search
Back to results

Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer (EPIC)

Primary Purpose

Early Stage Breast Carcinoma

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
implanted port for chemo administration (X-port isp)
Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Sponsored by
Centre Henri Becquerel
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Early Stage Breast Carcinoma focused on measuring Early breast cancer, Chemotherapy, PICC line, Implanted port

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women age > 18
  • Documented breast cancer
  • No Her2 overexpression
  • Patients operated with curative intent (no distant metastasis at diagnosis)
  • Patients undergoing an adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin 100mg/m² and cyclophosphamide ) followed by 3 courses of Taxotere, or 6FEC100 (according to CHB refencial for localised breast cancer treatment).
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bilateral axillary node dissection
  • History of bilateral upper thoracic irradiation
  • Cutaneous disease (eczema, scleroderma, infection…) at catheter insertion site (arm or upper thorax)
  • Recent thrombosis of the upper body
  • Therapeutic anticoagulation
  • Tracheotomy
  • Treatment for bacteriemia in process
  • Altered hemostasis: INR > 1.5 ; APTT > 1.5 , platelets < 60 G/l
  • Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 60mL/min
  • Involvement in another trial
  • Contraindication to chemotherapy by FEC 100 or taxotere
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Protected major patient (under guardianship).
  • Psychosocial disorders : decompensated mental disorders, no social security coverage, patient who does not speak french

Sites / Locations

  • Centre Henri Becquerel

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

PICC line

Implanted Port

Arm Description

Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)

Use of an implanted port for chemo administration

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device
To define between the two device (PICC line and implanted port) which one provides the less probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the device (SAERD), from the insertion to the first consultation of survey (36-38 weeks after implantation of the device which is also 5 months after its ablation).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Patients' satisfaction for the use of their central venous device
Evaluation of the patients' satisfaction assessed by the QLQ C30, and by a 19 questions home-made questionnaire dedicated to the use of central veinous devices

Full Information

First Posted
October 25, 2013
Last Updated
July 20, 2018
Sponsor
Centre Henri Becquerel
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02095743
Brief Title
Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer
Acronym
EPIC
Official Title
Phase II Randomised Study Comparing the Tolerance of PICC Line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) and Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in HER2-negative Early Breast Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Centre Henri Becquerel

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Adjuvant chemotherapy is frequently proposed to patients presenting early breast cancer, in case of high risk of recurrence (large tumors, node involvement, high grade…). Due to its toxicity toward veins, chemotherapy must be administered through a central venous device. Today, one can use either an implanted port or a PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter). A PICC line is easier to implant and to explant, but has to be flushed every week and may impact daily life (no swimming, some clothes may not fit). On the other hand, a port is subcutaneous and lets patients lead a normal life, but its implant and explant require a cutaneous incision with possible complications (bleeding, pain, infection). For both venous devices, complications such as thrombosis or infection may happen. Published data comparing the two devices are heterogeneous and do not often distinguish patients treated for different diseases at various stages. Empirically in daily practice, for long term use (>6 months) a port is usually preferred, whereas for short-term treatments (<6 weeks) a PICC line is used. In the case of Her2 negative early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy usually lasts 4 to 5 months. There is no scientific evidence for preferring one device to the other for these patients. The aim of this study is to prospectively compare the patients' satisfaction and tolerance of each of the two devices.
Detailed Description
The intravenous device will be randomly attributed. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen will be selected according the standards of the center ( 6 cycles of FEC100 or 3 cycles of FEC100 then 3 cycles of Taxotere (docetaxel). The patient will be followed as per center's standards and visits (prior, during and after every drug administration, then monthly for six months). All Adverse Events will be reported.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Early Stage Breast Carcinoma
Keywords
Early breast cancer, Chemotherapy, PICC line, Implanted port

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
256 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PICC line
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Arm Title
Implanted Port
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Use of an implanted port for chemo administration
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
implanted port for chemo administration (X-port isp)
Other Intervention Name(s)
X-port isp M.R.I Implantable Port (Bard Access Systems Inc)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Use of a PICC line for chemo administration (PowerPICC SOLO²)
Other Intervention Name(s)
kit PowerPICC SOLO² (Bard Access Systems Inc)
Intervention Description
The description of the device could found on the published marketing authorisation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the central venous device
Description
To define between the two device (PICC line and implanted port) which one provides the less probability of occurrence of a significant adverse event related to the device (SAERD), from the insertion to the first consultation of survey (36-38 weeks after implantation of the device which is also 5 months after its ablation).
Time Frame
37 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Patients' satisfaction for the use of their central venous device
Description
Evaluation of the patients' satisfaction assessed by the QLQ C30, and by a 19 questions home-made questionnaire dedicated to the use of central veinous devices
Time Frame
1 year

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women age > 18 Documented breast cancer No Her2 overexpression Patients operated with curative intent (no distant metastasis at diagnosis) Patients undergoing an adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 3 courses of FEC 100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin 100mg/m² and cyclophosphamide ) followed by 3 courses of Taxotere, or 6FEC100 (according to CHB refencial for localised breast cancer treatment). Signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Bilateral axillary node dissection History of bilateral upper thoracic irradiation Cutaneous disease (eczema, scleroderma, infection…) at catheter insertion site (arm or upper thorax) Recent thrombosis of the upper body Therapeutic anticoagulation Tracheotomy Treatment for bacteriemia in process Altered hemostasis: INR > 1.5 ; APTT > 1.5 , platelets < 60 G/l Renal failure with creatinine clearance < 60mL/min Involvement in another trial Contraindication to chemotherapy by FEC 100 or taxotere Pregnancy or breast feeding Protected major patient (under guardianship). Psychosocial disorders : decompensated mental disorders, no social security coverage, patient who does not speak french
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Florian Clatot, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Centre Henri Becquerel
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Centre Henri Becquerel
City
Rouen
ZIP/Postal Code
76038
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26342484
Citation
Lefebvre L, Noyon E, Georgescu D, Proust V, Alexandru C, Leheurteur M, Thery JC, Savary L, Rigal O, Di Fiore F, Veyret C, Clatot F. Port catheter versus peripherally inserted central catheter for postoperative chemotherapy in early breast cancer: a retrospective analysis of 448 patients. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Mar;24(3):1397-403. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2901-8. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Tolerance of PICC Line Versus Implanted Port for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs