4-item role-physical scale covers an array of physical health-related role limitations, including: a) limitations in the kind of work or other usual activities; b) reductions in the amount of time spent on work or other usual activities; c) difficulty performing work or other usual activities; & d) accomplishing less. Items in the role-physical scale are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Bodily Pain Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The bodily pain scale comprises of 2 items pertaining to the intensity of bodily pain and extent of interference with normal work activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): General Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The general health scale consists of 5 items including a rating of health and 4 items addressing the respondent's view and expectations of his or her health. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Vitality Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 4-item measure of vitality captures a broad range of subjective evaluations of well-being from feelings of tiredness and being worn out to feeling full of energy all or most of the time. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Social Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 2-item social functioning scale assesses health-related effects on quantity and quality of social activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-emotional Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 3-item role-emotional scale assesses mental health-related role limitations in terms of a) time spent in work or other usual activities; b) amount of work or activities accomplished; c) care with which work or other activities were performed. All 3 items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 5-item mental health scale includes 1 or more items from each of 4 major mental health dimensions: anxiety, depression, loss of behavioral/emotional control, and psychological well-being. All items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-Care: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today: Months 1, 3, 6
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score: Months 1, 3, 6
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Change From Baseline in Score Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI): Months 1, 3, 6
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participants answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averaged the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.

Full Information

First Posted
June 18, 2013
Last Updated
September 8, 2017
Sponsor
Pfizer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01882439
Brief Title
Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects With Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors
Acronym
OPAL BEYOND
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of 2 Doses Of Tofacitinib (Cp-690,550) In Subjects With Active Psoriatic Arthritis And An Inadequate Response To At Least One Tnf Inhibitor
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To examine the safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in subjects with active psoriatic arthritis who have previously had an inadequate response to at least one TNF inhibitor either due to lack of efficacy or an adverse event.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psoriatic Arthritis
Keywords
psoriatic arthritis, tofacitinib, ACR20, HAQ-DI, TNF inhibitor failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
395 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treatment Sequence A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 6 months
Arm Title
Treatment Sequence B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 6 months
Arm Title
Treatment Sequence C
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 5 mg BID for 3 months
Arm Title
Treatment Sequence D
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo for 3 months then tofacitinib 10 mg BID for 3 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
tablets, 5 mg BID x 6 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
tablets, 10 mg BID x 6 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
tablets, to match tofacitinib 5 mg BID x 3 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
tablets, 5 mg BID x 3 months
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
tablets, to match tofacitinib 10 mg BID x 3 months
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tofacitinib
Intervention Description
tablets, 10 mg BID x 3 months
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 20% (ACR20): Month 3
Description
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender/painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Month 3
Description
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability.
Time Frame
Month 3
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥50% (ACR50) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Description
ACR50 was calculated as a ≥50% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥50% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Time Frame
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria ≥70% (ACR70) at Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Description
ACR70 was calculated as a ≥70% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥70% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Time Frame
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting American College of Rheumatology Response Criteria Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 20% (ACR20): Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Description
ACR20 was calculated as a ≥20% improvement from baseline in tender /painful and swollen joint counts and ≥20% improvement from baseline in 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's global assessment of arthritis, physician's global assessment of arthritis, patient's assessment of arthritis pain, HAQ-DI, and CRP. n=number of responders.
Time Frame
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score: Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Description
The HAQ-DI assesses the difficulty a patient has had in the past week in 8 domains of daily living activities: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and other activities. Each activity category consists of 2-3 items. For each question, level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 with 0=no difficulty, 1=some difficulty, 2=much difficulty, and 3=unable to do. The score for each domain is the maximum (worst) score from the items/questions within the domain. Higher score indicates greater disability. Overall score was computed as the sum of the domain scores divided by the number of domains answered. The total possible score ranged from 0 to 3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. Higher overall score indicates greater disability. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Week 2 and Months 1, 2, 4, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components: C-reactive Protein (CRP) Levels: Month 3
Description
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain: Month 3
Description
Participants assessed the severity of their arthritis pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (no pain) and 100 (most severe pain), which corresponded to the magnitude of their pain.
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
Description
Participants answered the following question, "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" The participant's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very well) and 100 (very poorly).
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis: Month 3
Description
The blinded investigator or qualified assessor assessed how the participant's overall arthritis appeared at the time of the visit. This was an evaluation based on the participant's disease signs, functional capacity and physical examination, and was independent of the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The investigator's response was recorded using a 100 mm VAS by placing a mark on the scale between 0 (very good) and 100 (very poor).
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Swollen Joint Count: Month 3
Description
Swollen joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty six (66) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered swelling.
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response Criteria Components Score: Tender/Painful Joint Count: Month 3
Description
Tender/painful joint counts are considered the most specific quantitative clinical measure used to assess the status of participants with inflammatory types of arthritis. Sixty eight (68) joints were assessed by a blinded assessor to determine the number of joints that were considered tender or painful.
Time Frame
Month 3
Title
Percentage of Participants Meeting Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC): Week 2, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Description
The PsARC covers 4 measures: Tender joint count, swollen joint count, the Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis, and the Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis. The PsARC response is defined as improvement in 2 of 4 items, 1 of which must be joint pain or swelling, without worsening in any measure. Improvement criteria: ≥20% improvement in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥20% improvement in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis; ≥30% improvement in tender joint count; and ≥30% improvement in swollen joint count. n=number of responders.
Time Frame
Week 2, Months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Psoriasis (PGA-PsO) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
Description
The PGA-PsO is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are rated separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale, scored as 0=none; 1, 2, 3, or 4=most severe. The severity rating scores are summed and the average taken; the total average is rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA-PsO score on a scale of 0 to 4 (0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe). n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, and 6
Title
Percentage of Participants With Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response: Months 1, 3, and 6
Description
PASI determines psoriasis severity based on lesion severity and percentage of body surface area (BSA) affected. Lesion severity is assessed for erythema, induration, and scaling evaluated separately for the head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs and then rated for each body area according to a 5 point scale: 0=no involvement; 1=slight; 2=moderate; 3=marked; 4=very marked. BSA involvement is the extent (%) of body area affected by psoriasis and is assigned a numerical score: 0=no involvement; 1=0% to 9%; 2=10% to 29%; 3=30% to 49%; 4=50% to 69%; 5=70% to 89%; 6=90% to 100%. In each area, the sum of the severity rating scores is multiplied by the score representing the percentage of this area involved by psoriasis, multiplied by a weighting factor (head 0.1; upper limbs 0.2; trunk 0.3; lower limbs 0.4). The sum of the numbers obtained for each of the 4 body areas is the PASI. PASI75 is defined as a 75% reduction from baseline in PASI. n=number of responders.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS): Months 1, 3, and 6
Description
Dactylitis is characterized by swelling of the entire finger or toe. The DSS is a function of finger circumference and tenderness, assessed and summed across all dactylitic digits. The severity of dactylitis is scored on a scale of 0-3, where 0=tenderness and 3=extreme tenderness in each digit of the hands and feet. The range of total dactylitis scores for a participant is 0-60. Higher score indicates greater degree of tenderness. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Index: Months 1, 3, and 6
Description
The SPARCC Enthesitis Index identifies the presence or absence of tenderness at 16 enthesial sites, including the bilateral Achilles tendons, plantar fascia insertion at the calcaneus, patellar tendon insertion at the base of the patella, quadriceps insertion into the superior border of the patella, supraspinatus insertion into the greater tuberosity of the humerus, and medial and lateral epicondyles. On examination, tenderness is recorded as present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 16 sites, with an overall total score ranging from 0 to 16. Higher score indicates a greater number of sites that are affected by enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI): Months 1, 3, and 6
Description
Enthesitis is inflammation in the tendon, ligament, and joint capsule fiber insertion into bone. The LEI assesses enthesitis in 6 sites. Tenderness is recorded as either present (1) or absent (0) for each of the 6 sites, for a total score of 0-6. Higher score indicates greater severity of enthesitis. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, and 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the physical component summary (PCS) score and the mental component summary (MCS) score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher PCS score represents better physical health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Component Summary Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The health domains are aggregated into two summary scores known as the PCS score and the MCS score. Normalized domain scores, PCS and MCS scores are used in the analyses. The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. A higher MCS score represents better mental health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Physical Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 10 items of the physical functioning scale represent levels & kinds of limitations between extremes of physical activities, including lifting & carrying groceries; climbing stairs; bending, kneeling, or stooping; walking moderate distances; self-care limitations. The physical functioning items capture the presence & extent of physical limitations using a 3-level response continuum. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher physical functioning domain score represents better physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-physical Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure evaluating 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, & mental health. The 4-item role-physical scale covers an array of physical health-related role limitations, including: a) limitations in the kind of work or other usual activities; b) reductions in the amount of time spent on work or other usual activities; c) difficulty performing work or other usual activities; & d) accomplishing less. Items in the role-physical scale are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-physical domain score represents better role-physical functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Bodily Pain Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The bodily pain scale comprises of 2 items pertaining to the intensity of bodily pain and extent of interference with normal work activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher bodily pain domain score represents less bodily pain. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): General Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The general health scale consists of 5 items including a rating of health and 4 items addressing the respondent's view and expectations of his or her health. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher general health domain score represents better general health perceptions. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Vitality Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 4-item measure of vitality captures a broad range of subjective evaluations of well-being from feelings of tiredness and being worn out to feeling full of energy all or most of the time. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher vitality domain score represents better vitality. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Social Functioning Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 2-item social functioning scale assesses health-related effects on quantity and quality of social activities. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher social functioning domain score represents better social functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Role-emotional Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 3-item role-emotional scale assesses mental health-related role limitations in terms of a) time spent in work or other usual activities; b) amount of work or activities accomplished; c) care with which work or other activities were performed. All 3 items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher role-emotional domain score represents better role-emotional functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in the Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2, Acute Components (SF-36v2 Acute): Mental Health Domain: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The SF-36v2 acute is a 36-item measure that evaluates 8 domains: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The 5-item mental health scale includes 1 or more items from each of 4 major mental health dimensions: anxiety, depression, loss of behavioral/emotional control, and psychological well-being. All items are answered on a 5-point scale. The domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T-scores for both the SF36 version 2 & SF36 health domain scales & component summary measures have means of 50 & standard deviations of 10. A higher mental health domain score represents better mental health functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Mobility: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Self-Care: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Usual Activities: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Pain/Discomfort: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on a Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Anxiety/Depression: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score on EuroQol-5 Dimension Health State Profile (EQ-5D) and Change in Patient's Self-rated Health on Vertical Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Recorded on the EQ-5D Questionnaire (EQ-VAS): Patient's Health State Today: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
The EQ-5D is a descriptive system of health-related quality of life states consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) each of which can take 1 of 3 responses. The responses record 3 levels of severity (no problems/some or moderate problems/extreme problems) within a particular EQ-5D dimension. Standard vertical 0 to 100 mm VAS (similar to a thermometer) for recording an individual's rating for their current health-related quality of life state, with a higher value representing better health status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Total Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better fatigue status. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Experience Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue experience. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) Scores: Impact Domain Score: Months 1, 3, 6
Description
FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire, with each item score ranging from 0 to 4. Three endpoints are derived: change in FACIT-F total score, change in FACIT-F experience domain score, and change in FACIT-F impact domain score. FACIT-F total score (range 0-52) is calculated by summing the 13 items. FACIT-F experience domain score (range 0-20) is calculated by summing 5 items : I feel fatigued, I feel weak all over, I feel listless ("washed out"), I feel tired, and I have energy, while FACIT-F impact domain score (range 0-32) is calculated by summing the remaining 8 items. All responses are added with equal weight to obtain the total score. Higher scores represent better (less) fatigue impact on daily functioning. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6
Title
Change From Baseline in Score Evaluating Spondylitis Using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI): Months 1, 3, 6
Description
BASDAI is a validated self-assessment tool used to determine disease activity in participants with ankylosing spondylitis. Utilizing a VAS of 0-10 (0=none and 10=very severe) participants answered 6 questions measuring discomfort, pain, and fatigue. The final BASDAI score averaged the individual assessments for a final score ranging 0-10cm, with higher scores representing more severe ankylosing spondylitis disease activity. n=number of participants evaluable at each visit.
Time Frame
Months 1, 3, 6

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Active arthritis at screening/baseline as indicated by >/= 3 tender/painful and 3 swollen joints Active plaque psoriasis at screening Inadequate efficacy or lack of toleration to previously administered TNF inhibitor Exclusion Criteria: Non-plaque forms of psoriasis (with exception of nail psoriasis) History of autoimmune rheumatic disease other than PsA; also prior history of or current, rheumatic inflammatory disease other than PsA
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates P.C.
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of North Alabama, PC
City
Huntsville
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35801-4414
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Associates, P.C.
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medvin Clinical Research
City
Covina
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91723
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Drug Information Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Diego Arthritis Medical Clinic
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Research Associates, LLC
City
Trumbull
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rheumatology Associates of Central Florida, PA
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millennium Research
City
Ormond Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32174
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis Center, Inc.
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34684
Country
United States
Facility Name
Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists (IRIS)
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Medical Clinic, P.A.
City
Zephyrhills
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33542
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Luke's Clinic - Rheumatology
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Luke's Intermountain Research Center
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83702
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bluegrass Community Research, Inc
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Klein & Associates, M.D., P.A.
City
Hagerstown
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21740
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center For Rheumatology And Bone Research
City
Wheaton
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20902
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham & Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Pharmacology Study Group
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01605
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Paul Rheumatology, PA
City
Eagan
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55121
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clayton Medical Research
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63117
Country
United States
Facility Name
Physician Research Collaboration, LLC
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68516
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC)
City
Lebanon
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Rheumatic Disease Study Group, Inc.
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paramount Medical Research & Consulting, LLC
City
Middleburg Heights
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44130
Country
United States
Facility Name
East Penn Rheumatology Associates, PC
City
Bethlehem
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
18015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Low Country Rheumatology, PA
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arthritis Clinic
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Tennessee Research Institute
City
Jackson
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Adriana M. Pop-Moody, M.D., Clinic, P.A.
City
Corpus Christi
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pioneer Research Solutions, Inc.
City
Cypress
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77429
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metroplex Clinical Research Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Shipment/Storage: Investigational Drug Services
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84112
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah Hospital & Clinics
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dynacare Laboratories
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seattle Rheumatology Associates
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Rheumatology Department
City
Camperdown
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2050
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Rheumatology Research Unit
City
Maroochydore
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4558
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Emeritus Research Pty Ltd
City
Malvern East
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3145
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Hospital Erasme - Clinique Universitaire de Bruxelles
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1070
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
ReumaClinic
City
Genk
ZIP/Postal Code
3600
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Hospital Leuven, Department of Rheumatology
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
ZNA Jan Palfijn
City
Merksem
ZIP/Postal Code
2170
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
CMIP: Centro Mineiro de Pesquisa Ltda /
City
Juiz de Fora
State/Province
MG
ZIP/Postal Code
36010-570
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
CETAC - DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM (image only)
City
Curitiba
State/Province
PR
ZIP/Postal Code
80240-160
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
EDUMED - Educacao em Saude SS LTDA.
City
Curitiba
State/Province
PR
ZIP/Postal Code
80440-080
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA) / UFRGS
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
RS
ZIP/Postal Code
90035-003
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Clinica Medica Bonfiglioli Ltda. / Clinica Bonfiglioli
City
Campinas
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
13015-001
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Radiologia Clínica de Campinas - RCC (Images only)
City
Campinas
State/Province
São Paulo
ZIP/Postal Code
13015-240
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Medical Plus s.r.o.
City
Uherske Hradiste
ZIP/Postal Code
68601
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Centre Hospitalier Sud-Francilien - Secretariat de Rhumatologie
City
Corbeil-Essonnes
State/Province
Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
91106
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital Avicenne
City
Bobigny
ZIP/Postal Code
93000
Country
France
Facility Name
Rheumazentrum Prof. Dr. med Gunther Neeck
City
Bad Doberan
ZIP/Postal Code
18209
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
10117
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Rheumapraxis Steglitz
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
12161
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Schlosspark-Klinik
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
14059
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen, Medizinische Klinik 3
City
Erlangen
ZIP/Postal Code
91054
Country
Germany
Facility Name
CIRI - Centrum für innovative Diagnostik und Therapie Rheumatologie/Immunologie (GmbH)
City
Frankfurt am Main
ZIP/Postal Code
60528
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Universitatsklinik Freiburg
City
Freiburg
ZIP/Postal Code
79106
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Des Saarlandes Und Medizinische Fakultaet Der Universitaet Des Saarlandes
City
Homburg
ZIP/Postal Code
66421
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital of Cologne
City
Koeln
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Elisabeth Klinik Bigge
City
Olsberg
ZIP/Postal Code
59939
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Hospital Angeles Clinica Londres
City
Mexico City
State/Province
D.F
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Grupo Medico Camino S.C.
City
Mexico City
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
03310
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
CLIDITER, S.A. de C.V.
City
Mexico
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
06700
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Universidad La Salle AC
City
Mexico
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
14000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Medica Sur, S.A.B. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
City
Mexico
State/Province
Distrito Federal
ZIP/Postal Code
14050
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro Integral en Reumatologia SA de CV
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44160
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Grupo Santa Bernardette S.A. de C.V.
City
Guadalajara
State/Province
Jalisco
ZIP/Postal Code
44200
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion de Tratamientos Innovadores de Sinaloa, S.C
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Sanatorio CEMSI Chapultepec (For Emergencies Only)
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80040
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Hospital General de Culiacan "Dr. Bernardo J. Gastelum"
City
Culiacan
State/Province
Sinaloa
ZIP/Postal Code
80230
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Star Medica S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
City
Merdia
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97133
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Institute Medico Panamericano, S.A. de C.V. (For Emergencies Only)
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Unidad Reumatologica Las Americas SCP
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro de Investigacion Clinica Pensiones
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97070
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centro Multidisciplinario para el Desarrollo
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97130
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Hospital Star Medica Merida (For Emergencies Only)
City
Merida
State/Province
Yucatan
ZIP/Postal Code
97133
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Christus Muguerza del parque, S.A de C.V
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Investigacion y Biomedicina de Chihuahua
City
Chihuahua
ZIP/Postal Code
31000
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Centrum Kliniczno-Badawcze J.Brzezicki, B.Gornikiewicz-Brzez
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Radiologii for X-Ray only
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Centrum Reumatologiczne Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska Lek. Med. Barbara Bazela
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony Zaklad Radiologii
City
Elblag
ZIP/Postal Code
82-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Przychodnia Specjalistyczna Lekarskiej Spozielni Pracy "Medica" for X-Ray Only
City
Grodzisk Mazowiecki
ZIP/Postal Code
05-825
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie "DERMED" Anna Kaszuba
City
Lodz
ZIP/Postal Code
90-265
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Lecznica MAK-MED S.C.
City
Nadarzyn
ZIP/Postal Code
05-830
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Prywatna Praktyka Lekarska Prof. UM dr hab. Pawel Hrycaj
City
Poznan
ZIP/Postal Code
61-397
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Reumatika Centrum Reumatologii nzoz
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-691
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Regional State Budgetary Healthcare Institution of Karelia Republic "Republic Hospital n.a.
City
Petrozavodsk
State/Province
Karelia Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
185019
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Autonomic Healthcare Institution City Clinical Hospital # 7
City
Kazan
State/Province
Republic of Tatarstan, Russia
ZIP/Postal Code
420103
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
SBIH of Moscow "City Clinical Hospital#1 n. a. N.I. Pirogov" of the Healthcare Department of Moscow
City
Moscow
ZIP/Postal Code
119049
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
City Neurological Centre "SibNeyroMed", LLC
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630091
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Limited Liability Company Consultative Diagnostic Rheumatology Center "Healthy Joints"
City
Novosibirsk
ZIP/Postal Code
630099
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Budget Educational Institution of Highest Professional Education
City
Tomsk
ZIP/Postal Code
634050
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
State Institution of Healthcare of Yaroslavl Region
City
Yaroslavl
ZIP/Postal Code
150003
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
MEDMAN s.r.o. - reumatologicka ambulancia
City
Martin
ZIP/Postal Code
036 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico de Santiago
City
Santiago De Compostela
State/Province
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli
City
Sabadell
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08208
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
City
Santander
State/Province
Cantabria
ZIP/Postal Code
39008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Sierrallana
City
Torrelavega
State/Province
Cantabria
ZIP/Postal Code
39300
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruna
City
A Coruna
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitaro Y Politecnico La Fe
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
46026
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
State/Province
Taiwan Roc
ZIP/Postal Code
11217
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Buddhist Dalin Tzu Chi General Hospital
City
Chia-Yi
ZIP/Postal Code
62247
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Chang Gung Medical Foundation-Kaohsiung Branch
City
Kaohsiung City
ZIP/Postal Code
83301
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40201
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
China Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
ZIP/Postal Code
40447
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Goodmayes
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
IG3 8YB
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
City
Romford
State/Province
Essex
ZIP/Postal Code
RM7 0AG
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust
City
Dudley
State/Province
West Midlands
ZIP/Postal Code
DY1 2HQ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Bradford Royal Infirmary, BTHFT
City
Bradford
State/Province
West Yorkeshire
ZIP/Postal Code
BD9 6RJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Royal United Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Bath
ZIP/Postal Code
BA1 1RL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Bradford
ZIP/Postal Code
BD5 0NA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
York Hospital, York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
City
York
ZIP/Postal Code
YO31 8HE
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36076054
Citation
de Vlam K, Mease PJ, Bushmakin AG, Fleischmann R, Ogdie A, Azevedo VF, Merola JF, Woolcott J, Cappelleri JC, Fallon L, Taylor PC. Identifying and Quantifying the Role of Inflammation in Pain Reduction for Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis Treated With Tofacitinib: A Mediation Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Oct;9(5):1451-1464. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00482-5. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36045453
Citation
Orbai AM, Mease PJ, Helliwell PS, FitzGerald O, Fleishaker DL, Mundayat R, Young P. Effect of tofacitinib on dactylitis and patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: post-hoc analysis of phase III studies. BMC Rheumatol. 2022 Sep 1;6(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s41927-022-00298-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35385361
Citation
Taylor PC, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Young P, Germino R, Merola JF, Yosipovitch G. Relationships of dermatologic symptoms and quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis: analysis of two tofacitinib phase III studies. J Dermatolog Treat. 2022 Aug;33(5):2614-2620. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2022.2060924. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
35139908
Citation
Gladman DD, Coates LC, Wu J, Fallon L, Bacci ED, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Helliwell PS. Time to response for clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib, adalimumab, or placebo. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Feb 9;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02721-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34921355
Citation
Dikranian A, Gold D, Bessette L, Nash P, Azevedo VF, Wang L, Woolcott J, Shapiro AB, Szumski A, Fleishaker D, Wollenhaupt J. Frequency and Duration of Early Non-serious Adverse Events in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Tofacitinib. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Apr;9(2):411-433. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00405-w. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34870800
Citation
Winthrop KL, Curtis JR, Yamaoka K, Lee EB, Hirose T, Rivas JL, Kwok K, Burmester GR. Clinical Management of Herpes Zoster in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Tofacitinib Treatment. Rheumatol Ther. 2022 Feb;9(1):243-263. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00390-0. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34510295
Citation
Kivitz AJ, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Pang S, Azevedo VF, Wang C, Takiya L. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib by background methotrexate dose in psoriatic arthritis: post hoc exploratory analysis from two phase III trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2022 Feb;41(2):499-511. doi: 10.1007/s10067-021-05894-2. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34226183
Citation
de Vlam K, Ogdie A, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Fleischmann R, Taylor PC, Azevedo V, Fallon L, Woolcott J, Mease PJ. Median time to pain improvement and the impact of baseline pain severity on pain response in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with tofacitinib. RMD Open. 2021 Jul;7(2):e001609. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001609.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33766074
Citation
Coates LC, Bushmakin AG, FitzGerald O, Gladman DD, Fallon L, Cappelleri JC, Hsu MA, Helliwell PS. Relationships between psoriatic arthritis composite measures of disease activity with patient-reported outcomes in phase 3 studies of tofacitinib. Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 Mar 26;23(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02474-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32910531
Citation
Ritchlin CT, Giles JT, Ogdie A, Gomez-Reino JJ, Helliwell P, Young P, Wang C, Wu J, Romero AB, Woolcott J, Stockert L. Tofacitinib in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Metabolic Syndrome: A Post hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2020 Oct;2(10):543-554. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11166. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32816215
Citation
Panaccione R, Isaacs JD, Chen LA, Wang W, Marren A, Kwok K, Wang L, Chan G, Su C. Characterization of Creatine Kinase Levels in Tofacitinib-Treated Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Results from Clinical Trials. Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2732-2743. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06560-4. Epub 2020 Aug 20. Erratum In: Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Oct 10;:
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32006348
Citation
Burmester GR, Curtis JR, Yun H, FitzGerald O, Winthrop KL, Azevedo VF, Rigby WFC, Kanik KS, Wang C, Biswas P, Jones T, Palmetto N, Hendrikx T, Menon S, Rojo R. An Integrated Analysis of the Safety of Tofacitinib in Psoriatic Arthritis across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies with Comparison to Real-World Observational Data. Drug Saf. 2020 Apr;43(4):379-392. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-00904-9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31112005
Citation
Gladman DD, Charles-Schoeman C, McInnes IB, Veale DJ, Thiers B, Nurmohamed M, Graham D, Wang C, Jones T, Wolk R, DeMasi R. Changes in Lipid Levels and Incidence of Cardiovascular Events Following Tofacitinib Treatment in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: A Pooled Analysis Across Phase III and Long-Term Extension Studies. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2019 Oct;71(10):1387-1395. doi: 10.1002/acr.23930.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31111255
Citation
Cella D, Wilson H, Shalhoub H, Revicki DA, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Kudlacz E, Hsu MA. Content validity and psychometric evaluation of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 May 20;3(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0115-4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30713722
Citation
Strand V, de Vlam K, Covarrubias-Cobos JA, Mease PJ, Gladman DD, Chen L, Kudlacz E, Wu J, Cappelleri JC, Hendrikx T, Hsu MA. Effect of tofacitinib on patient-reported outcomes in patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in the phase III, randomised controlled trial: OPAL Beyond. RMD Open. 2019 Jan 11;5(1):e000808. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000808. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30680661
Citation
Cella D, Wilson H, Shalhoub H, Revicki DA, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Kudlacz E, Hsu MA. Content validity and psychometric evaluation of Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jan 24;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0094-5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30414064
Citation
Nash P, Coates LC, Fleischmann R, Papp KA, Gomez-Reino JJ, Kanik KS, Wang C, Wu J, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Ports WC. Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies. Rheumatol Ther. 2018 Dec;5(2):567-582. doi: 10.1007/s40744-018-0131-5. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30373651
Citation
Helliwell P, Coates LC, FitzGerald O, Nash P, Soriano ER, Elaine Husni M, Hsu MA, Kanik KS, Hendrikx T, Wu J, Kudlacz E. Disease-specific composite measures for psoriatic arthritis are highly responsive to a Janus kinase inhibitor treatment that targets multiple domains of disease. Arthritis Res Ther. 2018 Oct 29;20(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s13075-018-1739-0.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29045207
Citation
Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF, Behrens F, Blanco R, Kaszuba A, Kudlacz E, Wang C, Menon S, Hendrikx T, Kanik KS. Tofacitinib for Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients with an Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 19;377(16):1525-1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615977.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A3921125&StudyName=Tofacitinib%20In%20Psoriatic%20Arthritis%20Subjects%20With%20Inadequate%20Response%20to%20TNF%20Inhibitors
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.

Learn more about this trial

Tofacitinib In Psoriatic Arthritis Subjects With Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs