Feasibility of recruitment among all patients
We will report number of participants who agree to participate out of those eligible, evaluated at the end of study for all participants.
Appropriateness rated by participants randomized to TOR, assessed by the Credibility and Expectancy Scale
Rate of participant's expectations and believed credibility for program, with range 3 to 27 and higher ratings indicating more belief that the program is logical and will help with the intended outcome.
Feasibility of data collection
We will report number of patients who complete assessments at each time-point.
Acceptability of treatment (satisfaction) assessed with the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (patients randomized to TOR only)
Participant's satisfaction with treatment received after completion of TOR. Items are summed to generate a total score; scores range from 3 to 12, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.
Acceptability of TOR (attendance for patients randomized to TOR)
We will report number of sessions attended for participants enrolled to TOR.
Feasibility of randomization/adherence to assigned arm for all enrolled patients all enrolled patients
We will report number of participants who are randomized within one arm and complete post-test.
Orthopedic staff feasibility of referral
We will report number of surgeons who make at least 5 referrals per site. We will keep track of the referring source and report number of referrals made by each surgeon.
Fidelity to study procedures
We will report number of protocol deviations per site among all enrolled patients.
Adherence to TOR homework
We will report number of homework logs that are returned with 4 out of 7 days of practice among patients randomized to TOR.
Acceptability as rated by therapist
We will report number of participants who score over 7 out of 10 on the therapist rating of participation quality in each session among patients randomized to TOR.
Perceived acceptability for those who completed the satisfaction measures
We will report number of surgeons and staff who score over 7 on satisfaction measure, among completers.
Perceived acceptability of staff regarding ease of referral
We will report number of surgeons and staff who score over 7 on ease of referral measure, among completers.
Perceived acceptability of staff regarding cost-benefit
We will report number of surgeons and staff who score over 7 on cost-benefit measure, among completers.
Feasibility of study implementation as perceived by study staff
We will report number of surgeons and staff who score over 7 on Feasibility of study implementation as perceived by study staff who completed measures.
Appropriateness as perceived by study staff
We will report number of surgeons and staff who score over 7 on Appropriateness as perceived by study staff who completed measures.
Feasibility of collecting Orthopedic staff satisfaction measures
We will report number of surgeons and study staff who complete the measure.
Feasibility of obtaining data on Orthopedic staff perceived ease of referrals
We will report number of surgeons and study staff who complete the measure.
Feasibility of obtaining data on Orthopedic staff perceived cost-benefit
We will report number of surgeons and study staff who complete the measure.
Feasibility of collecting data on feasibility of study implementation
We will report number of surgeons and staff who complete the data.
Feasibility of collecting appropriateness measures
We will report number of surgeons and staff who complete appropriateness measure.
Numerical Rating Scale
Rate of participant's pain at rest and with activity using the Numerical Rating Scale, a Likert scale with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain.
Physical function self-report
The PROMIS Physical Function (v1.0 8b) assesses one's ability to carry out activities that require physical actions ranging from self-care to social and work. Items ranging from 1-4, and total scores ranging from 8-40, with a higher score reflect greater physical function.
Physical function performance-based
The Timed 10 Meter Walk Test will be used for those with lower extremity injury or body injury, which measures how fast one can walk 10 meters, which is a valid indicator for evaluating the physical function. The Grip Test using a dynamometer will be used for those with upper extremity injuries and measures the amount of muscular strength or the maximum force/tension generated by one's forearm muscles, as a method for assessing physical function.
Coping and emotional function
The Center for Epidemiologic Study of Depression (CES-D), a 20-item measure assesses depressive symptomatology; scores range from 0-60 and higher scores indicate greater depressive symptomatology. The 17-item PTSD Checklist civilian measure assesses post-traumatic stress; scores range from 17-85 with higher scores indicating greater post-traumatic stress. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), a 13-item measure assesses hopelessness, helplessness and rumination about pain, with items ranging from 0-4 and total scores ranging from 0-52, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain catastrophizing. The Pain Anxiety Scale, short form (PASS-20) assesses cognitive and somatic symptoms of anxiety, items range from 0-100 and higher scores indicating greater pain anxiety. The Measure of Current Status (MOCS-A) assesses ability to engage in healthy coping skills, with items ranging from 0-4, total score ranging from 0-52, and higher scores reflecting more usage of general coping skills.
Feasibility of data collection for performance based measures of physical function (walk/grip test) at each of the 3 time points
We will report number of enrolled participants who will have complete for performance based measures of physical function (Walk/Grip test).
Feasibility of data collection of rescue analgesics (non-narcotic)
We will report number of participants with complete data on rescue analgesics (non-narcotic) among enrolled patients with orthopedic injuries via self-report log.
Feasibility of data collection of rescue analgesics (narcotic)
We will report number of participants with complete data on rescue analgesics (narcotic) among enrolled patients with orthopedic injuries via self-report log.
Adverse events
We will report number of adverse events among all enrolled patients with orthopedic injuries.
Feasibility of data collection of adverse events
We will report number of participants with complete data on adverse events among enrolled patients with orthopedic injuries.
Therapist adherence/fidelity to session
We will report number of participants who present ≥75 adherence (checklist and audio recordings).
Within group change in rescue analgesics (non-narcotic)
Self-report of past-week rescue analgesics use collected before each intervention session.
Within group change in narcotic analgesics
Self-report of past-week narcotic rescue analgesics use collected before each intervention session.