search
Back to results

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Stroke Recovery

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
tDCS
Sponsored by
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, recovery, tDCS, direct current, electric stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • single symptomatic stroke more than 3 months ago with hand/arm weakness
  • able to perform required tests and provide consent
  • Age 18-80
  • Modified Ashworth scale <3
  • range of motion functional at shoulder elbow wrist and hand

Exclusion Criteria:

  • more than one symptomatic stroke in middle cerebral artery territory or bilateral involvement
  • severe medical or psychiatric conditions, drug abuse, seizure disorder
  • pregnancy/breast feeding
  • subarachnoid hemorrhage, lobar hemorrhage
  • patients who can not have tDCS (prior head surgery, pacemakers, metallic implants in the head etc)
  • patients taking antiadrenergic medications

Sites / Locations

  • UT Southwestern Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

subcortical

cortical

Arm Description

Subcortical stroke patients will receive tDCS stimulation and sham in random order

subjects will receive active and sham tDCS in random order

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Wolf Motor Function test
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a quantitative index of upper extremity motor ability examinable through the use of timed and functional tasks. The WMFT has been posited as instructive for assessing the motor status of higher functioning chronic patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury, in terms of severity and upper extremity motor deficiency. The final time score will be the median time required for all timed tasks executed. One hundred twenty seconds is the maximum time allowed for each task attempted. Since medians will be used, all scores above the median (whether, e.g., 62 sec. or 120+ sec.) have the same weight
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Scoring is based on direct observation of performance. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. The total possible scale score is 226, though it is common practice to assess all domains separately <50 = severe impairment, 50-84 = marked impairment, 85-94 = moderate impairment, 95-99= slight impairment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
November 2, 2009
Last Updated
April 9, 2020
Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01014897
Brief Title
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Stroke Recovery
Official Title
tDCS in Chronic Stroke Recovery-pilot
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The hypothesis of this study is that different subgroups of stroke will respond differently to direct current stimulation.
Detailed Description
We have tested the effectiveness of each stimulation condition: 1) anodal over the lesional motor cortex 2) anodal PMD (positive electrode at the dorsal premotor cortex (PMD) of the lesional hemisphere (first phase) or dual motor cortex stimulation (second phase), 3) cathodal over the contralesional motor cortex, and 4) sham in a double blind crossover design in chronic cortical and subcortical strokes. Persons in the chronic stage of recovery from stroke (>3 months) will receive each type of tDCS stimulation for 20 minutes concurrent with physical therapy treatments (90 minutes ) utilizing the Armeo ®, a gravity neutral arm exercise support system for the most involved upper extremity which provides for task practice in a virtual reality environment, followed by a therapist supervised targeted hand exercise. The experimental protocol will not alter standard of care, will be performed after standard rehabilitation is completed. The experimental therapy is not part of standard care and will not be charged or reimbursed by the patients' insurance. Participation will be free of charge for subjects. We were planning to perform the study in two phases. In the first exploratory phase, we will conduct a short pilot study with 15 subjects to optimize and if possible simplify the treatment parameters for the second longer phase of the experiment. In this first phase we will perform one of the four different tDCS stimulation conditions concurrently with the physical therapy protocol on each therapy day, so that all subjects will receive all stimulation types in a randomized counterbalanced order. There will be a 1 day rest period in between sessions, making 9 days (10 days if initial evaluation is done on the day before the 1st treatment) the total commitment time for the first phase of study. The outcome measures were collected before and after each session. The outcome measures collected after the 1 day rest provide the baseline for the next session will be also used as to validate the stability of the treatment effect. Subjects participating in the first part of the study will be offered the option to participate in the second longer phase of the study. (please see table under study procedures) In the second phase of the experiment we will perform only the promising stimulation paradigms plus sham from the first part of the experiment in a random, counterbalanced order on up to 30 chronic stroke subjects. If in the initial phase there are no differences found between stimulation types in the cortical vs subcortical patient groups then all 3 stimulation paradigms will be performed in the second phase. Based on our preliminary data, we will perform the following paradigms in the second phase: 1) sham 2) dual stimulation 3) optimized tDCS in a randomized counterbalanced order. The optimized tDCS will be determined during a test session prior to the first treatment where the tDCS montage producing the best behavioral response will be used during therapy. Subjects will perform this under IRB approved study # STU 102013-085. The patient time commitment in the second phase is 18 weeks, where subjects will have 3 x 1 weeks long treatment (5 weekdays) sessions with 5 week inter-treatment "rest period". The blinded tester will perform a final outcome evaluation 5 weeks after the end of the last session. (please see table under study procedures) Total number of potential enrolled subjects for both phases will be approximately 45 [Phase 1 (15) + Phase 2 (30)]. The stepwise design will enable us to optimize study time commitment and expenses for both patients and researchers while maximizing clinical/scientific gain.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
stroke, recovery, tDCS, direct current, electric stimulation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
14 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
subcortical
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subcortical stroke patients will receive tDCS stimulation and sham in random order
Arm Title
cortical
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
subjects will receive active and sham tDCS in random order
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
tDCS
Other Intervention Name(s)
transcranial direct current stimulation
Intervention Description
tDCS and sham will be applied in random order during standardized occupational therapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Wolf Motor Function test
Description
The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is a quantitative index of upper extremity motor ability examinable through the use of timed and functional tasks. The WMFT has been posited as instructive for assessing the motor status of higher functioning chronic patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury, in terms of severity and upper extremity motor deficiency. The final time score will be the median time required for all timed tasks executed. One hundred twenty seconds is the maximum time allowed for each task attempted. Since medians will be used, all scores above the median (whether, e.g., 62 sec. or 120+ sec.) have the same weight
Time Frame
immediately before and immediately after treatment
Title
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Description
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) is a stroke-specific, performance-based impairment index. It is designed to assess motor functioning, balance, sensation and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia. Scoring is based on direct observation of performance. Scale items are scored on the basis of ability to complete the item using a 3-point ordinal scale where 0=cannot perform, 1=performs partially and 2=performs fully. The total possible scale score is 226, though it is common practice to assess all domains separately <50 = severe impairment, 50-84 = marked impairment, 85-94 = moderate impairment, 95-99= slight impairment
Time Frame
immediately before and immediately after treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: single symptomatic stroke more than 3 months ago with hand/arm weakness able to perform required tests and provide consent Age 18-80 Modified Ashworth scale <3 range of motion functional at shoulder elbow wrist and hand Exclusion Criteria: more than one symptomatic stroke in middle cerebral artery territory or bilateral involvement severe medical or psychiatric conditions, drug abuse, seizure disorder pregnancy/breast feeding subarachnoid hemorrhage, lobar hemorrhage patients who can not have tDCS (prior head surgery, pacemakers, metallic implants in the head etc) patients taking antiadrenergic medications
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Timea Hodics, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
UTSW
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UT Southwestern Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33175411
Citation
Elsner B, Kugler J, Pohl M, Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 11;11(11):CD009645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009645.pub4.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22579647
Citation
Hodics TM, Nakatsuka K, Upreti B, Alex A, Smith PS, Pezzullo JC. Wolf Motor Function Test for characterizing moderate to severe hemiparesis in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Nov;93(11):1963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 May 10.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Chronic Stroke Recovery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs