search
Back to results

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in Myofascial Chronic Pain Patients

Primary Purpose

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Active rTMS
Sham rTMS
Active Neuroacupuncture
Sham Neuroacupuncture
Sponsored by
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Myofascial Pain Syndromes focused on measuring myofacial pain, neuromodulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroacupuncture

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Providing informed consent to participate in the study ;
  • 18 to 70 years old;
  • Myofascial pain in the cranial- cervical- mandibular complex, with duration more than 3 months;
  • In the last week, score higher or equal to 3cm (0 cm = 'no pain' and 10cm ='worst possible pain') on the VAS for pain perception at the baseline in the most part of seven days before;
  • Refractoriness to drugs for pain relieve - such as tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs and/or narcotics (pain resistant to at least 2 of these drugs supplied in adequate dosages for six months).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory chronic disease;
  • Neurological deficits;
  • History of substance abuse;
  • Neuropsychiatric co-morbidity;
  • Systemic diseases not well balance;
  • Habitual use of anti-inflammatory steroids;
  • Implanted devices for pain control, such as vagal or deep brain stimulators;
  • Contraindications to rTMS: metal in the head, implanted brain medical devices, previous convulsion or epilepsy, serious cranial trauma, audition problem, cochlear implant, neurostimulador implantable, spinal cord surgery, bypass valve ventriculoperitoneal peritonenal,cardiac pacemaker or other metal in the body;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Prior experience with acupuncture.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre - HCPARecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Sham Comparator

Sham Comparator

Sham Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Both Sham rTMS and Neuroacupuncture

Active rTMS and sham Neuroacupuncture

Sham rTMS and Active Neuroacupuncture

Both Active rTMS and Neuroacupuncture

Arm Description

Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both sham treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMSat 10hHz (1600pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.

Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of active rTMS and sham neurofunctional electrical acupuncture treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.

Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of sham rTMS and active Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS placebo coil over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.

Experimental Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both active treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10 Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain severity
The intensity of pain was measured by a 10-cm VAS. VAS scores ranged from no pain (zero) to the worst possible pain (10cm).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Peripheral Biochemical Markers
Different peripheral biochemical: BDNF, TNF, S100 beta, interleukins, LDH, oxidative stress, catecolamines serum levels; 6-sulphatoxymelatonin urinary; salivary cortisol.
Parameters of motor cortex excitability
Parameters of cortical excitability: motor threshold, motor-evoked potential, intracortical inhibition and facilitation, cortical silent period using transcranial magnetic stimulation technique.
Quality of Life
Using Quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-bref) with 26 questions.
Functional Capacity
Using The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Profile of Chronic Pain.
Pain threshold
Pain threshold assessed by algometer (pain pressure threshold) and quantitative sensory

Full Information

First Posted
March 21, 2014
Last Updated
March 5, 2015
Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Collaborators
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02381171
Brief Title
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in Myofascial Chronic Pain Patients
Official Title
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in the Rehabilitation of Patients With Myofascial Chronic Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
February 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2015 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Collaborators
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To evaluate the hypothesis: the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic (rTMS) stimulation and/or peripheral stimulation (neurofunctional electrical acupuncture) treatments are more effective in pain relief than placebo-sham in patients with myofascial chronic pain.
Detailed Description
This project is a multidisciplinary study, with available technology, which aims are to provide more data to consolidate the techniques of central and peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of myofascial pain with a component in the craniofacial complex . This is a randomized, double-dummy, factorial, blind, parallel, placebo - sham controlled clinical trial. The issues investigated in this study include important public health problem because chronic musculoskeletal pain affects 30 % of the world population , according to WHO. Around 75-80 % of people seeking health care for pain and that 40% of adults suffer from some type of chronic pain. According to the severity of the problem , the International Association for the Study of Pain has defined the year 2010 as the International Year Against Musculoskeletal Pain, facing the increasing prevalence and the limited impact of the classical therapeutic interventions ( ~ 30 % ). Possibly, part of this poor response is due to the limitation of pathophysiological knowledge, few resources in diagnostic methods and the consequent implementation of measures that do not reach the main routes of this disease process. It is important to mention that epidemiological studies have greatly contributed to improve the understanding of the process of these musculoskeletal diseases, but increase few knowledge about the understanding of the pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic developments. It is important to highlight that evidence has shown strong association of musculoskeletal pathologies conditions and chronic stress. This relationship is cascading and permeated by manifestations suggest that the neuro-immune-endocrine axis, such as poor sleep quality, anxiety symptoms, depressive symptoms, increased susceptibility to infections and manifestations of neuro-vegetative dysfunctions. Thus, this project will examine whether the hypothesis that the application of central and peripheral neuromodulatory therapies can have a positive impact on possible systems implicated in the pathophysiological course of musculoskeletal disorders in the craniofacial complex, and evaluate clinical outcomes characterizing the process of rehabilitation of these patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Myofascial Pain Syndromes
Keywords
myofacial pain, neuromodulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, electroacupuncture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Both Sham rTMS and Neuroacupuncture
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both sham treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMSat 10hHz (1600pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.
Arm Title
Active rTMS and sham Neuroacupuncture
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of active rTMS and sham neurofunctional electrical acupuncture treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without current connection over peripheral region.
Arm Title
Sham rTMS and Active Neuroacupuncture
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of sham rTMS and active Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS placebo coil over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.
Arm Title
Both Active rTMS and Neuroacupuncture
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Experimental Subjects will be randomized to receive 10 sessions of both active treatments. Stimulation will be given on consecutive days (Monday- Friday) for 2 weeks: rTMS at 10 Hz (1600 pulses) over the primary motor cortex area and neurofunctional electrical acupuncture at 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes over peripheral region.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active rTMS
Intervention Description
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) 10Hz (1600 pulses)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham rTMS
Intervention Description
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) with Placebo coil
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Active Neuroacupuncture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Electrical Deep Intramuscular Stimulation
Intervention Description
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture 1Hz, continuous, 10mA current for 20 minutes.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Neuroacupuncture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham Electrical Deep Intramuscular Stimulation
Intervention Description
Neurofunctional electrical acupuncture without needles
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain severity
Description
The intensity of pain was measured by a 10-cm VAS. VAS scores ranged from no pain (zero) to the worst possible pain (10cm).
Time Frame
up to three months after the end of treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Peripheral Biochemical Markers
Description
Different peripheral biochemical: BDNF, TNF, S100 beta, interleukins, LDH, oxidative stress, catecolamines serum levels; 6-sulphatoxymelatonin urinary; salivary cortisol.
Time Frame
The difference in the baseline, after one week of treatment and the end of the treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
Title
Parameters of motor cortex excitability
Description
Parameters of cortical excitability: motor threshold, motor-evoked potential, intracortical inhibition and facilitation, cortical silent period using transcranial magnetic stimulation technique.
Time Frame
The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).
Title
Quality of Life
Description
Using Quality of life questionnaire (WHOQOL-bref) with 26 questions.
Time Frame
Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment )
Title
Functional Capacity
Description
Using The Brazilian Portuguese version of the Profile of Chronic Pain.
Time Frame
Baseline (before the treatment) and after the treatment (after last session of treatment and follow-up of two weeks, one month and three months after the end of treatment ).
Title
Pain threshold
Description
Pain threshold assessed by algometer (pain pressure threshold) and quantitative sensory
Time Frame
The variation between the baseline and the end of treatment (2 weeks after starting the treatment).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Providing informed consent to participate in the study ; 18 to 70 years old; Myofascial pain in the cranial- cervical- mandibular complex, with duration more than 3 months; In the last week, score higher or equal to 3cm (0 cm = 'no pain' and 10cm ='worst possible pain') on the VAS for pain perception at the baseline in the most part of seven days before; Refractoriness to drugs for pain relieve - such as tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs and/or narcotics (pain resistant to at least 2 of these drugs supplied in adequate dosages for six months). Exclusion Criteria: Inflammatory chronic disease; Neurological deficits; History of substance abuse; Neuropsychiatric co-morbidity; Systemic diseases not well balance; Habitual use of anti-inflammatory steroids; Implanted devices for pain control, such as vagal or deep brain stimulators; Contraindications to rTMS: metal in the head, implanted brain medical devices, previous convulsion or epilepsy, serious cranial trauma, audition problem, cochlear implant, neurostimulador implantable, spinal cord surgery, bypass valve ventriculoperitoneal peritonenal,cardiac pacemaker or other metal in the body; Pregnancy; Prior experience with acupuncture.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Phone
55 51 33598083
Email
caumo@cpovo.net
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Iraci S Torres, PhD
Phone
55 51 33598083
Email
iracitorres@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA
City
Porto Alegre
State/Province
Rio Grande do Sul
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wolnei Caumo, PhD
Phone
+55 51 33598083
Email
caumo@cpovo.net
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Iraci LS Torres, PhD
Phone
+55 51 33598083
Email
iracitorres@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liciane F Medeiros, MsC
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wolnei Caumo, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30459575
Citation
Botelho L, Angoleri L, Zortea M, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Torres ILS, Fregni F, Caumo W. Insights About the Neuroplasticity State on the Effect of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation in Pain and Disability Associated With Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 16;12:388. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00388. eCollection 2018.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26408420
Citation
Medeiros LF, Caumo W, Dussan-Sarria J, Deitos A, Brietzke A, Laste G, Campos-Carraro C, de Souza A, Scarabelot VL, Cioato SG, Vercelino R, de Castro AL, Araujo AS, Bello-Klein A, Fregni F, Torres IL. Effect of Deep Intramuscular Stimulation and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurophysiological Biomarkers in Chronic Myofascial Pain Syndrome. Pain Med. 2016 Jan;17(1):122-35. doi: 10.1111/pme.12919.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and/or Neurofunctional Electrical Acupuncture in Myofascial Chronic Pain Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs