Topcon Endpoint Management (Topcon EM)
Primary Purpose
Diabetic Macular Edema
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Topcon Endpoint Management laser
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Macular Edema focused on measuring Diabetic Macular Edema, DME, Laser, Topcon, EndPoint Management
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must have macular edema involving the center of the macula with a corresponding leakage on fluorescein angiography.
- Thickening of the fovea of at least 300 microns (thickness of the central point in OCT) with a standard deviation of the center point <10% and signal strength of ≥ 5 OCT ILM and borders (internal limiting membrane) and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) properly identified. Also, the initial OCT must be confirmed by repeated measurements on the same day, with the thickness of the central point being within 10% between measurements. In cases where the OCT imaging program can not properly define the limits of ILM and RPE, if the investigator can obtain an estimate of the thickness of the manual by OCT central point of at least 300 microns, the patient will be considered eligible.
- The distance visual acuity in the better eye corrected the study must have an index between 70 and 35 letters inclusive (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200).
- Clear media and eye pupil dilation adequate to allow fundus photography with good quality.
- Intraocular pressure not exceeding 21 mmHg.
- The ophthalmologist should feel comfortable with the delay of the focal laser treatment (direct and grid, as needed) by at least 12 weeks in the study eye.
- Patients with diabetes Type I or Type II as defined by WHO criteria of any gender and age ≥ 18 years.
- Ability to provide a written consent.
- Ability to return for all study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Eyes with scatter photocoagulation (PRP) one month prior the enrollment, or eyes where scatter photocoagulation is required now, or it likely to be needed over the next 6months (for example, eyes with high risk PDR DRS not properly treated with photocoagulation).
- Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound the assessment of the improvement in visual acuity in eyes with macular edema to resolve or improve as an area of hard exudates involving the foveal avascular zone (FAZ - involving 2 or more quadrants centered around the foveal avascular zone), epiretinal membrane associated with signs of contraction and / or significant opacification (ie, striations within the diameter of a disc from the center of the fovea), or the presence of chorioretinal atrophy involving the center of the macula.
- Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and / or OCT, which in the opinion of the investigator, contributes to macular edema (associated or cause a detachment of the fovea) and prevents the improvement with treatment.
- Any cause of macular edema other than DME.
- Atrophy / scar / fibrosis involving the center of the macula, including evidence of atrophy treated with laser within 200 microns of the FAZ.
- Patients who received panphotocoagulation, YAG laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation (for retinal tears) or focal or grid photocoagulation within the last 12 weeks or more of treatment with focal or grid laser.
- Significant opacities of the optical medium, including cataracts, which may interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or photography background. Patients will not be included if they have high probability of requiring cataract surgery within the next year.
- Any intraocular surgery within 6 months prior to study entry.
- Prior peeling of epiretinal membrane or inner limiting membrane.
- Any major surgical procedure within one month of study entry
- Prior irradiation of the head region of the eye under study.
- Any previous pharmacological treatment for DME (including corticosteroid intravitreal, subconjunctival or subtenon) or at any time during the last 90 days for any other condition.
- Important known allergies to sodium fluorescein dye used in angiography.
- Acute ocular or periocular infection.
Sites / Locations
- Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Topcon Endpoint Management Laser
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Changes in Visual acuity
Improvement in visual acuity > 10 letters or two lines in the ETDRS chart
Reduction of the central macular thickness by SD-OCT
Reduction of the central macular thickness by SD-OCT
Secondary Outcome Measures
Cessation of leakage areas on FA
Use of fluorescein angiography to assess leakage and identify laser burn
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01732614
First Posted
November 14, 2012
Last Updated
March 19, 2014
Sponsor
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Collaborators
Topcon Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01732614
Brief Title
Topcon Endpoint Management
Acronym
Topcon EM
Official Title
Safety Assessment and Therapeutic Effect of Non-damaging Patterned Scanning Laser Phototherapy in Patients With Diffuse Diabetic Macular Edema
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Collaborators
Topcon Corporation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This trial seeks to prove that sub-lethal laser power levels are as effective and less damaging than traditional laser. Diabetic macular edema (DME) affects approximately 29% of diabetic patients with a disease duration of 20 or more years and is one of the most frequent causes of vision loss in this population. The Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) demonstrated a significant benefit of laser photocoagulation for the treatment of clinically significant macular edema, reducing the incidence of vision loss by approximately 50% at 3 years' follow-up.
Detailed Description
Sub-visible, non-damaging visible laser (532 nm) exposures of 100 ms in duration resulted in enhanced expression of heat shock proteins in the retina. To test clinical efficacy of sub-visible retinal therapy using ms-range exposures of visible lasers one needs first to establish proper titration methods necessary to assure on one hand the lack of tissue damage, and on the other hand sufficient hyperthermia to elicit cellular response.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Macular Edema
Keywords
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME, Laser, Topcon, EndPoint Management
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Topcon Endpoint Management Laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Topcon Endpoint Management laser
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in Visual acuity
Description
Improvement in visual acuity > 10 letters or two lines in the ETDRS chart
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Reduction of the central macular thickness by SD-OCT
Description
Reduction of the central macular thickness by SD-OCT
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cessation of leakage areas on FA
Description
Use of fluorescein angiography to assess leakage and identify laser burn
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The patient must have macular edema involving the center of the macula with a corresponding leakage on fluorescein angiography.
Thickening of the fovea of at least 300 microns (thickness of the central point in OCT) with a standard deviation of the center point <10% and signal strength of ≥ 5 OCT ILM and borders (internal limiting membrane) and RPE (retinal pigment epithelium) properly identified. Also, the initial OCT must be confirmed by repeated measurements on the same day, with the thickness of the central point being within 10% between measurements. In cases where the OCT imaging program can not properly define the limits of ILM and RPE, if the investigator can obtain an estimate of the thickness of the manual by OCT central point of at least 300 microns, the patient will be considered eligible.
The distance visual acuity in the better eye corrected the study must have an index between 70 and 35 letters inclusive (Snellen equivalent of 20/40 to 20/200).
Clear media and eye pupil dilation adequate to allow fundus photography with good quality.
Intraocular pressure not exceeding 21 mmHg.
The ophthalmologist should feel comfortable with the delay of the focal laser treatment (direct and grid, as needed) by at least 12 weeks in the study eye.
Patients with diabetes Type I or Type II as defined by WHO criteria of any gender and age ≥ 18 years.
Ability to provide a written consent.
Ability to return for all study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Eyes with scatter photocoagulation (PRP) one month prior the enrollment, or eyes where scatter photocoagulation is required now, or it likely to be needed over the next 6months (for example, eyes with high risk PDR DRS not properly treated with photocoagulation).
Presence of any abnormality that is likely to confound the assessment of the improvement in visual acuity in eyes with macular edema to resolve or improve as an area of hard exudates involving the foveal avascular zone (FAZ - involving 2 or more quadrants centered around the foveal avascular zone), epiretinal membrane associated with signs of contraction and / or significant opacification (ie, striations within the diameter of a disc from the center of the fovea), or the presence of chorioretinal atrophy involving the center of the macula.
Vitreomacular traction determined clinically and / or OCT, which in the opinion of the investigator, contributes to macular edema (associated or cause a detachment of the fovea) and prevents the improvement with treatment.
Any cause of macular edema other than DME.
Atrophy / scar / fibrosis involving the center of the macula, including evidence of atrophy treated with laser within 200 microns of the FAZ.
Patients who received panphotocoagulation, YAG laser, or peripheral retinal cryoablation (for retinal tears) or focal or grid photocoagulation within the last 12 weeks or more of treatment with focal or grid laser.
Significant opacities of the optical medium, including cataracts, which may interfere with visual acuity, assessment of toxicity or photography background. Patients will not be included if they have high probability of requiring cataract surgery within the next year.
Any intraocular surgery within 6 months prior to study entry.
Prior peeling of epiretinal membrane or inner limiting membrane.
Any major surgical procedure within one month of study entry
Prior irradiation of the head region of the eye under study.
Any previous pharmacological treatment for DME (including corticosteroid intravitreal, subconjunctival or subtenon) or at any time during the last 90 days for any other condition.
Important known allergies to sodium fluorescein dye used in angiography.
Acute ocular or periocular infection.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pravin U Dugel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Retinal Consultants of Arizona
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85014
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Topcon Endpoint Management
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs