Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Primary Purpose
Rectal Cancer
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transanal total mesorectal excision
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rectal Cancer focused on measuring TaTME, Rectal cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years < age < 80 years
- Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
- Tumor located in mid and low rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection)
- Pathological rectal carcinoma
- Clinically diagnosed cT1-3N0-2 M0 lesions according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual with or without neoadjuvant therapeutic history
- Tumor size of 5 cm or less
- ECOG score is 0-1
- ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
- Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Requiring a Mile's procedure
- Fecal incontinence
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- Pregnant woman or lactating woman
- Severe mental disease
- Intolerance of surgery for severe comorbidities
- Previous abdominal surgery
- Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by rectal cancer
- Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
Sites / Locations
- Ruijin Hospital North
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
TaTME
LaTME
Arm Description
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Positive rate of circumferential resection margin (pathological assessment)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Completeness of mesorectum
Pathological assessment of completeness of the TME specimen(complete, near
Lymph node detection
Lymph nodes harvested(numbers)
Distal safety margin
Length of distal margin (millimeter,mm)
Operative time
Operative time(minutes)
Intraoperative blood loss
Estimated blood loss(milliliters,ml)
Length of stay
Duration of hospital stay(days after surgery)
Postoperative recovery course
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and soft diet (hours after surgery)
Early morbidity rate
Morbidity rate 30 days after surgery
Pain score
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-10 points)tool on postoperative day 1, 2, 3 and the day of discharge
3-year disease free survival rate
3-year disease free survival rate
5-year overall survival rate
5-year overall survival rate
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03413930
Brief Title
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
Official Title
Single-center Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of the Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in Rectal Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
No funding was raised
Study Start Date
June 2019 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2026 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ruijin Hospital
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is designed to evaluate the short-term and long-term results after transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for the resection of mid and low rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision(LaTME).
Detailed Description
Colorectal cancer (CRC) including rectal cancer is one of the most common gastrointestinal tumors, and its incidence is third in the world. At present,surgical treatments is the main means to cure CRC. Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the gold standard for rectal cancer surgery. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was recently developed to overcome technical difficulties associated with LaTME and open TME. Most reports are retrospective studies. More studies, especially large-scale, randomized controlled trials are needed to establish the best indications for TaTME for mid and low rectal cancer.This is a single-center, open-label, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial. A total of 120 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to TaTME group and LaTME group at a 1:1 ratio. It will provide valuable clinical evidence for the objective assessment of the oncological safety,efficacy and potential benefits of TaTME compared with LaTME for mid and low rectal cancer.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rectal Cancer
Keywords
TaTME, Rectal cancer, Laparoscopic Surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
TaTME
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)
Arm Title
LaTME
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with mid or low rectal cancer undergo laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transanal total mesorectal excision
Intervention Description
Patients undergo transanal total mesorectal excision.(assisted by laparoscopy to control the IMA)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision
Intervention Description
Patients undergo Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Circumferential resection margin (CRM)
Description
Positive rate of circumferential resection margin (pathological assessment)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Completeness of mesorectum
Description
Pathological assessment of completeness of the TME specimen(complete, near
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Lymph node detection
Description
Lymph nodes harvested(numbers)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Distal safety margin
Description
Length of distal margin (millimeter,mm)
Time Frame
14 days after surgery
Title
Operative time
Description
Operative time(minutes)
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Intraoperative blood loss
Description
Estimated blood loss(milliliters,ml)
Time Frame
Intraoperative
Title
Length of stay
Description
Duration of hospital stay(days after surgery)
Time Frame
1-30 days after surgery
Title
Postoperative recovery course
Description
Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet and soft diet (hours after surgery)
Time Frame
1-14 days after surgery
Title
Early morbidity rate
Description
Morbidity rate 30 days after surgery
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Pain score
Description
Postoperative pain is recorded using the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score (0-10 points)tool on postoperative day 1, 2, 3 and the day of discharge
Time Frame
1-3 days after surgery
Title
3-year disease free survival rate
Description
3-year disease free survival rate
Time Frame
36 months after surgery
Title
5-year overall survival rate
Description
5-year overall survival rate
Time Frame
60 months after surgery
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years < age < 80 years
Body mass index (BMI) <30 kg/m2
Tumor located in mid and low rectum ( the lower border of the tumor is located distal to the peritoneal reflection)
Pathological rectal carcinoma
Clinically diagnosed cT1-3N0-2 M0 lesions according to the 7th Edition of AJCC Cancer Staging Manual with or without neoadjuvant therapeutic history
Tumor size of 5 cm or less
ECOG score is 0-1
ASA score is Ⅰ-Ⅲ
Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Requiring a Mile's procedure
Fecal incontinence
History of inflammatory bowel disease
Pregnant woman or lactating woman
Severe mental disease
Intolerance of surgery for severe comorbidities
Previous abdominal surgery
Emergency operation due to complication (bleeding, perforation or obstruction) caused by rectal cancer
Requirement of simultaneous surgery for other disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yimei Jiang, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ruijin Hospitla North
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ruijin Hospital North
City
Shanghai
State/Province
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
201821
Country
China
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26466751
Citation
Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP. A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;18(1):19-36. doi: 10.1111/codi.13151.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25185463
Citation
Fernandez-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, Diaz del Gobbo G, DeLacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM. Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):221-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000865.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26537907
Citation
Deijen CL, Velthuis S, Tsai A, Mavroveli S, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Sietses C, Tuynman JB, Lacy AM, Hanna GB, Bonjer HJ. COLOR III: a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing transanal TME versus laparoscopic TME for mid and low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3210-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4615-x. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Transanal Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs